All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 841Question

Sourdough bread is made by fermenting dough using naturally occurring lactobacilli and yeast. To maintain a sourdough starter, a baker must regularly "feed" the mixture with fresh flour and water. If the starter is kept at room temperature, it must be fed daily to keep the wild yeast active and healthy.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph:

"Yeast is also used in the fermentation process to brew beer and produce biofuels."

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph by introducing uses of yeast unrelated to maintaining a sourdough starter.

Answer

The writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph by introducing uses of yeast unrelated to maintaining a sourdough starter.
The correct decision is to exclude the sentence because the paragraph is narrowly focused on the maintenance of a sourdough starter. Mentioning the role of yeast in brewing beer and making biofuels shifts the focus away from baking sourdough, resulting in a minor distraction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the process of maintaining and feeding a sourdough starter.
Understanding the paragraph's main focus is essential to evaluating whether new information is relevant.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the proposed sentence.
The proposed sentence introduces the use of yeast in beer brewing and biofuel production, which deviates from the topic of baking and maintaining sourdough.
Determining if the proposed sentence supports the established focus helps make the keep/delete decision.
3
Choose the option that reflects the correct decision and logical justification.
The correct option is the one stating that the sentence should not be added because it introduces unrelated uses of yeast that distract from the sourdough focus.
Only one option correctly identifies both the decision to exclude the sentence and the correct rhetorical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:45s
Question 842Question

The sandwich is named after John Montagu, the 4th Earl of Sandwich. According to legend, Montagu was an avid gambler who did not want to leave the gaming table to eat. He ordered his valet to bring him meat tucked between two slices of bread, allowing him to play cards and eat at the same time. Playing cards first became popular in Europe during the late fourteenth century. This convenient meal option quickly grew in popularity among his peers, eventually becoming a staple of modern cuisine.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the origin of the sandwich with an unrelated detail about playing cards.

Answer

Deleted, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the origin of the sandwich with an unrelated detail about playing cards.
The correct option is the one stating the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the sandwich with an unrelated detail. The paragraph is about the origin of the sandwich, and the historical timeline of playing cards is irrelevant to this topic.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the primary focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the origin of the sandwich, explaining how John Montagu's gambling habits led to the creation of a convenient food option.
Identifying the main idea helps evaluate whether the underlined sentence contributes to that idea.
2
Analyze the role and content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes when playing cards became popular in Europe, which is a historical fact about cards rather than sandwiches.
This step evaluates if the sentence supports the main topic or introduces a distraction.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one with the correct decision and logical reasoning.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces irrelevant information. The option stating that it interrupts the focus on the origin of the sandwich provides the correct rationale.
Both the correct action (deletion) and the correct reason must align.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:45s
Question 843Question

The following passage is about the discovery of pulsars.

In 1967, astrophysicist Jocelyn Bell Burnell detected a series of anomalous, highly regular radio pulses while analyzing data from a newly constructed radio telescope. The signals were so precise, repeating every 1.33 seconds, that Bell Burnell and her advisor, Antony Hewish, jokingly designated the source 'LGM-1' (for 'Little Green Men'). Hewish was later awarded the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physics for the discovery, an honor that many astronomers believed Bell Burnell should have shared. However, as similar pulses were soon observed in other regions of the sky, the researchers concluded that the signals had a natural, celestial origin rather than an extraterrestrial one. These objects, named 'pulsars,' are now understood to be rapidly rotating neutron stars emitting beams of electromagnetic radiation.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of how pulsars were discovered and identified with details about the subsequent recognition of the researchers.

Answer

The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of how pulsars were discovered and identified with details about the subsequent recognition of the researchers.
The correct option correctly determines that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the paragraph's focus. The paragraph describes the scientific sequence of events in the discovery of pulsars, explaining how the signals were detected, initially hypothesized to be extraterrestrial, and eventually identified as rapidly rotating neutron stars. The underlined sentence, which discusses the 1974 Nobel Prize award and controversy, shifts the focus from the scientific process of discovery to post-discovery recognition, thereby disrupting the logical flow of the passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the scientific process of discovering pulsars, from the initial detection of regular pulses to the conclusion that they are rotating neutron stars.
Understanding the paragraph's specific focus is necessary to evaluate the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Analyze the content of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence discusses the 1974 Nobel Prize in Physics, Hewish's receipt of the award, and the controversy surrounding Bell Burnell's exclusion.
This step determines whether the sentence's content directly supports the main focus of the paragraph.
3
Determine whether the underlined sentence should be kept or deleted by comparing its content to the paragraph's focus.
The sentence should be deleted because it introduces historical/award controversy that interrupts the narrative of the scientific discovery and identification of pulsars.
Irrelevant information that disrupts the flow and focus of a paragraph should be deleted.
4
Match this decision and reasoning to the correct option.
The option stating that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the explanation of the discovery and identification of pulsars is correct.
This option correctly identifies both the correct edit (delete) and the correct rhetorical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 844Question

