Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

A supply chain analyst at a publicly traded electronics manufacturer learns during an internal meeting that a critical component failure will delay the company's flagship product launch indefinitely. That evening, the analyst shares this information with a neighbor who has no professional connection to the company. The neighbor immediately purchases put options on the company's stock and realizes a significant profit following the public announcement of the delay. Under federal securities laws regarding insider trading, which of the following statements correctly describes the legal liability of the neighbor?

  1. The neighbor is liable as a tippee because the neighbor knowingly traded securities using material nonpublic information obtained from an insider who breached a duty.Answer
  2. B
    The neighbor is exempt from insider trading liability because the neighbor is not an employee, officer, or registered insider of the manufacturing company.
  3. C
    Only the supply chain analyst can be held liable for insider trading, as individuals without a direct fiduciary duty to shareholders cannot be prosecuted as tippees.
  4. D
    The neighbor cannot be held liable for insider trading unless the supply chain analyst received direct financial compensation in exchange for disclosing the confidential information.

Answer

The neighbor is liable as a tippee because the neighbor knowingly traded securities using material nonpublic information obtained from an insider who breached a duty.
The correct answer correctly states that tippees who knowingly act on material nonpublic information derived from a breach of duty are subject to insider trading liability. Under federal securities regulations (including Rule 10b-5 and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act), tippees assume a derivative duty not to trade once they receive nonpublic material facts from an insider.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the information
The unannounced product launch delay is material nonpublic information because a reasonable investor would consider it significant when making an investment decision.
Determining whether information is material and nonpublic is the threshold requirement for insider trading liability.
2
Evaluate the analyst's role (tipper)
The analyst breached a duty of confidentiality by disclosing corporate material nonpublic information to an outside third party.
An insider who passes confidential corporate information violates fiduciary or corporate duties.
3
Evaluate the neighbor's role (tippee)
The neighbor acted on material nonpublic information knowing it came from a company insider, establishing tippee liability under the Insider Trading Sanctions Act and Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act.
Tippees assume derivative liability when trading on material nonpublic information provided in breach of an insider's duty.

Key Concept

Tippee Liability under Insider Trading Regulations
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information