All practice questions

5556 questions

Question 1181Question

In the early twentieth century, astronomer Henrietta Swan Leavitt analyzed photographic plates of variable stars in the Magellanic Clouds, calculating and computing the changing brightness of these stars, which varied in luminosity over time, she discovered the period-luminosity relation.

Which choice most effectively and concisely completes the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: and, by calculating their varying brightness, she

Answer

The correct answer is the option that reads 'and, by calculating their varying brightness, she'. This option is the most concise and grammatically correct choice because it eliminates the redundant phrasing of the original sentence and correctly connects the two independent clauses with the coordinating conjunction 'and' to avoid a comma splice.
The correct option is the one that reads 'and, by calculating their varying brightness, she'. It removes all redundant synonyms ('calculating and computing') and repetitive descriptions ('changing brightness... which varied in luminosity over time') while introducing the coordinating conjunction 'and' to properly connect two independent clauses and resolve the comma splice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the original sentence for redundancy and wordiness.
The phrase 'calculating and computing' uses redundant synonyms, and 'changing brightness... which varied in luminosity over time' repeats the same concept of change unnecessarily.
Standardized grammar tests require eliminating redundant words and phrases that repeat the same idea.
2
Analyze the sentence structure to ensure grammatical correctness.
The sentence consists of two independent clauses: Leavitt analyzed photographic plates, and she discovered the period-luminosity relation. Simply joining them with a comma creates a comma splice.
Independent clauses must be joined by a coordinating conjunction (like 'and') and a comma, or a semicolon.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the one that is both concise and grammatically correct.
The option beginning with 'and, by' resolves the wordiness by shortening the phrase to 'calculating their varying brightness' and uses 'and' to correct the comma splice. The option without 'and' is concise but creates a comma splice, while the option with 'which was performed by her' is wordy and passive.
The correct choice must be the most concise option that is also grammatically correct.

Key Concept

Eliminating Wordiness
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1182Question

Passage:

Cellulose nitrate film, the standard medium for early motion pictures, is highly flammable and degrades rapidly over [1] <underline>time. Consequently, archivists</underline> house these fragile reels in specialized, temperature-controlled vaults. By maintaining low temperatures and stable humidity, they prevent the film from decomposing into an acidic powder or catching fire.

Question:

Which choice best establishes a logical and grammatically correct transition between the two sentences?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct answer is the option 'NO CHANGE', which maintains the period between the independent clauses and uses the transition 'Consequently' to show a cause-and-effect relationship.
The original phrasing 'NO CHANGE' is correct because it appropriately punctuates the boundary between two independent clauses with a period, and it uses 'Consequently' to establish the correct cause-and-effect logical relationship.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relationship between the first independent clause (detailing the flammability and decay of cellulose nitrate film) and the second independent clause (detailing the storage of film in specialized vaults).
The second clause represents a direct result or protective response to the hazard described in the first clause, indicating a cause-and-effect relationship.
Understanding the logical connection between the ideas is necessary to choose the correct transition word.
2
Examine the grammatical structure of the connection between the two independent clauses.
Because both clauses are independent, they must be separated by a period, a semicolon, or a coordinating conjunction with a comma to avoid run-on sentences and comma splices.
Ensuring proper sentence structure prevents punctuation errors like comma splices.
3
Evaluate the options against the logical and grammatical requirements.
The choice 'NO CHANGE' preserves the period between the clauses and uses the cause-and-effect transition 'Consequently'. The choice with a comma creates a comma splice. The choice with 'but, consequently' causes transition overuse. The choice with 'Likewise' uses an incorrect transition of similarity.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect and logically flawed options identifies the correct answer.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1183Question

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the following paragraph:

In 1951, computer scientist Grace Hopper developed the A-0 compiler, a revolutionary program that translated mathematical code into machine-readable instructions. Prior to Hopper’s breakthrough, programming required writing tedious sequences of binary numbers by hand. By allowing programmers to use English-like commands instead, the compiler made software development accessible to a much broader range of people. Hopper, who earned a PhD in mathematics from Yale University, also served in the United States Navy Reserve. Ultimately, Hopper's innovation laid the foundation for modern programming languages and transformed the future of computing.

Should the writer make this deletion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and impact of the compiler by introducing unrelated biographical details.

Answer

Yes, because the sentence interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and impact of the compiler by introducing unrelated biographical details.
The correct answer is the option that advocates deleting the sentence because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development and impact of the compiler by introducing unrelated biographical details. The passage focuses on the technical breakthrough of the A-0 compiler and how it simplified programming. Biographical details about Hopper's PhD and Navy service are not relevant to this discussion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph focuses on Grace Hopper's development of the A-0 compiler, how it changed programming from binary to English-like commands, and its impact on the field of computing.
Understanding the paragraph's main focus is essential to determine whether any sentence is relevant or irrelevant.
2
Analyze the underlined sentence to see if it supports the main focus.
The underlined sentence discusses Hopper's PhD from Yale and her service in the U.S. Navy Reserve. While interesting, these details do not help explain how the compiler works, why it was developed, or what its impact was.
Evaluating the relationship between the sentence and the paragraph's core topic determines if the sentence belongs in the passage.
3
Evaluate the decisions and reasons given in the options to select the correct choice.
The correct decision is to delete the sentence (Yes to deletion) because it introduces irrelevant biographical details that interrupt the main narrative. This matches the option highlighting the interruption of the paragraph's focus.
Matching the correct decision with the accurate reason avoids common distractors that use incorrect justifications.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Question 1184Question

Before the invention of modern refrigeration, food preservation relied heavily on salting and curing techniques. Each year, people repeated these practices annually during the autumn months to prepare for winter.

Which choice is the best version of the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: People repeated these practices

Answer

People repeated these practices
The correct answer successfully removes the redundant words 'Each year' and 'annually', conveying the idea of repetition clearly and concisely without grammar errors.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the redundant elements in the underlined portion of the passage.
The original phrasing contains both 'Each year' and 'annually', which repeat the same idea of yearly repetition.
Good writing avoids using synonyms that repeat information within the same clause.
2
Evaluate the choices to select the one that resolves the redundancy without introducing new grammatical errors.
The phrase 'People repeated these practices' is concise and grammatically sound. The other options either maintain the redundancy, introduce a comma splice, or create a sentence fragment.
The correct answer must be both grammatically correct and concise.

Key Concept

Eliminating Redundancy
Question 1185Question

Aerogel, a synthetic ultralight material derived from a gel, consists of more than 99 percent air. Despite its light weight, it is remarkably strong and can support thousands of times its own mass. Because of its properties as an insulator, which insulate against heat, it is used by aerospace engineers for insulation in spacecraft.

Which choice most effectively and concisely expresses the information in the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Because it insulates against heat, aerospace engineers use it in spacecraft.

Answer

Because it insulates against heat, aerospace engineers use it in spacecraft.
The correct answer is the most concise and direct option. It eliminates the repetitive use of 'insulator,' 'insulate,' and 'insulation' found in the original sentence, and uses an active voice structure that is grammatically complete.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the redundant and wordy elements in the original sentence.
The words 'properties as an insulator,' 'insulate against heat,' and 'insulation' repeat the same concept redundantly.
ACT English requires eliminating unnecessary repetition to improve clarity and flow.
2
Evaluate the choices to find the one that removes redundancy while maintaining a complete sentence.
The correct choice must express the relationship clearly using active voice and without fragmenting the sentence.
Conciseness should not come at the expense of grammatical correctness.

Key Concept

Eliminating Wordiness
Question 1186Question

In the mid-twentieth century, geologist Marie Tharp painstakingly plotted sonar data to map the ocean floor, revealing a massive rift valley running down the center of the Atlantic. This discovery supported the theory of continental drift, which had previously been dismissed by many scientists. Through her careful charting of the ocean floor, Tharp was able to create the first comprehensive map of the ocean bottom, which was a major breakthrough that transformed the field of oceanography.

Which choice, if substituted for the underlined portion, makes the sentence the most concise while remaining grammatically correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: By mapping the ocean floor, Tharp created a breakthrough that

Answer

The correct choice is the most concise option that avoids redundancy and maintains grammatical correctness: 'By mapping the ocean floor, Tharp created a breakthrough that'.
The correct choice is the most concise option because it eliminates the repetitive synonyms ('ocean floor' and 'ocean bottom') and uses the direct active construction 'Tharp created a breakthrough' instead of wordy relative clauses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the underlined portion for wordiness and redundancy.
The original phrasing repeats the concept of mapping the bottom/floor ('charting of the ocean floor' and 'map of the ocean bottom') and uses wordy, indirect constructions ('was able to create', 'which was a major breakthrough that').
Identifying redundancy and wordiness helps narrow down the choices to the most direct option.
2
Evaluate the choices for conciseness and clarity.
The phrasing starting with 'By mapping the ocean floor' conveys the same information in fewer words, using active verbs and removing repetitive terms.
The ACT English section favors the most direct and clear phrasing that keeps the original meaning.
3
Check the concise choices for grammatical correctness.
The choice using a comma splice and the choice creating a sentence fragment are grammatically incorrect, leaving the chosen active phrasing as the only correct, concise option.
An option must be both concise and grammatically correct to be the right answer.

