Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation

176 questions

Question 121Question

To address declining attendance, the city history museum recently eliminated its admission fee, expecting the policy to attract first-time visitors. Six months after the policy took effect, total monthly attendance figures were identical to those recorded during the same period in the previous year. Museum administrators concluded that free admission failed to attract first-time visitors because local residents simply lack interest in regional history.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the administrators' conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: During the six-month period following the policy change, major road construction rendered the museum's primary parking area inaccessible, causing a sharp drop in visits by regular patrons.

Answer

The statement regarding road construction rendering the parking area inaccessible weakens the conclusion by demonstrating that total attendance could remain flat even if first-time visitor numbers increased.
The conclusion relies on equating flat total attendance with a failure to attract first-time visitors. The correct option demonstrates that regular patron attendance dropped significantly due to parking accessibility issues. Consequently, total attendance could remain unchanged even if a substantial number of first-time visitors responded to the free admission offer, thereby exposing a flaw in the administrators' reasoning.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise: Total attendance remained identical before and after eliminating entry fees. Conclusion: Free admission failed to attract first-time visitors because local residents lack interest.
Understanding the logic gap requires clearly isolating what evidence was used to justify the conclusion.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that no other factor reduced attendance among existing regular visitors during the same six-month period.
If regular attendance dropped simultaneously, total attendance numbers could mask a rise in first-time visitors.
3
Evaluate the correct weakening option
The option noting that road construction disrupted parking and caused a sharp drop in regular patrons shows that first-time visitor numbers could have increased while total attendance stayed constant.
Demonstrating an offsetting decline in another segment of visitors breaks the link between static overall attendance and the supposed failure to attract new visitors.

Key Concept

Evaluating alternative causes and offsetting variables in causal argument evaluation
Question 122Question

To reduce its overall operational expenditures, a commercial food distribution company plans to replace its fleet of diesel-powered refrigerated delivery trucks with electric refrigerated trucks. Company directors base this strategy on data demonstrating that electric delivery vehicles incur significantly lower per-mile energy and routine maintenance expenses than diesel vehicles. Which of the following would be most useful to evaluate in order to determine whether implementing the plan will achieve the company's goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether the continuous power demand of the refrigeration units reduces the battery lifespan of the electric trucks enough to require costly battery pack replacements prior to the end of the vehicles' intended operational service.

Answer

Determining whether the continuous power demand of the refrigeration units reduces battery lifespan enough to require costly battery pack replacements before the end of the vehicles' operational service.
The correct answer identifies a factor that directly impacts whether the projected operating savings will be realized. Under the Variance Test: if the refrigeration units rapidly degrade the electric truck batteries, the substantial cost of recurring battery replacements will exceed the per-mile energy and routine maintenance savings, defeating the plan's goal. Conversely, if battery life is not severely compromised, the expected cost reductions will occur. Because opposing answers to this question dictate whether the plan succeeds or fails, this information is critical for evaluation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the plan and the stated goal
The plan is to replace diesel refrigerated trucks with electric refrigerated trucks. The goal is to reduce overall operational expenditures.
Evaluating a plan requires clear identification of the proposed mechanism and the intended outcome.
2
Identify the underlying assumption of the plan
The plan assumes that lower per-mile energy and routine maintenance costs for electric vehicles will translate into lower net operating costs overall.
Plans fail if hidden, unconsidered expenses offset projected cost savings.
3
Apply the Variance Test to evaluate useful information
If refrigeration units cause premature battery failure, battery replacement costs will negate energy and maintenance savings (plan fails). If refrigeration units do not significantly degrade battery life, projected savings will materialize (plan succeeds).
An information item is relevant to plan evaluation if opposite answers to the underlying question produce opposite conclusions about the plan's success.

Key Concept

Evaluating Plans and Strategies using the Variance Test
Question 123Question

To combat fraudulent crop loss claims, a national agricultural insurer plans to require all policyholders to submit high-resolution satellite imagery of their farmland taken immediately before and after any reported severe weather event. The insurer reasons that comparing these images will enable claims adjusters to verify whether physical crop damage actually occurred as a direct result of the weather event, thereby eliminating payouts for pre-existing crop degradation or unverified losses.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the insurer's plan depends?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: High-resolution satellite imagery can provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing crop degradation from physical damage caused by a severe weather event.

