Organization, Unity, and Cohesion

302 questions

Question 81Question

When Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE, the intense heat carbonized hundreds of papyrus scrolls in a villa at Herculaneum, leaving them fragile and fused together. For centuries, researchers who tried to physically unroll these charred documents ended up destroying them. Indeed, modern scientists have turned to non-invasive technologies like X-ray phase-contrast tomography to read the text without disturbing the physical structure. This technique can detect the minute difference in thickness between the carbonized ink and the carbonized papyrus, allowing scholars to virtually unroll and read the scrolls.

Which of the following options best replaces the underlined portion to establish a logical transition between the two sentences?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: destroying them; instead, modern

Answer

destroying them; instead, modern
The sentence describes two contrasting methods: the destructive physical unrolling used in the past versus the non-destructive X-ray scanning used today. The transition word 'instead' correctly establishes this contrast. Furthermore, since both clauses are independent, they must be separated by a semicolon when joined by a conjunctive adverb like 'instead'. Therefore, the option with the semicolon and 'instead' is both grammatically and logically correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the logical relationship between the two clauses separated by the transition.
The first clause describes how past physical attempts to unroll the scrolls resulted in their destruction. The second clause describes how modern scientists use non-invasive virtual scanning. These two ideas represent a contrast or a transition from a failed physical approach to a successful modern alternative.
Identifying the logical relationship helps determine the correct transition word category (contrast, addition, illustration, or cause-effect).
2
Evaluate the transition words in the options based on the identified relationship.
'Indeed' and 'Furthermore' are incorrect because they indicate emphasis and addition, respectively, rather than the necessary contrast. 'Instead' is the correct transition because it introduces a contrasting alternative to the destructive physical methods.
Selecting the correct logical connector ensures the coherence of the passage.
3
Verify the punctuation separating the two independent clauses.
Both parts are independent clauses, so they must be separated by a period or a semicolon when using a conjunctive adverb like 'instead'. Using a comma before 'instead' creates a comma splice. The option with a semicolon and 'instead' is grammatically and logically correct.
Ensuring proper punctuation prevents run-on sentences and comma splices.

Key Concept

Selecting logical sentence transitions and joining independent clauses correctly with proper punctuation.
Question 82Question

[1] Until the late twentieth century, marine biologists assumed that all oceanic life ultimately depended on sunlight and photosynthesis for survival. [2] This paradigm was shattered in 1977 when researchers exploring the Galápagos Rift discovered thriving ecosystems surrounding hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor. [3] Instead of utilizing sunlight, these bizarre organisms relied on specialized bacteria that synthesized energy from the toxic chemical compounds spewed by the vents. [4] Such a process, known as chemosynthesis, demonstrated that life could flourish in the complete absence of solar radiation. [5] Today, astrobiologists study these extreme environments to model how life might exist on icy moons like Europa or Enceladus.

The writer wants to insert the following sentence into the paragraph:

'By oxidizing hydrogen sulfide, these microbes produce organic matter, forming the foundation of the vent food web.'

To make the paragraph most logical, where should this sentence be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: before Sentence 4

Answer

before Sentence 4
The correct placement is before the sentence starting with 'Such a process' because 'these microbes' in the inserted sentence refers directly back to the 'specialized bacteria' in the third sentence, and the description of oxidizing hydrogen sulfide explains the chemical reaction that the fourth sentence names 'chemosynthesis'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the target sentence for grammatical and logical markers.
The target sentence contains the plural demonstrative noun phrase 'these microbes' and describes a specific biological process ('oxidizing hydrogen sulfide... produce organic matter').
Identifying these clues helps locate their corresponding referents and context in the paragraph.
2
Find the logical antecedent for the phrase 'these microbes' in the paragraph.
Sentence 3 introduces 'specialized bacteria', which serves as the direct logical antecedent for 'these microbes'.
A pronoun or demonstrative phrase must follow the noun it references to maintain text cohesion.
3
Trace the logical connection for the biochemical process described in the target sentence.
Sentence 4 refers to 'Such a process, known as chemosynthesis'. The target sentence describes the actual chemical process that is named in Sentence 4.
The phrase 'Such a process' requires a prior description of the process to make logical sense.
4
Synthesize the placement position.
Inserting the sentence before Sentence 4 (and after Sentence 3) perfectly connects 'specialized bacteria' to 'these microbes' and provides the process described by 'Such a process' in Sentence 4.
This positioning preserves the logical narrative flow without creating gaps or misplaced references.

Key Concept

Logical sentence placement requires identifying key transitions, tracking pronouns to their antecedents, and placing descriptions of processes immediately before they are referenced or named.
Question 83Question

In 1968, researcher Spencer Silver was working at 3M to develop a super-strong adhesive for the aerospace industry. Instead, he accidentally created a very weak glue that stuck lightly to surfaces, could be easily peeled off, and left no residue behind.

