"To coerce the Indians, and to drive them from their lands... would be an option that is both expensive and unjust. The United States, instead of waging an expensive war of extirpation, should establish a system of justice and humanity towards the Native inhabitants, purchasing their lands through formal treaties rather than seizing them by conquest."
— Henry Knox, Secretary of War, report to President George Washington, 1789
Which of the following developments in the 1790s most directly contradicted the policy toward Native Americans advocated by Knox in the excerpt?
- AThe inability of the federal government to raise taxes to support military defense on the frontier under the Articles of Confederation.
- BThe implementation of Federalist policies that permanently banned westward migration to preserve the eastern labor force for manufacturing.
- The deployment of federal military forces to defeat the Western Confederacy in the Ohio Country.Answer
- DThe efforts of Democratic-Republicans to block the annexation of western territories in order to limit the expansion of slavery.
Answer
The deployment of federal military forces to defeat the Western Confederacy in the Ohio Country.
The correct option is correct because Knox explicitly argued against using military force ('coercion') and conquest to acquire Native American lands, suggesting instead a system of treaties and purchases. The deployment of federal military forces to engage and defeat the Western Confederacy in the Northwest Indian War (culminating in the Battle of Fallen Timbers in 1794) directly contradicted this recommendation by using military defeat to force land concessions in the Treaty of Greenville.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Federal frontier policy, military conflict with Native Americans, and the transition from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution.