All practice questions

13931 questions

Question 10001Question

During the implementation of indirect administration in Northern Nigeria, Lord Lugard preserved the Islamic legal system operated by traditional courts. Which of the following best describes how colonial officers exercised ultimate control over these traditional judicial bodies?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: British colonial officers exercised ultimate oversight by reserving the right to inspect court records, reduce excessive sentences, and transfer specific cases to provincial courts.

Answer

British colonial officers exercised ultimate oversight by reserving the right to inspect court records, reduce excessive sentences, and transfer specific cases to provincial courts.
Under Lord Lugard's Indirect Rule system in Northern Nigeria, existing Alkali and Emir courts were formalized into the Native Court system. To maintain ultimate colonial control without destroying local legitimacy, British Residents and District Officers were empowered to review court records, modify sentences deemed excessive under colonial standards, and transfer cases to British provincial courts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural framework of the judicial system under Indirect Rule in Northern Nigeria.
Identified that the British integrated existing Islamic Alkali courts and Emir courts into the Native Court system.
Indirect Rule relied on existing traditional institutions to maintain order efficiently.
2
Examine the supervisory mechanism used by British officials over traditional courts.
Determined that British Residents and District Officers held powers of review, sentence modification, and case transfer.
This ensured traditional judicial practices aligned with British colonial laws while preserving local customary authority.

Key Concept

Supervisory Role of British Colonial Officers over Native Courts in Northern Nigeria
Question 10002Question

In a democratic system of government, political power is concentrated in a single organ of state to maximize administrative efficiency and political stability.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False. Democratic governance requires the division and separation of powers among distinct organs of government rather than power concentration.
The correct answer is False because democratic systems distribute power across executive, legislative, and judicial branches to maintain checks and balances and safeguard citizen rights.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main claim in the statement regarding power distribution in a democracy.
The statement asserts that democracy involves concentrating political power within one organ of state.
Analyzing the structural arrangement described in the statement.
2
Compare this assertion with essential democratic principles.
Democracy relies on principles such as constitutionalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances, which explicitly oppose power concentration.
Concentration of power is a characteristic of totalitarian or authoritarian regimes, not democracy.

Key Concept

Features of Democracy and Separation of Powers
Question 10003Question

Match each political ideology listed on the left with its primary defining characteristic on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Communism
Fascism
Nazism

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Communism matches with the pursuit of a stateless, classless society through public ownership; Fascism matches with total state control combined with economic corporatism and national unity; Nazism matches with totalitarian control centered on racial hierarchy and Aryan supremacy.
Each ideology aligns directly with its fundamental doctrine: Communism prioritizes classless public ownership, Fascism asserts total state authority and corporate regulation, and Nazism builds upon fascism by enforcing racial hierarchy and anti-Semitism.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Communism's ultimate social and economic goal.
Communism seeks to eliminate private property and social classes to establish a stateless, classless society.
Marxist theory defines communism by collective ownership of the means of production.
2
Examine Fascism's primary structural and economic arrangement.
Fascism subordinates everything to the state while managing labor and industry through state-supervised corporate syndicates.
Fascist doctrine prioritizes absolute state supremacy and national unity over class identity.
3
Distinguish Nazism from broader Fascism.
Nazism explicitly integrates racial hygiene, biological determinism, and anti-Semitism into fascist state control.
Racial doctrine forms the central defining element that differentiates Nazism from Italian Fascism.

Key Concept

Distinguishing features of Communism, Fascism, and Nazism
Question 10004Question

Which method of public debt redemption involves setting aside a portion of government revenue into a dedicated reserve account annually to repay a maturing long-term obligation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Sinking fund

Answer

The correct option is the one specifying a sinking fund.
Establishing a sinking fund allows a government to make regular budgetary allocations into a designated reserve over the life of a loan. When the debt reaches maturity, the accumulated capital in the sinking fund is used to liquidate the principal sum fully.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary mechanism of debt redemption described in the scenario
The scenario describes setting aside revenue periodically into a special account to meet future debt repayment.
Governments use dedicated reserve accounts to reduce the lump-sum burden of redeeming long-term public debts when they mature.
2
Differentiate a sinking fund from other public debt management tools
A sinking fund systematically accumulates funds, unlike conversion (swapping instruments), refinancing (taking new debt), or repudiation (canceling debt).
This confirms that the option identifying the sinking fund accurately captures the annual reserve accumulation process.