Which choice provides the most logical transition at the underlined portion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: NO CHANGE

Answer

The transition that indicates contrast ('Instead') is correct because the second sentence describes an unexpected, opposite result to the goal mentioned in the first sentence.
The correct transition is 'Instead' because it accurately communicates a contrast. The writer contrasts Spencer Silver's goal of developing a strong adhesive with his accidental creation of a weak glue.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the first sentence and the second sentence.
The first sentence describes the goal (creating a super-strong adhesive), while the second sentence describes the actual, contrasting result (creating a very weak glue).
Transitions must reflect the logical connection between the clauses they connect.
2
Evaluate the transition category needed.
Since the outcome is the opposite of the intended goal, a contrast transition is required.
Contrast transitions like 'instead' or 'however' signal that the second statement contradicts or qualifies the first.
3
Compare the choices to identify the correct transition.
Only 'Instead' establishes a contrast relationship, while the other options indicate addition, cause-effect, or illustration.
Choosing the transition that matches the logical relationship ensures sentence-level cohesion.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 84Question

[1] In the early twentieth century, astronomer A.E. Douglass sought to understand the relationship between sunspot cycles and Earth's climate. [2] However, he realized that reliable meteorological records extended back only a few decades. [3] To overcome this limitation, Douglass began analyzing the growth rings of ancient trees, noting that wider rings indicated wet years and narrower ones indicated dry years. [4] This innovative technique, which he named dendrochronology, soon expanded beyond climate science. [5] Archaeological remains of prehistoric dwellings, for instance, could now be dated with annual precision by matching their timber rings to the master sequence. [6] By comparing these patterns across regional samples, he constructed a continuous, year-by-year chronological record.

To make the paragraph flow most logically, where should Sentence 6 be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: After Sentence 3

Answer

After Sentence 3
Placing the sentence after Sentence 3 is correct because it ensures that 'these patterns' immediately follows the description of the growth rings (wider and narrower rings) in Sentence 3. Furthermore, constructing a chronological record is the final step in developing the methodology before it is formally named 'dendrochronology' in Sentence 4 and applied to other fields in Sentence 5.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the logical markers and pronoun clues in the target sentence, Sentence 6.
The phrase 'these patterns' must refer back to a previously described set of patterns, and the pronoun 'he' must refer to a male individual (A.E. Douglass).
Tracking logical and pronoun indicators is crucial to finding where the sentence connects to the rest of the text.
2
Locate the description of the patterns and the individual referred to in the paragraph.
Sentence 3 describes the patterns of 'wider rings' and 'narrower ones' in tree growth, and introduces A.E. Douglass's methodology.
This establishes Sentence 3 as the source of the reference for 'these patterns'.
3
Evaluate the placement of Sentence 6 immediately after Sentence 3 to see if it maintains chronological and thematic coherence.
Placing Sentence 6 after Sentence 3 creates a logical sequence: analyzing rings -> constructing a master chronological record by comparing patterns -> naming the technique dendrochronology (Sentence 4) -> applying the technique to archaeology (Sentence 5).
This positioning ensures a smooth transition from basic data collection to the synthesis of a master timeline, and finally to its broader scientific applications.

Key Concept

Logical sentence placement in a paragraph is determined by transition words, pronoun antecedents, and chronological or thematic flow.
Question 85Question

When conservators at the museum began analyzing the seventeenth-century Dutch landscape painting, they noticed several patches of dark, distorted color. Over the centuries, layers of soot and yellowed varnish had accumulated on the canvas, obscuring the artist's original work. [1] The team decided to use a modern, non-invasive laser technique to clean the delicate surface.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that introduces the specific technical challenge of removing aged debris without stripping away the historical paint itself. Which of the following choices most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Traditional liquid solvents could easily penetrate the cracked varnish and dissolve the underlying oil pigments.

Answer

Traditional liquid solvents could easily penetrate the cracked varnish and dissolve the underlying oil pigments.
The correct choice is the option discussing traditional liquid solvents penetrating cracked varnish and dissolving underlying oil pigments. This sentence is grammatically correct and successfully fulfills the rhetorical goal by identifying the specific danger that traditional cleaning methods present to the original paint layers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal requested by the prompt.
The target sentence must introduce a technical challenge of removing debris (cleaning the painting) without harming the historical paint itself.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
The option starting with 'Because' is a fragment. The option using a semicolon creates a punctuation error by separating a dependent clause. The option with 'process, they' is a comma splice. Only the option discussing traditional liquid solvents is grammatically correct.
Eliminating grammatically incorrect options is a crucial step in ACT English.
3
Evaluate the remaining grammatically correct option against the rhetorical goal.
The option explaining that traditional liquid solvents could penetrate the varnish and dissolve the underlying oil pigments directly states the technical challenge of cleaning without damaging the paint itself.
This confirms that the grammatically correct option also fulfills the specific writing goal.

