In 1895, the Supreme Court ruled in *In re Debs* that the federal government had the authority to issue an injunction to end the Pullman Strike, citing the government's duty to prevent obstructions to interstate commerce and the transit of the mail. This ruling and the government's actions during the strike best support which of the following conclusions about the Gilded Age?
- The federal government frequently intervened in industrial disputes to support business owners and protect corporate interests over labor demands.Answer
- BThe federal government maintained a strict policy of laissez-faire, refusing to interfere in conflicts between private corporations and labor unions.
- CIndustrial conflicts were primarily resolved through the regulatory reforms enacted by urban middle-class Progressive reformers.
- DThe federal government intervened to protect the constitutional rights of workers under the newly ratified Reconstruction Amendments.
Answer
The federal government frequently intervened in industrial disputes to support business owners and protect corporate interests over labor demands.
The correct answer is correct because federal actions during the Pullman Strike—such as using the Sherman Antitrust Act against unions, dispatching federal troops, and issuing court injunctions—demonstrated that the state was willing to use its authority to suppress labor strikes and protect corporate property and interstate commerce. This was part of a consistent pattern of government intervention on behalf of employers during Gilded Age labor disputes.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The role of the federal government in Gilded Age labor disputes
Estimated Time:1m 30s