Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

A freelance clinical trial consultant contracted by a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company learns during an unblinded study review that a key oncology drug failed to meet its primary efficacy endpoints. Prior to any public disclosure, the consultant informs a personal acquaintance of the trial failure, intending for the acquaintance to trade on the information. The acquaintance subsequently purchases put options on the company's stock and realizes substantial profits, while the consultant executes no trades. Which of the following statements regarding tipper, tippee, and civil liability under federal insider trading regulations are correct?

  1. The consultant can be held liable for insider trading as a tipper even though the consultant did not personally execute any trades or receive direct financial compensation.Answer
  2. The acquaintance can be held liable as a tippee if the acquaintance knew or had reason to know that the information was material, nonpublic, and passed in breach of a duty of confidentiality.Answer
  3. C
    Civil monetary penalties for insider trading violations under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act are restricted strictly to disgorgement of actual profits gained or losses avoided.
  4. D
    The consultant is completely exempt from tipper liability under federal securities laws because temporary independent contractors owe no fiduciary duties to corporate shareholders.

Answer

Both statements establishing that the consultant is liable as a tipper despite not executing trades and that the acquaintance is liable as a tippee if they knew or should have known of the breach of duty are correct.
Tippers who selectively disclose material nonpublic information in breach of a duty of confidentiality incur insider trading liability regardless of whether they execute trades themselves. Concurrently, tippees who knowingly receive and act on such information inherit derivative liability when trading. Independent contractors function as constructive insiders bound by duties of trust and confidence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze tipper liability elements for the contracted consultant.
Under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act and SEC Rule 10b-5, temporary consultants qualify as temporary/constructive insiders. Passing material nonpublic information to another person with the expectation or intent that they trade constitutes an unlawful tipper breach, even if the tipper does not personally trade or profit.
Liability stems from breaching a duty of trust and confidence by improperly selective disclosure.
2
Analyze tippee liability elements for the acquaintance who traded.
The acquaintance incurs derivative tippee liability if they trade while knowing or having reason to know that the information was material, nonpublic, and derived from a breach of duty.
Tippees inherit the insider's fiduciary duty once they are aware of the illegal nature of the tip.
3
Evaluate potential civil sanctions under federal securities laws.
Civil penalties for insider trading can reach up to three times (treble) the profit made or loss avoided, making simple disgorgement an incorrect limit.
Congress established treble damages under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act of 1984 to deter market misuse.

Key Concept

Elements of Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Law
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information