Key Concept

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 86Question

[1]
In 1856, Eunice Foote, an American scientist and women's rights campaigner, conducted a series of simple yet groundbreaking experiments. Using an air pump, two glass cylinders, and four thermometers, she tested the effects of sunlight on different gases. She discovered that a cylinder filled with carbon dioxide became much hotter than one filled with common air, and that it took far longer to cool down.

[2]
Consequently, Foote’s contributions were largely overlooked for over a century, while John Tyndall, an Irish physicist who published similar findings three years later, was long credited with discovering the greenhouse effect. It was not until 2011, when a retired geologist stumbled upon Foote’s paper in an annual scientific journal from 1856, that her pioneering role was finally recognized.

[3]
Based on her observations, Foote reached a prophetic conclusion. She wrote that an atmosphere of carbon dioxide would give our Earth a high temperature, effectively describing the fundamental mechanism of what we now call the greenhouse effect.

[4]
However, despite the significance of her findings, Foote was not permitted to read her own paper at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science; instead, it was read aloud by a male colleague.

To make the essay most logical and cohesive, where should Paragraph 2 be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: after Paragraph 4

Answer

after Paragraph 4
The correct answer is the option that places Paragraph 2 after Paragraph 4. This order establishes a logical progression: Paragraph 1 introduces the experiment, Paragraph 3 details the prophetic conclusion reached from the observations in Paragraph 1, Paragraph 4 describes how Foote was barred from presenting those findings, and Paragraph 2 concludes by stating that 'Consequently' (due to this lack of presentation and recognition) her contributions were overlooked for a century.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the transition words and reference pronouns at the beginning of each paragraph to determine the logical relationships.
Paragraph 2 begins with the transition 'Consequently,' signaling a cause-and-effect relationship. Paragraph 3 begins with 'Based on her observations,' which directly refers to the experimental observations detailed in Paragraph 1. Paragraph 4 begins with 'However, despite the significance of her findings,' which references the conclusions mentioned in Paragraph 3.
Identifying transition markers and pronoun references helps establish the relative order of paragraphs.
2
Determine the correct logical sequence of the other paragraphs to see where Paragraph 2 fits best.
Paragraph 1 introduces the experiments. Paragraph 3 details the observations and conclusion. Paragraph 4 explains the barrier she faced in presenting these findings (she was not allowed to read them). The logical sequence is Paragraph 1, followed by Paragraph 3, followed by Paragraph 4.
Establishing the core sequence ensures that we can place the misplaced paragraph where it logically links cause and effect.
3
Determine where the transition in Paragraph 2 ('Consequently, Foote’s contributions were largely overlooked...') logically fits.
The fact that Foote was not allowed to read her own paper (Paragraph 4) is the direct cause of her contributions being overlooked in favor of John Tyndall (Paragraph 2). Thus, Paragraph 2 must follow Paragraph 4.
This positioning creates a cohesive chronological and cause-and-effect flow for the essay.

Key Concept

Paragraph Reordering and Placement
Question 87Question

Located in the heart of the city, the community garden serves as a vibrant green space for residents. Volunteers gather every Saturday to plant seeds, pull weeds, and harvest fresh vegetables. [X] This collaborative effort has not only beautified the neighborhood but has also fostered a strong sense of community among the participants.

The writer wants to add a sentence at this point (indicated by [X]) that emphasizes the diverse backgrounds of the volunteers who participate in the garden. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: People of all ages and occupations, from young children to retired teachers, work side by side.

Answer

The correct option is the sentence stating that people of all ages and occupations work side by side, as it is grammatically correct and directly describes the diverse backgrounds of the participants.
The sentence describing people of all ages and occupations working side by side is grammatically correct and directly addresses the writer's goal of highlighting the diverse backgrounds of the garden's volunteers by specifying their different ages and professions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the rhetorical goal specified in the prompt.
The goal is to choose a sentence that emphasizes the diverse backgrounds of the volunteers.
This establishes the criteria for evaluating the choices based on their content.
2
Evaluate the choices for grammatical correctness.
Three options contain grammatical errors: one is a comma splice, one is a sentence fragment, and one misuse of a semicolon.
ACT English questions require the chosen answer to be grammatically correct.
3
Select the correct option that meets both the grammatical and rhetorical requirements.
The option describing people of all ages and occupations is correct and error-free.
It fulfills the writing goal of emphasizing diversity while maintaining proper sentence structure.

Key Concept

Fulfilling specific rhetorical goals requires choosing an option that is both grammatically correct and directly aligned with the requested purpose.
Question 88Question

The following passage is an excerpt from an essay about medieval European architecture. Read the passage and answer the question that follows.

Many architectural historians credit the invention of the flying buttress to the builders of Notre-Dame de Paris in the late twelfth century [1] , indeed, early versions of these external arched supports can be found in much older Byzantine and Romanesque structures across Europe, albeit in a less prominent form.