[1]
In 1947, Marjory Stoneman Douglas published *The Everglades: River of Grass*, a book that fundamentally redefined how the public viewed the vast wetlands of southern Florida. For decades prior, developers and politicians had viewed the Everglades as a useless swamp to be drained for agriculture and real estate. Douglas, however, argued that the Everglades was a dynamic, slow-flowing river vital to the state's ecological health.

[2]
Her book combined scientific detail with poetic prose to describe the unique ecosystems of the region, from the sawgrass marshes to the mangrove forests. She explained how the flow of fresh water from Lake Okeechobee sustained a rich array of wildlife. More importantly, she warned that disrupting this delicate balance would threaten the region’s fresh water supply, which millions of residents depended upon.

[3]
Following the publication of the book, Douglas spent the remaining decades of her life campaigning for the protection of the Everglades. She founded the organization Friends of the Everglades in 1969 to mobilize public opposition to a proposed jetport in the Big Cypress Swamp. Her tireless advocacy helped shift national policy toward restoration, cementing her legacy as a pioneering figure of the modern environmental movement.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the specific legislative policies enacted by the United States Congress to fund the ecological restoration of the Florida Everglades. This goal is successfully achieved by the essay.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is false because the essay focuses on Marjory Stoneman Douglas's advocacy, her book, and her impact on public perception, rather than detailing specific legislative policies enacted by Congress.
The statement is false because the essay focuses on Marjory Stoneman Douglas's book, her activism, and the public's perception of the Everglades, and does not provide details about specific acts of Congress or federal funding policies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the hypothetical goal presented in the statement.
The goal is to detail specific legislative policies enacted by the United States Congress to fund the restoration of the Florida Everglades.
This establishes the target criteria for evaluating the passage.
2
Analyze the passage to see if it contains information about congressional legislation and funding.
The passage discusses Marjory Stoneman Douglas's book, her activism, and a general shift in national policy, but it contains no details about specific congressional acts, laws, or funding.
Determining what information is actually present in the text is necessary to see if the goal is met.
3
Compare the essay's contents with the hypothetical goal and evaluate the statement.
Because the essay does not cover specific legislative policies, the goal is not met, meaning the statement is false.
This yields the correct truth value for the statement.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 845Question

[1] Every autumn, millions of monarch butterflies in eastern North America embark on a remarkable journey to their overwintering sites in the mountain forests of central Mexico. [2] Traveling up to 3,000 miles, these delicate insects rely on thermal air currents and a sophisticated internal compass to navigate. [3] The destination of this migration was a mystery to scientists until 1975, when researchers finally located the specific oyamel fir forests where the monarchs cluster. [4] These forests provide a unique microclimate that protects the butterflies from freezing temperatures and wet weather. [5] Oyamel firs, also known as sacred firs, are native to the high-altitude mountains of central and southern Mexico.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 5 from the passage. Which of the following decisions and justifications is most appropriate regarding this potential deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of how the oyamel fir forest microclimate protects the butterflies with unrelated botanical details.

Answer

Delete the sentence because it interrupts the explanation of how the oyamel fir forest microclimate protects the butterflies with unrelated botanical details.
The paragraph focuses on the monarch butterfly migration and the protective microclimate of the oyamel fir forests. Sentence 5 introduces botanical details (alternative names and native range) of the oyamel fir that are irrelevant to this focus, so it should be deleted. The correct decision and justification are to delete the sentence because it interrupts the explanation of the forest microclimate with unrelated botanical details.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the monarch butterfly migration to Mexico, the discovery of their overwintering site in oyamel fir forests, and how the forest microclimate protects them.
Understanding the paragraph's theme is necessary to determine the relevance of any single sentence.
2
Evaluate the content of the sentence being considered for deletion (Sentence 5).
Sentence 5 provides alternative names and the native range of oyamel firs.
Comparing the sentence's content to the paragraph's theme reveals whether the sentence adds value or introduces a distraction.
3
Determine if the sentence is relevant and choose the correct decision and reason.
The sentence is not relevant because it shifts the focus to botanical properties of the trees. Therefore, it should be deleted because it interrupts the discussion of the butterflies' protective habitat.
Only one option contains both the correct decision (delete) and the correct justification (relevance shift).