Answer

The insurer's plan relies on the assumption that high-resolution satellite imagery can provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing crop degradation from physical damage caused by a severe weather event.
The conclusion asserts that comparing satellite images will eliminate payouts for pre-existing crop degradation by verifying whether damage resulted directly from a weather event. For this verification process to work, the satellite images must possess sufficient resolution and detail to differentiate between crop degradation present before the storm and new damage caused by the storm. If the images cannot distinguish between these two states, adjusters cannot verify causality, and the plan fails. Therefore, this statement is a necessary unstated assumption.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into premises and main conclusion.
Premise: Insurers will require satellite imagery immediately before and after severe weather. Premise: Adjusters will compare images to verify if damage was directly caused by the storm. Conclusion: The plan will eliminate payouts for pre-existing degradation or unverified losses.
Identifying the logic gap requires clearly isolating what the premises establish versus what the conclusion claims.
2
Identify the unstated logical gap between the premise and conclusion.
The premises state that images will be compared, but assume that comparing these images actually enables adjusters to tell pre-existing damage apart from new weather damage.
An assumption is an unstated premise required to bridge the gap between the evidence provided and the outcome claimed.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm logical necessity.
Negated statement: 'High-resolution satellite imagery CANNOT provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing degradation from weather damage.' If true, comparing images fails to verify causality, shattering the conclusion that fraudulent payouts will be eliminated.
If the negated version of a choice causes the argument to collapse, that choice is a strictly necessary assumption.

Key Concept

Identifying Unstated Assumptions using the Negation Test
Estimated Time:1m 50s
Question 124Question

To reduce long-term municipal energy expenses, the city of Varna plans to replace standard double-pane glass with advanced electrochromic smart glass across all municipal office buildings. The smart glass automatically darkens in response to intense sunlight, significantly reducing the energy needed to power air-conditioning systems during warm months. City planners estimate that the resulting energy savings will fully offset the initial purchase and installation costs within four years. Therefore, the planners conclude that adopting smart glass will reduce the city's total administrative operating costs over the next ten years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the planners' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Electrochromic smart glass blocks a substantial portion of natural visible light when darkened, requiring office buildings to run internal electric lighting at full capacity during daylight hours.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that electrochromic smart glass blocks natural visible light when darkened, forcing municipal office buildings to run internal electric lighting at full capacity during daylight hours.
The correct answer identifies a major counterproductive side effect of the proposed plan. If the smart glass reduces natural light entry when darkened, artificial lighting must be operated at full capacity during peak daylight hours. This added electrical load directly offsets the energy saved on air conditioning, undermining the planners' conclusion that total administrative operating costs will decrease over the ten-year period.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Smart glass darkens in sunlight, reducing summer air-conditioning energy use. Premise: Energy savings offset purchase and installation costs in 4 years. Conclusion: Smart glass installation will reduce total administrative operating costs over 10 years.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion reveals the core assumption.
2
Identify the central unstated assumption
The planners assume that reducing air-conditioning energy use will yield a net reduction in overall energy expenses without creating offsetting operational costs during the 10-year timeframe.
A plan-to-goal argument relies on the assumption that hidden side effects or secondary costs will not negate the projected benefits.
3
Evaluate the impact of new factual information
If darkening the glass necessitates running electric lights at full capacity throughout the day, the electricity cost for lighting increases significantly whenever air-conditioning savings occur, negating the expected net cost reduction.
Showing a direct, counteracting financial cost undermines the conclusion that net administrative expenses will decline.

Key Concept

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Causal Argument via Unintended Side Effects
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 125Question

To combat declining commuter usage of its central passenger rail system, a metropolitan transit authority plans to introduce free high-speed Wi-Fi service on all trains. Municipal officials reason that providing internet access will allow passengers to work productively during travel, thereby persuading individuals who currently drive to work to switch to commuting by train. Which of the following would be most useful to determine in evaluating the likelihood that the transit authority's plan will succeed?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether a substantial proportion of automobile commuters refrain from using the rail system primarily because they cannot work while commuting.

Answer

Determining whether a substantial proportion of automobile commuters refrain from using the rail system primarily because they cannot work while commuting is most useful for evaluating the plan.
The correct answer evaluates the primary mechanism of the plan. The transit authority's goal is to convert automobile commuters into train passengers by allowing them to work on board. For this plan to succeed, the inability to work while traveling must be a key reason drivers currently choose cars over trains. Evaluating this factor directly tests the validity of the authority's core strategy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the plan and its stated goal.
Plan: Install free high-speed Wi-Fi on trains. Goal: Persuade automobile commuters to switch to rail transit by enabling them to work during their commute.
Evaluating a plan requires understanding the causal link between the proposed action and the intended outcome.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption connecting the plan to the goal.
The plan assumes that a lack of Wi-Fi / inability to work during travel is a primary reason drivers currently avoid taking the train.
If the targeted audience does not value working during travel or drives for unrelated reasons, the incentive will fail to change their behavior.
3
Apply the Variance Test to the correct option.
If YES (drivers avoid trains due to inability to work), the plan removes the main barrier and succeeds. If NO (drivers avoid trains due to schedules, cost, or location), Wi-Fi will not persuade them and the plan fails.
Answering this question in opposite directions yields opposite conclusions regarding the plan's success, confirming its utility.