Which of the following alternatives to the underlined portion is grammatically correct and establishes the most logical transition between the two clauses?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: . However, early

Answer

The option that starts a new sentence with '. However, early' is correct because it avoids a comma splice and provides the correct contrast transition.
The correct option correctly uses a period to separate the two independent clauses, resolving the comma splice. It also uses the transition 'However' to establish the appropriate logical relationship of contrast between the common historical belief and the older physical evidence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the two clauses separated by the underlined portion.
The first clause states that historians credit the invention of the flying buttress to the builders of Notre-Dame in the late twelfth century. The second clause states that older versions exist in Byzantine and Romanesque structures. This is a contrast relationship.
Determining the correct transition category is necessary to choose the right transition word.
2
Examine the grammatical structure of the sentence.
Both clauses are independent and can stand alone as complete sentences. Joining them with only a comma and a conjunctive adverb creates a comma splice.
Identifying independent clauses helps determine the required punctuation to avoid run-on sentences or comma splices.
3
Evaluate the choices based on both logical transition and grammatical correctness.
The option using '. However, early' correctly uses a period to prevent a comma splice and the contrast word 'However' to show the contradiction.
The correct answer must satisfy both logical coherence and standard grammatical rules.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions and Punctuation of Independent Clauses
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 89Question

The following passage is an excerpt from an essay about nineteenth-century science.

In the mid-nineteenth century, Irish physicist John Tyndall set out to study the radiative properties of gases, aiming to understand how the atmosphere traps heat. He expected that the most abundant atmospheric gases, nitrogen and oxygen, would be the primary absorbers of solar radiation, [1] furthermore, his rigorous testing demonstrated that these dominant gases were virtually transparent to infrared rays, while trace gases like water vapor and carbon dioxide absorbed heat greedily.

Which choice provides the most logical transition between the two clauses while maintaining correct sentence structure?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: radiation. Instead, his

Answer

radiation. Instead, his
The correct option correctly uses a period to separate the two independent clauses and uses the contrast transition 'Instead' to connect the scientist's expectation with the contradictory results of his experiment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between the two connected clauses.
The first clause describes Tyndall's expectation that nitrogen and oxygen would absorb the most heat. The second clause reveals the experimental result: these dominant gases were transparent, while trace gases were the actual absorbers. This represents a contrast/contradiction relationship.
Identifying the logical relationship determines the category of transition word needed.
2
Identify correct transition words for a contrast relationship.
Transitions like 'instead', 'however', or 'rather' fit a contrast relationship. Transitions like 'furthermore' (addition) and 'consequently' (cause-effect) are logically incorrect.
Eliminating incorrect transition types narrows down the choices.
3
Examine the grammatical punctuation required to connect two independent clauses.
Since both clauses are independent, they must be separated by a period, a semicolon, or a comma combined with a coordinating conjunction. Joining them with only a comma and a conjunctive adverb creates a comma splice.
Punctuation rules prevent run-on sentences and comma splices.
4
Combine logical and grammatical constraints to select the correct option.
The option with a period followed by the contrast transition 'Instead' is the only choice that is both grammatically correct and logically coherent.
Ensuring both syntax and logical cohesion are correct yields the final answer.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Question 90Question

Read the following passage and answer the question.

Many scientists initially believed that the deep ocean floor was completely devoid of life. Consequently, the discovery of hydrothermal vents in 1977 revealed thriving ecosystems powered by chemical energy rather than sunlight.

Which of the following choices provides the most logical transition in the underlined portion of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: However,

Answer

The transition 'However,' is the correct choice because it establishes the necessary contrasting relationship between the two sentences.
The correct answer correctly uses the transition 'However' to show contrast. This fits the context because the second sentence presents a discovery (thriving ecosystems) that directly contradicts the initial belief mentioned in the first sentence (devoid of life).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Read both sentences to identify their core ideas.
The first sentence establishes that scientists believed the deep ocean floor was lifeless, while the second sentence describes the discovery of thriving ecosystems on the deep ocean floor.
Understanding the content of both sentences is necessary to determine how they relate to one another.
2
Analyze the logical relationship between the two sentences.
The two ideas are in opposition; the second sentence contradicts the expectation established in the first sentence. This requires a transition that shows contrast.
Identifying the correct relationship (contrast) allows you to eliminate incorrect transition types (cause-effect, addition, illustration).
3
Evaluate the choices to find the transition that expresses contrast.
The transition word 'However' expresses contrast. Transitions like 'Consequently' and 'Furthermore' show cause-effect and addition, which do not fit.
Choosing the word that represents contrast restores the logical flow of the passage.

