Question

Passage A
In the mid-twentieth century, the architectural movement known as Brutalism emerged, driven by a profoundly utopian ethos. Proponents championed the use of unfinished concrete—*béton brut*—as a great equalizer. By rejecting the elaborate, costly ornamentation of earlier styles, Brutalist architects sought to construct civic spaces that were uncompromisingly honest, functional, and accessible. The stark, imposing geometries of these buildings were intended to reflect a democratic transparency, stripping away bourgeois pretensions to offer raw, unmediated environments where all citizens could interact on equal footing.

Passage B
Despite its egalitarian origins, Brutalist architecture has largely failed to endear itself to the communities it was meant to serve. To the contemporary urban dweller, the massive, windowless concrete facades do not communicate democratic transparency; rather, they project an aura of bureaucratic hostility and dystopian surveillance. Consequently, municipal governments worldwide have faced immense public pressure to demolish these monolithic structures. What was initially conceived as a liberating aesthetic is now widely condemned by the public as oppressive, leading to the erasure of countless Brutalist civic centers.

The relationship between the original intent behind Brutalism as described in Passage A and the modern public's reception of it as described in Passage B is most structurally analogous to which of the following scenarios?