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 846Question

The sentence below contains a nonessential phrase that begins with a dash. To ensure grammatical correctness and punctuation consistency, which punctuation mark should be placed in the blank to close this nonessential phrase?

Fill in the blanks below

Marine biologists have recently discovered that the Greenland shark—the longest-lived vertebrate animal known to sciencecan live for nearly four centuries.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

A dash (—)
A dash is the correct punctuation mark because it matches the dash used to open the parenthetical phrase 'the longest-lived vertebrate animal known to science'. In standard English grammar, parenthetical elements set off by dashes must be enclosed by a consistent pair of dashes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nonessential phrase in the sentence.
The phrase 'the longest-lived vertebrate animal known to science' is a nonessential appositive that describes the 'Greenland shark'.
Nonessential elements add extra details but can be removed from the sentence without changing its core meaning.
2
Determine the punctuation mark used to open the nonessential phrase.
The nonessential phrase begins with a dash ('—') after 'Greenland shark'.
Nonessential phrases must be set off by matching punctuation marks on both sides.
3
Select the correct closing punctuation mark.
A matching dash must be placed in the blank to close the nonessential phrase.
Mismatching punctuation marks (such as starting with a dash and ending with a comma) is grammatically incorrect.

Key Concept

Dash Pair Consistency
Estimated Time:45s
Question 847Question

For centuries, Mayan hieroglyphs remained a profound mystery to scholars who struggled to decipher the complex symbols. A breakthrough came when Yuri Knorozov, a Soviet linguist, proposed that the glyphs that were carved in stone, which had puzzled scholars for years, could finally be deciphered using a phonetic key.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct answer is the option that leaves the sentence unchanged, keeping the restrictive clause unpunctuated and setting off the nonessential clause with a pair of commas.
The correct option preserves the original sentence, which is punctuated correctly. The clause 'that were carved in stone' is restrictive because it identifies the specific type of glyphs being discussed; therefore, it should not be preceded by a comma. The relative clause 'which had puzzled scholars for years' is nonessential and acts as a parenthetical element, so it must be enclosed by a pair of commas: one before 'which' and one after 'years'. The phrase 'could finally' correctly follows the nonessential clause to complete the predicate of the sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the essential (restrictive) and nonessential (parenthetical) elements in the sentence.
'that were carved in stone' is an essential clause specifying which glyphs are being referred to, while 'which had puzzled scholars for years' is nonessential parenthetical information.
Essential clauses must not be set off by commas, whereas nonessential clauses must be enclosed in a pair of commas.
2
Check the punctuation around both clauses in the options.
Only the original punctuation correctly leaves 'that were carved in stone' joined to 'glyphs' without a comma, and uses a pair of commas to enclose 'which had puzzled scholars for years'.
This maintains the correct grammatical relationship between the referent and its modifiers.

Key Concept

Setting off nonessential parenthetical elements with a pair of commas while leaving restrictive clauses unpunctuated.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 848Question

Ada Lovelace was a visionary mathematician who is widely celebrated today for her work on Charles Babbage’s mechanical computer.

[1] __________________________________________________ She appended a set of notes that was longer than the article itself. These notes included what is now recognized as the first computer program: an algorithm designed to calculate Bernoulli numbers. Lovelace saw that Babbage’s machine could do more than just compute numbers; she envisioned it processing symbols, music, and art, laying the conceptual groundwork for modern computing.

Which choice most effectively introduces the paragraph?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In 1843, Lovelace published an influential translation of an article about the Analytical Engine.

