During the evaluation of industrialization strategies in Nigeria, economists observed that the adoption of Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) failed to resolve the nation's severe foreign exchange constraints. Which of the following structural factors best explains why the ISI strategy intensified rather than reduced foreign exchange pressure?
- The strategy depended heavily on imported capital equipment and raw materials for domestic production without generating foreign currency through exports.Answer
- BThe strategy eliminated protective tariffs on foreign finished goods, causing massive import surges that depleted external reserves.
- CThe strategy allocated substantial foreign exchange subsidies exclusively to non-oil export sectors, starving local consumer goods manufacturers of capital.
- DThe strategy created a substantial balance of trade surplus, leading to currency overvaluation that made domestic agricultural exports uncompetitive.
Answer
The strategy depended heavily on imported capital equipment and raw materials for domestic production without generating foreign currency through exports.
The correct answer identifies the primary structural vulnerability of Import Substitution Industrialization in Nigeria. Domestic manufacturing plants established under ISI were largely consumer-goods assembly plants that relied heavily on imported intermediate inputs, spare parts, and machinery. Because these industries produced strictly for the domestic market behind protectionist barriers, they consumed large amounts of foreign exchange without generating any export revenues to replenish external reserves.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Structural limitations of Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) vs. Export Promotion Strategy (EPS)
Estimated Time:2m 0s