All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 861Question

Passage Excerpt:
During a freezing winter trip to New York City in 1903, Mary Anderson observed a trolley driver struggle to see through the falling sleet. At the time, [underlined portion]. Anderson immediately began sketching a solution: a rubber blade attached to a lever inside the cab, allowing the driver to clear the window without being exposed to the elements.

Which choice most vividly emphasizes the harsh weather conditions that the trolley drivers had to endure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: drivers had to stand in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields

Answer

The choice describing drivers standing in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields is correct because it uses strong descriptive language to convey the harshness of the weather, fulfilling the specified rhetorical goal.
The option that mentions drivers standing in the biting wind and freezing rain to scrape ice off the windshields is correct because it uses descriptive vocabulary ('biting wind,' 'freezing rain') to illustrate the severe weather conditions directly, thereby satisfying the prompt's goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to determine the exact rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that most vividly emphasizes the harsh weather conditions that the trolley drivers faced.
Identifying the target criteria helps narrow down the acceptable choices.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing a comma splice ('drivers had to open their windows, they wiped...') is grammatically incorrect and must be eliminated.
An answer choice on the ACT English exam must be grammatically correct to be the right answer.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the rhetorical goal.
The options focusing on shift length or multitasking do not describe the weather. Only the option describing the 'biting wind and freezing rain' details the harsh weather conditions.
Selecting the option that contains specific sensory details of severe weather satisfies the precise rhetorical criteria.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Question 862Question

[1]
In December 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a curator at a museum in East London, South Africa, received a call from a local trawler captain who had brought in an unusual catch. Amidst the piles of sharks and rays, she noticed a strange, iridescent blue fish with fleshy, limb-like fins. Unable to identify the creature, she made sketches and sent them to J.L.B. Smith, a prominent South African ichthyologist, who recognized the fish as a coelacanth—a species believed to have gone extinct 66 million years ago.

[2]
This discovery was the biological equivalent of finding a living dinosaur. It challenged the scientific community's understanding of vertebrate evolution and prehistoric survival. The coelacanth’s unique anatomy provided a rare window into the transition of vertebrates from water to land. Its lobed fins, which contain bones arranged similarly to those in tetrapod limbs, suggested an evolutionary link to early land-dwelling animals.

[3]
While modern coelacanths live in deep-water environments, their prehistoric ancestors inhabited shallow waters, adapting over millions of years to survive in deep ocean caves. Over the next few decades, search efforts successfully located living populations of the coelacanth off the coast of the Comoro Islands and in Indonesia. These discoveries allowed scientists to study the creature's behavior in its natural habitat, proving that this "living fossil" had survived relatively unchanged for eons.

Suppose the writer’s goal had been to write an essay that traces the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa. Would this essay successfully fulfill that goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because the essay focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions.

Answer

No, because the essay focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions.
The correct answer is the option stating that the essay does not fulfill the goal because it focuses on the discovery and evolutionary significance of a single fish species rather than providing a broad historical account of marine biology expeditions. The passage centers on the coelacanth, its anatomical traits, and its importance to understanding vertebrate evolution, which is far narrower than a history of South African marine expeditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proposed writing goal.
The goal is to write an essay that traces the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa.
Understanding the target goal is necessary to evaluate whether the passage fulfills it.
2
Analyze the actual content and primary focus of the passage.
The passage describes the 1938 discovery of the coelacanth, explains why it was scientifically significant (its lobe-like fins as an evolutionary link to land animals), and notes the subsequent discovery of living populations.
Determining the true focus of the text allows comparison with the proposed goal.
3
Compare the actual focus with the proposed goal and select the correct option.
The essay does not trace the history of marine biology expeditions in South Africa; it focuses narrowly on one evolutionary discovery. Therefore, the essay does not fulfill the goal.
This comparison identifies the correct 'No' direction and the accurate reasoning for it.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 863Question

To catalog the rare specimens, the botanist collected several fragile, alpine buttercup samples, and she preserved them in hermetically sealed jars.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: fragile alpine buttercup samples, and she preserved

