Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

An institutional proprietary trader enters a series of large limit sell orders for a thinly traded equity security at price levels slightly above the current national best offer. The trader has no intention of executing these sell orders and rapidly cancels them as soon as lower-priced sell orders from other market participants are triggered, allowing the firm to purchase shares at an artificially depressed price for its inventory. Which of the following statements correctly identifies this prohibited market manipulation tactic and the regulatory oversight involved?

  1. The activity constitutes spoofing because non-bona fide orders were submitted to create a deceptive impression of order book depth; both the SEC and FINRA have civil enforcement jurisdiction over such market manipulation.Answer
  2. B
    The activity constitutes wash trading because the trader is entering cancelling orders to generate artificial trading volume without incurring genuine market risk.
  3. C
    The activity constitutes spoofing, a violation that falls exclusively under the criminal prosecution authority of FINRA as a self-regulatory organization.
  4. D
    The activity is deemed lawful price discovery as long as the firm executes the ultimate purchasing trade in an agency broker capacity rather than a dealer principal capacity.

Answer

The activity constitutes spoofing because non-bona fide orders were submitted to create a deceptive impression of order book depth; both the SEC and FINRA have civil enforcement jurisdiction over such market manipulation.
Entering quote interest without the intent to execute in order to trick other investors into moving market prices is spoofing. Fraudulent order tactics violate federal securities acts and FINRA rules, subjecting violators to regulatory actions by both FINRA and the SEC.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the trading scenario to identify the nature of the submitted orders and intent.
The trader submitted non-bona fide limit orders intended for cancellation to trick other participants into driving the stock price down.
This specific pattern of entering and cancelling fake interest to move prices is defined as spoofing or layering.
2
Distinguish spoofing from other manipulative practices such as wash trades.
Wash trades require offsetting executed transactions with no change in beneficial ownership, whereas spoofing relies on non-executed orders intended to manipulate quotes.
Clear differentiation between manipulation types prevents conflating order-book deceptive quotes with executed wash sales.
3
Evaluate the regulatory jurisdiction over anti-manipulation rules.
The SEC (federal regulator) and FINRA (SRO) hold regulatory oversight and civil enforcement powers, while criminal prosecution is reserved for federal law enforcement (DOJ).
FINRA cannot criminally prosecute member firms or individuals.

Key Concept

Spoofing and Regulatory Jurisdiction in Market Manipulation
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices