Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardMust Be True Questions

Read the following stimulus and evaluate whether the concluding statement must logically be true.

Stimulus: Botanical researchers studying the alpine tundra have discovered that every plant species possessing deep taproots can survive permafrost conditions. Furthermore, no plant species native to the lower valley can survive permafrost conditions. Most plant species currently documented in the Highland Registry possess deep taproots, and every plant species documented in the Highland Registry is classified as a perennial.

Statement: At least some perennial plant species are not native to the lower valley.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is logically True.
The concluding statement is a definitively valid deduction. By linking the absolute conditionals (Deep Taproot -> Survive Permafrost -> NOT Lower Valley), we know that no plant with a deep taproot is native to the lower valley. The stimulus then states that most Highland Registry plants have deep taproots, which means most Highland Registry plants are not native to the lower valley. Finally, since every Highland Registry plant is a perennial, the subset of Highland Registry plants that are not native to the lower valley are necessarily perennials. Thus, it is undeniably true that at least some perennials are not native to the lower valley.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Diagram the absolute conditional statements found in the first two sentences.
Deep Taproots -> Survive Permafrost; and Lower Valley -> NOT Survive Permafrost. The contrapositive of the second statement is: Survive Permafrost -> NOT Lower Valley.
Establishing the baseline rules is necessary to build a transitive chain of logic.
2
Chain the conditional statements together.
Deep Taproots -> Survive Permafrost -> NOT Lower Valley, which simplifies to: Deep Taproots -> NOT Lower Valley.
Chaining allows us to see the indirect, definitive relationship between deep taproots and geographic origin.
3
Diagram the remaining premises involving quantifiers and the Highland Registry.
Highland Registry -most- Deep Taproots; and Highland Registry -> Perennial.
These premises must be connected to the conditional chain derived in Step 2 to determine what inferences can be drawn.
4
Synthesize the quantifier premises with the conditional chain to test the statement.
Since Highland Registry -most- Deep Taproots, and Deep Taproots -> NOT Lower Valley, it follows that Highland Registry -most- NOT Lower Valley. Because ALL Highland Registry plants are perennials, the 'most' Highland plants that are NOT Lower Valley must also be perennials. Therefore, Perennials -some- NOT Lower Valley.
This confirms that the statement 'At least some perennial plant species are not native to the lower valley' is a logically proven deduction.

Key Concept

Combining formal conditional logic chains with quantitative qualifiers (most/all/some) to draw a necessarily true deduction.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Must Be True Questions

More questions from this topic