Key Concept

Evaluating Plans and Useful Information
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Question 126Question

To reduce cargo loss from food spoilage during long-distance transport, a logistics firm plans to equip all its refrigerated trucks with automated high-precision humidity sensors. The firm argues that because elevated humidity is the primary catalyst for mold proliferation in boxed produce, real-time sensor alerts allowing drivers to manually open external air vents whenever humidity spikes will significantly lower the rate of produce spoilage. Which of the following, if true, most undermines the reasoning behind the logistics firm's plan?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Opening external air vents during highway transit introduces ambient outdoor moisture and road dust into the cargo bay, creating optimal conditions for rapid mold spore activation inside the produce packaging.

Answer

The statement that opening external air vents during highway transit introduces ambient outdoor moisture and road dust into the cargo bay, creating optimal conditions for rapid mold spore activation inside produce packaging.
The correct answer identifies a fatal flaw in the plan's execution mechanism. The author assumes that opening external vents when humidity spikes will lower spoilage. However, if opening those vents introduces outside moisture and dust that actively accelerates mold spore activation inside the packaging, taking the planned action will actually increase or exacerbate produce spoilage rather than reduce it.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise, plan, and central assumption.
Premise: Elevated humidity causes mold proliferation in boxed produce. Plan: Install real-time humidity sensors so drivers can open external air vents when humidity spikes. Conclusion: This plan will significantly lower produce spoilage.
Identifying the unstated assumption is essential for evaluating argument validity.
2
Identify the core underlying assumption of the plan.
The argument assumes that opening external air vents when humidity spikes will successfully lower internal humidity without introducing new factors that promote mold growth.
Weakening questions targeting plans typically break the connection between the action taken and the desired goal.
3
Evaluate the impact of introducing new evidence on the central assumption.
If opening the vents introduces ambient moisture and dust that activates mold spores inside the packaging, the proposed action directly causes the exact harm it was designed to prevent.
Showing that an action produces a counterproductive side effect directly undermines the feasibility of achieving the stated goal.

Key Concept

Plan-to-Goal Causal Breakdown and Counterproductive Side Effects
Question 127Question

To reduce financial losses caused by perishable produce spoilage, a regional supermarket chain plans to replace its standard delivery trucks with high-speed refrigerated vans, cutting transit time from distribution warehouses to retail stores by 40 percent. Company executives argue that because fruits and vegetables degrade continuously while in transit, this faster transport schedule will significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils before reaching store shelves. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the executives' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The vast majority of produce spoilage occurs during backroom holding periods at retail stores prior to shelf placement due to inadequate store refrigeration capacity.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that the vast majority of produce spoilage occurs during backroom holding periods at retail stores prior to shelf placement due to inadequate store refrigeration capacity.
The executives assume that transit time is a major driver of overall produce spoilage before shelf placement. The correct option demonstrates that the vast majority of spoilage happens after transit while produce waits in store backrooms with poor refrigeration. Because transit is not the primary point of failure, cutting transit time will not significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Produce degrades continuously during transit, and high-speed vans will reduce transit time by 40%. Conclusion: Faster transport will significantly decrease the proportion of produce that spoils before reaching shelves.
Understanding the precise logical link between the premise (transit time reduction) and the conclusion (spoilage reduction) is required to identify unstated assumptions.
2
Identify the central assumption.
The argument assumes that transit duration is a primary cause of total pre-shelf spoilage, and that eliminating transit time will substantially impact total spoilage rates.
A weakening statement must target this underlying assumption by showing that transit time reduction will not produce the expected outcome.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that undermines the central assumption.
The correct choice reveals that the primary location of spoilage is backroom store holding areas, not transit. Thus, reducing transit time leaves the main source of spoilage completely unaddressed.
Demonstrating an unaddressed major bottleneck undermines the claim that the plan will achieve its intended goal.

Key Concept

Plan-to-Goal Weakening and Bottleneck Identification
Question 128Question

To reduce urban air pollution and traffic congestion, the municipality of Ardenville plans to construct a light-rail line connecting its dense outer suburbs to the commercial downtown core. City planners argue that because traveling by light rail generates significantly fewer carbon emissions per passenger-mile than driving a private automobile, building the light-rail system will lead to a net decrease in Ardenville's total commuter-related carbon emissions over the next decade.

Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating the validity of the city planners' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether a substantial proportion of the projected light-rail passengers will consist of individuals who currently commute by walking or cycling rather than by driving private automobiles.