Key Concept

Sentence-Level Transitions
Estimated Time:45s
Question 91Question

The following sentences are from a draft of an essay about ancient acoustics. Arrange the sentences to form a cohesive paragraph that logically transitions from introducing the Theater of Epidaurus to explaining the scientific basis for its unique acoustic properties.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with the introduction of the Theater of Epidaurus, followed by the historical debate over its acoustics, the introduction of the 2007 research study, the findings of that study regarding the filtering effect of the limestone seats, and finally the practical impact of this filtering on the audience.
The correct paragraph order flows logically from general context to a specific mystery, then to a scientific study investigating that mystery, the specific findings of that study, and finally the real-world implication of those findings. Cohesive links such as 'this enduring mystery' pointing back to the debate, 'Their study' pointing to the researchers, and 'By filtering out' referencing the acoustic filter ensure a smooth, coherent progression.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing the Theater of Epidaurus and its reputation for acoustic clarity must come first to establish the topic.
Readers require the subject to be introduced before exploring any mysteries or scientific investigations related to it.
2
Connect the introduction to the historical problem.
The sentence describing the centuries-long debate about how the actors' voices carry is placed second.
This establishes the central question or mystery that subsequent research will attempt to solve.
3
Identify the transition to modern scientific investigation.
The sentence introducing the 2007 study is placed third.
It uses the demonstrative phrase 'this enduring mystery' to refer directly back to the debate mentioned in the second sentence.
4
Determine the placement of the study's findings.
The sentence explaining how the limestone seats act as a filter is placed fourth.
It begins with 'Their study,' which uses a pronoun that must immediately follow the introduction of the researchers in the third sentence.
5
Establish the concluding impact.
The sentence describing the result of the acoustic filtering is placed last.
It begins with 'By filtering out,' which directly references the 'acoustic filter' mechanism established in the fourth sentence, summarizing the ultimate effect on the audience.

Key Concept

Fulfilling rhetorical goals of organization and cohesion requires arranging sentences so that each sentence logically connects to the preceding one through explicit transitions, pronoun referents, and topic development.
Question 92Question

The following paragraphs are from a draft of an essay about the preservation of the Terracotta Army. For the sake of the logic and cohesion of this essay, arrange the paragraphs in the most logical order.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order of the paragraphs is: the introduction to the Terracotta Army, the explanation of the lacquer painting technique, the description of how exposure caused flaking, and the summary of the scientific treatment used to stop the degradation.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and causal progression: the introduction of the Terracotta Army, the description of how the lacquer base was applied to achieve that realism, the explanation of how this lacquer became a vulnerability during excavation, and finally the collaborative scientific solution to halt the degradation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'In 1974, farmers...' is selected as the first paragraph.
It introduces the topic of the Terracotta Army and does not rely on any preceding transition phrases or pronouns.
2
Find the paragraph that transitions from the introduction's mention of vibrant colors.
The paragraph starting with 'To achieve this vibrant realism...' is placed second.
The transition 'this vibrant realism' refers directly to the colorful 'lifelike spectacle' described in the final sentence of the first paragraph.
3
Find the paragraph that explains the vulnerability mentioned at the end of the second paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'This vulnerability became apparent...' is placed third.
The opening words 'This vulnerability' refer back to the 'greatest vulnerability during modern excavation' introduced in the previous paragraph.
4
Place the paragraph containing the resolution.
The paragraph starting with 'Recognizing the urgency...' is placed fourth.
It refers to 'this rapid degradation' (referring to the flaking described in the third paragraph) and provides the scientific solution, bringing the essay to a logical conclusion.

Key Concept

Logical paragraph reordering using transition words, cohesive phrases, and pronoun-antecedent reference links.
Question 93Question

The following sentences are from a paragraph about the history of green fluorescent protein (GFP). Arrange these sentences in the most logical sequence to form a cohesive, unified paragraph, ensuring that the introduction and conclusion are placed effectively.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological and logical order of the paragraph is: the discovery of the protein in the jellyfish, the realization decades later of its fusion capabilities and naming it GFP, the description of how expressing this tag allowed live cell visualization, the subsequent revolution of specific scientific fields, and the concluding summary of its global biotechnology legacy.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and logical progression. It begins by introducing the discovery of the bioluminescent protein in 1962. It then transitions decades later to the formal naming of GFP and the discovery of its genetic fusion. Next, it explains the mechanism of expressing this tag to visualize cells. After that, it details the specific scientific fields revolutionized by this imaging breakthrough. Finally, it concludes with a summary of GFP's global legacy as a biotechnology powerhouse.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing the initial 1962 isolation of the protein from the jellyfish is the only option that does not rely on prior context, establishing the subject of the paragraph.
An effective introduction must establish the topic and set the baseline context for subsequent sentences.
2
Establish the next chronological step using transitions.
The sentence starting with 'Decades later' transitions from the 1962 discovery to the formal naming of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the realization of its genetic fusion potential.
Logical flow relies on transitions that link ideas chronologically and introduce terms before they are referenced.
3
Find the sentence that elaborates on the mechanism of fusion.
The sentence starting with 'By successfully expressing this glowing tag' directly expands on the genetic fusion technique, explaining how it enables live visualization.
Paragraph unity requires details about a mechanism to immediately follow the introduction of that mechanism.
4
Identify the impact of the visualization technique.
The sentence starting with 'This non-invasive imaging breakthrough' names the specific fields (neurobiology and oncology) that were revolutionized by the live visualization technique.
Information should flow from general capability to specific real-world applications.
5
Determine the concluding sentence.
The sentence starting with 'Ultimately' provides a high-level summary of the entire transition from jellyfish discovery to biotechnological powerhouse.
A strong conclusion synthesizes the paragraph's details and emphasizes the overall significance of the subject.

