Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumCourse of Action

Statement: Despite repeated awareness campaigns by the municipal corporation over the past year, residents of a major metropolitan ward continue to mix hazardous electronic waste (e-waste) with general household garbage. This practice has led to severe health hazards for sanitation workers and toxic contamination at the local landfill.

Courses of Action:
I. The municipal corporation should immediately suspend all daily garbage collection services for the entire ward until every household signs a legally binding affidavit committing to strict waste segregation.
II. The municipal administration should deploy specialized, highly visible e-waste drop-off bins across the ward while concurrently instituting a system of targeted fines for households repeatedly found mixing hazardous waste during random checks.

Which of the following is the correct evaluation of the proposed courses of action?

  1. A
    Only I follows
  2. Only II followsAnswer
  3. C
    Either I or II follows
  4. D
    Neither I nor II follows
  5. E
    Both I and II follow

Answer

Only II follows is the correct evaluation of the proposed courses of action.
The correct evaluation validates only the second proposed action. The second action is a sound administrative response because it combines facilitating proper behavior (providing specific bins) with reasonable deterrence (targeted fines). It directly addresses the problem without disrupting essential public services. The first action is invalid because halting garbage collection is an extreme, disproportionate reaction that would lead to a broader sanitation crisis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core problem presented in the statement.
The problem is the ongoing mixing of hazardous e-waste with general garbage by residents, despite awareness campaigns, causing severe health and environmental hazards.
Understanding the exact nature of the problem is required to evaluate if the proposed administrative solutions are relevant and helpful.
2
Evaluate the first course of action for feasibility, practicality, and proportionality.
Suspending all garbage collection for a ward is disproportionate and creates a massive secondary public health crisis. It acts as collective punishment rather than a targeted solution, making it invalid.
A valid course of action must not introduce a problem more severe than the one it attempts to solve.
3
Evaluate the second course of action for feasibility, practicality, and proportionality.
Deploying specialized bins provides the necessary infrastructure, and targeted fines for repeat offenders enforce compliance reasonably. It directly mitigates the hazard without halting essential services.
A valid course of action should offer a practical, balanced step toward a solution without causing undue public harm.

Key Concept

Evaluating Administrative Courses of Action for Proportionality and Feasibility
Rate this question

Topics

Course of Action

More questions from this topic