Key Concept

Sinking fund mechanism for public debt redemption
Question 10005Question

Match each term or legislation associated with French colonial administration in West Africa with its correct historical description.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Sujets
Conseil Général
Loi Cadre (1956)
Association Policy

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Sujets matches African colonial subjects residing outside the Four Communes; Conseil Général matches the elected assembly in Senegal for local governance; Loi Cadre (1956) matches the reform legislation extending internal self-governance; and Association Policy matches the policy framework utilizing indigenous political structures.
Each administrative term correctly maps to its definition in French colonial history: Sujets were non-citizens without civic privileges; the Conseil Général was an advisory and financial assembly for Senegalese communes; the Loi Cadre of 1956 reformed territorial power structures; and Association focused on pragmatic co-governance with traditional authorities.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the status of colonial populations under French administration.
Recognize that 'Sujets' designated non-citizen Africans governed under strict native regulation.
French policy distinguished between full citizens (Citoyens/Originaires) and non-citizen subjects (Sujets).
2
Examine the political institutions created in coastal Senegal.
Link 'Conseil Général' to the representative assembly of the Four Communes.
This body managed local budgetary decisions for naturalized French citizens in Senegal.
3
Analyze the constitutional evolution leading to decolonization.
Connect 'Loi Cadre (1956)' to territorial devolution and electoral expansion.
The 1956 Enabling Act decentralized power across French West Africa prior to independence.
4
Differentiate between French colonial doctrines.
Associate 'Association Policy' with indirect supervision and preservation of traditional authorities.
Association replaced direct cultural assimilation with administrative collaboration.

Key Concept

French Colonial Administration: Distinctions, Institutions, and Policy Reforms
Question 10006Question

Within the executive framework of pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani emirates, governance relied on specialized officials overseeing civil, judicial-custodial, and municipal functions. Pair each traditional office holder on the left with their correct administrative portfolio on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Sarkin Fada
Sarkin Dogarai
Yari
Sarkin Ruwa

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings connect Sarkin Fada to Head of Palace Officials and Household Administration, Sarkin Dogarai to Commander of the Royal Bodyguards and Native Police, Yari to Superintendent of Prisons and Custodial Facilities, and Sarkin Ruwa to Overseer of Waterways, Fishing Rights, and Riverine Commerce.
In the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani system, executive portfolios were clearly defined: the Sarkin Fada organized palace household administration, the Sarkin Dogarai commanded the royal guard and police force, the Yari supervised prison facilities, and the Sarkin Ruwa managed riverine resources and water trade levies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the palace administrative role
Identify Sarkin Fada as the official in charge of palace staff and internal royal household administration.
The term 'Fada' refers to the palace in Hausa, designating the Sarkin Fada as the chief administrator of the palace.
2
Analyze the internal policing and enforcement role
Identify Sarkin Dogarai as the chief commander of royal guards and law enforcement officers.
The Dogarai were the native police force, operating directly under the executive authority of the Sarkin Dogarai.
3
Analyze the correctional and penal governance role
Identify Yari as the chief administrator of prisons.
In the Hausa-Fulani executive structure, custodial functions and prison facilities were managed by the Yari.
4
Analyze the municipal and economic supervisory role
Identify Sarkin Ruwa as the official overseeing riverine trade, fishing rights, and water resources.
'Ruwa' translates to water in Hausa, designating the Sarkin Ruwa as the official in charge of waterborne commerce and resources.