Key Concept

Opening and Concluding Sentences
Question 94Question

The following paragraphs are from an essay about the origin of the ice cream cone. Arrange the paragraphs in the most logical order to make the essay cohesive.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The logical order of the paragraphs is: first the introduction of Arnold Fornachou and the 1904 World's Fair setting; second, the description of Fornachou's dish shortage and the introduction of Ernest Hamwi; and third, the description of Hamwi rolling a waffle to create the ice cream cone.
The correct order follows a clear chronological and logical progression. The essay begins by introducing the setting of the 1904 World's Fair and the ice cream seller Arnold Fornachou. The second paragraph introduces a conflict (running out of dishes) using the contrasting transition 'However' and introduces the neighbor Ernest Hamwi. The final paragraph resolves this conflict by showing how Hamwi used his waffles to create the cone, referencing Hamwi by name and the waffles introduced previously.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory paragraph.
The paragraph starting with 'In the summer of 1904...' is identified as the introduction.
It establishes the time, place, and main subject (Arnold Fornachou) without relying on any external references.
2
Find the paragraph that introduces a conflict or problem related to the introduction.
The paragraph beginning with 'However, Fornachou's success...' is placed next.
It uses the transition word 'However' to contrast Fornachou's success mentioned in the first paragraph with a new problem, and introduces Ernest Hamwi.
3
Locate the paragraph that resolves the conflict.
The paragraph starting with 'Hamwi rolled...' is placed last.
It references 'Hamwi' and 'his warm waffles' (which were introduced in the second paragraph) and describes the solution to the dish shortage.

Key Concept

Identifying logical transitions, chronological order, and clear pronoun/noun references between paragraphs to ensure cohesion.
Question 95Question

The writer wants to organize the following sentences into a cohesive paragraph that introduces the Montreal Biosphere, details its physical structure, explains the engineering solution used to support it, and concludes with its modern significance. Arrange the sentences in the correct order to fulfill this goal.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The paragraph should begin with introducing the dome, followed by its physical description, the mathematical solution to its weight distribution, and finally its modern significance.
The correct order begins by introducing the dome, describes its physical structure, explains the engineering principle used to support it, and concludes with its modern significance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the introductory sentence.
The sentence introducing the dome serves as the topic sentence.
A logical paragraph must first establish the subject (the Montreal Biosphere) before providing specific structural details.
2
Identify the sentence detailing physical structure.
The sentence describing the steel lattice and acrylic skin follows the introduction.
This details the specific construction of the geodesic dome mentioned in the introduction.
3
Identify the engineering solution.
The sentence about using interlocking triangles to support the vast space follows the structural details.
This explains how the physical structure (the geodesic dome) is mathematically supported without internal columns.
4
Identify the concluding sentence.
The sentence starting with 'Today' concludes the paragraph.
This provides a natural transition to the modern legacy of the Biosphere, wrapping up the paragraph's discussion.

Key Concept

Fulfilling specific rhetorical goals through logical paragraph organization.
Question 96Question

Paragraph 1

[1] In the mid-twentieth century, Russian linguist Yuri Knorozov proposed that the ancient Maya writing system was logo-syllabic, meaning it combined symbols representing whole words with symbols representing phonetic syllables. [2] He demonstrated that the glyphs could be read by matching the sounds of spoken Mayan words to specific signs. [3] This skepticism delayed widespread acceptance of his breakthrough for nearly thirty years, during which Mayan epigraphy remained largely stagnant. [4] Decades later, however, researchers built upon his insights to systematically crack the remainder of the writing system. [5] Today, Knorozov is widely celebrated for having revolutionized our understanding of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica.

The writer wants to add the following sentence to the paragraph:

*However, this phonetic approach was initially dismissed by Western scholars who believed the glyphs were strictly logographic.*

To make the paragraph most logical, this sentence should be placed:

