Examkin

All practice questions

13931 questions

All types13,931Multiple choice7,139True / False771Numeric1,526Matching2,583Ordering631Fill in the blank1,223Short answer58
Question 10021Question →

Arrange the following procedural stages in the passage of a public bill through a legislature in their correct chronological sequence, from initial introduction to final enactment.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence is: 1. Formal presentation, reading of the bill's short title, and gazetting (First Reading) → 2. Plenary debate focusing on general principles and policy aims (Second Reading) → 3. Detailed clause-by-clause scrutiny and technical amendment (Committee Stage) → 4. Presentation of committee findings, final deliberation, and formal vote on passage (Report Stage & Third Reading) → 5. Transmission to the Head of State for signing into law or constitutional veto (Executive Assent).
The standard legislative procedure requires a bill to first be introduced and gazetted (First Reading), followed by a general debate on its merits (Second Reading). After passing the Second Reading, it is referred to a committee for clause-by-clause scrutiny and amendment (Committee Stage). The committee reports back to the full house for final voting (Report Stage and Third Reading), and once passed by the legislature, it is transmitted to the Executive for assent.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the initial legislative action required to bring a bill before the house.
The process begins with the First Reading, consisting of formal presentation, reading of the short title, and official publication (gazetting).
Members must be formally notified of the bill's existence before any debates can occur.
2
Determine the stage where the general merits and broad policy of the bill are debated.
The Second Reading follows the First Reading.
Legislators must first decide whether the policy framework of the bill is acceptable in principle before spending time on clause-by-clause modifications.
3
Identify where detailed technical work and amendments occur.
Upon passing the Second Reading, the bill moves to the Committee Stage.
Standing committees examine individual clauses, conduct public hearings, and suggest specific amendments.
4
Locate the stage where the house reviews committee work and takes the final legislative vote.
The Committee Stage is followed by the Report Stage and Third Reading.
The full house must consider the committee's recommended amendments and take a final vote on the complete text.
5
Identify the final external constitutional requirement for enactment.
The process culminates with Executive Assent.
Once passed by the legislature (or both chambers in a bicameral legislature), the bill is sent to the Head of State for assent to become enforceable law.

Key Concept

Chronological Stages of the Law-Making Process
Question 10022Question →

Match each citizen action on the left with its appropriate constitutional classification on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Filing a lawsuit to challenge unlawful detention by state security agents
Prompt payment of statutory personal income tax to public authorities
Participating actively in voluntary community sanitation and welfare projects

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Filing a lawsuit against unlawful detention matches with Fundamental Right; prompt payment of statutory personal income tax matches with Legal Obligation; participating actively in voluntary community sanitation projects matches with Civic Duty.
Enforcing protection against unlawful detention via courts represents exercising a Fundamental Right. Paying statutory taxes is legally enforced by government acts and constitutes a Legal Obligation. Engaging in voluntary neighborhood welfare activities represents a Civic Duty aimed at furthering community wellbeing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the action of filing a lawsuit against unlawful detention
Identified as a Fundamental Right
Constitutional rights grant entitlements to protection of life, liberty, and due process which citizens can enforce through judicial redress.
2
Analyze the action of paying statutory income tax
Identified as a Legal Obligation
Taxation is mandated by statutory legislation, creating a binding legal duty enforced by state authority.
3
Analyze participation in voluntary community sanitation projects
Identified as a Civic Duty
Community service is a voluntary civic responsibility expected of good citizens to promote public welfare, rather than a legally penalized requirement.

