Despite being adopted in post-independence Nigeria to conserve foreign exchange by replacing imported light consumer goods with domestically manufactured alternatives, the Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) strategy paradoxically worsened the country's foreign reserve pressures and import dependency. Which of the following structural factors best explains this outcome?
- Domestic manufacturing firms remained heavily dependent on imported capital machinery, raw materials, and spare parts, thereby shifting the structure of imports rather than reducing total import expenditure.Answer
- BThe implementation of the policy caused an over-expansion of manufactured exports, leading to severe foreign market oversupply and declining export revenue.
- CThe government eliminated protective tariffs and import quotas on foreign finished goods, exposing local manufacturers to intense international price competition.
- DThe policy generated massive currency devaluation, which made foreign consumer goods drastically cheaper than locally produced manufactured items.
Answer
Domestic manufacturing firms remained heavily dependent on imported capital machinery, raw materials, and spare parts, thereby shifting the structure of imports rather than reducing total import expenditure.
The correct answer highlights the structural weakness of Nigeria's Import Substitution Industrialization strategy. Industrial policy focused on assembling light consumer goods without establishing heavy capital goods or raw material processing industries. Consequently, domestic manufacturing required constant importation of heavy machinery, equipment, spare parts, and intermediate inputs, which transformed finished-goods import reliance into input import reliance and intensified foreign exchange drain.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Structural limitation of Import Substitution Industrialization (ISI) due to capital goods import dependence