Show answer & explanation

Answer: after Sentence 2

Answer

after Sentence 2
Placing the sentence after Sentence 2 is correct because the new sentence refers to 'this phonetic approach,' which has its logical antecedent in Sentence 2 (where Knorozov demonstrates matching spoken sounds to signs). Additionally, the new sentence mentions that the approach 'was initially dismissed,' which provides the necessary referent for the phrase 'This skepticism' at the beginning of Sentence 3. Placing the sentence here creates a cohesive logical bridge between Knorozov's demonstration and the subsequent delay in acceptance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the target sentence for logical and grammatical clues.
The target sentence contains the transition 'However' and the demonstrative phrase 'this phonetic approach,' indicating it must follow a sentence that describes or defines a phonetic method.
Identifying cohesive markers helps narrow down the placement based on antecedent information.
2
Evaluate the existing sentences in the paragraph to find the antecedent for 'this phonetic approach'.
Sentence 2 describes Knorozov demonstrating that glyphs could be read by 'matching the sounds of spoken Mayan words to specific signs,' which is the phonetic approach.
This establishes that the target sentence must be placed somewhere after Sentence 2.
3
Examine the paragraph for other missing logical connections or unresolved pronouns.
Sentence 3 begins with 'This skepticism,' but there is no mention of skepticism, doubt, or dismissal in Sentences 1 or 2.
This indicates that a sentence introducing skepticism must be inserted immediately before Sentence 3.
4
Verify the logical flow of the entire paragraph with the new sentence inserted.
Inserting the target sentence after Sentence 2 resolves both connections: Sentence 2 defines the phonetic approach, the target sentence describes its dismissal (skepticism), and Sentence 3 explains the consequences of that skepticism.
Ensuring the placement maintains a smooth, coherent narrative flow.

Key Concept

Sentence Reordering and Placement
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 97Question

The following paragraph is from an essay about the history of the pencil:

[1] The first pencils were developed in England during the sixteenth century, following the discovery of a massive graphite deposit. [2] Locals quickly realized that this newly found material was excellent for marking their sheep. [3] Because graphite is naturally soft and messy, people soon began wrapping the graphite sticks in string or wood. [4] Today, pencils are manufactured globally using a refined blend of graphite and clay.

The writer wants to add the following sentence to the paragraph:

"This protective casing kept the dark graphite from staining the writer's fingers."

To make the paragraph most logical, where should this sentence be placed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: After Sentence 3

Answer

After Sentence 3
Placing the sentence after Sentence 3 is correct because the phrase 'this protective casing' refers directly to the action of 'wrapping the graphite sticks in string or wood' described in Sentence 3. This placement maintains a clear logical flow by immediately explaining the purpose and benefit of the wrapping before transitioning to the modern pencil manufacturing described in Sentence 4.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key logical marker in the sentence to be inserted.
The phrase 'This protective casing' is a demonstrative noun phrase that requires a previously mentioned 'casing' or 'wrapping' to serve as its antecedent.
Tracking pronouns and demonstrative adjectives is the most reliable way to find the correct placement of a sentence.
2
Scan the paragraph to locate where a 'casing' or 'wrapping' is first introduced.
Sentence 3 mentions that people 'began wrapping the graphite sticks in string or wood.' This is the only reference to a casing in the paragraph.
Locating the antecedent establishes the necessary context before the new sentence can be introduced.
3
Insert the sentence after the identified antecedent and verify the flow of the paragraph.
Placing the sentence after Sentence 3 allows 'this protective casing' to immediately refer to the string or wood wrapping. The paragraph then flows smoothly into Sentence 4, which discusses modern pencils.
Verifying the overall coherence ensures that the insertion does not disrupt the narrative flow or create logical gaps elsewhere.

Key Concept

Sentence reordering and placement relies on identifying logical connectors, transition words, and pronoun-antecedent relationships to position a sentence where its references are clear.
Question 98Question

Although the impact of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption on global temperatures is well-documented, its influence on nineteenth-century British art remains a subject of debate. Some art historians argue that the vibrant, crimson sunsets in William Ashcroft’s pastel drawings from the mid-1880s were direct records of the volcanic aerosols that dispersed worldwide.

[1] Ashcroft, who resided in Chelsea, London, created thousands of these quick sketches from his west-facing window, starting just months after the cataclysm.

Others, however, contend that his palette was merely a continuation of a pre-existing British aesthetic tradition of dramatic twilight scenes, suggesting the volcanic dust was coincidental to his style.

The writer is considering deleting Sentence 1 (marked by [1]) from the passage. Should the sentence be kept or deleted?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Kept, because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects.

Answer

Kept, because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects.
The correct choice is to keep the sentence because it provides essential geographical and chronological context that supports the argument that Ashcroft’s work recorded the eruption’s actual atmospheric effects. The details that he painted in London (showing the global reach of the volcanic dust) and began just months after the eruption (when the atmospheric aerosols would still be present) are critical pieces of evidence for the historians who argue his art was a literal record.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main idea and focus of the paragraph.
The paragraph discusses a debate among art historians regarding whether William Ashcroft's mid-1880s sunset drawings literally recorded the atmospheric effects of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption or were simply stylistic choices.
Understanding the paragraph's focus is necessary to determine whether the sentence in question contributes to or detracts from that focus.
2
Evaluate the specific information provided in Sentence 1.
Sentence 1 states where Ashcroft painted (Chelsea, London), how he painted (from his west-facing window), and when he started (just months after the eruption).
This step identifies the exact evidence and context the sentence adds to the passage.
3
Determine the logical connection between Sentence 1 and the surrounding arguments.
The timing ('just months after') is critical because volcanic aerosols in the atmosphere are temporary; sketches created long after would not be direct records. The location (London) shows that the effects were visible globally. Therefore, the sentence provides essential support for the argument that the drawings were direct records.
This establishes the rhetorical function of the sentence, proving it should be kept.
4
Evaluate the justifications in the options to find the correct match.
The choice proposing to keep the sentence because of geographical and chronological context matches our analysis. The other options mischaracterize the text or the paragraph's focus.
This eliminates the distractors and confirms the correct option.

Key Concept

Evaluating relevance for adding or deleting content based on paragraph focus and evidentiary support
Question 99Question

The following paragraph is from an essay about the decipherment of ancient scripts:

[1] For decades after their discovery in 1900, the clay tablets of Knossos remained an indecipherable enigma, their script dubbed "Linear B" by archaeologists. [2] Believing that the key lay in mathematical analysis rather than guesswork, classicist Alice Kober meticulously cataloged symbol frequencies on thousands of hand-cut index cards. [3] Her focus eventually narrowed to grammatical inflections, the shifts in word endings that denote grammatical relationships. [4] These grammatical variations, which scholars later named "Kober's triplets," provided the first concrete proof that the script represented an inflected language. [5] By arranging these related characters into a grid, she was able to map relationships between phonetic values long before the script was deciphered.

The writer wants to add the following sentence to the paragraph:
"Specifically, she documented instances where a root word appeared in three distinct variations depending on its grammatical function."

To make this paragraph most logical, this sentence should be placed after which sentence?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Sentence 3

Answer

Sentence 3
The correct answer is the option indicating placement after Sentence 3. Placing the sentence here provides a logical transition. The word 'Specifically' in the target sentence narrows the focus from the general concept of 'grammatical inflections' in Sentence 3 to a detailed explanation of the three variations of a root word. Crucially, the target sentence introduces the 'three distinct variations' that serve as the required antecedent for 'These grammatical variations, which scholars later named "Kober's triplets"' in Sentence 4.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the target sentence for logical, grammatical, and transition clues.
The target sentence contains the transition word 'Specifically' and mentions 'three distinct variations' of a root word, which indicates it must follow a general sentence about grammatical changes and precede a sentence referencing those variations.
Identifying transition words and reference pronouns helps locate where a sentence fits structurally in a paragraph.
2
Identify the sentences in the passage that introduce the general concept of grammatical changes and those that reference specific groups or variations.
Sentence 3 introduces 'grammatical inflections, the shifts in word endings,' which is the general concept. Sentence 4 begins with 'These grammatical variations, which scholars later named "Kober's triplets,"' which is a specific group of three variations.
Finding the general concept and its subsequent reference points narrows down the potential insertion locations.
3
Evaluate the placement of the target sentence between Sentence 3 and Sentence 4.
Placing the target sentence here allows 'Specifically' to elaborate on the 'shifts in word endings' from Sentence 3, and provides the necessary antecedent ('three distinct variations') for the phrase 'These grammatical variations, which... named "Kober's triplets"' in Sentence 4.
Verifying that the target sentence resolves grammatical references and maintains smooth transitions confirms the correct position.

Key Concept

Sentence placement relies on using transition words, identifying pronoun-antecedent relationships, and maintaining a logical progression from general concepts to specific details.
Question 100Question

A scientist studying the rainforest canopy drafted the following paragraph:

For decades, biologists studying the tropical rainforest had to rely on observations made from ground level, which offered only a limited view of the ecosystem. [1] However, the development of canopy cranes in the 1990s allowed researchers to easily ascend into the treetops. This new access opened up a previously unreachable world, revealing that the majority of rainforest organisms actually live high above the ground.

The writer wants to add a sentence at Point [1] that emphasizes the physical difficulty of climbing into the rainforest canopy before the invention of canopy cranes. Which choice most effectively accomplishes this goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: To reach the treetops, researchers had to use strenuous and dangerous rope-climbing methods.

Answer

To reach the treetops, researchers had to use strenuous and dangerous rope-climbing methods.
The choice describing the strenuous and dangerous rope-climbing methods is correct because it directly addresses the physical challenge of climbing into the canopy before cranes were invented, fulfilling the writer's specific rhetorical goal while maintaining grammatical correctness and an appropriate academic tone.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt to identify the specific rhetorical goal.
The goal is to find a sentence that highlights the physical difficulty of climbing into the forest canopy prior to the introduction of canopy cranes.
Understanding the specific rhetorical constraint guides the selection of the correct detail.
2
Evaluate the choices for factual alignment with the rhetorical goal and grammatical correctness.
The option describing strenuous and dangerous rope-climbing methods is grammatically correct and focuses entirely on the physical challenges of climbing.
The correct choice must satisfy both rhetorical intent and standard grammar rules.

Key Concept

Fulfilling Specific Rhetorical and Writing Goals
PreviousPage 5 / 16Next
Organization, Unity, and Cohesion Practice Questions — ACT — Page 5 | Examkin