Interpolation and Extrapolation

2 questions

Question 1Question

A group of microbiologists measured the enzymatic reaction rate (RR, in nmol/minmg\text{nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}) of a newly discovered halophilic bacterial strain across various salinity levels (SS, in parts per thousand, ppt) at three fixed temperatures (20C20^\circ\text{C}, 30C30^\circ\text{C}, and 40C40^\circ\text{C}). The results are recorded in the table below.

Salinity (SS, ppt)Rate at 20C20^\circ\text{C}Rate at 30C30^\circ\text{C}Rate at 40C40^\circ\text{C}
1014.022.010.0
2020.032.016.0
3026.042.022.0
5038.062.034.0

Based on linear interpolation and extrapolation of the data trends, arrange the four estimated reaction rates described below in order from lowest to highest.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct order from lowest to highest estimated reaction rate is: the estimated rate at 30C30^\circ\text{C} and 5 ppt5\text{ ppt} (17.0 nmol/minmg17.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}), followed by the estimated rate at 40C40^\circ\text{C} and 25 ppt25\text{ ppt} (19.0 nmol/minmg19.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}), followed by the estimated rate at 20C20^\circ\text{C} and 60 ppt60\text{ ppt} (44.0 nmol/minmg44.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}), and finally the estimated rate at 30C30^\circ\text{C} and 40 ppt40\text{ ppt} (52.0 nmol/minmg52.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}).
To place the estimated rates in correct order from lowest to highest, calculate each value using the constant linear rates of change shown in the table. At 30C30^\circ\text{C} and 5 ppt5\text{ ppt}, extrapolating below 10 ppt10\text{ ppt} yields 17.0 nmol/minmg17.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}. At 40C40^\circ\text{C} and 25 ppt25\text{ ppt}, interpolating halfway between 2020 and 30 ppt30\text{ ppt} yields 19.0 nmol/minmg19.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}. At 20C20^\circ\text{C} and 60 ppt60\text{ ppt}, extrapolating above 50 ppt50\text{ ppt} yields 44.0 nmol/minmg44.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}. At 30C30^\circ\text{C} and 40 ppt40\text{ ppt}, interpolating halfway between 3030 and 50 ppt50\text{ ppt} yields 52.0 nmol/minmg52.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}. Comparing these numerical values (17.0<19.0<44.0<52.017.0 < 19.0 < 44.0 < 52.0) produces the correct sequence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the linear relationship (slope) for each temperature column.
For 20C20^\circ\text{C}, the rate increases by 0.6 nmol/minmg0.6\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg} per ppt salinity. For 30C30^\circ\text{C}, the rate increases by 1.0 nmol/minmg1.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg} per ppt salinity. For 40C40^\circ\text{C}, the rate increases by 0.6 nmol/minmg0.6\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg} per ppt salinity.
Establishing the rate of change allows calculation of values between existing data points (interpolation) and beyond existing data points (extrapolation).
2
Calculate the numerical value for each item.
Item 1 (30C,40 ppt30^\circ\text{C}, 40\text{ ppt}): 42.0+10(1.0)=52.0 nmol/minmg42.0 + 10(1.0) = 52.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}.
Item 2 (20C,60 ppt20^\circ\text{C}, 60\text{ ppt}): 38.0+10(0.6)=44.0 nmol/minmg38.0 + 10(0.6) = 44.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}.
Item 3 (40C,25 ppt40^\circ\text{C}, 25\text{ ppt}): 16.0+5(0.6)=19.0 nmol/minmg16.0 + 5(0.6) = 19.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}.
Item 4 (30C,5 ppt30^\circ\text{C}, 5\text{ ppt}): 22.05(1.0)=17.0 nmol/minmg22.0 - 5(1.0) = 17.0\text{ nmol/min}\cdot\text{mg}.
Obtaining exact numerical estimates enables precise relative comparison.
3
Sort the items by calculated value from lowest to highest.
17.017.0 (Item 4) < 19.019.0 (Item 3) < 44.044.0 (Item 2) < 52.052.0 (Item 1).
Direct numerical comparison determines the correct sequence.

Key Concept

Interpolation and Extrapolation of Data Trends
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 2Question

Materials engineers measured the electrical conductivity (σ\sigma, in 106 S/m10^6\text{ S/m}) of a copper-nickel alloy at various temperatures (TT, in K). The measured values are recorded in the table below:

Temperature (TT, K)Electrical Conductivity (σ\sigma, 106 S/m10^6\text{ S/m})
30014.2
40011.8
5009.4
6007.0
7004.6

Based on the data, if the linear relationship between temperature and electrical conductivity continues beyond 700 K700\text{ K}, what is the predicted electrical conductivity of the alloy at 800 K800\text{ K}?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 2.2×106 S/m2.2 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}

Answer

The predicted electrical conductivity at 800 K800\text{ K} is 2.2×106 S/m2.2 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}.
The electrical conductivity decreases by a constant rate of 2.4×106 S/m2.4 \times 10^6\text{ S/m} for every 100 K100\text{ K} increase in temperature. At 700 K700\text{ K}, the conductivity is 4.6×106 S/m4.6 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}. Extrapolating to 800 K800\text{ K} requires subtracting 2.4×106 S/m2.4 \times 10^6\text{ S/m} from 4.6×106 S/m4.6 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}, giving 2.2×106 S/m2.2 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the change in electrical conductivity per 100 K100\text{ K} temperature increase.
Between 300 K300\text{ K} and 400 K400\text{ K}, conductivity decreases by 14.211.8=2.4×106 S/m14.2 - 11.8 = 2.4 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}. Checking other intervals confirms a constant rate of 2.4×106 S/m-2.4 \times 10^6\text{ S/m} per 100 K100\text{ K}.
Establishing the linear rate of change is necessary for linear extrapolation.
2
Apply the linear trend to extrapolate from 700 K700\text{ K} to 800 K800\text{ K}.
4.62.4=2.2×106 S/m4.6 - 2.4 = 2.2 \times 10^6\text{ S/m}.
Extrapolation involves extending the observed trend by one temperature interval (100 K100\text{ K}) beyond the measured range.

Key Concept

Linear Extrapolation
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Interpolation and Extrapolation Practice Questions — ACT | Examkin