Key Concept

Distinction between fundamental rights (enforceable entitlements), legal obligations (statutory requirements), and civic duties (moral/social responsibilities).
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10023Question →

A fundamental philosophical distinction between Italian Fascism under Benito Mussolini and German Nazism under Adolf Hitler lies in their primary object of political exaltation. While Italian Fascism views the corporate state itself as the supreme, all-encompassing end, Nazism treats the state merely as a instrument subordinated to which of the following core concepts?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Racial purity and the biological supremacy of the Volk

Answer

Racial purity and the biological supremacy of the Volk
While Italian Fascism worshipped the state structure as the ultimate entity ('statolatry'), Nazism defined itself primarily through biological racism. In Nazi ideology, the state was not an end in itself, but merely a mechanism used to serve, preserve, and advance the biological purity and expansion of the Aryan race (the Volk).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core doctrine of Italian Fascism
Italian Fascism was totalistic and state-centric, encapsulated by Mussolini's slogan: 'Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State.'
Establishing that Fascism exalts the political state structure above all else.
2
Contrast with the core defining tenet of National Socialism (Nazism)
Nazism integrated totalitarian control with pseudo-scientific racial determinism, holding that the preservation and dominance of the Aryan race (Volk) was paramount.
Identifying how Hitler's ideology subordinated state institutions to racial/biological goals.
3
Evaluate the option choices to select the accurate distinction
Racial purity and the biological supremacy of the Volk correctly captures the supreme focal point of Nazism, distinguishing it from state-centered Fascism and class-centered Communism.
Matching the conceptual requirement of the question stem.

Key Concept

Distinction between Italian Fascism and German Nazism regarding State vs. Race
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10024Question →

Which of the following serves as the primary practical justification for adopting a unicameral legislature in a developing unitary nation?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Reducing the financial cost of administration and accelerating the law-making process

Answer

Reducing the financial cost of administration and accelerating the law-making process
Unicameralism features a single legislative body. This streamlined setup avoids the financial expense of maintaining two houses and eliminates political delays caused by conflicts between upper and lower chambers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the structural definition of a unicameral legislature
A unicameral legislature consists of only one law-making chamber or house.
Understanding the structure establishes its operational capabilities and limitations.
2
Evaluate the advantages of operating a single law-making chamber
Having a single chamber eliminates redundant debate across houses, prevents inter-cameral deadlocks, and reduces government spending on legislative salaries and overhead.
This directly matches the administrative efficiency needs of unitary developing states.

Key Concept

Merits and Rationale of Unicameralism
Question 10025Question →

Consider the key political developments and regional crises that occurred during Nigeria's First Republic (1960–1966). In what chronological order did these events occur, from earliest to latest?

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological order of events from earliest to latest is: (1) The declaration of a state of emergency in the Western Region (May 1962), (2) The creation of the Mid-Western Region (August 1963), (3) The adoption of the Republican Constitution (October 1, 1963), and (4) The constitutional impasse between the President and Prime Minister following the federal election (December 1964 – January 1965).
The events progressed chronologically as follows: First, the Action Group crisis led to the federal declaration of a state of emergency in the Western Region in May 1962. Next, the Mid-Western Region was created in August 1963 following a referendum. Shortly after, Nigeria enacted the Republican Constitution on October 1, 1963. Finally, the post-election constitutional stalemate between President Azikiwe and Prime Minister Balewa occurred in December 1964 – January 1965.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the date of the Western Region emergency declaration.
The state of emergency in the Western Region was declared by Prime Minister Balewa's federal government in May 1962 after violence broke out in the Western House of Assembly.
This establishes May 1962 as the starting point among the listed events.
2
Identify the creation date of the Mid-Western Region.
The Mid-Western Region was formally created in August 1963 following a referendum in July 1963.
This event took place shortly before Nigeria transitioned to a Republic.
3
Determine the date Nigeria adopted the Republican Constitution.
Nigeria became a Republic on October 1, 1963, replacing Queen Elizabeth II with Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe as President.
This constitutional change occurred immediately after the Mid-Western region creation in late 1963.
4
Identify the period of the Azikiwe-Balewa election crisis.
The federal election crisis took place between December 1964 and January 1965 when UPGA boycotted elections and President Azikiwe initially refused to reappoint Balewa.
This places the federal election crisis as the latest event in the sequence.

Key Concept

Chronological timeline of major constitutional changes and political crises in Nigeria's First Republic (1960–1966)
Question 10026Question →

Which of the following principles distinguishes universal adult suffrage from a restricted franchise in democratic electoral systems?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Granting voting rights to all citizens who have attained the constitutional age of majority regardless of property, gender, or tax status

Answer

Granting voting rights to all citizens who have attained the constitutional age of majority regardless of property, gender, or tax status
Universal adult suffrage means that every citizen who reaches the legal age of majority is granted the right to vote, irrespective of wealth, income, gender, or social standing.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define Universal Adult Suffrage
Identify that universal franchise removes discriminatory socio-economic and demographic barriers to voting for adult citizens.
Democratic electoral theory defines universal adult suffrage by its inclusivity across all adult citizens.
2
Contrast with Restricted Franchise
Differentiate universal suffrage from historical or qualified franchise systems that required property ownership, tax payments, or gender criteria.
Restricted franchise limits voting rights to specific privileged sub-groups of the population.
3
Evaluate the Options
Select the definition that accurately reflects universal voter qualification without extraneous electoral system or legal sovereignty confusions.
The option describing equal voting rights for all citizens of legal majority age accurately captures the core principle of universal adult suffrage.

Key Concept

Universal Adult Suffrage vs Restricted Franchise
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10027Question →

Match each key principle of executive systems on the left with its appropriate operational definition on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Dual Executive
Vote of No Confidence
Fixed Tenure
Fusion of Powers

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Dual Executive pairs with the separation of roles between a ceremonial Head of State and an active Head of Government. Vote of No Confidence pairs with the legislative procedure used to dismiss the Prime Minister and cabinet before term completion. Fixed Tenure pairs with the constitutional guarantee of a specified term length for the President, independent of legislative approval. Fusion of Powers pairs with overlapping personnel between the executive cabinet and the legislature.
Dual Executive accurately describes the division between a ceremonial head (monarch or president) and a political head (prime minister). A vote of no confidence is the standard parliamentary mechanism for removing a government. Fixed tenure is a defining feature of the presidential model guaranteeing term duration. Fusion of powers accurately describes the parliamentary arrangement where cabinet ministers are also members of parliament.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify structural characteristics of parliamentary executives.
Recognize that parliamentary systems feature a dual executive, fusion of powers between branches, and reliance on votes of no confidence.
These core features define parliamentary operations and executive accountability.
2
Identify structural characteristics of presidential executives.
Recognize that presidential systems feature a single executive serving a fixed tenure under separation of powers.
Fixed tenure isolates the president's term from legislative votes of confidence.
3
Match each left-side concept with its precise definition on the right.
Align Dual Executive to split leadership roles, Vote of No Confidence to cabinet removal mechanism, Fixed Tenure to guaranteed term length, and Fusion of Powers to shared legislative-executive personnel.
Matches align theoretical terms with their actual institutional definitions.

Key Concept

Parliamentary vs Presidential Executive Systems
Question 10028Question →

A citizen challenges an administrative order issued by a Federal Minister, claiming it exceeds the statutory powers granted under an Act of the National Assembly. When a court evaluates whether this executive action conforms with the Constitution and enabling statute, which judicial power is it primarily exercising?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Judicial review

Answer

Judicial review
Judicial review is the constitutional power vested in competent courts to examine acts of the executive and legislative arms of government to ensure compliance with the law and the Constitution, declaring invalid any acts that exceed legal authority.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the legal action described in the scenario
The court is asked to test the validity of a Ministerial order against statutory and constitutional boundaries.
Determining whether an executive body has acted within its lawful authority is a key mechanism of checking administrative overreach.
2
Identify the corresponding legal function of the judiciary
The judicial power to invalidate unconstitutional or ultra vires government actions is known as judicial review.
Judicial review specifically applies to examining official executive and legislative acts, whereas appellate jurisdiction deals with reviewing trial decisions of subordinate courts.

Key Concept

Judicial Review
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10029Question →

In the classic Yoruba political structure, the Oba was revered as the supreme executive authority and spiritual leader of the kingdom. However, constitutional authority was shared rather than absolute. Which of the following best explains why the Oba could not exercise absolute, autocratic control over state administration?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Major executive decisions and policy implementations required the concurrence and balance of principal noble councils such as the Oyomesi and Ogboni.

