Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardProhibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices

An active trader routinely enters large buy limit orders for a thinly traded equity security at prices above the current national best bid with no intention of letting those orders execute. Once other market participants react to the displayed buying pressure by bidding up the stock, the trader cancels the buy limit orders and immediately executes sell orders against the higher bids. Which of the following statements correctly identifies this prohibited practice and the legal boundaries of regulatory enforcement?

  1. The activity is spoofing, a form of market manipulation subject to civil action by the SEC and criminal prosecution by the Department of Justice, whereas FINRA as an SRO is limited to disciplinary sanctions such as fines and industry bars.Answer
  2. B
    The activity is wash trading, because the trader submitted non-bona fide orders that created a false impression of market activity to induce trading by other investors.
  3. C
    The activity is spoofing, and FINRA maintains independent authority as a self-regulatory organization to criminally prosecute the violator and impose federal imprisonment terms.
  4. D
    The activity is front-running, which occurs whenever a firm improperly acts in a dealer capacity by executing non-bona fide orders to alter prevailing bid-ask spreads.

Answer

The prohibited activity described is spoofing. Civil enforcement and criminal prosecutions under federal securities statutory provisions are brought by the SEC and Department of Justice, while self-regulatory organizations like FINRA enforce SRO rule compliance through administrative sanctions (fines, suspensions, and bars) rather than criminal imprisonment.
The correct response correctly classifies the practice of entering quotes without the intent to execute as spoofing. It accurately distinguishes SRO disciplinary powers (such as fines, censures, and industry bars) from federal criminal prosecution powers held by statutory bodies like the SEC and Department of Justice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the trader's trading pattern and intention
Entering non-bona fide orders designed to be canceled before execution to falsely influence market supply and demand constitutes spoofing.
Spoofing relies on displaying artificial liquidity to move prices in favor of a subsequent trade.
2
Distinguish spoofing from wash trading and front-running
Wash trading requires transactions with no change in beneficial ownership; front-running requires trading ahead of a known customer block order.
Clear categorization prevents conflation of distinct prohibited trading practices.
3
Determine the jurisdictional limits of SROs versus federal authorities
FINRA (an SRO) can issue fines, censures, suspensions, or bars, but only federal prosecutors (DOJ) and civil regulators (SEC) enforce statutory federal fraud statutes with potential criminal penalties.
SROs are membership organizations overseen by the SEC and do not hold government criminal prosecution powers.

Key Concept

Market Manipulation (Spoofing) and Regulatory Jurisdiction Boundaries
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Prohibited Market Manipulation and Fraudulent Practices