Answer

The statement introducing Lovelace's 1843 publication of her translation of an article on the Analytical Engine is the correct choice, as it is grammatically correct and logically sets up the paragraph.
The correct answer provides a grammatically complete and logically fitting sentence that introduces the main topic of the paragraph. By establishing that Lovelace published a translation of an article about the Analytical Engine, it sets up the transition to the subsequent sentence, which refers to the notes she appended to that translation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Read the paragraph to understand the topic and find the logical connection between the missing sentence and the sentence that follows.
The sentence following the blank says 'She appended a set of notes...', which implies the preceding sentence must mention a document or publication she produced.
Establishing context is necessary to select an introduction that flows smoothly into the paragraph's details.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'Although' is a fragment. The option with 'were published' has a subject-verb agreement error. The option with the semicolon contains a punctuation error.
An effective introductory sentence must be grammatically correct.
3
Choose the grammatically correct option that provides the logical transition.
The option starting 'In 1843, Lovelace published an influential translation...' is a complete sentence and introduces the translation referenced in the next sentence.
This option satisfies both the grammatical and rhetorical requirements of the paragraph.

Key Concept

Establishing Introductions and Thesis Statements
Question 849Question

[1] In 1858, Hymen Lipman patented the first pencil with an attached eraser. [2] Before this invention, writers had to carry separate pieces of rubber or use breadcrumbs to erase mistakes. [3] Rubber trees are native to South America and produce latex when their bark is cut. [4] Lipman’s design made writing far more convenient by combining two essential tools into one.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 3 from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a detail about rubber trees that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on Lipman’s invention.

Answer

Yes, because it introduces a detail about rubber trees that is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on Lipman’s invention.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because the biological origin of rubber trees is irrelevant to the paragraph's focus on the history and convenience of the pencil-eraser invention.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic of the paragraph by reading the surrounding sentences.
Sentences 1, 2, and 4 establish that the paragraph is about Hymen Lipman's invention of the pencil eraser and how it made writing more convenient.
To evaluate relevance, you must first establish the main focus of the passage.
2
Analyze Sentence 3 to see if it supports the main topic.
Sentence 3 describes the biological origin and harvesting of rubber from rubber trees.
This determines whether the information in the sentence directly contributes to the topic of the invention.
3
Decide whether to keep or delete the sentence based on its relevance.
Because the biological origin of rubber is irrelevant to the history of the pencil-eraser invention, the sentence should be deleted.
Irrelevant information disrupts the flow and unity of the paragraph.
4
Evaluate the reasons in the options to find the correct justification for deletion.
The correct option correctly states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces an irrelevant detail about rubber trees.
In add/delete questions, the correct option must contain both the correct decision (yes/no) and the correct rhetorical reasoning.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:45s
Question 850Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1964, radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were troubled by a persistent, low-frequency hum emanating from their Holmdel horn antenna. Seeking to isolate the source of this background noise, they systematically dismantled and cleaned the equipment, even going so far as to scrub away what they dryly referred to as a "white dielectric material" left by nesting pigeons. Despite these meticulous efforts, the static remained, [eventually leading to their realization that they had detected the cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang].

Question:

The writer wants to choose a concluding phrase for the sentence (replacing the underlined portion in brackets) that emphasizes the contrast between the mundane, domestic nature of the troubleshooting tasks and the vast, cosmic scale of their discovery. Given that all the choices are true, which one best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: eventually leading to their realization that they had detected the cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang.

Answer

The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) is the correct choice because it is grammatically correct and successfully highlights the contrast between the domestic task of scrubbing pigeon droppings and the grand scale of the cosmic microwave background radiation.
The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) best accomplishes the writer's goal because it contrasts the domestic, mundane nature of cleaning pigeon nests with the vast, ancient origin of the signal ('cosmic microwave background radiation—the thermal echo of the Big Bang'). This phrasing highlights the shift from a small-scale, ordinary chore to a discovery of universal significance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the writer's specific rhetorical goal in the prompt.
The goal is to emphasize the contrast between the mundane troubleshooting tasks (like cleaning pigeon droppings) and the vast, cosmic scale of the discovery.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices against the rhetorical goal.
The options focusing on the antenna's functionality and the cleaning failure do not mention the cosmic discovery, so they are eliminated. The option stating 'they realized...' and the original phrasing both mention the Big Bang, which represents the cosmic scale.
This narrows down the choices to those that address the rhetorical requirements.
3
Assess the remaining options for grammatical correctness.
The option stating 'they realized...' creates a comma splice because it introduces a new independent clause after a comma. The original phrasing (NO CHANGE) uses a participial modifier ('eventually leading to...') that connects grammatically and logically.
This determines the final correct choice based on both grammar and rhetoric.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 851Question

The Light Fantastic

[1]
For decades, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) were familiar but limited fixtures of modern technology. Introduced in the 1960s, red and green LEDs quickly found their way into indicator lights, digital clocks, and calculator displays. However, one color remained conspicuously absent from the spectrum. To produce white light—which is essential for general household illumination—scientists needed to combine red, green, and blue light. While red and green were easily manufactured, the blue LED proved to be an elusive "holy grail" of semiconductor physics, frustrating researchers worldwide.

