In a constitutional democracy governed by the rule of law, which procedure best protects judges against arbitrary removal by the executive arm of government?
- Requiring an independent judicial body's recommendation and a two-thirds legislative majority vote based strictly on proven misconduct or incapacityAnswer
- BGranting the head of state sole discretionary authority to dismiss judges whenever political convenience requires it
- CGranting sitting executive officers permanent immunity from court summonses and post-tenure criminal prosecution
- DSubjecting all major judicial rulings to legislative approval before they become legally binding
Answer
Requiring an independent judicial body's recommendation and a two-thirds legislative majority vote based strictly on proven misconduct or incapacity.
Judicial independence is maintained through security of tenure, which protects judges from arbitrary dismissal. Requiring a recommendation from an independent judicial body along with a supermajority legislative vote ensures that removal occurs only under severe, proven conditions like gross misconduct or inability to discharge functions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Security of Tenure as a Safeguard for Judicial Independence