A registered representative at a member firm receives a large non-discretionary buy order for 200,000 shares of a thinly traded equity security from an institutional client. Before placing the client's order into the market, the representative buys 1,000 shares of the same security for their personal account, expecting the client's large order to drive up the market price. Which of the following statements correctly identifies the prohibited practice committed and the governing regulatory enforcement authority?
- The representative engaged in front-running by trading ahead of a pending customer block order, which violates FINRA and SEC rules and is subject to enforcement by both self-regulatory organizations and the SEC.Answer
- BThe representative engaged in spoofing by submitting an order with the intent to cancel it after influencing market prices, an activity regulated exclusively by the Federal Reserve Board.
- CThe representative engaged in front-running, but because self-regulatory organizations such as FINRA lack enforcement authority over trading violations, only the SEC has jurisdiction to sanction the representative.
- DThe representative engaged in unauthorized dealer mark-up manipulation, which occurs whenever a firm acts in an agency capacity while simultaneously executing principal transactions.
Answer
The representative engaged in front-running by trading ahead of a pending customer block order, which violates FINRA and SEC rules and is subject to enforcement by both self-regulatory organizations and the SEC.
The representative committed front-running by purchasing security shares for a personal account prior to executing a customer's large block buy order. Front-running violates FINRA rules and federal securities laws, placing the representative and firm subject to enforcement actions from both self-regulatory organizations (FINRA) and federal regulators (SEC).
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Front-Running and SRO/SEC Regulatory Authority
Estimated Time:1m 30s