Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims

Although proponents of government price caps on essential prescription drugs argue that such measures are vital to protect low-income patients from exorbitant healthcare costs, economic analysts point out that artificial price ceilings drastically reduce the projected revenue from newly developed therapies. Consequently, pharmaceutical companies will inevitably divert their funding away from high-risk, groundbreaking drug discovery toward safer, incremental modifications of existing medications. Because long-term therapeutic progress relies fundamentally on pioneering research rather than minor product iterations, implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes.

Which of the following best expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

  1. A
    Government price caps on essential prescription drugs are effective mechanisms for ensuring low-income patients can access necessary medical treatment.
  2. B
    Artificial price ceilings significantly lower the financial returns that drug companies expect to earn from developing new medical therapies.
  3. C
    Pharmaceutical firms will respond to drug price controls by shifting research investments away from breakthrough discovery toward minor medicine modifications.
  4. Enacting strict government regulation on prescription drug prices will in the long run prove detrimental to overall public health.Answer
  5. E
    Abolishing price controls on prescription drugs would guarantee a rapid increase in the development of pioneering healthcare therapies.

Answer

Enacting strict government regulation on prescription drug prices will in the long run prove detrimental to overall public health.
The correct answer accurately states the author's final claim: that implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes. The preceding sentences detail how price caps reduce revenue, leading pharmaceutical companies to shift R&D to safer modifications, which in turn leads to the overall negative impact on public health.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify structural indicators and separate premises from conclusions.
The word 'Although' introduces a counter-perspective ('protect low-income patients'), followed by supporting evidence regarding reduced revenues and R&D shift.
Understanding the structural flow reveals which claims serve as support and which serves as the destination of the argument.
2
Distinguish between intermediate conclusions and the ultimate final claim.
The claim that firms will shift funding away from discovery is supported by revenue evidence, but itself supports the final sentence introduced by 'will ultimately undermine...'.
The main conclusion is the claim for which all other statements in the passage provide support, directly or indirectly.
3
Select the option that accurately paraphrases the ultimate final claim.
The final claim asserts that implementing strict price caps on prescription drugs will ultimately undermine public health outcomes.
The correct paraphrase directly captures this final judgment without overstating its scope.

Key Concept

Identifying the Main Conclusion by distinguishing it from premises, concessions, and intermediate conclusions.
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Main Conclusions and Final Claims

More questions from this topic