Question

Difficulty: MediumProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

An individual trader opens trading accounts at two different brokerage firms under the same name. Over a two-week period, the trader simultaneously places offsetting buy and sell orders for 5,000 shares of a thinly traded stock at identical prices across both accounts. These transactions result in no change in beneficial ownership but create the artificial impression of active trading volume. Which of the following best describes this prohibited practice and its regulatory classification?

  1. Wash trading, which is an illegal manipulative practice involving transactions designed to create a false appearance of trading activity without a change in beneficial ownership.Answer
  2. B
    Spoofing, because the trader submitted non-bona fide orders that were intended to be canceled before execution to deceive market participants.
  3. C
    Wash trading, which is permitted under self-regulatory organization rules unless criminal prosecution is initiated directly by FINRA.
  4. D
    Interpositioning, because the trader failed to route orders through a primary broker-dealer acting in an agency capacity.

Answer

The prohibited practice is wash trading, an illegal market manipulation tactic where transactions are executed without any change in beneficial ownership to generate misleading trading activity.
Executing matching buy and sell orders across accounts owned by the same beneficial owner creates a false and misleading appearance of active trading volume without altering economic interest. This practice is classified as wash trading and is prohibited under federal securities laws and SRO regulations.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the trading activity described in the scenario.
The trader executes buy and sell orders of identical quantities and prices across two accounts held under the same name, resulting in no change in true ownership.
Identifying whether beneficial ownership changes distinguishes wash trading from other trading practices.
2
Differentiate wash trading from other manipulative practices such as spoofing.
Because the orders actually executed (rather than being canceled prior to execution), the behavior constitutes wash trading rather than spoofing.
Spoofing relies on non-bona fide orders designed to be canceled, whereas wash trades are executed transactions with matching buy/sell orders.
3
Evaluate the regulatory implications.
Wash trading is prohibited under SEC rules and FINRA self-regulatory rules due to its fraudulent nature in misleading the public regarding market liquidity.
Market manipulation rules apply universally across federal statutes and SRO frameworks.

Key Concept

Wash Trading and Market Manipulation
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question