Answer

fragile alpine buttercup samples, and she preserved
The correct choice removes the comma between the cumulative adjectives 'fragile' and 'alpine' because 'alpine buttercup' functions as a single noun phrase modified by 'fragile'. Since these adjectives are cumulative and cannot be reversed or joined by 'and', they should not be separated by a comma. The choice also correctly retains the comma before the coordinating conjunction 'and' because it joins two independent clauses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine if 'fragile' and 'alpine' are coordinate or cumulative adjectives.
They are cumulative adjectives because they cannot be reversed ('alpine fragile buttercup') and cannot be logically linked with 'and' ('fragile and alpine buttercup'). Thus, no comma should separate them.
Cumulative adjectives must not be separated by commas.
2
Check the clause structure around the conjunction 'and'.
The sentence is composed of two independent clauses: 'the botanist collected...' and 'she preserved...'.
Two independent clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction require a comma before the conjunction.
3
Select the option that corrects the adjective punctuation and properly joins the independent clauses.
The correct choice is 'fragile alpine buttercup samples, and she preserved'.
It removes the comma between the cumulative adjectives and keeps the comma before 'and'.

Key Concept

Identifying cumulative adjectives and punctuating independent clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 864Question

During the late Renaissance, a guild of Venetian glassmakers guarded their secret formulas with fierce protectiveness. Any artisan who dared to share these methods, which were considered state secrets, with outsiders faced banishment or worse. Consequently, the island of Murano became the undisputed capital of luxury glasswork in Europe.

Which of the following options represents the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct choice is the option that makes no change to the sentence, as it correctly maintains a pair of commas around the nonessential clause while keeping the restrictive clause free of commas.
The correct option correctly keeps the sentence as written. The nonessential clause 'which were considered state secrets' is parenthetical and properly enclosed by a pair of commas. The essential relative clause 'who dared to share these methods... with outsiders' defines 'artisan' and is correctly left without surrounding commas, preventing the subject from being separated from its verb.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the sentence to identify restrictive (essential) and nonessential clauses.
The clause 'who dared to share these methods... with outsiders' is restrictive because it defines the specific group of artisans. The clause 'which were considered state secrets' is nonessential because it offers extra detail about 'methods' that is not required to identify them.
Distinguishing between restrictive and nonessential clauses determines whether commas are required.
2
Apply comma rules to the restrictive clause.
Do not set off the clause 'who dared to share these methods... with outsiders' with commas.
Restrictive clauses are necessary for sentence meaning and should not be isolated from the words they modify.
3
Apply comma rules to the nonessential clause.
Enclose the clause 'which were considered state secrets' with a pair of commas: one after 'methods' and one after 'secrets'.
Nonessential elements must be set off by punctuation at both their beginning and end to show they are parenthetical.
4
Evaluate the choices to find the one matching these rules.
The original phrasing correctly punctuation the clauses, making the no change option correct.
Only the original sentence keeps the essential clause unpunctuated while properly pairing commas around the nonessential clause.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Question 865Question

Although often confused with the giant panda, the red panda is in its own unique evolutionary family. The red panda—a small mammal native to the eastern [underlined]Himalayas, is known[/underlined] for its bright reddish-brown fur and acrobatic climbing skills.

Which of the following choices best maintains punctuation consistency in the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Himalayas—is known

Answer

The correct option is the phrase that replaces the comma with a dash to match the opening dash, resulting in 'Himalayas—is known'.
The sentence contains a parenthetical, nonessential phrase ('a small mammal native to the eastern Himalayas') that is introduced with a dash. To ensure grammatical correctness and punctuation consistency, the phrase must also be closed with a dash. The correct option successfully provides this matching dash, linking the subject 'red panda' directly and cleanly to its verb 'is known'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the parenthetical nonessential phrase in the sentence.
The phrase is 'a small mammal native to the eastern Himalayas'.
Nonessential phrases provide extra information and must be set off from the rest of the sentence by consistent punctuation on both sides.
2
Determine the opening punctuation mark of the parenthetical phrase.
The phrase is introduced with a dash after the word 'panda'.
To maintain punctuation consistency, parenthetical elements must be enclosed by matching punctuation marks: either two commas, two parentheses, or two dashes.
3
Select the option that closes the parenthetical phrase with a matching dash.
Replacing the comma with a dash after 'Himalayas' closes the phrase consistently.
This maintains the matching pair of dashes and avoids punctuation mismatches.