Answer

Major executive decisions and policy implementations required the concurrence and balance of principal noble councils such as the Oyomesi and Ogboni.
In pre-colonial Yoruba governance (notably in the Oyo Empire), executive authority was constitutional rather than absolute. While the Oba was the supreme executive figurehead, decisions were counterbalanced by key institutions. The Oyomesi controlled state policy and kingmaking, while the Ogboni council held judicial veto powers, ensuring that royal executive authority relied on institutional consensus.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional nature of executive authority in pre-colonial Yoruba political organization.
The Oba held sacred divine rights and executive leadership, but governance operated within a decentralized system of checks and balances.
Understanding the division of authority clarifies that royal decisions were not autocratic commands.
2
Examine the political roles of institutional councils within the Yoruba state.
Bodies like the Oyomesi (council of state/kingmakers) and Ogboni (earth cult/secret judicial society) possessed legislative, judicial, and constitutional veto powers over executive decrees.
These institutions ensured power was balanced across society and prevented absolute monarchy.
3
Select the option that accurately describes this structural check on the Oba's executive powers.
The statement highlighting the concurrence of noble councils such as the Oyomesi and Ogboni correctly identifies the constitutional limitation on royal autocracy.
This directly aligns with pre-colonial Yoruba constitutional principles.

Key Concept

Yoruba Constitutional System of Checks and Balances
Question 10030Question →

The 1979 Constitution of Nigeria introduced a fundamental structural change in the leadership of the executive organ. Which of the following best describes the executive system established during the Second Republic?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: An Executive President who combines the roles of Head of State and Head of Government

Answer

An Executive President who combines the roles of Head of State and Head of Government
The correct answer highlights the central feature of the 1979 Constitution of Nigeria, which adopted an executive presidential system where one individual serves as both the ceremonial Head of State and the chief executive Head of Government.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the key political transition established by the 1979 Constitution of Nigeria.
The 1979 Constitution transitioned Nigeria from a parliamentary system (First Republic) to an American-style executive presidential system (Second Republic).
Understanding this structural shift is essential for analyzing executive leadership in the Second Republic.
2
Analyze the role of the President under the 1979 presidential constitution.
The dual roles of Head of State (ceremonial leadership) and Head of Government (chief administrator) were fused into a single office of the Executive President.
This eliminated the previous conflicts experienced between the ceremonial President and the executive Prime Minister during the First Republic.

Key Concept

Executive Presidency in the 1979 Constitution
Question 10031Question →

A government that originally came to power through democratic elections begins bypassing statutory legislative procedures and routinely utilizes state security forces to suppress dissent and compel public compliance. According to fundamental principles of political science, how does this shift fundamentally alter the regime's political standing?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It erodes political legitimacy by substituting voluntary popular acceptance and legal authority with coercive power.

Answer

The regime loses political legitimacy as its rule shifts from legitimate authority based on consent and constitutionalism to the exercise of coercive power.
Political legitimacy is the belief by citizens that a government has the rightful authority to govern and issue binding commands. When a state abandons constitutional checks and balances to rely heavily on security agencies and force, it sacrifices popular consent. Consequently, its governance transitions from legitimate authority to mere coercive power.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core political concepts in the scenario
Legitimacy refers to the rightful right to rule based on public acceptance and constitutional compliance, whereas power is the capacity to compel compliance through force.
Differentiating between power (coercion) and authority/legitimacy (lawful right to rule) is key to evaluating political governance.
2
Evaluate the effect of bypassing constitutional mechanisms and relying on security forces
The government abandons consent-based legal authority and relies on state force.
When democratic processes are undermined in favor of military or security compulsion, public voluntary compliance is lost.
3
Determine the impact on the state's political standing
The government's legitimacy erodes, leaving it operating on bare coercive power rather than legitimate authority.
Legitimacy cannot be sustained long-term purely through physical suppression.