Key Concept

Executive Portfolios of Traditional Officials in the Hausa-Fulani System
Question 10007Question

Political authority is distinguished from coercive political power primarily because authority relies on which fundamental factor?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The recognition of legitimacy and the acknowledged right to command compliance

Answer

The recognition of legitimacy and the acknowledged right to command compliance
Authority is fundamentally power clothed in legitimacy. Unlike raw political power, which may rely on force or coercion, political authority exists when the governed acknowledge and accept the ruler's constitutional or traditional right to issue directives and expect compliance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core distinction between political power and political authority.
Power refers to the ability to compel obedience through any means (including force), whereas authority is power backed by legitimacy.
Understanding the role of legitimacy is essential to differentiating authority from mere coercion.
2
Evaluate the options to identify which element confers authority.
The recognition of legitimacy by the governed transforms raw power into accepted authority.
Without legitimacy, compliance must be forced, which defined coercive power rather than political authority.

Key Concept

Legitimacy as the defining boundary between Power and Authority
Question 10008Question

Under Section 30(2) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the President possesses the legal authority to deprive a citizen by registration of their Nigerian citizenship if they are found guilty of acts of disloyalty towards the nation.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is False. Under Section 30(2) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the President's power to deprive a person of Nigerian citizenship on the grounds of disloyalty or trading with an enemy applies exclusively to citizens by naturalization. The provision explicitly excludes both citizens by birth and citizens by registration.
The statement is false because Section 30(2) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria explicitly restricts presidential authority regarding deprivation for disloyalty to naturalized citizens, specifically excluding citizens by birth and citizens by registration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the category of citizenship and the ground for deprivation presented in the statement.
The statement claims a citizen by registration can be deprived of citizenship by the President for acts of disloyalty under Section 30.
Chapter III of the 1999 Constitution establishes distinct legal rules for citizens by birth, registration, and naturalization.
2
Examine the exact text of Section 30(2) of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria.
Section 30(2) empowers the President to deprive a person of citizenship for disloyalty or enemy trading ONLY if that person is 'other than a person who is a citizen of Nigeria by birth or by registration'.
The constitution explicitly grants immunity from disloyalty-based deprivation to registered citizens alongside citizens by birth.
3
Evaluate the truth value of the statement based on constitutional provisions.
Since citizens by registration are constitutionally protected from deprivation on grounds of disloyalty, the statement is false.
Disloyalty-based deprivation under Section 30(2) applies strictly and exclusively to naturalized citizens.

Key Concept

Constitutional immunity of citizens by registration from deprivation of citizenship on grounds of disloyalty under Section 30(2) of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution.
Question 10009Question

Arrange the following structural and administrative developments during military rule in Nigeria in the correct chronological order from earliest to latest:

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence is: Promulgation of Decree No. 1 (1966), followed by the inauguration of the Constitution Drafting Committee (1975), then the establishment of the Armed Forces Ruling Council (1985), and finally the creation of the Provisional Ruling Council (1993).
The events follow the historical sequence of Nigerian military governance: Decree No. 1 was enacted in January 1966; the Constitution Drafting Committee for the Second Republic was inaugurated in October 1975; General Babangida created the Armed Forces Ruling Council in August 1985; and General Abacha instituted the Provisional Ruling Council in November 1993.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical context and date of the first event.
The promulgation of Decree No. 1 took place in January 1966 under Major-General J.T.U. Aguiyi-Ironsi right after the initial military intervention.
This laid the legal framework for military rule and established the Supreme Military Council (SMC).
2
Identify the timing of the Constitution Drafting Committee's inauguration.
The CDC was inaugurated by General Murtala Muhammed in October 1975.
This was the first major step in the military's phased transition plan towards the 1979 Second Republic.
3
Identify the creation of the Armed Forces Ruling Council.
General Ibrahim Babangida restructured the military high command and created the AFRC in August 1985.
Babangida introduced the AFRC to replace the SMC and concentrated executive powers in the office of the Military President.
4
Determine the date of the Provisional Ruling Council's establishment.
The Provisional Ruling Council (PRC) was constituted in November 1993 under General Sani Abacha.
The PRC replaced the National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) following Abacha's seizure of power from the Interim National Government.