[2]
The primary challenge lay in finding a suitable semiconductor material. Most researchers focused on zinc selenide, which was easier to work with but yielded unstable, short-lived diodes. A few determined scientists, however, turned their attention to gallium nitride (GaNGaN), despite widespread consensus that it was too difficult to grow in high-quality crystal form. In the late 1980s, researchers Isamu Akasaki and Hiroshi Amano at Nagoya University made a breakthrough by using a thin layer of aluminum nitride on a sapphire substrate to grow the elusive GaNGaN crystals. Soon after, Shuji Nakamura, working independently at a small chemical company, developed a novel thermal annealing process that vastly improved the material's electrical properties.

[3]
By 1993, Nakamura had demonstrated the first high-brightness blue LED, completing the trio of primary colors. By combining the blue LED with existing red and green ones, or by coating a blue LED with a yellow phosphor layer, engineers could finally produce bright, energy-efficient white light. Today, this technology powers everything from smartphone screens to streetlights, dramatically reducing global energy consumption and earning the inventors the 2014 Nobel Prize in Physics.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that evaluates the specific physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping in gallium nitride crystals. Is the statement that the essay successfully achieves this goal true or false?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The correct answer is False because the essay focuses on the historical progression and general technological impact of the blue LED rather than explaining the scientific mechanisms of semiconductor doping.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the essay's actual content and focus.
The essay provides a historical narrative of the development of blue LEDs, discussing the history of red and green LEDs, the material challenge of growing gallium nitride (GaNGaN) crystals, the researchers involved, and the global impact of energy-efficient white light.
This establishes the actual scope and focus of the passage.
2
Analyze the proposed writing goal.
The proposed goal is to evaluate the specific physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping in gallium nitride crystals.
This identifies the target criteria that the essay must meet.
3
Compare the essay's content against the proposed writing goal.
While the essay mentions the challenge of growing gallium nitride crystals and improvements to electrical properties, it does not explain or evaluate the physical mechanisms of semiconductor doping (such as how dopants create charge carriers or change band structures).
This determines whether the goal is achieved.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 852Question

The Nitrogen Dilemma

[1]
In the early twentieth century, the world faced a looming Malthusian catastrophe. The natural deposits of sodium nitrate in Chile, the primary source of agricultural fertilizer, were rapidly depleting. Without a new source of nitrogen, global agriculture could not support the growing human population. The challenge was that atmospheric nitrogen (N2N_2), though abundant, is chemically inert and cannot be directly utilized by plants.

[2]
In 1909, German chemist Fritz Haber successfully demonstrated a high-pressure chemical reaction that synthesized ammonia (NH3NH_3) directly from atmospheric nitrogen and hydrogen gas. Shortly thereafter, chemical engineer Carl Bosch scaled this laboratory breakthrough into an industrial process. By utilizing iron-based catalysts at extreme temperatures and pressures, the Haber-Bosch process allowed for the mass production of synthetic fertilizer, effectively lifting the ecological limit on crop yields and sustaining billions of lives.

[3]
However, this scientific triumph carried a dark legacy. The very same ammonia production facilities were quickly repurposed during World War I to manufacture nitric acid, a precursor for explosives. Haber himself actively pioneered the development of chemical weapons, leading to the deployment of chlorine gas on the battlefield. Thus, a process created to nourish humanity also facilitated unprecedented devastation, illustrating the profound ethical ambivalence of modern scientific advancement.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that analyzes how a single scientific innovation can both avert a global humanitarian crisis and generate new forms of warfare. Would this essay fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it describes how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons.

