A healthcare committee is evaluating a newly approved oral anticoagulant to replace standard therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The committee reviews data from a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial involving patients. Participants were randomized in a ratio to receive either the novel anticoagulant or standard therapy and were followed for two years.
The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of ischemic stroke. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding. The trial results are as follows:
| Outcome | Novel Anticoagulant () | Standard Therapy () |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemic stroke | ||
| Major bleeding |
The pharmaceutical representative highlights that the novel anticoagulant reduces the relative risk of stroke by compared to standard therapy. The committee wants to understand the absolute clinical impact of adopting this new medication in their population.
Based on the trial data, which of the following accurately describes the absolute impact of switching patients from standard therapy to the novel anticoagulant?
- Treating patients will prevent stroke, but treating patients will cause additional major bleeding event.Cevap
- BTreating patients will prevent stroke, but treating patient will cause additional major bleeding event.
- CTreating patients will prevent stroke, but treating patients will cause additional major bleeding event.
- DTreating patients will prevent stroke, and treating patients will cause additional major bleeding event.
- EThe absolute risk reduction for stroke is , and the absolute risk increase for major bleeding is .