Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

An audio technician working at an independent podcast studio records a pre-taped interview with the Chief Executive Officer of a publicly traded software company. During the unreleased recording, the officer reveals an unannounced major corporate acquisition. Prior to the public broadcast of the episode, the technician purchases shares of the software company's stock based on this confidential information. Under federal securities laws, which of the following statements regarding the technician's actions is correct?

  1. The technician violated insider trading laws by purchasing stock while in possession of material, nonpublic information obtained through a position of trust.Answer
  2. B
    The technician is exempt from insider trading liability because the technician is not an officer, director, or employee of the software company.
  3. C
    The technician's stock purchase is legal as long as the podcast recording is officially aired to the public within thirty days of the trade execution.
  4. D
    The technician can only be found liable if the corporate officer explicitly directed the technician to trade on the confidential information.

Answer

The technician violated insider trading laws by purchasing stock while in possession of material, nonpublic information obtained through a position of trust.
Under federal securities regulations and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, trading on material, nonpublic information obtained in breach of a duty of trust or confidence (misappropriation theory) constitutes illegal insider trading. Direct employment by the issuing firm is not required to establish liability.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate whether the information accessed by the technician qualifies as material and nonpublic.
The unreleased details of a major corporate acquisition are both material (likely to affect stock price) and nonpublic (not yet broadcast or filed).
Information remains nonpublic until it is broadly disseminated to the investing public through official channels.
2
Determine if the technician owed a duty of trust and confidence regarding the information.
As an audio technician producing confidential media content, taking personal financial advantage of nonpublic knowledge breaches a duty of trust.
Under the misappropriation theory of insider trading, individuals who misappropriate confidential information in breach of a duty owe liability under Rule 10b-5.
3
Assess insider trading liability for non-employees.
The technician committed an insider trading violation regardless of lack of direct corporate employment.
Federal securities laws prohibit anyone—insiders, tippees, or misappropriators—from trading on material nonpublic information.

Key Concept

Misappropriation Theory and Non-Employee Insider Trading Liability
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information