Key Concept

Dashes must be used in consistent pairs when enclosing nonessential or parenthetical information in a sentence.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 866Question

The ancient Greek theater of Epidaurus, constructed in the fourth century BCE, is renowned for its extraordinary acoustics. Performers on the open-air stage can be heard clearly by spectators seated in the top rows, some sixty meters away. For decades, researchers debated the mechanism behind this phenomenon. In 2007, acoustic experts discovered that the secret lies in the theater’s limestone seats. The theater, which could accommodate up to 14,000 spectators, was designed by the architect Polykleitos the Younger. The researchers found that the corrugated surface of the seats acts as a natural sound filter, reflecting high-frequency sounds—such as the actors' voices—toward the audience while absorbing low-frequency background noise like the rustle of wind and the murmur of the crowd.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of the theater's acoustics with details about its seating capacity and architect.

Answer

Delete it, because it interrupts the explanation of the theater's acoustics with details about its seating capacity and architect.
The correct option is correct because the paragraph is focused entirely on the acoustic properties of the Epidaurus theater, explaining how researchers solved the mystery of how sound travels so well in the open air. The underlined sentence introduces unrelated historical and biographical facts about the theater's capacity and architect, which interrupts the explanation of how the limestone seats act as a sound filter.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic of the paragraph.
The paragraph explains the extraordinary acoustics of the Epidaurus theater and the scientific reason (limestone seats filtering sound) behind this phenomenon.
Understanding the paragraph's specific focus is necessary to evaluate if the sentence contributes to that focus.
2
Analyze the content and function of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence discusses the theater's seating capacity (14,000 spectators) and its architect (Polykleitos the Younger).
Determining what information the sentence adds helps evaluate its relevance.
3
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's topic.
The capacity and architect are unrelated to the acoustic mechanism. Placing this sentence between the discovery of the limestone seats and the explanation of their filtering effect breaks the paragraph's logical flow.
This establishes that the sentence should be deleted because it is irrelevant and disruptive.
4
Select the option that matches the decision to delete and provides the correct rhetorical reason.
The option suggesting deletion because it interrupts the explanation of acoustics with details about capacity and the architect is the correct choice.
Only one option correctly identifies the need for deletion and justifies it based on paragraph cohesion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 867Question

The following passage contains an underlined portion.

In the early twentieth century, a group of artists shocked the Paris art world with their expressive, non-naturalistic use of color. The French painter Henri Matisse, who pioneered the Fauvism movement, created art that was characterized by bold colors and simplified shapes. His revolutionary style challenged traditional academic representation and paved the way for modern abstract art.

Which choice is the best version of the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct choice properly uses a pair of commas to enclose the nonessential relative clause 'who pioneered the Fauvism movement' and correctly avoids placing a comma before the restrictive clause 'that was characterized by bold colors and simplified shapes'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nonessential relative clause in the sentence.
The clause 'who pioneered the Fauvism movement' is nonessential (nonrestrictive) because the subject 'Henri Matisse' is already specific and fully identified.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence using punctuation (usually a pair of commas).
2
Determine the punctuation needed for the nonessential clause and the rest of the underlined portion.
Commas must be placed both before 'who' and after 'movement'. The clause 'that was characterized by bold colors and simplified shapes' is restrictive (essential to define the kind of art Matisse created) and should not be preceded by a comma.
A pair of commas is required to enclose nonessential elements, whereas restrictive clauses must not be set off by commas.

Key Concept

Commas with Nonessential and Parenthetical Elements
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 868Question

In 1895, Harvard University’s new Fogg Art Museum opened to the public, but its lecture hall was immediately deemed an acoustic failure. The room’s curved walls and high plaster ceiling created an echo so persistent that speakers’ words remained suspended in the air, overlapping into an unintelligible din. Desperate for a solution, the university president turned to a young physics professor, Wallace Sabine. Sabine spent years conducting painstaking experiments, using organ pipes and cushions borrowed from nearby theaters to measure sound decay. His work culminated in the first mathematical relationship governing reverberation time, effectively establishing the field of architectural acoustics.