Key Concept

Eliminating wordiness and redundancy while maintaining correct sentence structure
Question 1187Question

In the early nineteenth century, timekeeping in the United States was a purely local affair. Every town set its own clocks based on the sun's position at midday, creating a confusing patchwork of hundreds of local times across the country. This system was manageable when travel was slow, but the rapid expansion of railroads after the Civil War made scheduling train routes and avoiding collisions nearly impossible. To solve this crisis, major railroad companies agreed to establish four standardized time zones across the continental United States in November 1883. Although the federal government did not officially adopt these zones until the passage of the Standard Time Act in 1918, the public quickly embraced the railroad-devised system, realizing its convenience for daily commerce and travel.

The writer is considering adding the following sentence to the paragraph (placed after the sentence ending with the word 'impossible'):

'At the time, railroad tracks were made of durable steel rather than iron, allowing for heavier trains and faster travel.'

Should the writer make this addition?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: No, because it interrupts the paragraph's focus on the development of standardized time by introducing an unrelated detail about railroad construction materials.

Answer

The option stating that the writer should not add the sentence because it interrupts the focus on standardized time by introducing details about railroad materials.
The paragraph focuses on the development of standardized time zones in the United States and how they resolved scheduling conflicts caused by local timekeeping. The proposed sentence discusses railroad track materials (steel instead of iron) and its effect on train speed and weight. While this information is related to railroads, it is irrelevant to the central theme of timekeeping and standardized time. Therefore, the sentence should not be added because it introduces an unrelated detail that interrupts the paragraph's primary focus.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary topic and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the transition from confusing local timekeeping systems in the United States to standardized time zones, driven by the scheduling needs of expanding railroads.
Understanding the paragraph's core focus is necessary to determine if new information is relevant.
2
Analyze the proposed sentence to determine its main subject.
The proposed sentence details the shift from iron to steel tracks and how this allowed for heavier and faster trains.
This helps identify whether the sentence contributes to the theme of time standardization or introduces an unrelated topic.
3
Compare the proposed sentence to the paragraph's focus and evaluate the choice.
The proposed sentence is about railroad construction materials, which does not support the topic of time standardization. Therefore, the sentence should not be added because it is irrelevant and interrupts the logical flow.
This leads directly to the correct decision and explanation.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1188Question

Passage Excerpt:
In 1856, eighteen-year-old chemist William Henry Perkin was attempting to synthesize quinine, a scarce drug used to treat malaria, in his makeshift home laboratory. During one of his failed trials, he ended up with a dark, sludge-like residue at the bottom of his flask. Rather than discarding the mess, Perkin cleaned the flask with alcohol and noticed that the substance dissolved into a brilliant, deep purple liquid. Recognizing the commercial potential of this accidental creation, he patented the substance as the world's first synthetic dye, mauveine.

Given that all the choices are true, which one most effectively highlights the contrast between the cheap, synthetic source of Perkin's new dye and the expensive, natural sources of traditional dyes?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: This accidental substance could easily be mass-produced from coal tar, unlike traditional dyes that required harvesting thousands of rare plants or insects.

Answer

The correct option highlights that the accidental substance could be mass-produced from coal tar, unlike traditional dyes that required harvesting thousands of rare plants or insects.
The correct option directly highlights the contrast requested by the prompt. It pairs the cheap, synthetic source of Perkin's dye ('easily be mass-produced from coal tar') with the expensive, natural sources of traditional dyes ('harvesting thousands of rare plants or insects') in a single, grammatically correct sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the specific rhetorical goal in the prompt.
The goal is to highlight the contrast between the cheap, synthetic source of Perkin's dye (coal tar) and the expensive, natural sources of traditional dyes (harvesting plants or insects).
Determining the rhetorical goal allows you to evaluate each choice based on the specific criteria requested rather than general relevance.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option containing two independent clauses joined only by a comma is a comma splice and must be eliminated. The other three options are grammatically correct.
An option must be grammatically correct to be the right answer on the ACT English section.
3
Select the grammatically correct option that fulfills the rhetorical goal.
The option comparing coal tar production to harvesting plants or insects directly establishes the requested contrast. The options about washing durability and Victorian fashion do not address this contrast.
Only one grammatically correct option fulfills the specific rhetorical goals of the prompt.

