Arguments and Evidence

83 questions

Question 81Question

In recent years, urban planners in Southgate have advocated for replacing traditional asphalt roads with permeable paver blocks. Proponents claim that this transition will dramatically reduce urban runoff by allowing rainwater to filter directly into subsurface aquifers, thereby preventing seasonal street flooding. Their argument relies on pilot study data demonstrating that newly installed permeable pavers absorb up to eighty percent of surface water. Based on these findings, the city council recently approved a major capital project to pave all high-traffic downtown avenues with permeable blocks.

However, environmental engineer Dr. Aris Thorne argues that this initiative will not achieve its intended flood mitigation goals. Thorne points out that permeable pavers require specialized high-pressure vacuuming every three months to clear fine sediment from the gaps; otherwise, silt accumulation reduces water infiltration to the level of standard asphalt within eighteen months. Because Southgate's public works department currently possesses only conventional street sweepers and lacks the budgetary funds to purchase specialized vacuuming machinery, Thorne concludes that the new paving project will ultimately fail to alleviate downtown flooding.

Dr. Thorne's conclusion that the project will fail to alleviate downtown flooding depends on which of the following unstated assumptions?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Southgate's public works department cannot maintain the pavers' permeability through alternative equipment or non-budgetary service arrangements.

Answer

Dr. Thorne's argument relies on the unstated assumption that the public works department cannot maintain the pavers' permeability through alternative equipment or non-budgetary service arrangements.
The correct option identifies the necessary logical bridge between Dr. Thorne's premises (lack of public works budget for specialized machinery) and his conclusion (the project will fail). If Southgate could obtain maintenance through outside grants, equipment sharing, or third-party contractors without using public works purchasing funds, the pavers could be maintained and the project would succeed. Thus, the argument indispensably assumes no such alternatives exist.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's main conclusion
Dr. Thorne concludes that Southgate's project to install permeable pavers will fail to alleviate downtown flooding.
Understanding the exact conclusion is necessary before identifying the assumptions supporting it.
2
Analyze the stated premises offered in support of the conclusion
Premise 1: Pavers require specialized vacuuming to stay permeable. Premise 2: Standard sweepers are ineffective. Premise 3: The public works budget lacks funds to buy specialized sweepers.
Unstated assumptions are unmentioned logical bridges between the stated premises and the conclusion.
3
Determine what logical gap must be bridged for the argument to hold
If the city could secure alternative equipment, borrow machinery, or contract out maintenance without using public works capital funds, the pavers would not clog and the project would not fail.
The conclusion of guaranteed failure relies on assuming that no such alternative solutions or non-budgetary arrangements are possible.

Key Concept

Identifying Unstated Assumptions in Arguments
Question 82Question

Recent studies in cognitive linguistics demonstrate that native speakers of languages with grammatical gender—such as German or Spanish—frequently attribute gender-stereotyped adjectives to inanimate objects. For instance, when asked to describe a key, German speakers (for whom 'key' is masculine) often select words like 'hard' and 'heavy,' whereas Spanish speakers (for whom 'key' is feminine) prefer words like 'golden' and 'intricate.' Based on these findings, educational researchers have proposed replacing traditional foreign language instruction in primary schools with gender-neutral artificial languages. Proponents argue that eliminating grammatical gender from early language acquisition will effectively prevent children from forming subconscious gender biases regarding human professional roles. Consequently, they claim this curriculum reform is essential for building a more egalitarian society.

Which of the following represents an unstated assumption upon which the proponents' argument for curriculum reform depends?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The subconscious cognitive associations formed between grammatical gender and inanimate objects transfer to how individuals perceive human social roles.

Answer

The argument relies on the unstated assumption that subconscious cognitive associations formed between grammatical gender and inanimate objects transfer to how individuals perceive human social roles.
The correct answer identifies the essential logical connection missing between the passage's evidence and its conclusion. The passage provides evidence solely regarding how grammatical gender influences descriptions of inanimate objects (keys), yet concludes that removing grammatical gender will prevent biases regarding human professional roles. For this evidence to support the conclusion, the author must assume that the mental association between linguistic gender and inanimate objects directly affects how people evaluate human social roles.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's primary conclusion.
The conclusion is that eliminating grammatical gender in early language instruction will prevent children from developing subconscious gender biases regarding human professional roles.
Understanding the ultimate claim is necessary to analyze what premises are required to support it.
2
Identify the explicit evidence provided in the passage.
The evidence shows that grammatical gender affects how speakers describe inanimate objects (e.g., a key).
Comparing the explicit evidence to the conclusion reveals the missing logical connection.
3
Determine the logical bridge needed between the evidence and the conclusion.
To connect evidence about inanimate objects to a conclusion about human professional roles, the author must assume that gender perceptions of inanimate objects influence perceptions of human roles.
Without this assumption, evidence about inanimate objects provides no support for claims about human social bias.

Key Concept

Identifying Unstated Assumptions in Argumentation
Question 83Question

Based on the passage below, match each of the claims regarding the function of zebra stripes with its corresponding evidence or status of support.

Passage

For decades, biologists hypothesized that the zebra’s bold black-and-white stripes functioned primarily as a cooling mechanism, generating micro-currents of air across the animal's skin. However, recent empirical studies have challenged this thermoregulation claim. Researchers led by Dr. Alison Cobb measured the skin temperatures of wild zebras and found no significant difference in cooling efficiency compared to uniform-colored herbivores in the same environment. Instead, experimental evidence increasingly supports the hypothesis that stripes serve to deter biting flies. In controlled field tests, scientists covered horse models with various patterned rugs. They observed that tabanid flies (horseflies) attempted to land on striped surfaces far less frequently than on solid-colored ones. High-speed video analysis revealed that the flies failed to decelerate properly when approaching stripes, suggesting that the pattern disrupts their visual processing during landing. While some researchers still argue that stripes may also disrupt predator tracking by creating a motion dazzle effect, the physical deterrence of disease-carrying insects stands as the claim with the most robust experimental backing to date.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

The claim that zebra stripes function as a cooling system (thermoregulation)
The claim that zebra stripes deter biting flies by disrupting landing
The claim that zebra stripes protect against predators through a motion dazzle effect

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Thermoregulation matches with skin temperature measurements; fly deterrence matches with high-speed video of flies failing to decelerate; and predator protection matches with lack of robust experimental backing.
Each claim is correctly matched with its specific evidence or support status: the cooling hypothesis is paired with wild zebra skin temperature measurements; the fly deterrence claim is paired with video evidence of fly landing failures; and the predator defense hypothesis is paired with the note that it lacks robust backing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the claim regarding thermoregulation and locate the corresponding evidence in the text.
The text states that researchers measured wild zebras' skin temperatures and found no difference from uniform-colored herbivores, which directly addresses the cooling/thermoregulation claim.
To connect the claim about cooling to its specific empirical test.
2
Identify the claim regarding fly deterrence and locate the corresponding evidence in the text.
The text details controlled tests with horse models and high-speed video analysis showing tabanid flies failing to decelerate properly when approaching stripes.
To connect the insect deterrence claim to its supporting observational and video evidence.
3
Identify the claim regarding predator defense and determine its status in the passage.
The text describes the predator tracking (motion dazzle) claim as a continuing argument but explicitly notes that the physical deterrence of insects has the most robust experimental backing, leaving the motion dazzle claim as currently lacking such robust support.
To distinguish a hypothesis with limited evidence from those with active empirical support.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Claims from Evidence
Estimated Time:2m 0s
PreviousPage 5 / 5
Arguments and Evidence Practice Questions — ACT — Page 5 | Examkin