Question

Difficulty: EasyTracking Viewpoints

Read the following passage excerpt:

While traditional historians often argue that the advent of algorithmic trading primarily stabilized financial markets by increasing liquidity, recent economic studies suggest a different reality. The author contends that despite the increase in trade volume, the high-speed nature of these transactions actually amplified market volatility during periods of economic stress.

Statement: According to the passage, the author shares the viewpoint of traditional historians regarding the impact of algorithmic trading on market stability.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is False.
The statement is false because the passage explicitly contrasts the two perspectives. The traditional historians believe algorithmic trading stabilized markets, whereas the author argues it amplified market volatility.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the viewpoint of the traditional historians as stated in the passage.
Traditional historians argue that algorithmic trading primarily stabilized financial markets.
To track viewpoints, we must first isolate what each specific group believes.
2
Identify the viewpoint of the author.
The author contends that algorithmic trading actually amplified market volatility during economic stress.
Comparing the author's perspective to the historians' view is necessary to evaluate the statement.
3
Compare the two viewpoints to determine if they are shared.
The author's view (amplified volatility) directly contradicts the traditional historians' view (stabilized markets).
The statement claims they share the same viewpoint, which the comparison proves to be incorrect.

Key Concept

Tracking and Distinguishing Viewpoints
Rate this question