Read the following passage.
In recent years, the movement to preserve Brutalist architecture—mid-twentieth-century concrete structures often derided as austere and imposing—has gained momentum. "Functionalist" preservationists argue that these buildings should be saved primarily because of their embodied energy and structural durability, asserting that adapting these robust frameworks for modern use is an ecological imperative. In contrast, "Aesthetic Revisionists" advocate for preservation on the grounds that Brutalism represents a pinnacle of uncompromising civic expression, one that honestly reflects the post-war socio-political landscape. While the Aesthetic Revisionists champion the strict retention of original, raw concrete facades to maintain historical authenticity, the Functionalists are largely indifferent to exterior cosmetic modifications, provided the core structural shell is retained and optimized for energy efficiency.
Based on the passage, the "Functionalist" preservationists would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding a proposed renovation of a Brutalist civic center?
- APreserving the uncompromising civic expression of the post-war era is the most important factor in the renovation project.
- BThe civic center should be preserved precisely because its austere and imposing facade serves as a testament to historical architectural trends.
- The original raw concrete exterior should be altered if doing so significantly improves the building's overall energy efficiency.Answer
- DEvery Brutalist structure ever built should be retained and retrofitted regardless of the structural condition of its core shell.
- EThe ecological benefits of adaptive reuse will always be recognized by the public once the renovation is complete.