Answer

Determining whether a substantial proportion of projected light-rail passengers previously walked or cycled rather than drove private automobiles is most useful for evaluating the argument.
The correct answer directly tests the core assumption of the argument using the Test of Variance. The planners claim that total carbon emissions will fall because light rail emits less per passenger-mile than private cars. However, if the new ridership is drawn primarily from people who currently produce zero emissions by walking or biking, adding a light-rail system will add new emissions to the environment, causing total emissions to increase. Conversely, if riders are drawn almost entirely from car commuters, total emissions will fall. Because extreme answers to this question yield opposite outcomes for the argument's validity, it is the crucial information to determine.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Light rail produces fewer emissions per passenger-mile than private automobiles. Conclusion: Constructing a light-rail system will decrease Ardenville's total commuter-related emissions.
Identifying the logic leap between relative emissions per passenger-mile and total net emissions.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that light-rail riders will primarily be drawn from high-emission private automobile drivers, not zero-emission pedestrians or cyclists.
If riders shift from zero-emission modes to light rail, overall emissions will rise despite the light rail being cleaner than automobiles.
3
Apply the Test of Variance to the correct option
Answering 'Yes' to whether riders come from walking/cycling undermines the conclusion (emissions increase). Answering 'No' supports the conclusion (emissions decrease).
Opposite extreme answers produce opposite impacts on the validity of the conclusion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Argument Validity and Test of Variance
Question 129Question

A pharmaceutical company plans to transition from traditional synthetic batch processing to enzyme-catalyzed continuous-flow processing to manufacture its primary hypertension medication. In small-scale laboratory trials, continuous-flow processing achieved a 40 percent reduction in raw material waste and required significantly shorter reaction times per production run. Based on these findings, company management concluded that implementing continuous-flow processing on a commercial scale will substantially reduce the overall per-unit manufacturing cost of the medication. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the management's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The specialized enzymes required for continuous-flow processing degrade rapidly under high-volume pressure in commercial reactors, necessitating frequent and costly replacement.

Answer

The conclusion is most weakened by the finding that the specialized enzymes degrade rapidly under high-volume commercial pressure, requiring frequent and expensive replacements that offset raw material savings.
The correct answer demonstrates that scaling up the continuous-flow process introduces a substantial operational expense—frequent, costly enzyme replacement—that was not present or impactful during small-scale laboratory trials. This directly undermines management's assumption that laboratory savings will translate into overall per-unit cost reductions at the commercial level.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and main conclusion of the argument.
Premises: Small-scale trials of continuous-flow processing reduced raw material waste by 40% and shortened reaction times. Conclusion: Full commercial implementation will significantly lower overall per-unit manufacturing costs.
Understanding the logic gap between small-scale lab success and commercial financial viability is key to finding the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in the reasoning.
The argument assumes that the cost benefits observed in small-scale trials will not be negated by new, unexpected expenses that arise when scaling up to commercial production.
To weaken a plan-to-cost argument, look for a factor that introduces significant new costs unique to full-scale operations.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that breaks the central assumption.
The statement regarding rapid enzyme degradation under commercial pressure identifies a severe recurring cost unique to commercial scaling that directly neutralizes the efficiency gains.
This hidden operational drawback demonstrates that total per-unit manufacturing costs may actually rise rather than fall.

Key Concept

Weakening a Causal / Plan-to-Cost Argument via Unintended Scaling Costs
Question 130Question

A corporate strategy consultant presented the following argument to executive leadership: 'Over the past two years, every department within our software development division that adopted flexible core working hours recorded a 25 percent increase in annual project delivery rate. By contrast, departments in the same division that maintained rigid, fixed-office schedules demonstrated no increase in delivery rate. Therefore, mandating flexible core working hours across our risk management division will guarantee a similar increase in productivity.'

Statement: The consultant's reasoning is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it assumes a policy correlated with productivity gains in one specialized operational environment will automatically produce identical results in a fundamentally different operational setting.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True. The argument commits a flaw of unwarranted extrapolation across different operational contexts.
The statement accurately pinpoints the argument's flaw. The author takes evidence from software development and applies it directly to risk management without establishing that the two divisions function similarly enough for the policy to have the same effect.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument premises and conclusion.
Premise: Flexible hours correlated with +25% delivery rate in software development. Conclusion: Mandating flexible hours in risk management will guarantee a similar increase.
Understanding the gap between the evidence domain and the target domain is essential for identifying reasoning vulnerabilities.
2
Analyze the logical leap between premise and conclusion.
The author assumes that because flexible hours worked in software development, they are sufficient to produce the same result in risk management.
Extrapolating results from one group or setting to a non-equivalent group without justification constitutes a scope shift flaw.
3
Evaluate the statement against the identified flaw.
The statement asserts that the argument relies on the unwarranted assumption that a policy successful in one specialized environment will yield identical results in a different setting, which matches the core flaw.
Determining whether the description of the flaw is accurate.

Key Concept

Extrapolation and Scope Shift Flaws
Question 131Question

To reduce patient wait times for critical care, a hospital network plans to replace its manual paper triage system with an automated algorithmic triage program. In a preliminary trial, the software analyzed patient vital signs and symptom checklists in under 15 seconds, compared to the 8 minutes required by triage nurses. Hospital management concludes that implementing this software across all its emergency departments will significantly decrease the average time critical-care patients wait before receiving treatment from an emergency physician. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the hospital management's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Hospital safety rules require an attending emergency physician to manually verify and sign off on any algorithm-generated triage score before a patient can be transferred to a critical care bed.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement that hospital safety rules mandate an attending emergency physician to manually verify and sign off on algorithm-generated triage scores before transferring patients to critical care.
The argument assumes that reducing triage time from 8 minutes to 15 seconds will decrease overall wait times for critical-care patients. The option pointing out mandatory physician sign-off before transfer introduces a procedural dependency on physician availability. Because physicians must clear the triage result before transfer occurs, the delay is simply shifted to physician sign-off availability, directly undermining the conclusion that overall wait times will decrease.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise: Automated software triages patients in 15 seconds vs. 8 minutes for nurses. Conclusion: Implementing software will reduce average wait times for critical-care patients before seeing a physician.
The conclusion relies on the unstated assumption that saving time at the initial triage intake stage directly translates into faster overall access to a physician.
2
Formulate the central assumption
The argument assumes no downstream procedural bottlenecks will offset or eliminate the time saved during the 15-second triage phase.
To weaken a plan-to-goal argument, an option must show that an unstated obstacle or side effect prevents the plan from achieving its stated goal.
3
Evaluate the choices for a weakening factor
Mandating physician sign-off on the automated score prior to transfer introduces a bottleneck tied directly to physician availability, undermining the time savings.
If patients cannot proceed until a busy physician signs off, the total wait time to receive critical care remains constrained by physician availability rather than initial triage speed.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments - Uncovering Downstream Bottlenecks
Question 132Question

To bolster its regional commercial shipping sector, the port authority of City X recently instituted a substantial reduction in dockage fees for all international cargo vessels. Over the subsequent six months, the total volume of freight passing through the city's port increased by 25 percent. Based on this outcome, the port authority's director concluded that reducing dockage fees is a reliable strategy for any municipal port seeking to expand its international shipping volume.

The director's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it...

Show answer & explanation

Answer: infers a general causal principle for all municipal ports based on evidence from a single case that may not be representative

Answer

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it infers a general causal principle for all municipal ports based on evidence from a single case that may not be representative.
The correct answer accurately describes an unrepresentative sample flaw (hasty generalization). The director observes a positive outcome following a policy change in a single municipality over a brief six-month window and uses that limited evidence to endorse the policy as a universally reliable strategy for all municipal ports worldwide.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the Premise and Conclusion structure of the argument.
Premise: City X reduced dockage fees, and freight volume at City X's port increased by 25 percent over six months. Conclusion: Reducing dockage fees is a reliable strategy for ANY municipal port seeking to expand international shipping volume.
Identifying the gap between a specific premise (one port's six-month outcome) and a broad conclusion (all municipal ports) isolates the central reasoning vulnerability.
2
Evaluate the logical leap from a single case study to a universal rule.
The director assumes that what occurred in City X over a short period will hold true across all municipal ports, ignoring unique local economic conditions, geographic advantages, or concurrent macro-environmental factors.
Generalizing from an unrepresentative or single sample represents a classic inductive fallacy in Critical Reasoning.
3
Select the choice that accurately articulates this inductive sampling flaw.
The statement highlighting that a general principle is inferred from a single, potentially unrepresentative instance precisely matches the identified logical flaw.
Abstract descriptions of unrepresentative sample flaws are standard correct answers for GMAT argument evaluation items.

