Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardCourse of Action

Statement: A coordinated series of highly sophisticated AI-generated voice cloning scams has recently targeted elderly pensioners across the state, resulting in the unauthorized siphoning of millions in retirement savings within the last two months.

Courses of Action:
I. The government should immediately freeze all electronic pension disbursements statewide and mandate that all future withdrawals be conducted in-person at bank branches to prevent further digital theft.
II. The authorities should immediately establish a joint cyber-financial task force to intercept fraudulent transfers and launch targeted digital literacy campaigns for senior citizens.

Based on the statement provided, which of the following logically follows?

  1. A
    Only course of action I follows
  2. Only course of action II followsAnswer
  3. C
    Both courses of action I and II follow
  4. D
    Neither course of action I nor II follows

Answer

Only course of action II follows.
The correct answer identifies that only the second course of action is logically sound. Establishing a joint cyber-financial task force and initiating awareness campaigns is a practical, proportional, and highly effective administrative response to a modern fraud crisis. The first course of action is invalid because freezing all electronic disbursements and forcing elderly citizens to make in-person withdrawals creates disproportionate physical and logistical hardship, violating the principles of feasible administrative problem-solving.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core problem presented in the statement.
The problem is a specific cybercrime threat (AI voice cloning) causing financial loss specifically to a vulnerable demographic (elderly pensioners).
Understanding the exact nature and target of the crisis is required to evaluate if proposed solutions are relevant and proportional.
2
Evaluate Course of Action I for feasibility and proportionality.
Course of Action I is invalid. Freezing all electronic disbursements and forcing elderly individuals to physically visit banks is an extreme overreaction that creates severe mobility, health, and logistical hardships.
A valid course of action must solve the problem without creating a disproportionately larger negative impact on the affected stakeholders.
3
Evaluate Course of Action II for feasibility and proportionality.
Course of Action II is valid. It directly targets the technical nature of the crime (cyber-financial task force) and the vulnerability of the victims (digital literacy campaigns) in a practical, balanced manner.
Targeted, measured, and directly relevant administrative responses are the gold standard for crisis management.

Key Concept

Evaluating Administrative Feasibility and Proportionality
Rate this question

Topics

Course of Action

More questions from this topic