Sabine’s new scientific principles were put to the test when he was hired to design Boston’s Symphony Hall. Rather than copying the circular shapes that had ruined the Fogg museum’s hall, Sabine chose a rectangular, "shoebox" layout with deep balconies, high ceilings, and walls coffered with niches and statues. These features dispersed the sound waves evenly throughout the auditorium, preventing focused echoes. Even today, the venue remains a popular destination for tourists visiting the historic city of Boston.

Which choice most effectively concludes the paragraph by highlighting the successful application of Sabine’s new scientific field and its lasting impact?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: This triumph proved that exceptional acoustics could be scientifically engineered, cementing Sabine’s principles as the foundation of modern concert hall design.

Answer

The option stating that the triumph proved acoustics could be scientifically engineered, cementing Sabine’s principles as the foundation of modern concert hall design, is the correct choice.
The correct option successfully connects the triumph of Boston's Symphony Hall to the broader theme of Sabine establishing the scientific field of architectural acoustics, highlighting its lasting legacy in modern design without introducing grammatical errors.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage to identify the central theme and the specific goal of the concluding sentence.
The passage focuses on Wallace Sabine establishing the scientific field of architectural acoustics. The prompt specifically asks for a conclusion that highlights the success of this new scientific field and its lasting impact.
Understanding the context and rhetorical goal is essential for evaluating concluding options on the ACT.
2
Evaluate each option against the rhetorical criteria and check for grammatical correctness.
The original sentence focuses on tourism, which is irrelevant. The option with 'Ultimately, Sabine's calculations...' is a comma splice. The option with 'Conversely, Sabine's formulas...' has a tense shift ('build... relied') and an incorrect transition word ('Conversely').
ACT English questions frequently test both rhetorical effectiveness and grammar within the same item.
3
Identify the option that is both grammatically correct and satisfies the rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'This triumph proved...' is grammatically sound and directly links the scientific engineering of acoustics to modern design (lasting impact).
This option is the only one that meets all criteria and contains no errors.

Key Concept

Selecting concluding sentences that align with a paragraph's purpose and maintain grammatical integrity.
Question 869Question

In the sentence below, two independent clauses are joined. Which single punctuation mark must be placed in the blank to correctly join them?

Fill in the blanks below

In the high-altitude forests of the Andes, the spectacled bear relies on bromeliads for nourishment this unique diet distinguishes it from other bear species.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

semicolon (;)
A semicolon is the correct punctuation mark to join two independent clauses that are closely related in thought when no coordinating conjunction is used.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the grammatical structure of the clauses before and after the blank.
Both clauses are independent because they contain their own subjects and verbs and express complete thoughts.
Understanding clause structure is necessary to determine the appropriate punctuation rule.
2
Apply the rule for joining two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction.
A semicolon is required to connect the clauses.
A semicolon is the standard punctuation mark used to link closely related independent clauses without coordinating conjunctions.

Key Concept

Semicolons
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 870Question

The following passage contains a sentence with a missing punctuation mark. What punctuation mark should be placed in the blank to complete the sentence with consistent and grammatically correct punctuation?

Fill in the blanks below

Coastal redwoods are among the oldest and most resilient organisms in the world. These massive trees—the tallest living things on Earthcan reach heights of over 350 feet and live for more than two thousand years.
Show answer & explanation

Answer

An em dash (—) or dash
A dash is required to close the nonessential phrase because the phrase was opened with a dash. To maintain punctuation consistency, any parenthetical element set off by dashes must use a dash at both the beginning and the end.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nonessential parenthetical phrase in the sentence.
The phrase is 'the tallest living things on Earth', which provides extra descriptive information about 'These massive trees'.
Recognizing the boundary of the nonessential element is necessary to determine what punctuation is needed to set it off from the rest of the sentence.
2
Examine the punctuation mark that opens the nonessential phrase.
An em dash (—) appears right before 'the tallest living things on Earth'.
Punctuation marks that set off parenthetical elements must be consistent on both sides.
3
Determine the punctuation mark needed to close the nonessential phrase.
A matching em dash (—) is required to close the phrase before the main verb 'can reach'.
Mixing a dash with another punctuation mark (like a comma) is incorrect; a dash must be matched with another dash.