Key Concept

Meeting specific rhetorical goals requires selecting the choice that matches the precise criteria specified in the prompt while maintaining standard grammatical rules and consistency with the surrounding text.
Question 1189Question

A student is writing an essay about the 1977 discovery of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Read the five sentences below and arrange them in the most logical order to create a cohesive paragraph that establishes a clear introduction and transitions smoothly to a strong conclusion.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct logical sequence begins with the introduction of the oceanographers' 1977 discovery, moves to the description of their descent, transitions to the unexpected finding of hydrothermal vents, explains the chemosynthetic nature of the organisms found, and concludes with the broader impact of this scientific revelation.
The paragraph begins with a clear introduction that establishes the historical and scientific context of the 1977 discovery. The second sentence flows logically by using the pronoun 'They' to refer back to the 'oceanographers' and describes their initial expectations. The third sentence uses the transitional word 'Instead' to introduce the actual, surprising discovery, directly countering those expectations. The fourth sentence builds on this discovery by detailing the 'bizarre creatures' as 'These organisms' and describing their survival method. Finally, the fifth sentence concludes the paragraph by highlighting the wider scientific implications of 'this revelation,' resolving the opening sentence's claim that the discovery would rewrite our understanding of life.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence that provides context and sets the topic.
The sentence introducing the 1977 discovery off the Galápagos Islands establishes the subject and main idea without relying on previous context.
An effective paragraph must begin with an independent opening sentence that defines the topic and outlines its significance.
2
Find the logical continuation of the introduction by tracking pronoun references.
The sentence beginning with 'They' immediately follows the introduction, as 'They' refers directly to the 'oceanographers'.
Cohesive writing requires that pronouns have clear, immediately preceding antecedents to prevent ambiguity.
3
Identify the sentence that transitions from expectations to the actual discovery.
The sentence starting with 'Instead' directly contrasts the expectation of a 'barren, lifeless' seafloor with the discovery of vents and creatures.
The transitional adverb 'Instead' marks a shift and must follow a sentence that sets up an expectation or state that is being contradicted.
4
Link details about the organisms to the sentence that introduced them.
The sentence explaining 'chemosynthesis' follows the sentence that introduced the 'dense communities of bizarre creatures', using the demonstrative phrase 'These organisms'.
The demonstrative adjective 'These' must refer back to a noun phrase in the immediate preceding context.
5
Select the sentence that summarizes the findings and offers a broader conclusion.
The sentence starting with 'This revelation' wraps up the paragraph by discussing the wider scientific implications for finding extraterrestrial life.
A concluding sentence should not introduce new narrow details but should synthesize the paragraph's points and return to the main theme of the introduction.

Key Concept

Developing paragraph unity and cohesion through logical sequencing, pronoun-antecedent tracking, transitional markers, and matching introductory and concluding scopes.
Question 1190Question

In 1915, Albert Einstein published his theory of general relativity, which revolutionized modern physics. This groundbreaking work, a mathematical framework that describes gravity as the warping of spacetime, challenged Newton's classical laws. Scientists around the world immediately began testing its predictions.

Which of the following is the best replacement for the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The correct answer is the option that maintains a pair of commas to set off the nonessential appositive phrase without separating the restrictive clause from its referent.
The underlined portion introduces a nonessential appositive phrase ('a mathematical framework that describes gravity as the warping of spacetime') that modifies the noun phrase 'This groundbreaking work'. Nonessential appositives must be set off from the rest of the sentence by a pair of commas: one before the appositive and one after. The original text correctly places a comma after 'work' and a comma after 'spacetime'. Additionally, the relative clause 'that describes gravity as the warping of spacetime' is restrictive (essential to the meaning of the appositive framework) and should not be separated from 'framework' by a comma.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nonessential element in the sentence.
The phrase 'a mathematical framework that describes gravity as the warping of spacetime' is an appositive that provides extra, nonessential information about 'This groundbreaking work'.
Nonessential elements must be set off from the rest of the sentence with a matching pair of commas.
2
Evaluate the internal punctuation of the nonessential element.
The relative clause 'that describes gravity as the warping of spacetime' is restrictive because it defines the specific framework. Therefore, it must not be separated from 'framework' by a comma.
Restrictive elements should not be set off by commas.
3
Check the punctuation separating the clauses.
A semicolon cannot be used here because 'This groundbreaking work' is not an independent clause.
Semicolons are reserved for connecting two independent clauses.

Key Concept

Using a pair of commas to set off nonessential appositive phrases, while keeping restrictive relative clauses integrated without commas.
Question 1191Question

Biologists studying deep-sea hydrothermal vents discovered a species of extremophile shrimp that thrives in superheated water. Although these organisms are currently existing today in environments that would kill most marine species, they have developed unique proteins to stabilize their cellular structure.

