An investor simultaneously places offsetting buy and sell orders for the same security across two accounts under their common control. The orders execute against each other, resulting in no actual change in beneficial ownership, but generating the appearance of substantial market activity to induce others to trade. Which of the following prohibited practices has occurred?
- Wash trading, because transactions were executed with no change in beneficial ownership to artificially inflate trading volume.Answer
- BSpoofing, because non-bona fide orders were entered into the order book with the intent to cancel them before execution.
- CFront-running, because a broker-dealer executed principal trades in its own market-maker inventory ahead of customer limit orders.
- DA permissible volume-boosting strategy, provided the trader registers with FINRA's criminal prosecution division prior to execution.
Answer
Wash trading, because transactions were executed with no change in beneficial ownership to artificially inflate trading volume.
The correct answer highlights wash trading. Wash trading occurs when an investor enters matching buy and sell orders for a security across accounts with common beneficial ownership. The primary objective of this prohibited activity is to create a false or misleading appearance of active trading and volume in order to deceive other market participants.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Wash Trading and Prohibited Market Manipulation