Key Concept

Dashes
Estimated Time:45s
Question 871Question

Sequoyah's Syllabary

[1]
In the early nineteenth century, a Cherokee silversmith named Sequoyah became convinced that the key to maintaining his people's independence lay in the power of the written word. Observing how European settlers shared information across great distances using what he termed "talking leaves," Sequoyah embarked on a decades-long quest to create a writing system for the Cherokee language. Despite facing initial skepticism and even accusations of witchcraft from his peers, he persisted in his work, recognizing that literacy would foster unity and preserve Cherokee culture in a rapidly changing world.

[2]
Sequoyah initially attempted to design a unique pictogram for every word in the Cherokee language. However, this approach quickly proved impractical, as the sheer number of symbols became impossible to memorize. Abandoning this method, he began to analyze the spoken language, breaking it down into distinct phonetic units. He realized that Cherokee is comprised of eighty-five recurring syllables. By assigning a distinct graphic symbol—some adapted from the Latin alphabet and others of his own invention—to each of these syllables, he established a complete and easily learnable writing system.

[3]
The impact of Sequoyah's invention was immediate and profound. Within a few years of its introduction in 1821, a majority of the Cherokee nation achieved literacy, outstripping the literacy rates of the surrounding European-American settlers. The syllabary enabled the publication of the *Cherokee Phoenix*, a bilingual newspaper, and allowed families separated by displacement to communicate. Sequoyah's achievement stands as a singular milestone: he is the only person in recorded history to single-handedly create an entire, functional writing system for an illiterate population.

Suppose the writer's goal had been to write an essay that details the grammatical rules and structural characteristics of the Cherokee language. This essay successfully fulfills that goal.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is false.
The statement is false because the passage is a historical and biographical account of Sequoyah's invention of the Cherokee syllabary and its impact on literacy, rather than a technical analysis of Cherokee grammar or linguistic structure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the hypothetical goal mentioned in the statement.
The hypothetical goal is to write an essay detailing the grammatical rules and structural characteristics of the Cherokee language.
To establish what criteria the essay needs to meet.
2
Read and summarize the actual content of the essay.
The essay narrates Sequoyah's development of the Cherokee syllabary and its cultural impacts, mentioning only briefly that the language has eighty-five recurring syllables.
To identify the main theme and scope of the passage.
3
Determine whether the essay fulfills the hypothetical goal.
The essay does not detail grammatical rules or structural characteristics of the language, meaning it fails to fulfill the hypothetical goal.
To decide the truth value of the statement.

Key Concept

Evaluating Whole-Essay Goals and Purpose
Question 872Question

Passage Excerpt:
In 1952, computer pioneer Grace Hopper developed the first compiler, a program that translated English-like commands into the binary code understood by computers. Before this invention, programming required writing tedious strings of ones and zeros, a task restricted to a small group of mathematicians. [1] Hopper’s compiler, known as the A-0, paved the way for modern software development.

Given that all the choices are true, which choice best accomplishes the writer's goal of emphasizing how Hopper’s compiler democratized the field of computer programming by making it accessible to those without advanced mathematical training?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: By allowing programmers to write instructions in plain English, the compiler opened the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics departments.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that by allowing programmers to write instructions in plain English, the compiler opened the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics departments.
The correct choice explains how the compiler functioned (translating instructions into plain English) and directly connects this to making programming accessible to those outside of advanced mathematics, thereby democratizing the field.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal requested by the writer.
The goal is to show how the compiler democratized programming by making it accessible to individuals without advanced mathematical training.
Understanding the precise criteria of the goal is essential to filtering out irrelevant details.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option starting with 'Translating commands' contains a comma splice, making it grammatically incorrect. The other three options are grammatically correct.
ACT English questions require the correct answer to be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct options against the identified rhetorical goal.
The option starting with 'By allowing programmers' mentions writing instructions in plain English and opening the technology to individuals outside of advanced mathematics, which perfectly aligns with the goal. The options starting with 'The compiler was a major' and 'Hopper's work on the A-0' focus on unrelated details (future achievements and employer details).
Matching the remaining grammatically correct choices to the specific criteria in the prompt reveals the single best answer.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 873Question

In 1943, mechanical engineer Richard James was working in a Philadelphia shipyard, attempting to develop springs that could support and stabilize sensitive marine instruments. During his experiments, he accidentally knocked a tension spring off a shelf. Instead of simply falling to the ground, the spring stepped down from a stack of books, onto a table, and coiled itself upright on the floor. James spent the next two years determining the perfect steel wire tension to turn this accidental movement into a children's toy, which his wife, Betty, named the "Slinky." [1]

The writer wants to conclude the paragraph with a sentence that highlights how a simple accident in a shipyard led to a successful, enduring commercial product. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Ultimately, this simple shipyard accident launched one of the most popular and enduring toys in history.

Answer

Ultimately, this simple shipyard accident launched one of the most popular and enduring toys in history.
The correct option perfectly aligns with the prompt's instructions by identifying both the initial event (the simple shipyard accident) and the long-term success (one of the most popular and enduring toys in history) without grammatical errors.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the question stem to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to conclude the paragraph by showing how a simple accident in a shipyard resulted in a successful, enduring commercial product.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for evaluating concluding options on the ACT.
2
Evaluate the choices for both thematic relevance to the goal and grammatical correctness.
The option focusing on Betty James's later life introduces irrelevant details. The option mentioning millions of units sold contains a comma splice. The option placing commas around the restrictive clause 'that occurred in the shipyard' contains a punctuation error. The option mentioning the simple shipyard accident and the popular, enduring toy is both grammatically correct and directly relevant.
Correct answers on the ACT English section must be both grammatically correct and rhetorically appropriate.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Question 874Question

In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemistry student William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a treatment for malaria, in his home laboratory. Instead of obtaining the clear drug, his experiments yielded a dark, sticky sludge. Rather than discarding the failed mixture, Perkin investigated its properties and discovered that when diluted with alcohol, it produced a vibrant, long-lasting purple color. Historically, purple dye was harvested from the mucus of thousands of marine snails, rendering it so expensive that only royalty could afford it. Recognizing the commercial potential of his accidental creation, Perkin patented the substance as mauveine, the world's first synthetic dye, and opened a factory to mass-produce it.

The writer wants to add a concluding sentence to the paragraph that reinforces the significance of Perkin's transition from an accidental discovery to a commercial success. Which choice best accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: By making a once-exclusive color widely accessible, Perkin not only revolutionized the textile industry but also launched the modern chemical manufacturing sector.

Answer

By making a once-exclusive color widely accessible, Perkin not only revolutionized the textile industry but also launched the modern chemical manufacturing sector.
The correct answer effectively concludes the paragraph by highlighting the transition of purple dye from an exclusive luxury to an accessible commodity, which reinforces the paragraph's discussion of Perkin's commercialization of mauveine and its industry-wide impact.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the paragraph's main theme and flow.
The paragraph describes Perkin's accidental creation of a synthetic purple dye, its historical context as a rare and expensive luxury, and his effort to commercialize and mass-produce it.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential to selecting a concluding sentence that summarizes or extends the main ideas without introducing off-topic points.
2
Evaluate the choices for relevance and correct transition of ideas.
The option focusing on making the color accessible and launching the chemical industry directly resolves the narrative arc. Other options either introduce irrelevant details about quinine, contain grammatical errors, or contradict the success of the factory.
Eliminating options with irrelevant content or incorrect logical transitions ensures the conclusion is both supportive and cohesive.
3
Check the remaining option for grammatical correctness.
The correct option is grammatically sound, avoiding the comma splice present in the option describing Perkin's retirement.
ACT English questions require that the correct choice not only fit rhetorically but also adhere strictly to standard English grammar conventions.

Key Concept

Selecting Concluding Sentences and Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 875Question

The local community center recently launched a rooftop garden project to promote urban sustainability. The garden, which features solar-powered irrigation, grows organic vegetables for nearby families. Volunteers hope this initiative will inspire other neighborhoods to start their own green spaces.

Which of the following choices is the correct punctuation for the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: garden, which features solar-powered irrigation, grows

Answer

The correct option is the one that reads 'garden, which features solar-powered irrigation, grows'.
The correct choice is the one that sets off the nonessential relative clause 'which features solar-powered irrigation' with a pair of commas (one after 'garden' and one after 'irrigation'). This correctly indicates that the clause contains extra, nonessential information that can be removed without changing the core meaning of the sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clause 'which features solar-powered irrigation' as a nonessential relative clause because it provides extra descriptive information about the garden but is not required to identify which specific garden is being discussed.
The clause must be set off from the rest of the sentence with punctuation on both sides.
Nonessential elements require punctuation (usually commas) to separate them from the main independent clause.
2
Evaluate the punctuation choices to ensure the clause is properly enclosed.
A comma must be placed after 'garden' and another comma after 'irrigation' to completely enclose the nonessential clause. Using a semicolon creates a fragment, and using commas around a 'that' clause is incorrect because 'that' introduces essential clauses which should not have commas.
Only the choice with commas on both sides of 'which features solar-powered irrigation' is grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Nonessential clauses must be set off with a pair of commas, whereas restrictive clauses should not be punctuated with commas.
Estimated Time:45s
Question 876Question

To successfully preserve the delicate centuries-old tapestry, the conservators used a highly specialized technique: they kept the exhibition room at a constant humidity level and blocked all UV light.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: technique: they kept

Answer

technique: they kept
The colon is used correctly here because the clause before the colon is independent, and the clause after the colon explains the specific technique that was used.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clause preceding the punctuation mark.
The clause 'To successfully preserve the delicate centuries-old tapestry, the conservators used a highly specialized technique' is independent because it contains a subject and verb and expresses a complete thought.
A colon can only be placed after a clause that is grammatically complete.
2
Analyze the clause following the punctuation mark.
The clause 'they kept the exhibition room at a constant humidity level and blocked all UV light' is also independent.
This helps determine if the relationship between the two clauses allows for a colon, semicolon, or coordinating conjunction.
3
Evaluate the relationship between the two independent clauses.
The second clause explains and defines the specific technique mentioned in the first clause.
A colon is appropriate when the second independent clause explains, illustrates, or amplifies the first.
4
Eliminate incorrect options based on punctuation rules.
The comma splice option, the option placing a colon after a preposition, and the option placing a comma before a restrictive clause are eliminated.
Only the colon option correctly connects the two independent clauses without grammatical error.

Key Concept

Colon punctuation rules and independent clauses
Question 877Question

Astronomer Annie Jump Cannon developed a system to organize stellar spectra. The system that she created, which became the standard for modern astrophysics, helped catalog hundreds of thousands of stars. Her work laid the foundation for future generations of astronomers.

Which choice best punctuates the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

NO CHANGE
The correct answer properly distinguishes between the restrictive modifier 'that she created' (which should not be set off by commas because it is essential to identifying the system) and the nonessential relative clause 'which became the standard for modern astrophysics' (which must be enclosed in a pair of commas because it is parenthetical).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the clauses modifying the noun 'system' in the sentence.
The two modifying clauses are 'that she created' and 'which became the standard for modern astrophysics'.
Understanding the function of each clause determines how they should be punctuated.
2
Determine whether each modifying clause is essential (restrictive) or nonessential (nonrestrictive).
The clause 'that she created' is restrictive because it identifies which specific system is being discussed. The clause 'which became the standard for modern astrophysics' is nonessential because it adds descriptive information but is not required to identify the system.
Restrictive clauses do not take commas, whereas nonessential clauses must be set off by commas.
3
Apply the appropriate punctuation rules to the clauses.
Do not place commas around 'that she created'. Place a pair of commas around 'which became the standard for modern astrophysics', resulting in a comma before 'which' and a comma after 'astrophysics'.
This configuration correctly sets off the parenthetical information without disrupting the essential connection between the noun and its restrictive modifier.