Which of the following choices, if substituted for the underlined portion, best eliminates the redundancy in the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although these organisms exist in environments

Answer

The correct choice is the option that states 'Although these organisms exist in environments' because it eliminates the redundant time indicators and maintains proper sentence structure.
The correct choice, which begins with 'Although these organisms exist in environments', successfully removes the redundant words 'currently' and 'today' while maintaining the subordinating conjunction 'Although' to properly link the dependent clause with the independent clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the redundant words in the underlined portion.
The words 'currently', 'existing', and 'today' all convey the exact same meaning of present existence.
To recognize which elements are unnecessary and should be removed to make the sentence concise.
2
Test the remaining choices in the context of the full sentence to evaluate grammatical correctness.
Removing the subordinating conjunction 'Although' creates a comma splice, while adding 'Because' turns the entire sentence into a fragment. Only the correct option maintains the appropriate subordinating structure.
To ensure that eliminating redundancy does not introduce a new grammatical error.

Key Concept

Eliminating Redundancy
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1192Question

[1]
In 1930, Ruth Wakefield and her husband purchased a historic lodge in Whitman, Massachusetts, and opened the Toll House Inn. Ruth, a skilled dietitian and chef, quickly gained a reputation for her exceptional desserts, particularly her thin, crisp butter drop cookies. The inn soon became a popular destination for travelers seeking a comforting meal and sweet treats.

[2]
One afternoon in 1938, while preparing a batch of her famous cookies, Wakefield realized she had run out of baker's chocolate. Hoping to save time, she chopped up a bar of Nestlé semi-sweet chocolate and added the small chunks directly to the cookie dough. She fully expected the chocolate pieces to melt and marbleize the cookies during baking.

[3]
Word of Wakefield’s delicious new recipe spread rapidly, causing sales of Nestlé's semi-sweet chocolate bars to skyrocket. This sudden surge in demand prompted the company to strike a deal with Wakefield: they would print her Toll House recipe on their packaging in exchange for providing her with a lifetime supply of chocolate.

[4]
Instead of melting completely into the dough, however, the chocolate bits retained their shape, softening into creamy pockets of rich flavor. The resulting creation—which she called the "Toll House Chocolate Crunch Cookie"—was an instant sensation among the inn's guests.

For the sake of the logic and cohesion of this essay, where should Paragraph 4 be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: after Paragraph 2

Answer

after Paragraph 2
Placing Paragraph 4 after Paragraph 2 is logically correct. At the end of Paragraph 2, the author states that Wakefield 'fully expected the chocolate pieces to melt.' Paragraph 4 begins with 'Instead of melting completely into the dough, however...' This transition directly addresses the expectation set up in Paragraph 2, establishing a clear cause-and-effect relationship and maintaining chronological order.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main topic and chronological progression of the essay.
The essay describes Ruth Wakefield opening the Toll House Inn (Paragraph 1), experimenting with chocolate in a cookie recipe (Paragraph 2), the recipe becoming highly successful and leading to a partnership with Nestlé (Paragraph 3), and the physical result of the chocolate pieces in the baked cookie (Paragraph 4).
Understanding the timeline and sequence of events is crucial for organizing narrative paragraphs.
2
Analyze transitional links and content connection clues between paragraphs.
At the end of Paragraph 2, Wakefield expects the chocolate pieces 'to melt.' Paragraph 4 begins with 'Instead of melting completely...'. This directly contrasts and resolves the expectation established in Paragraph 2.
Pronouns, transition words, and direct thematic links connect sequential paragraphs.
3
Determine the placement that maintains logical flow and avoids narrative gaps.
Placing Paragraph 4 immediately after Paragraph 2 allows the description of the baking outcome to precede the discussion of the recipe's subsequent popularity and Nestlé's business proposal in Paragraph 3.
Ensuring the description of the cookie's creation occurs before its commercial success maintains a logical cause-and-effect narrative.

