"The strong arm of the national government may be put forth to brush away all obstructions to the freedom of interstate commerce or the transportation of the mails. If the emergency arises, the army of the Nation, and all its militia, are at the service of the Nation to compel obedience to its laws."
— Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer, *In re Debs*, 1895
The judicial assertion in the excerpt most directly challenged which of the following ideas about the late nineteenth-century United States economy?
- AThe argument that the Populist movement was the only major faction advocating for the federal regulation of industrial corporations.
- The belief that the federal government adhered to a policy of strict laissez-faire neutrality in economic disputes.Answer
- CThe idea that the Market Revolution had permanently resolved the division of labor between skilled artisans and unskilled factory workers.
- DThe belief that the Fourteenth Amendment protected the collective bargaining rights of industrial laborers from state and federal interference.
Answer
The belief that the federal government adhered to a policy of strict laissez-faire neutrality in economic disputes.
The correct answer is correct because the federal government's intervention in the Pullman Strike (and the Supreme Court's subsequent ruling in *In re Debs*) clearly demonstrated that the state was not a neutral observer in economic conflicts. By issuing injunctions and deploying federal troops to break the strike, the government actively supported the interests of railroad corporations, thereby directly challenging the prevailing Gilded Age belief in strict laissez-faire capitalism.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The active role of the federal government in supporting business interests and suppressing labor unrest during the Gilded Age, which contradicted the ideology of pure laissez-faire capitalism.