Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

A equity trader enters a series of large buy limit orders at quotes slightly below the current national best bid without intending to execute them. The presence of these substantial orders creates a false impression of heavy buying interest, causing other market participants to raise their bid prices. The trader then executes a market sell order for a separate proprietary account at the artificially inflated bid price and immediately cancels the initial buy limit orders before they can be filled. Which of the following statements correctly identifies the prohibited market practice committed by the trader and the regulatory framework governing enforcement?

  1. The trader committed spoofing by submitting non-bona fide orders to manipulate market prices; FINRA can impose administrative sanctions for rule violations, but criminal prosecution requires referral to federal authorities.Answer
  2. B
    The trader committed wash trading because offsetting buy and sell orders were placed simultaneously across accounts to generate artificial trading volume without a change in beneficial ownership.
  3. C
    The trader committed market manipulation, empowering FINRA as a federal government agency to independently file criminal charges and order imprisonment for the representative.
  4. D
    The trader committed backing away because the firm failed to honor its advertised quote while acting in a dealer capacity charging a principal mark-up rather than an agent commission.

Answer

The trader committed spoofing by submitting non-bona fide orders to manipulate market prices; FINRA can impose administrative sanctions for rule violations, but criminal prosecution requires referral to federal authorities.
The correct answer accurately identifies spoofing as entering quotes without the intent to execute them to artificially influence price movement. It also correctly states that FINRA, as a Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO), has administrative jurisdiction (such as fines, suspensions, or expulsion) but must refer criminal matters to government law enforcement agencies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the trading technique described in the stem.
Entering orders with no intention of execution to trick market participants into adjusting prices, followed by quick order cancellation, is defined as spoofing under securities regulations.
Spoofing relies on non-bona fide order placement to distort market depth and supply/demand dynamics.
2
Distinguish spoofing from other manipulative practices such as wash trading.
Wash trading involves executing trades between accounts under common beneficial ownership to create fake volume, whereas spoofing involves non-bona fide quotes that are intended to be canceled unexecuted.
Recognizing the mechanism (canceled quotes vs. offsetting executed trades) prevents misclassifying the violation.
3
Evaluate the regulatory authority and jurisdiction of Self-Regulatory Organizations (SROs) like FINRA.
FINRA is a non-governmental SRO that enforces industry rules through administrative sanctions (fines, censure, bars). Criminal prosecution is reserved for governmental entities like the SEC and Department of Justice (DOJ).
SROs possess delegated industry regulatory oversight, not statutory criminal law authority.

Key Concept

Prohibited Market Practices: Spoofing vs. Wash Trading & Regulatory Authority
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices