Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

A commercial real estate broker assisting a publicly traded technology company with site selection confidentially learns from the firm's chief financial officer that the firm is finalizing an unannounced acquisition of a publicly traded logistics provider. The real estate broker discloses this pending acquisition to a close personal friend during a private dinner. Knowing the broker obtained this information through a confidential business relationship, the friend purchases call options on the logistics provider prior to the public announcement and sells them for a substantial profit. The broker did not execute any trades and received no direct monetary payment from the friend. Under federal securities laws, which of the following statements correctly describes the insider trading liability of the parties involved?

  1. A
    Only the real estate broker can be held liable, because tippees are exempt from insider trading regulations unless they are direct officers or employees of the target company.
  2. Both the real estate broker and the friend can be held liable, because the broker breached a duty of trust by sharing material nonpublic information and the friend knowingly traded on that information.Answer
  3. C
    Neither the real estate broker nor the friend can be held liable, because the broker did not receive a direct monetary payment or financial kickback from the friend.
  4. D
    Only the friend can be held liable, because tipper liability is completely eliminated if the tipper does not personally execute trades in the subject security.

Answer

Both the real estate broker and the friend can be held liable, because the broker breached a duty of trust by sharing material nonpublic information and the friend knowingly traded on that information.
Both the tipper (the real estate broker) and the tippee (the friend) can be held liable under federal securities laws. The broker breached a duty of trust and confidentiality by passing material nonpublic information regarding the acquisition to a friend. The friend inherited this duty by trading on the information while knowing it originated from a confidential source. Liability does not require the tipper to execute trades or receive direct financial compensation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the nature of the information.
The upcoming acquisition of the logistics provider is nonpublic and material, as it would reasonably affect an investor's decision to buy or sell the security.
Insider trading rules apply specifically to material nonpublic information (MNPI).
2
Analyze the tipper's liability.
The real estate broker owed a duty of trust/confidentiality derived from the commercial business relationship with the technology firm. Passing MNPI as a personal gift or favor to a friend constitutes a breach of that duty, establishing tipper liability even without direct monetary compensation or personal trading.
Under the Misappropriation Theory and tipper/tippee legal precedents, tipping MNPI to family or friends fulfills the personal benefit test.
3
Analyze the tippee's liability.
The friend knew (or should have known) that the information was material nonpublic information obtained through a breach of duty, yet proceeded to trade on it.
Tippees inherit the tipper's duty and become liable for insider trading when they trade on MNPI knowing it was improperly disclosed.

Key Concept

Tipper and Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information