Question

Difficulty: HardInferential Comprehension and Deduction

Read the passage below carefully and evaluate the statement that follows.

In recent years, the informal electronic waste recycling ecosystem of Agbogbloshie in Accra has undergone a subtle organizational shift. Historically, youth collectives operated autonomously, extracting scrap copper and aluminum through open burning—a process that yielded immediate cash returns but devastated local soil chemistry and respiratory health. When municipal authorities introduced centralized, non-thermal stripping facilities to curb environmental damage, initial adoption remained minimal. Workers resisted the initiative not out of aversion to cleaner technology, but because the facility’s rigid operational schedule conflicted with the unpredictable arrival of container shipments from maritime ports. Recognizing this friction, local scrap union leaders negotiated a flexible operational model that allowed cooperatives to manage facility processing hours autonomously while retaining collective ownership of recovered high-purity metals. Consequently, secondary market buyers began offering long-term supply contracts directly to the cooperatives, bypassing traditional predatory middlemen. This transition demonstrated that sustained technological adoption within informal urban economies relies less on providing state-of-the-art equipment than on aligning institutional workflows with the organic operational rhythms of the informal workforce.

Statement: The primary factor behind the scrap workers' initial rejection of the municipal stripping facility was a lack of awareness regarding the health risks associated with thermal extraction methods.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is False. Textual evidence directly refutes the claim by establishing that operational scheduling conflicts, rather than health illiteracy or clean tech aversion, drove the initial rejection.
The claim is false because the passage explicitly isolates the cause of resistance: rigid facility processing hours did not align with the unpredictable timing of imported scrap shipments. The author clarifies that aversion to clean technology was not the motive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the statement's claim regarding worker motivation.
The statement attributes the rejection to a lack of health risk awareness.
To verify an inferential claim, its cause-and-effect assertion must be checked against explicit contextual evidence.
2
Locate specific textual evidence addressing worker resistance.
The passage notes workers resisted 'not out of aversion to cleaner technology, but because the facility’s rigid operational schedule conflicted with the unpredictable arrival of container shipments'.
Identifying the author's explicit contrast isolates the true deductive cause of the rejection.
3
Deduce the validity of the statement.
Because the text specifies supply-chain schedule mismatch as the true barrier, attributing the rejection to health ignorance is logically unsupported.
A claim contradicted by context-specific causal evidence is false.

Key Concept

Inferential Comprehension and Deduction
Rate this question