Answer

Yes, because it describes how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons.
The correct answer shows how the synthesis of ammonia resolved the agricultural nitrogen shortage while explaining how the process was also used to manufacture explosives and chemical warfare. This directly matches both components of the writer's goal—preventing a humanitarian crisis and generating new forms of warfare.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the writer's stated goal: to write an essay that analyzes how a single scientific innovation can both avert a global humanitarian crisis and generate new forms of warfare.
Identify the two required elements: (1) averting a global crisis, and (2) generating new forms of warfare.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the essay-wide purpose.
2
Evaluate the passage content paragraph by paragraph against the identified criteria.
Paragraph 1 and 2 detail the Malthusian agricultural crisis and how the Haber-Bosch process resolved it (averting the crisis). Paragraph 3 details the repurposing of the process to manufacture explosives and chemical weapons (generating new forms of warfare).
Determining whether both components of the writing goal are actively discussed in the text.
3
Formulate the final evaluation and match it with the correct option.
Since both elements are present, the answer must be 'Yes'. The option explaining both the resolution of the agricultural crisis and the development of explosives/weapons is the correct match.
Selecting the option that offers the correct direction and complete justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 853Question

In the sentence below, a portion is underlined:

The museum's new digital archive is incredibly detailed; nevertheless, many visitors still prefer browsing the physical card catalog.

Which of the following choices best completes the underlined portion of the sentence grammatically?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct option is the one that leaves the sentence unchanged, using a semicolon to connect two independent clauses with the conjunctive adverb 'nevertheless'.
The original sentence correctly joins two independent clauses using a semicolon before the conjunctive adverb 'nevertheless' and a comma after it.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the clauses on either side of the transition are independent.
The first clause is 'The museum's new digital archive is incredibly detailed' and the second is 'many visitors still prefer browsing the physical card catalog'. Both contain subjects and verbs and express complete thoughts, making them independent clauses.
Identifying the clause type is necessary to determine the appropriate punctuation. Semicolons can only connect independent clauses.
2
Evaluate the correct punctuation for joining independent clauses with a conjunctive adverb.
A semicolon must be placed before the conjunctive adverb 'nevertheless', and a comma must follow it.
When a conjunctive adverb is used to link two independent clauses, a semicolon must precede the transition, and a comma must follow it to avoid run-on sentences and comma splices.

Key Concept

Using a semicolon to connect independent clauses separated by a conjunctive adverb.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 854Question

The architect Antoni Gaudí designed several whimsical buildings in Spain. The historic cathedral, which is located in Barcelona, remains unfinished today. Despite this, it attracts millions of visitors every year.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct choice is 'NO CHANGE' because it correctly sets off the nonessential relative clause with commas on both sides.
The clause 'which is located in Barcelona' is nonessential because it adds extra, non-defining information about the cathedral. Nonessential clauses must be set off by a matched pair of commas—one before the clause starts and one after it ends. The option 'NO CHANGE' correctly places a comma before 'which' and another after 'Barcelona'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the clause 'which is located in Barcelona' is essential or nonessential to the sentence.
The clause is nonessential because the identity of the specific cathedral is already clear in context, and removing the clause does not change the core meaning of the sentence.
Nonessential information must be set off with punctuation on both sides.
2
Select the option that uses correct punctuation to enclose the nonessential relative clause.
A pair of commas must enclose the clause, starting with 'which'.
Omitting one comma, using a semicolon, or using commas around a 'that' clause violates standard punctuation rules.

Key Concept

Using a matched pair of commas to set off nonessential relative clauses.
Question 855Question

Passage Excerpt:

In 1931, engineering draftsman Harry Beck designed a new map for the London Underground. Rather than drawing the routes to geographic scale, Beck created a diagrammatic layout that resembled an electrical circuit, prioritizing readability over physical distance.

Which choice provides the most direct and specific explanation of how Beck's map design benefited passengers?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: passengers could easily plan their journeys without being confused by overlapping, geographically accurate lines.

Answer

passengers could easily plan their journeys without being confused by overlapping, geographically accurate lines.
The correct option directly addresses the prompt's requirement by explaining that the new map design helped passengers plan their journeys more easily and avoided the confusion caused by geographic scale lines. It is also grammatically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a choice that provides a direct and specific explanation of how Beck's map design benefited passengers.
This establishes the criteria that the correct answer must meet.
2
Evaluate the grammatical correctness of the choices.
The option containing 'will find' and 'helped' has an incorrect tense shift, and the option containing 'commuters loved the simplified grid, they were...' contains a comma splice. Both are grammatically incorrect.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect choices narrows down the options.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct choices against the rhetorical goal.
The option concerning the publicity department's rejection fails the rhetorical criteria because it does not discuss a passenger benefit. The option stating that passengers could easily plan journeys directly explains the functional benefit of the map design.
This confirms the correct choice that satisfies both grammar rules and the prompt's rhetorical goal.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 856Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about dendrochronology. To ensure that the paragraph logically builds its claim that tree-ring dating is a highly precise historical tool, in what order should the sentences be placed?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The sentences should be ordered starting with the introduction to dendrochronology, followed by the explanation of how precision is achieved through ring growth, then the methodology of comparing patterns to build timelines, and finally the concrete example of the dated shipwreck.
The paragraph flows logically from a general definition and claim about precision, to the biological mechanism enabling that precision, to the archaeological application of the mechanism, and finally to a specific historical example demonstrating that precision in practice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing dendrochronology and claiming it provides a precise timeline must come first.
It establishes the subject matter and key claim of the paragraph.
2
Connect the claim of precision to its scientific cause.
The sentence explaining how 'This high level of precision is achieved' via annual ring growth must come second.
The demonstrative pronoun 'this' directly links to the 'incredibly precise' claim in the first sentence.
3
Identify the logical link to larger scale applications.
The sentence describing how 'these distinctive patterns' are compared to wood samples to build regional timelines must come third.
It refers back to the patterns mentioned in the second sentence and explains how researchers use them to construct timelines.
4
Find the concrete supporting evidence.
The sentence starting with 'For example' about the shipwreck must come last.
It provides a specific real-world example that supports the general claims of precision and archaeological timeline construction established in the first three sentences.

Key Concept

Supporting Claims with Evidence and Details
Question 857Question

Deep-sea explorers diving near the Mariana Trench discovered a bizarre survival strategy employed by the telescope octopus: it spends its entire life floating vertically to minimize its silhouette against the faint sunlight from above.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: octopus: it

Answer

The correct option is the original phrasing, which uses a colon to separate the independent clause from the explanation that follows.
The correct choice maintains the original punctuation, using a colon to connect the independent clause about the telescope octopus's strategy to the independent clause explaining what that strategy is. A colon is grammatically correct here because it is preceded by a complete sentence and followed by an explanation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause preceding the punctuation mark.
The clause 'Deep-sea explorers diving near the Mariana Trench discovered a bizarre survival strategy employed by the telescope octopus' contains a subject and a verb and is capable of standing alone as a complete sentence.
A colon requires a complete, independent clause before it.
2
Examine the relationship between the clause before the punctuation and the clause after it.
The clause 'it spends its entire life floating vertically to minimize its silhouette against the faint sunlight from above' explains the specific 'bizarre survival strategy' mentioned in the first clause.
A colon is used to introduce an explanation or elaboration of the preceding independent clause.
3
Evaluate the grammar of the alternative choices.
Using a comma results in a comma splice because both clauses are independent. Using a semicolon followed by 'which' creates a fragment because 'which' makes the second clause dependent. Placing a colon after 'that' makes the first clause incomplete and incorrectly separates the pronoun from its verb.
Each alternative choice violates standard punctuation or clause structure rules, confirming that the colon is the only correct choice.

Key Concept

Colons must be preceded by an independent clause and are used to introduce an explanation, clarification, or list.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 858Question

Although the two marine biologists documented the migration pattern, the biologists' primary focus was its deviations from previous years.

Which choice best completes the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct option is the one that contains 'biologists' primary focus was its', which correctly uses the plural possessive form 'biologists'' to indicate the focus belonging to the two biologists, and the possessive pronoun 'its' to show that the deviations belong to the migration pattern.
The correct option is the one that contains 'biologists' primary focus was its' because it correctly implements the plural possessive noun 'biologists'' to refer to the two marine biologists and correctly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to modify 'deviations' without an apostrophe.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the noun referring to the biologists should be singular or plural, and possessive or not.
The phrase 'two marine biologists' establishes that there are multiple biologists, requiring a plural noun. The phrase 'biologists' primary focus' shows that the focus belongs to the biologists, requiring the possessive form.
Determining noun plurality and possession dictates the correct spelling and apostrophe placement.
2
Determine the correct spelling of the plural possessive noun.
For regular plural nouns ending in -s, the possessive is formed by adding an apostrophe after the -s, resulting in 'biologists'.'
This rules out options with incorrect noun punctuation.
3
Determine whether to use 'its' or 'it's' to modify the noun 'deviations'.
The pronoun must show that the deviations belong to the singular 'migration pattern', which requires the possessive pronoun 'its' (without an apostrophe). The contraction 'it's' (it is) is incorrect in this context.
Selecting the grammatically correct pronoun form prevents homophone confusion.