Key Concept

Distinguishing between restrictive (essential) and nonrestrictive (nonessential) clauses to apply commas correctly.
Question 878Question

A writer is editing an essay about the discovery of the coelacanth and has drafted the following paragraph:

In 1938, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, a curator at a small museum in South Africa, received a call from Hendrick Goosen, a local fishing captain. Goosen was known for his skilled navigation of the challenging waters of the Indian Ocean. Courtenay-Latimer frequently searched Goosen’s catches for interesting marine specimens. On this particular day, she found a bright blue, five-foot-long creature with fleshy, limb-like fins that she could not identify.

Should the writer delete the underlined sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.

Answer

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.
The correct option correctly identifies that the sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the narrative focus on Courtenay-Latimer’s discovery of the strange fish with irrelevant details about Goosen’s navigation skills.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes how Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer went to inspect Hendrick Goosen's catch in 1938 and found an unidentified, unusual fish.
Understanding the paragraph's primary focus is essential for evaluating whether a sentence is relevant or tangential.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to this main focus.
The underlined sentence describes Goosen's navigation skills in the Indian Ocean. This detail is not necessary to understand the meeting or the discovery of the fish.
This determines if the sentence should be deleted or kept based on relevance.
3
Match the decision to delete the sentence with the correct rhetorical reason.
The sentence should be deleted because it interrupts the focus of the paragraph with irrelevant details about Goosen's navigation skills.
This allows us to select the option that has both the correct decision (Yes) and the correct logical justification.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 879Question

Although the restaurant chain launched three new locations last month, the company's primary goal was to maintain it's high standards of service.

Which of the following is the correct form of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: company's primary goal was to maintain its

Answer

company's primary goal was to maintain its
The correct answer correctly uses the singular possessive noun 'company's' to modify 'goal', as the sentence refers to a single 'restaurant chain'. It also properly uses the possessive pronoun 'its' to refer back to the company.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine whether the noun modifying 'primary goal' should be singular or plural.
The sentence refers to 'the restaurant chain' (singular), so the possessive noun must be singular ('company's') rather than plural ('companies'').
The plural possessive form 'companies'' would incorrectly imply that multiple independent companies are being discussed.
2
Determine whether the sentence requires the possessive pronoun 'its' or the contraction 'it's'.
The sentence indicates a possessive relationship for the 'high standards of service', requiring 'its'.
The spelling 'it's' represents the contraction 'it is' or 'it has', which is grammatically incorrect in this context.
3
Combine the correct singular possessive noun and the correct possessive pronoun.
The correct phrasing is 'company's primary goal was to maintain its'.
This choice establishes correct punctuation and correct pronoun usage.

Key Concept

Apostrophes for Possessives and Contractions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 880Question

Originating in ancient Mesopotamia and later refined in India by the mathematician Brahmagupta, the concept of zero revolutionized mathematics by functioning as both a placeholder and a number in its own right. Prior to this innovation, mathematicians struggled to perform complex calculations without confusing notation. _Brahmagupta also wrote several influential treatises on astronomy, detailing the movements of the planets and the stars._ By defining zero’s mathematical properties—such as the rule that subtracting a number from itself yields zero—ancient scholars paved the way for modern algebra and calculus.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the passage. Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a detail about astronomy that is tangential to the paragraph’s focus on the mathematical significance and development of zero.

Answer

The correct answer states that the sentence should be deleted because it introduces a detail about astronomy that is tangential to the paragraph’s focus on the mathematical significance and development of zero.
The correct answer is correct because the paragraph focuses on the mathematical significance and development of zero. The underlined sentence introduces Brahmagupta's unrelated work in astronomy, which diverges from this focus. Deleting it maintains paragraph unity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focus is the historical and mathematical development of the concept of zero.
Evaluating relevance requires knowing the core topic of the text.
2
Analyze the content and purpose of the underlined sentence.
The underlined sentence describes Brahmagupta's contributions to astronomy.
Determining if the sentence aligns with or diverges from the paragraph focus.
3
Evaluate whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct justification.
The sentence should be deleted because astronomy is tangential to the mathematical focus of the paragraph.
Aligning the decision with the correct rhetorical reason.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 15s
PreviousPage 44 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin