Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

A registered representative receives a large block order from an institutional client to purchase 100,000 shares of an illiquid equity security. Before submitting the client's order for execution, the representative buys 2,000 shares of the same stock for their personal account to profit from the expected upward price movement caused by the client's trade. When audited by compliance, the representative claims the personal order was lawful because the firm routinely acts as a dealer in that security. Which of the following statements correctly evaluates the representative's trade under industry regulations?

  1. The representative engaged in illegal front-running, as entering a personal trade ahead of a pending customer block order violates SRO conduct rules regardless of whether the firm acts as a broker or a dealer.Answer
  2. B
    The representative engaged in prohibited wash trading, because placing personal orders alongside client block orders eliminates a genuine change in beneficial ownership.
  3. C
    The representative engaged in front-running, but enforcement lies strictly with the SEC through criminal prosecution because SROs lack regulatory authority over member trading conduct.
  4. D
    The representative's trade was permissible because broker-dealers operating in a principal capacity have priority rights to execute proprietary orders before customer orders to hedge inventory risk.

Answer

The representative engaged in illegal front-running, as entering a personal trade ahead of a pending customer block order violates SRO conduct rules regardless of whether the firm acts as a broker or a dealer.
The correct response identifies the activity as illegal front-running under FINRA Rule 5270. Front-running occurs when a registered person executes a transaction for their own account (or the firm's proprietary account) based on material, non-public knowledge of an imminent customer block order. The representative's claim regarding dealer capacity is invalid because principal trading privileges do not override anti-manipulation and fair dealing conduct rules.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the trading activity described in the scenario.
Purchasing securities for a personal account while holding an unexecuted non-public customer block order is defined as front-running.
Front-running takes unfair advantage of material non-public information (the pending customer order) expected to influence market price.
2
Evaluate the representative's justification regarding broker vs. dealer capacity.
The capacity in which a firm acts (agent/broker vs. principal/dealer) does not authorize trading ahead of customer orders.
SRO rules (FINRA Rule 5270) strictly prohibit front-running customer block orders across all account capacities.
3
Determine the appropriate regulatory framework and enforcement oversight.
SROs like FINRA establish and enforce trading conduct rules for associated persons, alongside SEC oversight.
SROs possess full regulatory authority to investigate, fine, and suspend member firms and registered representatives for ethical violations.

Key Concept

Front-Running and Prohibited Trading Practices
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices