A 32-year-old woman is currently managed in the intensive care unit for acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to severe viral pneumonitis. She has been mechanically ventilated and deeply sedated for the past two weeks. The critical care team determines that a tracheostomy is now medically indicated to facilitate weaning from the ventilator. The patient is unmarried, and her parents are deceased. She has lived with her long-term boyfriend for the past eight years. Her only living relative is an older sister who resides in a neighboring state. The patient has no written advance directive and has not legally designated a healthcare proxy. When discussing the proposed procedure, the boyfriend adamantly refuses the tracheostomy, stating he is certain she would never want to live with a 'hole in her neck.' The sister is contacted by telephone and requests that the medical team proceed with the tracheostomy to give the patient the best chance at recovery. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action for the physician?
- Follow the sister's directive because she is the legally recognized surrogate decision-maker.Cevap
- BFollow the boyfriend's directive because he is most likely to accurately represent the patient's values.
- CPostpone the procedure indefinitely until the boyfriend and sister can reach a unanimous consensus.
- DRequest a psychiatric evaluation to formally determine the patient's legal competence to decide.
- ETransfer the patient to a long-term care facility without performing the tracheostomy.