Key Concept

Apostrophes are used to show possession for plural nouns (typically by adding an apostrophe after the final 's') and must be distinguished from possessive pronouns like 'its', which do not contain apostrophes.
Question 859Question

When Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE, it buried the Roman town of Herculaneum under volcanic ash, carbonizing hundreds of papyrus scrolls in a lavish villa. For centuries, these scrolls remained unreadable, reduced to fragile lumps of carbon that crumbled at the slightest touch. Recently, however, scientists have begun using advanced X-ray imaging techniques to read the scrolls without unrolling them. By detecting the tiny differences in how X-rays pass through the charred papyrus versus the ancient ink, researchers can reconstruct the writing three-dimensionally. [1]

Which of the following concluding sentences, if added at [1], would best support the paragraph's main focus on the role of modern technology in uncovering historical texts?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: This non-invasive method allows scholars to read the fragile texts without physically damaging them, preserving their contents for future generations.

Answer

This non-invasive method allows scholars to read the fragile texts without physically damaging them, preserving their contents for future generations.
The correct option starting with 'This non-invasive method' logically wraps up the paragraph by summarizing how the X-ray technology successfully addresses the problem of the fragile, unreadable scrolls without causing physical damage. This reinforces the main focus on the technological solution and its impact.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main idea of the passage.
The passage describes how volcanic ash carbonized ancient scrolls, making them too fragile to open, and how modern X-ray imaging technology now allows researchers to read the texts three-dimensionally without unrolling them.
Understanding the paragraph's core focus is necessary to select a concluding sentence that reinforces this focus without introducing unrelated details.
2
Evaluate the choices to determine which one logically wraps up the passage and is grammatically correct.
The choice emphasizing that the non-invasive method preserves the contents for future generations without damaging them directly summarizes the main benefit of the technology discussed. Other choices introduce unrelated details (like a specific philosopher), contain grammatical errors like comma splices, or shift tenses inappropriately.
A good conclusion must tie back to the main thesis, flow logically, and be free of grammatical errors.

Key Concept

Selecting an effective concluding sentence requires identifying the main thesis of the paragraph and choosing an option that reinforces that focus while maintaining grammatical correctness and logical flow.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 860Question

While exploring the depths of the Mariana Trench, the oceanographers observed several rare, bioluminescent fish species, and they documented the organisms' behavioral patterns.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct option is 'NO CHANGE' because it properly places a comma between the coordinate adjectives 'rare' and 'bioluminescent', avoids a comma between the adjective and the noun phrase 'fish species', and correctly uses a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to join two independent clauses.
The correct choice properly applies comma rules for both coordinate adjectives and independent clauses. The adjectives 'rare' and 'bioluminescent' are coordinate, meaning they modify 'fish species' individually and can be separated by a comma. There should be no comma after 'bioluminescent' because it modifies the noun phrase 'fish species'. Additionally, the coordinating conjunction 'and' is preceded by a comma because it connects two independent clauses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if the adjectives modifying 'fish species' are coordinate or cumulative.
The adjectives 'rare' and 'bioluminescent' are coordinate because they can be reversed ('bioluminescent, rare fish species') or joined by 'and' ('rare and bioluminescent fish species') naturally. However, 'fish' is cumulative/part of the noun phrase 'fish species' and cannot be reversed with the other adjectives, so there should be a comma only between 'rare' and 'bioluminescent', and no comma after 'bioluminescent'.
Coordinate adjectives require a comma between them, while cumulative adjectives or adjectives directly modifying the noun should not be separated from the noun by a comma.
2
Identify the clause structure after the underlined portion to determine the correct punctuation and conjunction.
The sentence consists of two independent clauses: 'the oceanographers observed several...' and 'they documented the organisms' behavioral patterns.' These clauses must be joined by a comma and a coordinating conjunction (such as 'and'), or by a semicolon.
Joining two independent clauses with only a comma creates a comma splice, while separating them with a semicolon and a non-finite verb form creates a fragment.
3
Evaluate the options to find the one that meets both punctuation requirements.
Only the original phrasing ('NO CHANGE') correctly uses a comma between the coordinate adjectives and a comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' to join the independent clauses.
This maintains grammatical correctness and avoids comma splices, misplaced commas, and fragments.

Key Concept

Commas with Lists, Clauses, and Coordinate Adjectives
Estimated Time:1m 0s
PreviousPage 43 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin