Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

A broker-dealer's trading desk receives a customer order to purchase 150,000 shares of a thinly traded equity. Before executing the customer order, a trader at the firm buys 15,000 shares for the firm's proprietary account. Additionally, to fill the remaining portion of the customer order, the firm routes the trade through an unnecessary third-party broker-dealer who adds an additional markup, even though the firm had direct market access to execute at a better price.

Which of the following statements correctly describe the regulatory violations committed in this scenario? (Select ALL that apply.)

  1. The trader's purchase of shares for the firm's proprietary account prior to filling the customer's large block order constitutes illegal front-running.Answer
  2. Routing the customer order through an unnecessary third-party intermediary that adds an extra fee or markup violates anti-interpositioning rules.Answer
  3. C
    Routing the transaction through an independent intermediary alters the broker-dealer's capacity to a SRO representative, placing the activity outside FINRA jurisdiction.
  4. D
    The proprietary trade is classified as spoofing because it enters non-bona fide orders intended to be canceled prior to execution.

Answer

The scenario illustrates two distinct prohibited market practices: front-running (trading ahead of a customer order for a proprietary account) and interpositioning (inserting an unnecessary third-party intermediary to the client's financial detriment).
Executing proprietary orders ahead of an impending customer block order violates FINRA rules against front-running because it unfairly exploits non-public order information. Additionally, routing customer trades through an unnecessary third-party broker-dealer who adds extra costs violates anti-interpositioning regulations and the duty of best execution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the proprietary trading activity prior to executing the customer order.
Purchasing shares for the firm's account ahead of a known customer block order takes advantage of non-public order information, which constitutes front-running under FINRA Rule 5270.
Block orders have market impact, and trading ahead abuses non-public information for firm profit.
2
Analyze the routing choice through an unnecessary third party.
Inserting an extra intermediary between the client and the best market price adds unnecessary markups/fees, which violates FINRA Rule 5310 regarding interpositioning.
Broker-dealers owe clients a duty of best execution and cannot needlessly compromise pricing by interjecting middleman dealers.
3
Evaluate and eliminate incorrect regulatory characterizations.
Spoofing requires non-bona fide orders meant to be canceled, which is absent here. Furthermore, third-party routing does not exempt member firms from FINRA regulatory jurisdiction.
Regulatory definitions must accurately reflect the specific mechanics of the manipulative conduct.

Key Concept

Prohibited Market Manipulation & Customer Order Execution Ethics (Front-Running and Interpositioning)
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices