Read the passage below carefully:
For decades, the conservation of the Hadejia-Nguru wetlands in northern Nigeria relied on top-down ecological bans that prohibited local farming communities from harvesting wild doum palm fibers during peak dry seasons. Government conservationists argued that uncontrolled harvesting disrupted the nesting grounds of migratory waterbirds. However, recent ethnobotanical assessments revealed a subtle ecological synergy: the traditional selective pruning practiced by indigenous harvesters actually stimulated new frond growth, preventing dense canopy closure that would otherwise choke shallow waterways vital for bird foraging. When regional authorities replaced the absolute prohibition with a managed harvesting calendar structured around traditional pruning cycles, wetland bird populations increased by thirty percent over five years, while local artisan incomes stabilized. Paradoxically, neighboring reserves that maintained strict, non-interventionist conservation policies experienced marked declines in avian biodiversity, as unmanaged vegetation overgrown by invasive weeds degraded open water habitats.
Statement: The passage implies that managed human ecological participation can yield superior biodiversity conservation outcomes compared to strict environmental isolation.
Answer: Answer