Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardInsider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information

A senior supply chain consultant working for an independent advisory firm learns during a confidential corporate audit that a publicly traded aerospace firm is about to receive an unannounced multi-billion dollar government contract. During a private dinner, the consultant discloses this material nonpublic information to a personal acquaintance, explicitly noting that the award has not been announced. The consultant receives no monetary payment or financial benefit for sharing the information. The acquaintance immediately purchases call options on the aerospace firm's stock prior to the public announcement, realizing substantial profits when the contract is disclosed. Under federal securities laws, which of the following best describes the insider trading liability of the consultant and the acquaintance?

  1. Both the consultant and the acquaintance can be held liable for insider trading violations.Answer
  2. B
    Only the acquaintance is liable, because the consultant did not execute any securities transactions or receive direct financial compensation.
  3. C
    Only the consultant is liable, because third-party tippees who are not employed by the subject company are legally exempt from insider trading provisions.
  4. D
    Neither party is liable, because material nonpublic information shared in a private personal setting is protected from statutory regulatory enforcement.

Answer

Both the consultant (as tipper) and the acquaintance (as tippee) are liable for insider trading under federal securities laws.
The correct position is that both parties face legal liability. Under federal insider trading laws, a tipper (the consultant) violates securities regulations by improperly communicating material nonpublic information in breach of a duty of trust, even if the tipper does not trade or receive monetary gain. The tippee (the acquaintance) inherits that liability by trading on the information while knowing or having reason to know that it was material, nonpublic, and improperly disclosed.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the nature of the information conveyed by the consultant.
The upcoming contract award is material (substantially affects stock price) and nonpublic (disclosed confidentially during an audit).
Trading or tipping based on information that is both material and nonpublic violates Rule 10b-5 and the Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act.
2
Determine tipper liability for the consultant.
The consultant breached a duty of trust owed to the client by sharing confidential information.
Direct financial compensation is not required to establish tipper liability; conveying confidential information to an acquaintance constitutes a breach of duty.
3
Determine tippee liability for the acquaintance.
The acquaintance traded on material nonpublic information knowing it was confidential.
A tippee inherits the insider's duty and becomes liable upon trading if they knew or should have known that the information was communicated in breach of a duty.

Key Concept

Tipper and Tippee Liability under Federal Insider Trading Regulations
Rate this question

Topics

Insider Trading and Misuse of Material Nonpublic Information