Key Concept

Chronological evolution of military ruling organs and constitutional transition programs in post-independence Nigeria.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10010Question

Trace the institutional evolution of military governance in Nigeria by arranging the following structural modifications to the supreme ruling organs in chronological order, from the earliest to the most recent.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence is: (1) Promulgation of Decree No. 1 establishing the Supreme Military Council (January 1966), (2) Restructuring into a three-tier governance organ including the National Council of States (July 1975), (3) Replacement of the SMC with the Armed Forces Ruling Council (August 1985), and (4) Creation of the Provisional Ruling Council (November 1993).
Military governance in Nigeria evolved structurally across different regimes. The Supreme Military Council was first created under Decree No. 1 in January 1966. In July 1975, General Murtala Muhammed institutionalized a three-tier system introducing the National Council of States alongside the SMC and FEC. General Ibrahim Babangida later replaced the SMC with the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) in August 1985. Finally, General Sani Abacha instituted the Provisional Ruling Council (PRC) in November 1993.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the emergence of the first military ruling council in Nigeria.
Decree No. 1 of 1966 established the Supreme Military Council (SMC) under Major General J.T.U. Aguiyi-Ironsi right after the January 1966 coup.
This marked the initial suspension of parliamentary democracy and the creation of the highest military legislative organ.
2
Determine the subsequent structural reorganization during the post-civil war era.
In July 1975, General Murtala Muhammed restructured the governance apparatus into three distinct bodies: Supreme Military Council (SMC), National Council of States (NCS), and Federal Executive Council (FEC).
This reform separated federal legislative power from state governors' administration to prevent centralized overreach by state military heads.
3
Locate the change in nomenclature and authority under the Babangida regime.
In August 1985, General Ibrahim Babangida dissolved the SMC and constituted the Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC) as the sole legislative organ.
This structural change expanded military service chiefs' representation and concentrated executive authority in the Military President.
4
Identify the final major military ruling council created during the 1990s.
Following the collapse of the Interim National Government in November 1993, General Sani Abacha created the Provisional Ruling Council (PRC).
The PRC remained the supreme ruling body until the restoration of civilian democratic governance in May 1999.

Key Concept

Institutional Evolution of Military Ruling Councils in Post-Independence Nigeria
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 10011Question

A foreign national who has lived in Nigeria for sixteen years without Nigerian ancestry or a Nigerian spouse applies to become a Nigerian citizen. Which constitutional requirement is mandatory for this applicant to acquire citizenship through naturalization, but is not required for a foreign national acquiring citizenship by registration?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Fulfilling a minimum residence period of fifteen years and proving acceptability to the local community

Answer

Fulfilling a minimum residence period of fifteen years and proving acceptability to the local community is mandatory for naturalization under Section 27, but not for registration under Section 26 of the 1999 Constitution.
Under Section 27 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, naturalization requires the applicant to have resided in Nigeria for a period of at least fifteen years and to be acceptable to the local community in which they will live. In contrast, Section 26 (registration) applies primarily to foreign spouses of citizens or individuals born abroad with Nigerian grandparents, requiring no 15-year residency duration or local community assimilation clause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant legal provisions in Chapter III of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria.
Section 26 governs Citizenship by Registration, while Section 27 governs Citizenship by Naturalization.
Determining the legal framework allows comparison between the statutory requirements of both modes of acquisition.
2
Compare the criteria required for registration versus naturalization.
Both modes require full age, good character, intention to reside, and taking the Oath of Allegiance. However, naturalization uniquely demands a 15-year residency duration, contribution to the country's progress, and acceptability to the local community.
Identifying the unique qualifications isolates the correct distinguishing condition.
3
Evaluate the choices to select the option containing conditions exclusive to naturalization.
The requirement of fifteen years continuous residence and local community acceptance is unique to naturalization.
This requirement directly answers the stem question.

Key Concept

Distinction between legal requirements for Citizenship by Registration and Citizenship by Naturalization under the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10012Question

During the passage of a public bill in a parliament, after the bill successfully completes its Second Reading and is evaluated by a Standing Committee, which procedural step must be executed before the bill can proceed to its Third Reading?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The presentation of the committee's report followed by clause-by-clause scrutiny in the Committee of the Whole

Answer

The presentation of the committee's report followed by clause-by-clause scrutiny in the Committee of the Whole
In formal parliamentary law-making, once a Standing Committee finishes scrutinizing a bill after its Second Reading, it presents its report to the house. The house then resolves into the Committee of the Whole (or considers the Report Stage) where each clause and proposed amendment is debated and voted on. Only after this step is successfully completed can the bill move to its Third Reading for final voting.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the stage in the law-making process immediately following the Standing Committee evaluation.
The committee presents its report to the entire house detailing suggested amendments and recommendations.
The entire legislative body must consider the work done by the specialized committee.
2
Analyze the procedure required prior to the Third Reading.
The house resolves into the Committee of the Whole to debate and vote on each individual clause and amendment proposed.
Detailed clause-by-clause approval ensures that every part of the bill reflects legislative intent before final passage.
3
Select the option that matches this formal stage of legislative procedure.
The step involving report presentation and clause-by-clause scrutiny in the Committee of the Whole is correct.
Neither executive submission nor judicial involvement can take place prior to completing the reading stages inside the legislature.

Key Concept

Statutory Law-Making Process and Parliamentary Stages
Question 10013Question

Which of the following primary criteria determines whether a constitution is classified as rigid or flexible?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The degree of difficulty and special procedure required to amend its provisions

Answer

The degree of difficulty and special procedure required to amend its provisions.
Constitutions are classified as rigid or flexible based on the ease or difficulty of their amendment process. A rigid constitution requires complex, special procedures—such as a two-thirds majority in the legislature, state ratification, or a popular referendum—whereas a flexible constitution can be modified using the same simple majority process as standard statutes.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core basis of classifying constitutions into rigid or flexible categories.
The classification depends strictly on the legal mechanism and complexity involved in altering constitutional laws.
Rigid constitutions require special, stringent amendment procedures (such as a two-thirds legislative majority or referendum), whereas flexible constitutions can be altered through ordinary law-making procedures.
2
Evaluate the distractors against the target definition.
Codification defines written vs unwritten constitutions, power division defines federal vs unitary systems, and executive arrangement defines presidential vs parliamentary systems.
Differentiating these categories prevents common conceptual overlap in political science.

Key Concept

Classification of Constitutions by Amendment Procedure
Question 10014Question

In the constitutional framework of the pre-colonial Old Oyo Empire, which institutional safeguard prevented the Bashorun and the Oyomesi council from abusing their power of royal rejection to arbitrarily depose an incumbent Alaafin?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The mandatory religious and judicial ratification required from the Ogboni society before a deposition decree could be finalized

Answer

The mandatory religious and judicial ratification required from the Ogboni society before a deposition decree could be finalized
In the Old Oyo political system, power was intricately balanced. While the Oyomesi possessed the prerogative to present the calabash of rejection to an oppressive monarch, they could not act unilaterally without judicial and spiritual consensus. The Ogboni society served as a vital judicial check over the Oyomesi, ensuring that charges against the Alaafin were valid under traditional law before sacred sanctions were invoked.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core institutional relationship in pre-colonial Yoruba (Oyo) political architecture
The Alaafin exercised executive power, checked by the legislative and kingmaking council known as the Oyomesi.
Understanding the separation of powers is necessary to evaluate checks on each organ.
2
Analyze potential abuses of power by the council of kingmakers (Oyomesi)
The Oyomesi held the power to reject an Alaafin by presenting him empty calabashes or parrot's eggs, signaling compulsory suicide.
Unchecked rejection power would allow the Bashorun (head of Oyomesi) to become an absolute dictator.
3
Determine the judicial/religious counter-check on the Oyomesi
The Ogboni society, composed of prominent religious elders and chiefs, maintained sacred judicial jurisdiction. Their approval was constitutionally necessary to validate any serious sanction against the monarch.
This prevented arbitrary removal of the king solely due to political rivalries between the Bashorun and the Alaafin.

Key Concept

Institutional Interplay between the Oyomesi and Ogboni in Pre-Colonial Yoruba Governance
Question 10015Question

In the pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani Emirate, a mandatory religious tax was collected from wealthy Muslims to support the poor and provide social welfare. Which tax refers to this specific levy?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Zakat

Answer

Zakat was the mandatory Islamic tax collected from wealthy Muslims for poor relief and social welfare in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate.
Zakat was the mandatory Islamic tax levied on the accumulated wealth of eligible Muslims in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate, earmarked specifically for charitable causes, welfare, and assistance to the needy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary purpose of the tax specified in the question stem.
The tax was a mandatory religious obligation meant for charitable redistribution and welfare.
The Hausa-Fulani administrative system operated under Islamic law (Sharia), which governed tax collection.
2
Distinguish between the different pre-colonial Hausa-Fulani taxes.
Zakat uniquely fits the definition of a charitable wealth tax, whereas Jangali applies to cattle, Kharaj to land, and Haraji to general civic head count.
Each tax in the Emirate fiscal structure had a defined target tax base and socio-administrative purpose.

Key Concept

Fiscal administration and Islamic tax classification in the Hausa-Fulani Emirate
Question 10016Question

What is the correct sequential order of the key stages involved in the legislative passage of an annual Appropriation Bill (budget) from its initial presentation to final enactment?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with the formal presentation of the budget estimates by the Executive head, followed by the Second Reading general policy debate, then the detailed committee defense sessions by government ministries, and concludes with the Committee of Supply consideration and final passage of the Appropriation Act.
The correct sequence reflects standard parliamentary financial procedure: the process begins when the Executive head presents the proposed budget estimates to the legislature. Next, the legislature debates the general economic policies and principles during the Second Reading. Afterwards, standing committees hold budget defense sessions to scrutinize line-item sectoral allocations with executive agencies. Finally, the house convenes as the Committee of Supply to vote on allocations and enact the Appropriation Act.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initiating stage of financial legislation
The Executive head presents the budget estimates to the legislature.
Financial bills originate from the Executive arm as public revenue and expenditure proposals.
2
Determine the broad policy evaluation stage
The legislature holds the Second Reading debate on fiscal policy.
Lawmakers must debate and approve general policy principles before clause-by-clause or line-item examination.
3
Identify the specialized committee scrutiny stage
Standing committees conduct budget defense sessions with executive ministries.
Committees possess technical capacity to examine line-item allocations and agency defense testimonies.
4
Determine the final approval and enactment stage
The house sits as the Committee of Supply and votes to pass the Appropriation Act.
Final financial authorization requires voting on all supply grants in the Committee of Supply before enactment.

Key Concept

Legislative Procedure for Passing Appropriation Bills and Financial Control
Question 10017Question

In traditional Yoruba political administration, what was the primary executive role of the Oba within the kingdom?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Serving as the paramount executive head and spiritual leader of the kingdom

Answer

Serving as the paramount executive head and spiritual leader of the kingdom
In the traditional Yoruba political structure, the Oba was the central executive authority and spiritual ruler of the town or kingdom. His leadership combined religious sanction with political administration, working in conjunction with title holders and advisory councils.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core constitutional role of the Oba in pre-colonial Yoruba governance.
The Oba held central executive authority and religious/spiritual oversight over the realm.
Yoruba political structure combined sacred authority with executive functions, balanced by traditional advisory institutions.