Key Concept

Identifying Hasty Generalization and Unrepresentative Sample Flaws
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 133Question

To protect vulnerable alpine wildflowers from being trampled by foot traffic, park authorities plan to replace the ground-level soil path through a popular mountain meadow with an elevated wooden boardwalk. They reason that elevating the walking surface will prevent hikers from stepping on the surrounding vegetation, thereby allowing damaged plant populations to recover.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The broad wooden planks of the elevated boardwalk cast dense shade and redirect rainwater, suppressing the growth of delicate alpine plant species directly adjacent to the pathway.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by the finding that the broad wooden planks of the elevated boardwalk cast dense shade and redirect rainwater, suppressing the growth of delicate alpine plant species directly adjacent to the pathway.
The correct answer identifies an unforeseen side effect of the proposed plan. If the boardwalk blocks sunlight and redirects rainwater away from the adjacent soil, the plants will suffer from lack of vital nutrients regardless of whether foot traffic is removed. This directly undermines the argument's conclusion that the boardwalk will allow plant populations to recover.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument.
Premise: Replacing soil paths with elevated boardwalks keeps hikers' feet off the ground. Conclusion: This change will allow damaged alpine wildflower populations to recover.
Understanding the logic underlying the plan is necessary to locate unstated assumptions.
2
Identify the central assumption underlying the plan.
The author assumes that elevating the path will not create any alternative conditions that hinder or destroy the wildflower population.
Weakening a plan-to-goal argument typically requires identifying an unintended side effect or bottleneck that prevents goal achievement.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information that invalidates the assumption.
Showing that the physical structure of the boardwalk blocks essential sunlight and rainfall demonstrates that the plan itself will harm the plants, preventing their recovery.
This directly counteracts the central claim that the boardwalk will enable vegetation recovery.

Key Concept

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument via Unintended Side Effects
Question 134Question

To increase the proportion of borrowed books returned on or before their due date, the Metro Central Library system plans to eliminate all monetary overdue fines and instead send automated daily text reminders starting three days prior to each book's due date. Library administrators reason that monetary fines create anxiety that deters patrons from returning late books promptly, whereas text notifications directly address the primary reason for late returns: patrons simply forgetting the due date. Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest ground for doubting that the library system's plan will achieve its goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A survey of library patrons revealed that most late returns are driven by the physical inconvenience of visiting a branch rather than forgetfulness, and patrons are even less motivated to make prompt return trips when monetary penalties are absent.

Answer

The plan is most weakened by evidence showing that late returns are primarily caused by the inconvenience of visiting a branch rather than forgetfulness, and that eliminating fines decreases patrons' motivation to return books on time.
The correct answer undermines the fundamental assumption of the plan. The library assumes that forgetfulness is the main cause of late returns and that fines are counterproductive. If late returns are actually caused by the inconvenience of visiting a branch, text reminders will not solve the underlying problem. Furthermore, if eliminating fines removes patrons' motivation to make the trip, the plan will actively decrease on-time returns.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and main premise of the argument.
Conclusion: Replacing monetary overdue fines with text reminders will increase on-time book returns. Main Premise: Late returns occur primarily because patrons forget due dates, and fines cause anxiety.
Understanding the central assumption—that forgetfulness causes late returns—is essential to evaluating how to weaken the conclusion.
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption.
The argument assumes that text reminders will fix the main cause of late returns (forgetfulness) and that eliminating fines will not decrease on-time returns.
To weaken a plan-to-goal argument, one must show that the plan fails to address the real problem or introduces counterproductive incentives.
3
Select the choice that directly attacks the core assumption.
The option showing that convenience, not forgetfulness, drives late returns and that removing fines reduces motivation directly undermines the plan's feasibility.
This shows both that the text reminders address a non-primary factor and that removing fines makes the goal harder to achieve.

Key Concept

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument
Question 135Question

To reduce severe crop damage caused by an invasive species of burrowing rodents, agricultural authorities in a rural valley plan to introduce a native raptor species known to prey heavily on small mammals. The authorities reason that establishing a population of these raptors in the valley will significantly decrease the rodent population, thereby protecting local grain harvests. Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The invasive rodents forage and move exclusively underground at night, whereas the raptors hunt strictly during daylight hours above open ground.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the invasive rodents forage exclusively underground at night while the raptors hunt strictly during daylight hours above ground.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that introducing raptors will result in significant predation of the invasive rodents. The correct option shows a complete temporal and spatial mismatch: the rodents are active only underground at night, while the raptors hunt only above ground during the day. Because the raptors will not encounter the rodents, the plan cannot achieve its goal of reducing the rodent population.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Raptors prey heavily on small mammals. Conclusion: Introducing raptors will significantly decrease the population of burrowing rodents and protect grain harvests.
Understanding the logical jump from raptor predation habits to effective rodent reduction isolates the underlying assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that the raptors will actually encounter and hunt these specific invasive rodents in this valley environment.
If environmental or behavioral barriers prevent raptors from preying on the rodents, the plan will fail.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for information that undermines this assumption.
The option stating that rodents are active underground at night while raptors hunt above ground during the day demonstrates that predator and prey will not interact.
A complete temporal and spatial mismatch negates the causal mechanism relied upon by the conclusion.

Key Concept

Causal Plan Weakening (Behavioral and Temporal Mismatch)
Question 136Question

To cut long-distance cargo transit expenses, a regional freight company plans to replace its entire fleet of diesel transport trucks with electric trucks powered by newly developed solid-state batteries. Management reasons that because electric trucks incur 40 percent lower energy costs per mile than diesel trucks and require significantly fewer routine engine maintenance services, making this transition will substantially reduce the company's total annual operational expenses over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The solid-state batteries required for these electric transport trucks degrade rapidly under continuous long-distance heavy usage and require full replacement every two years at a cost exceeding the total energy savings achieved during that period.

Answer

The statement regarding rapid battery degradation and expensive replacement costs most seriously weakens the argument by demonstrating that total operational costs over five years will actually increase rather than decrease.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that lower energy costs and fewer routine maintenance services will lead to lower net operational expenses. The option pointing out that the batteries degrade rapidly and require replacement every two years at a cost exceeding the total energy savings directly refutes this assumption by introducing a major ongoing expense that makes the transition more costly overall.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into premise and conclusion
Premises: Electric trucks have 40% lower energy costs per mile and fewer routine engine maintenance needs. Conclusion: Transitioning the fleet will substantially reduce total annual operational expenses over five years.
Identifying the logic path allows us to uncover the author's unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The author assumes that energy savings and lower engine maintenance will not be offset by other unexpected, mandatory operational costs unique to electric trucks over the five-year timeframe.
A weakening answer choice will target and undermine this unstated assumption.
3
Evaluate the impact of new information on the assumption
If solid-state batteries require replacement every two years at a cost greater than the total energy savings, overall expenses over five years will rise, directly invalidating the conclusion.
Pointing out a massive, recurrent operational expense directly disproves the claim of reduced total operational expenses.

Key Concept

Evaluating plan-to-goal feasibility by identifying hidden or offsetting operational costs
Question 137Question

To revitalize downtown retail commerce, the city of Vaelen converted a five-block stretch of Main Street from a vehicle-accessible thoroughfare into a pedestrian-only zone. City officials reasoned that eliminating car traffic would encourage visitors to spend more time browsing local shops, thereby increasing total retail sales in the district. However, three months after the conversion, total retail sales along Main Street were 15 percent lower than during the same three-month period last year. Consequently, city officials concluded that the pedestrian zone failed to attract shoppers and directly harmed retail commerce. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city officials' conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: During the three-month period following the conversion, overall retail sales throughout the entire city dropped by 35 percent due to a major regional economic downturn.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by establishing that citywide retail sales fell by 35 percent during the same period, showing that Main Street actually outperformed the regional trend.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal relationship: the pedestrian conversion caused the 15 percent drop in retail sales. Showing that overall citywide retail sales plunged by 35 percent during the exact same timeframe provides crucial baseline context. It demonstrates that sales on Main Street actually declined far less than expected given the severe regional downturn, which strongly suggests the pedestrian zone buffered Main Street from a worse fate rather than causing the decline.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion and premises.
Premise: Main Street sales fell 15% after pedestrian conversion. Conclusion: The conversion failed to attract shoppers and directly caused the sales decline.
Understanding the precise causal link asserted by the author is necessary to weaken it.
2
Identify the unstated assumption in the author's causal leap.
The author assumes no external factor (such as a broader economic slump) was responsible for the 15% drop in sales.
A weakening answer choice will often present an alternative cause or show that the baseline performance was affected by outside variables.
3
Evaluate the choices to find evidence undermining the assumed cause.
Showing that citywide retail sales dropped 35% demonstrates that Main Street's 15% drop was actually a relative success, undermining the claim that the pedestrian zone harmed commerce.
If the broader market fell much more sharply, the pedestrian zone likely helped protect Main Street from an even steeper decline.

Key Concept

Causal Fallacy and Baseline Confounding Variables
Question 138Question

To increase net profit margins across its retail locations, Apex Electronics plans to eliminate its complimentary home-delivery service for large household appliances. Management reasons that operating delivery trucks incurs substantial fuel and labor expenses without direct customer fees, and that customers will simply choose to transport their purchases home themselves using store pickup options. Therefore, management concludes that eliminating free delivery will reduce operational costs without sacrificing total sales revenue. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A majority of Apex's appliance customers lack personal vehicles capable of transporting bulky items and would purchase from competing retailers that offer home delivery.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the evidence that a majority of appliance buyers cannot transport large items themselves and will buy from competitors providing delivery, directly undermining the assumption that sales revenue will remain unaffected.
The argument relies on the central assumption that eliminating free appliance delivery will not decrease sales revenue because customers will easily shift to self-pickup. The correct answer presents new evidence showing that most target customers physically cannot transport large appliances themselves and will turn to competitors who still offer home delivery. This demonstrates that eliminating the delivery service will lead to substantial revenue loss, directly weakening the claim that profit margins will improve.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and key premises of the argument.
Premise: Operating delivery trucks adds fuel and labor costs without charging fees, and management assumes customers will switch to store pickup. Conclusion: Eliminating free delivery will cut costs without reducing sales revenue.
Understanding the logical jump between premise and conclusion highlights the unstated assumptions.
2
Formulate the central unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that customers have the means and willingness to pick up large appliances themselves rather than taking their business to a competitor offering delivery.
Weakening questions require finding evidence that breaks the link between the premise and conclusion.
3
Evaluate the choices to find information that undermines the central assumption.
The statement showing that most customers lack suitable vehicles and will switch to competitors directly undermines the claim that sales revenue will not suffer.
If sales revenue drops significantly due to lost customers, total net profit margins may decrease despite lower operating costs.

Key Concept

Weakening Causal and Plan-to-Goal Arguments
Question 139Question

To reduce employee turnover caused by workplace burnout, a technology firm plans to institute a mandatory four-day workweek while keeping salaries unchanged and maintaining existing weekly project deadlines. Management reasons that granting employees a three-day weekend every week will lower overall stress levels, thereby improving job satisfaction and reducing voluntary resignations. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Compressing the same total volume of weekly tasks into four days significantly increases daily work intensity and stress during working hours.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by the finding that compressing the unchanged weekly workload into four days increases daily stress during working hours.
The argument relies on the assumption that a three-day weekend will produce a net reduction in employee stress and burnout. The correct choice weakens the argument by exposing a major flaw in the plan: because weekly deadlines remain unchanged, employees must complete 40 hours of workload across 4 days. This compressed schedule creates high daily stress during working days, which directly negates the anticipated reduction in overall burnout.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premise and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Providing a mandatory three-day weekend will give employees extra time off. Conclusion: Giving employees an extra day off each week will reduce overall stress levels and lower employee turnover caused by burnout.
Deconstructing the argument reveals the core causal claim.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption.
The author assumes that the extra day off will actually lower net stress without introducing new, equal, or greater sources of workplace stress.
The conclusion relies on net stress decreasing as a result of the schedule change.
3
Evaluate the option that undermines this assumption.
If weekly project deadlines remain unchanged, completing five days of work in four days creates severe daily time pressure and stress during the workweek, offsetting or exceeding any stress relief from the long weekend.
Showing an unintended negative consequence directly negates the assumed benefit of reduced overall stress.

Key Concept

Weakening a Plan-to-Goal Argument via Implementation Constraints
Estimated Time:1m 50s
Question 140Question

To reduce fuel expenditure across its ocean cargo fleet, a maritime shipping company plans to apply a new hydrodynamic coating to the underwater hulls of all its vessels. In controlled tank tests, vessels treated with the coating experienced a 12 percent reduction in drag compared to untreated vessels. The company's directors conclude that applying this coating will significantly lower the fleet's total annual fuel expenditure.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the directors' conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In actual ocean environments, marine organisms rapidly adhere to the specialized coating, creating surface roughness that negates the drag reduction unless the hulls undergo frequent and costly cleanings.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by the finding that in actual ocean environments, marine organisms rapidly adhere to the specialized coating, creating surface roughness that negates the drag reduction unless the hulls undergo frequent and costly cleanings.
The conclusion relies on the assumption that the 12 percent drag reduction measured in controlled tank tests will produce significant real-world net fuel savings. The correct option directly shatters this assumption by revealing that real ocean conditions cause biological growth on the coating that negates drag reduction and adds substantial maintenance costs, thereby preventing the expected net savings.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument structure
Premise: Controlled tank tests showed a 12% reduction in drag for coated hulls. Conclusion: Applying the coating across the fleet will significantly lower total annual fuel expenditure.
Identifying the explicit premises and conclusion reveals the underlying assumption connecting test results to real-world financial outcomes.
2
Identify the key unstated assumption
The argument assumes that performance in controlled tank tests will translate directly to real-world ocean conditions without introducing prohibitive secondary costs.
A weakening item must attack this gap between laboratory performance and net operational cost savings.
3
Evaluate the options against the key assumption
The statement regarding marine organisms accumulating on the hull demonstrates that operational ocean conditions actively destroy the drag reduction effect and introduce heavy maintenance costs.
This directly undermines the conclusion that total annual fuel expenditure will significantly decrease.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments - Unstated Assumptions in Causal/Experimental Transitions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
PreviousPage 7 / 9Next
Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation Practice Questions — GMAT — Page 7 | Examkin