Read the following passage carefully:
"Mother’s insistence on keeping the conservatory damp was, she claimed, a necessity for the Peruvian ferns, though we all knew it was merely her way of preserving the illusion of growth in a house otherwise yielding to rot. She spent her afternoons there, writing letters to distant cousins who had long since ceased to reply, her pen scratching against the heavy parchment with the frantic energy of a trapped bird. I told her repeatedly that the dampness was ruining the baseboards—that the dry rot from the parlor would soon migrate to the joists—but she only smiled that vague, maddening smile of hers and remarked that some things are worth more than structural integrity. It was a typical display of her disregard for practical matters, a stubbornness that she masqueraded as artistic sensitivity. When the floorboards in the hallway finally buckled, she looked at the warped oak not with regret, but with a kind of quiet triumph, as if the house itself were agreeing with her assessment of our family’s decline. I have already contacted the builders, of course. Someone must maintain the boundaries of reality in this family, even if it means dismantling the very walls she has spent thirty years trying to damp-proof against the intrusion of common sense."
The narrator’s reliability in her account of the family dynamic is chiefly undermined by which of the following?
- Adetailed recount of the chronological steps she took to hire builders to repair the buckled floorboards
- Bmoral condemnation of a parent who is actively and maliciously trying to bankrupt the family
- obsession with physical utility, which prevents her from recognizing the emotional refuge her mother has constructedAnswer
- Dalignment with the author's critique of characters who value sentimental attachment over domestic safety
- Eaccurate diagnosis of her mother's psychological instability and the danger it presents to the household