Key Concept

Paragraph-level logical flow and transitional cohesion
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1193Question

The following paragraphs are from an essay about the invention and history of the saxophone. To make the essay flow most logically, in what order should the paragraphs be arranged?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The paragraphs should be arranged in the sequence starting with Adolphe Sax's vision to bridge the gap between instrument families, followed by the hybrid brass and woodwind design of the instrument, then the rejection of the instrument by traditional European classical orchestras, and concluding with its adoption and success in American jazz.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and logical progression. The first paragraph introduces Sax's goal to bridge the gap between woodwinds and brasses. The second paragraph begins with 'To realize this vision,' describing the creation of the saxophone and its anticipated use in military and classical domains. The third paragraph picks up on this anticipation by contrasting the immediate embrace of the instrument by military bands with the rejection from classical orchestras. The final paragraph transitions from this rejection with the phrase 'This initial rejection, however,' to describe the saxophone's ultimate success in American jazz.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory paragraph that establishes the main topic and does not rely on prior context.
The paragraph introducing Adolphe Sax and his goal to bridge the gap between woodwinds and brasses is the logical starting point, as it contains no transitional words referring to previous text.
An essay must begin by defining its subject and setting up the central theme before details can be developed.
2
Look for explicit transition words or phrases that link paragraphs together.
The phrase 'To realize this vision' at the beginning of the hybrid design paragraph directly connects to Sax's 'vision' mentioned at the end of the introductory paragraph.
Cohesion requires that sentences or paragraphs referencing specific ideas must immediately follow where those ideas are introduced.
3
Trace the logical progression of the remaining paragraphs using parallel structures and contrasting ideas.
The design paragraph ends by mentioning both military bands and classical orchestras. The rejection paragraph begins by contrasting these two: 'While military bands readily embraced... classical orchestras proved far more resistant.'
Paragraphs that elaborate on specific sub-topics introduced in preceding sentences must follow them to maintain structural unity.
4
Confirm the final paragraph's transition and ensure the narrative reaches a logical conclusion.
The jazz paragraph begins with 'This initial rejection, however,' which directly refers to the struggle and rejection described in the preceding paragraph, bringing the history to a successful modern resolution.
The final transition resolves the tension of the previous paragraph, transitioning from rejection to ultimate success.

Key Concept

Paragraph-Level Transitions
Question 1194Question

Passage:
For decades, Mesoamerican scholars assumed that cacao was strictly a luxury item reserved for the Maya elite, who drank it from elaborate vessels during ceremonial rituals. [1] <underline>Consequently,</underline> chemical analyses of pottery fragments from modest, ordinary households have revealed traces of theobromine, a compound unique to cacao. This finding suggests that chocolate consumption was far more widespread across social classes than previously believed.

Which choice most effectively establishes the logical relationship between the traditional scholarly assumption and the new scientific evidence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: However,

Answer

The correct option is 'However,' because it establishes the necessary contrast between the traditional academic view and the contradicting archaeological findings.
The correct option is 'However,' because the relationship between the two sentences is one of contrast. The first sentence describes the belief that cacao was strictly for the elite, while the second sentence introduces physical evidence that contradicts this belief by showing cacao was present in ordinary households.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the context of the preceding sentence.
The preceding sentence describes a long-held belief that cacao was strictly an elite luxury item.
Understanding the starting point of the transition is necessary to determine the correct relationship.
2
Analyze the context of the sentence containing the transition.
The sentence reveals that everyday household pottery showed chemical evidence of cacao, which contradicts the idea that it was only for the elite.
Comparing the two ideas allows us to identify the logical relationship between them.
3
Identify the logical relationship and select the transition that expresses it.
Because the new evidence contradicts the traditional view, a contrast transition is required. The option 'However,' provides this contrast.
Selecting the correct logical transition ensures cohesive paragraph flow.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1195Question

Passage Excerpt:

For decades, early audio recordings captured on wax cylinders remained silent, too fragile to be played by traditional styluses without being destroyed. In response, physicists developed the IRENE system, which uses non-contact optical scanning to create digital images of the grooves. The system then uses software to reconstruct the audio from these images, allowing listeners to hear long-lost voices.

Question:

Given that all the choices are true, which choice most effectively emphasizes the extreme precision of the optical scanning technology described in the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: map the microscopic contours of the grooves with sub-micrometer accuracy

Answer

map the microscopic contours of the grooves with sub-micrometer accuracy
The correct option most effectively emphasizes the extreme precision of the technology by using highly specific and detailed descriptors like 'microscopic contours' and 'sub-micrometer accuracy.'

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find the choice that most effectively emphasizes the 'extreme precision' of the optical scanning technology.
Understanding the precise criteria of the prompt is essential for evaluating the rhetorical suitability of each option.
2
Evaluate each option for grammatical correctness.
The option beginning with 'record visual details' contains a comma splice and is grammatically incorrect; all other options are grammatically sound.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options narrows the choices to those that are syntactically valid.
3
Compare the remaining grammatically correct options against the specified rhetorical goal.
The option beginning with 'map the microscopic contours' uses the terms 'microscopic contours' and 'sub-micrometer accuracy,' which explicitly convey high-precision measurements. The other grammatically correct options ('capture digital pictures' and 'take photos of') use general descriptions that do not highlight precision.
Selecting the option that best fulfills the specified rhetorical goal ensures the correct answer is determined.

Key Concept

Meeting Specific Rhetorical Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 1196Question

The writer wants to organize the sentences below to logically present the chronological steps of Jocelyn Bell Burnell's discovery of the first pulsar. Arrange the sentences in the most logical order to achieve this goal.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with the introduction of Jocelyn Bell Burnell analyzing chart data, followed by her noticing the anomalous scruff, then the inspection revealing regular pulses, and concluding with the realization that the signal was a pulsar.
The correct order follows a clear chronological progression. First, the context of scanning charts is set. Second, the scanning leads to noticing a strange 'scruff.' Third, closer inspection of this 'scruff' (referred to as 'this anomaly') reveals regular pulses. Fourth, these pulses (referred to as 'the signal') are identified as a pulsar, concluding the narrative.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the sentence that provides the necessary context and setting to begin the paragraph.
The sentence describing Bell Burnell beginning to analyze paper chart data in the summer of 19671967 must go first.
It introduces the time frame, the researcher, and the initial process before any specific discovery is mentioned.
2
Find the sentence that logically transitions from the general data analysis to a specific observation.
The sentence starting with "While scanning the charts" must go second.
It uses the phrase "scanning the charts" to connect directly to the "chart data" introduced in the first sentence, and introduces the anomalous "scruff."
3
Locate the sentence that expands on the details of the specific anomaly observed.
The sentence describing a "closer inspection" of "this anomaly" must go third.
The demonstrative pronoun phrase "this anomaly" has its antecedent in the "strange, recurring 'scruff'" mentioned in the second sentence.
4
Identify the sentence that resolves the paragraph by naming the discovery.
The sentence mentioning the joke about "Little Green Men" and the ultimate identification of the pulsar must go last.
It refers to "the signal" (the regular pulses from the third sentence) and provides the ultimate conclusion to the chronological sequence of the discovery.

Key Concept

Chronological coherence and pronoun-antecedent reference in paragraph organization
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1197Question

The following paragraph is from an essay about maritime archaeology.

[1] For centuries, the ancient Egyptian port city of Thonis-Heracleion was shrouded in myth, buried under the silt of the Mediterranean Sea. [2] Consequently, many scholars doubted whether the legendary trade hub had ever actually existed. [3] In 2000, French archaeologist Franck Goddio made a breakthrough discovery when he located the submerged ruins. [4] Subsequent excavations at the underwater site revealed colossal statues, gold coins, and massive temple structures. [5] These artifacts, remarkably preserved by the marine sediment, provided unprecedented insights into ancient maritime commerce.

The writer wants to add the following sentence to the paragraph:

'Until this discovery, historians had only known of the port through sparse mentions in classical Greek texts.'

To make the paragraph most logical, where should this sentence be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: After Sentence 3

Answer

After Sentence 3
The correct option is the one placing the sentence after Sentence 3. Sentence 3 introduces the 'breakthrough discovery' made by Franck Goddio. Placing the target sentence immediately after Sentence 3 provides the essential antecedent for the phrase 'this discovery' and logically explains the limited state of knowledge that existed before Goddio's work. Furthermore, this placement avoids breaking the cohesive tie between the list of ruins in Sentence 4 and the reference to 'These artifacts' in Sentence 5.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the target sentence to identify structural or logical clues.
The target sentence contains the phrase 'this discovery,' which requires a previously mentioned discovery to serve as its antecedent.
Demonstrative pronouns like 'this' must refer back to a noun or concept introduced immediately prior in the text.
2
Scan the paragraph to locate where a 'discovery' is first introduced.
Sentence 3 introduces the discovery, stating that Franck Goddio made a 'breakthrough discovery' when he located the ruins.
This establishes the necessary context and grammatical antecedent for the phrase 'this discovery.'
3
Check the surrounding sentences to ensure no other logical connections are disrupted.
Sentence 4 lists artifacts ('colossal statues, gold coins, and massive temple structures'), which are referred to in Sentence 5 as 'These artifacts.' Placing the target sentence after Sentence 3 keeps the connection between Sentence 4 and Sentence 5 intact.
Inserting sentences between a list and its demonstrative reference disrupts paragraph cohesion and readability.

Key Concept

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Question 1198Question

Although the summit of Mount Everest is the highest point on Earth, the climb is incredibly perilous. Due to the fact that the weather is extremely cold, climbers must wear specialized gear to prevent frostbite.

Which choice most effectively eliminates wordiness from the underlined portion of the sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Because of the extreme cold,

Answer

Because of the extreme cold,
The correct answer is the most concise option that preserves the original meaning and is grammatically correct. It replaces the wordy clause 'Due to the fact that the weather is extremely cold' with the clear, direct prepositional phrase 'Because of the extreme cold,' smoothly connecting the cause to the main clause of the sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the underlined portion for conciseness and clarity, identifying any unnecessary wordiness or redundancy.
The original phrasing 'Due to the fact that the weather is extremely cold' contains the bloated, wordy phrase 'Due to the fact that' when a simpler transition could be used.
Identifying wordy constructions helps determine which parts of the sentence need simplification.
2
Evaluate the remaining choices to find the most concise option that is grammatically correct and preserves the original meaning.
The option stating 'Because of the extreme cold' conveys the exact same cause-and-effect relationship in a much shorter, more direct manner without introducing grammatical errors or redundant synonyms.
Selecting the most concise and grammatically correct option is the primary goal of this question type on the ACT.

Key Concept

Eliminating Wordiness
Question 1199Question

At Chichén Itzá, the Mayan pyramid known as El Castillo produces a striking acoustic effect: a handclap at the base of the stairs triggers a chirping echo that mimics the sacred quetzal bird. This unique chirping sound is believed by researchers to have been an intentional creation that the ancient architects planned on purpose by designing steps of varying depths.

Which choice most effectively and concisely expresses the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Researchers believe the architects intentionally created this sound by designing steps of varying depths.

Answer

Researchers believe the architects intentionally created this sound by designing steps of varying depths.
The correct option is the most concise and direct way to express the idea. It changes the passive construction 'is believed by researchers' to the active 'Researchers believe' and removes the redundant repetitions of 'planned,' 'intentional,' and 'on purpose,' using only the word 'intentionally' to convey the design's deliberate nature.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify wordiness and redundancy in the underlined text.
The phrase 'is believed by researchers' is passive, and 'intentional,' 'planned,' and 'on purpose' are redundant synonyms.
ACT English prioritizes concise and active phrasing.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
One option introduces a comma splice by joining two independent clauses with a comma, and another introduces a fragment by starting with 'Because' without a main clause.
Eliminating wordiness cannot come at the expense of proper sentence structure.
3
Select the correct option that is both concise and grammatically sound.
The active-voice phrasing stating that 'Researchers believe the architects intentionally created...' is correct.
It removes all passive and redundant phrasing while maintaining complete, correct grammar.

Key Concept

Eliminating Wordiness
Question 1200Question

Located deep inside a sandstone mountain on a remote Norwegian island, the Svalbard Global Seed Vault serves as a fail-safe backup for the world's crop biodiversity. The facility is built to withstand natural disasters and power failures, ensuring the safety of millions of seed samples. [1] Svalbard, an archipelago in the Arctic Ocean, is home to more polar bears than people. In the event of a global catastrophe, scientists could retrieve these genetic samples to restore vital crops. Consequently, the vault represents a critical insurance policy for global food security.

The writer is considering deleting the underlined sentence from the paragraph. Should this sentence be deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Yes, because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife that is tangential to the paragraph's focus on the seed vault.

Answer

Yes, because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife that is tangential to the paragraph's focus on the seed vault.
The option recommending deletion because it introduces a detail about Svalbard's wildlife is correct because the paragraph is specifically focused on the purpose, design, and function of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. The underlined sentence discusses the archipelago's polar bear population, which is a tangential detail that interrupts the focus on crop preservation and agricultural security. Therefore, the sentence should be deleted.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph describes the purpose, durability, and function of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in safeguarding crop biodiversity.
Understanding the paragraph's topic is necessary to evaluate whether any single sentence contributes to that topic.
2
Evaluate the relevance of the underlined sentence to the paragraph's focus.
The underlined sentence discusses the relative population of polar bears to humans on Svalbard. This detail is about local wildlife and human geography, which does not relate to the agricultural function of the seed vault.
Determining relevance requires checking if the sentence supports the main idea or interrupts the flow with tangential information.
3
Determine whether the sentence should be kept or deleted, and select the correct justification.
Since the sentence is irrelevant, it should be deleted. The justification must highlight that the information is tangential to the main topic of the seed vault, making the option stating it is tangential the correct choice.
Both the decision (delete) and the reason (tangential detail) must align to form the correct answer.

Key Concept

Evaluating Relevance for Adding or Deleting Content
PreviousPage 60 / 278Next
All practice questions — ACT | Examkin