Key Concept

Executive Authority and Dual Role of the Oba in Yoruba Governance
Question 10018Question

Which of the following structural changes was introduced by the 1979 Constitution of Nigeria to eliminate the executive friction experienced between the Head of State and Head of Government during the First Republic?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Combining the functions of Head of State and Head of Government in a single elected Executive President

Answer

Combining the functions of Head of State and Head of Government in a single elected Executive President
During the First Republic, conflict arose due to the split executive roles between the ceremonial President and the executive Prime Minister. To prevent such friction in the Second Republic, the 1979 Constitution created a unified executive presidency in which a single individual serves as both Head of State and Head of Government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the historical context of executive governance in Nigeria's First Republic (1963 Constitution).
The First Republic used a parliamentary system with a divided (bicephalous) executive comprising a ceremonial President (Head of State) and a Prime Minister (Head of Government), which created conflict between Nnamdi Azikiwe and Abubakar Tafawa Balewa.
Understanding the constitutional deficiency of the First Republic is key to identifying why the 1979 Constitution was structured differently.
2
Identify the primary innovation of the 1979 Presidential Constitution.
The 1979 Constitution adopted an executive presidential system modeled after the United States, merging both roles into a single Executive President.
This structural shift ensured clear executive leadership and avoided split executive authority.

Key Concept

Executive Presidential System under the 1979 Constitution
Question 10019Question

During the legislative passage of an executive Appropriation Bill, lawmakers intend to conduct a line-by-line examination of specific ministerial budget allocations and introduce clause-by-clause amendments. At which stage of the law-making process does this detailed clause-by-clause scrutiny occur?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Committee stage

Answer

The Committee stage is the phase in which parliamentarians examine a bill clause by clause and introduce detailed line-item amendments.
The Committee stage allows the legislature (or the Committee of the Whole in the case of appropriation bills) to carefully inspect each clause of a bill, propose line-item amendments, and adjust specific financial allocations. This is distinct from earlier stages that focus only on general policy merits.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the procedural objective described in the stem.
The objective is conducting line-by-line budgetary examination and clause-by-clause amendments.
Different stages of bill passage carry distinct parliamentary functions.
2
Distinguish between broad policy debate and detailed clause scrutiny.
General policy debate occurs during Second Reading, whereas detailed clause-by-clause analysis is referred to the Committee stage (or Committee of the Whole).
Parliamentary rules prohibit making specific line-item modifications until the bill is committed to a committee.
3
Select the corresponding legislative stage.
The Committee stage is the correct phase for line-by-line scrutiny.
It provides the structured setting for specialized standing panels or the whole house sitting as a committee to alter specific clauses.

Key Concept

Legislative Law-Making Process and Committee Stage Scrutiny
Question 10020Question

In a constitutional democracy like Nigeria, which legal power enables the judiciary to invalidate acts of the executive or laws passed by the legislature that conflict with the constitution?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The power of judicial review

Answer

The power of judicial review
The power of judicial review enables courts to act as guardians of the constitution by declaring null and void any statute or executive policy that violates constitutional provisions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key function of the judiciary designed to enforce constitutional supremacy over government actions.
Judicial review is the specific authority vested in the courts to nullify legislative enactments or executive actions that violate the constitution.
Under constitutionalism, the constitution is the supreme law, and any conflicting law is void to the extent of its inconsistency.
2
Differentiate judicial review from trial and appellate jurisdictions.
While appellate jurisdiction reviews lower court judgements and original jurisdiction hears cases at first instance, judicial review measures state actions against constitutional standards.
Mistaking judicial review for general appellate litigation overlooks its constitutional checking function on coordinate branches of government.

Key Concept

Judicial Review in Nigeria
PreviousPage 501 / 697Next
All practice questions — JAMB UTME | Examkin