Key Concept

Legitimacy vs Coercive Power
Question 10032Question →

Read the dramatic extract below:

[Scene: The courtyard of General Olori's residence. GENERAL OLORI stands near the gate, wearing a golden ceremonial mantle presented to him by Prince Kene. The audience already knows from the preceding act that Prince Kene secretly lined the inner collar with lethal poison to eliminate his political rival.]

GENERAL OLORI: This splendid mantle, a gift from my dearest brother Prince Kene, is proof of our sacred trust. Wearing it tonight, I fear no betrayal, for a true friend's gift carries only warmth and protection!

Which dramatic device is primarily showcased in General Olori's statement?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Dramatic irony, because the audience possesses vital knowledge of the secret plot that is unknown to the speaker

Answer

Dramatic irony, because the audience possesses vital knowledge of the secret plot that is unknown to the speaker
The correct answer emphasizes dramatic irony because the audience has been given prior knowledge of the poisoned mantle, creating tension when General Olori unknowingly praises the garment as a token of protection.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stage directions and narrative context provided in the extract.
The stage direction reveals that the audience knows the golden mantle is secretly poisoned by Prince Kene.
Establishing what information is available to the audience versus what is known by the character is necessary to identify the device.
2
Analyze General Olori's speech in relation to the audience's prior knowledge.
General Olori praises the mantle as a symbol of 'sacred trust' and 'protection', completely unaware of its deadly nature.
Contrasting the character's naive speech with the reality known to the audience highlights the dramatic mechanism at work.
3
Match the observed dramatic effect to the standard literary definition.
The situation where the audience is aware of an impending danger that the character remains unaware of is defined as dramatic irony.
Dramatic irony creates tension precisely through this disparity in awareness between spectator and character.

Key Concept

Dramatic Irony
Question 10033Question →

Match each factor market phenomenon associated with buyer-dominated market structures on the left with its corresponding economic feature or outcome on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Marginal Factor Cost (MFCMFC) exceeding Average Factor Cost (AFCAFC)
Monopsonistic exploitation
Imposition of an effective minimum wage
Upward-sloping factor supply curve

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Marginal Factor Cost (MFCMFC) exceeding Average Factor Cost (AFCAFC) matches the outcome of facing an upward-sloping supply curve, requiring higher prices on all previous units to hire an additional unit. Monopsonistic exploitation matches the condition where the factor price paid is strictly lower than the factor's Marginal Revenue Product (MRPLMRP_L). Imposition of an effective minimum wage matches the scenario where employment and factor prices can rise simultaneously by making the buyer a price-taker over a specific range. Upward-sloping factor supply curve matches the factor market constraint demonstrating that additional resource units can only be attracted by offering progressively higher prices.
Each factor market phenomenon is correctly matched according to monopsony theory: MFC>AFCMFC > AFC is caused by price increases across all hired units when expanding inputs; monopsonistic exploitation represents paying factors less than their marginal revenue product (MRPLMRP_L); minimum wage enforcement eliminates the upward marginal factor cost slope to allow joint wage and employment gains; and the upward-sloping factor supply curve shows higher prices are needed to attract more inputs.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the relationship between Marginal Factor Cost (MFCMFC) and Average Factor Cost (AFCAFC) under monopsony.
Since the firm is the sole buyer, hiring an extra factor unit raises the factor price for all existing units, causing MFCMFC to lie above AFCAFC.
To establish the pair for MFC>AFCMFC > AFC.
2
Identify the economic definition of monopsonistic exploitation.
Monopsonistic exploitation occurs when factor owners (e.g., labor) are paid less than their marginal productivity (W<MRPLW < MRP_L).
To correctly pair monopsonistic exploitation with its productivity-gap definition.
3
Examine the impact of a price floor or minimum wage in a buyer-dominated market.
A minimum wage creates a horizontal supply section for the monopsonist, eliminating the upward wage pressure on MFCMFC and enabling higher employment alongside higher wages.
To match minimum wage imposition with simultaneous increases in employment and factor prices.
4
Evaluate the nature of an upward-sloping factor supply curve.
The upward slope indicates that higher factor prices must be offered to incentivize additional suppliers to enter or expand supply.
To pair the upward-sloping supply curve with the factor attraction constraint.

Key Concept

Monopsony Factor Markets, Marginal Factor Cost, and Market Distortions
Question 10034Question →

While communalism distributes land rights to individuals based on lineage and community membership, through which mechanism does a feudal system primarily organize land rights and political authority?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A hierarchical contractual arrangement where land grants are exchanged for military service and loyalty

Answer

A hierarchical contractual arrangement where land grants are exchanged for military service and loyalty
Feudalism is structured around reciprocal legal and military obligations among the landed nobility, revolving around lords, vassals, and fiefs. Land allocation is tied directly to military loyalty and political vassalage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core feature of communalism mentioned in the prompt.
Communalism relies on collective ownership, lineage ties, and community membership for resource access.
This establishes the baseline of how communal political systems organize property and authority.
2
Identify the defining structural characteristic of feudalism.
Feudalism is defined by land grants (fiefs) bestowed by lords upon vassals in exchange for loyalty, protection, and military service.
Socio-political power in feudalism is strictly bound to land tenure contracts across a rigid socio-economic hierarchy.

Key Concept

Structural differences between Communalism and Feudal Land Tenure Contracts
Question 10035Question →

In a liberal constitutional democracy, the doctrine of popular sovereignty grants an elected legislative majority the authority to suspend judicial review whenever necessary to enforce immediate public policy priorities.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False. Popular sovereignty in a constitutional democracy is constrained by the constitution and the rule of law, meaning an elected majority cannot arbitrarily override or suspend judicial review.
The correct answer is False because constitutional democracy requires that elected majorities govern within legal limits defined by the constitution. Judicial review is an essential mechanism for preserving constitutional supremacy and protecting minority rights against majority overreach.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core concept of popular sovereignty within a constitutional democracy.
Popular sovereignty means ultimate political authority resides in the people, but in a constitutional framework, this authority is exercised through established legal rules and institutional boundaries.
To determine whether legislative power under popular sovereignty is absolute or limited.
2
Examine the role of judicial review and constitutional checks.
Judicial review is a core feature that safeguards fundamental rights and constitutional supremacy against potential tyranny of the majority.
To evaluate if a legislative majority can legally suspend judicial oversight.
3
Deduce the truth value of the assertion.
Since democratic governance requires constitutionalism and judicial independence to prevent majority despotism, the statement is false.
To confirm the final answer based on democratic principles.

Key Concept

Constitutional Democracy and Limits on Majority Rule
Question 10036Question →

A primary advantage of maintaining a unicameral legislative system compared to a bicameral legislative system is the significant reduction in the financial cost of running government.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The statement is true because operating a single-chamber legislature eliminates the duplicate administrative structures, salaries, and allowances inherent in a two-chamber legislative setup, resulting in lower state expenditure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the structural definition of a unicameral legislature.
A unicameral legislature consists of only one legislative chamber or house.
Understanding the structure helps determine its resource requirements.
2
Compare the operational cost of unicameralism versus bicameralism.
Maintaining a single assembly requires fewer salaries, allowances, facilities, and staff than maintaining two separate chambers.
Reducing financial expenses is a widely recognized merit of single-chamber legislative systems.

Key Concept

Merits of Unicameralism
Question 10037Question →

In a single-member parliamentary constituency election governed by the First-Past-The-Post (simple plurality) electoral system, four political parties received the following valid votes:

- Party P: 18,500 votes
- Party Q: 15,200 votes
- Party R: 12,300 votes
- Party S: 4,000 votes

Based on the operational mechanics of the First-Past-The-Post system, which statement accurately describes the electoral outcome and its structural implication?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Party P wins the seat outright by securing a simple plurality (37%37\% of total votes), illustrating how the system allows a candidate to win without an absolute majority.

Answer

Party P wins the seat outright by securing a simple plurality (37%37\% of total votes), illustrating how the system allows a candidate to win without an absolute majority.
In a First-Past-The-Post (simple plurality) electoral system, the single seat in a constituency is awarded to the candidate who secures the highest number of valid votes relative to any individual rival. Here, Party P leads with 18,50018,500 votes out of 50,00050,000 cast (37%37\%). Even though 63%63\% of voters voted against Party P, Party P wins the seat outright because FPTP does not require an absolute majority (50%+150\% + 1).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate total valid votes cast in the constituency.
18,500+15,200+12,300+4,000=50,00018,500 + 15,200 + 12,300 + 4,000 = 50,000 total valid votes.
Establishing total vote tally helps evaluate candidate percentages against plurality and majority thresholds.
2
Identify the candidate with the highest number of votes.
Party P has the highest vote count with 18,50018,500 votes (37%37\% of total votes).
First-Past-The-Post determines the winner purely by who receives the highest single vote count.
3
Apply the rule of First-Past-The-Post (Simple Plurality).
Party P is declared winner of the single seat without requiring an absolute majority (>25,000>25,000 votes).
Simple plurality systems mandate that the leading candidate wins regardless of whether they achieve an absolute majority of total votes.

Key Concept

First-Past-The-Post (Simple Plurality) System Mechanics
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10038Question →

In a parliamentary executive system, cabinet members are bound by the doctrine of collective responsibility. If a minister strongly disagrees with a policy officially adopted by the cabinet, which course of action must that minister constitutionally take?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Resign from the cabinet position if choosing to publicly oppose the policy

Answer

The minister must resign from the cabinet position if choosing to publicly oppose the policy.
In a parliamentary executive, collective responsibility demands absolute cabinet solidarity. All ministers are jointly responsible for executive policies, so a minister who refuses to support a cabinet decision publicly must resign.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the principles governing executive decision-making in a parliamentary system.
The executive functions through cabinet government operating under the principle of collective responsibility.
Cabinet solidarity requires all ministers to share joint public responsibility for cabinet decisions regardless of personal opinion.
2
Determine the required constitutional behavior for a dissenting minister.
A minister who cannot defend a cabinet policy publicly must surrender their ministerial office.
Public criticism of cabinet decisions by a sitting minister breaks executive cohesion and constitutional convention.

Key Concept

Collective Responsibility of the Parliamentary Executive
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10039Question →

Political legitimacy in a state is maintained primarily through the persistent application of state coercion and physical force rather than the voluntary consent of the governed.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

The statement is false because political legitimacy fundamentally relies on citizen consent, lawful governance, and moral acceptance, whereas relying primarily on state coercion reflects a breakdown of legitimacy.
Legitimacy reflects the moral right of a government to exercise authority, which is sustained through factors such as fair elections, good governance, constitutionalism, and public support, rather than physical intimidation or armed force.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define the core meaning of political legitimacy in government.
Identify that legitimacy represents the right to rule as recognized and accepted by the citizens.
Distinguishing between authority derived from popular consent and control maintained by force is essential.
2
Evaluate the role of state coercion versus civic consent in maintaining legitimacy.
Recognize that over-reliance on physical force indicates a lack of moral authority and voluntary compliance.
Primary reliance on military or police coercion undermines democratic stability and erodes legitimacy.

Key Concept

Determinants and Maintenance of Political Legitimacy
Question 10040Question →

In modern political theory, government authority is sustained by the consent of the governed. Which type of sovereignty asserts that supreme power and ultimate political authority reside in the general electorate or citizens of a state?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Popular sovereignty

Answer

Popular sovereignty
Popular sovereignty is the foundational doctrine that the legitimacy and supreme authority of the state are created and sustained by the consent of its people, who express their sovereign will primarily through elections.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the question stem to identify the holder of ultimate authority
The stem describes supreme power vested in the general electorate or citizens.
Determining where sovereignty is located distinguishes between legal, political, and popular dimensions of sovereignty.
2
Match the description to the correct type of sovereignty
Popular sovereignty directly defines authority residing in the general populace.
This is distinct from legal sovereignty, which resides in the legislature or law-making institution.

Key Concept

Popular sovereignty locates supreme political authority in the citizens or electorate of a state.
PreviousPage 502 / 697Next
All practice questions — JAMB UTME | Examkin