Statement:
"To prevent artificial scarcity and price spikes during the upcoming festival season, the State Department of Food and Civil Supplies has ordered all licensed grain wholesalers to update their inventory holdings daily on the state e-governance portal, warning that non-compliance will result in immediate suspension of their storage permits."
Consider the following assumptions:
Assumption I: Mandatory digital inventory logging will assist the administration in detecting and curbing speculative hoarding of essential grains.
Assumption II: The market price of essential grains will fall significantly below the minimum support price once digital stock reporting commences.
Which of the above assumptions is/are implicit in the statement?
- Only assumption I is implicitAnswer
- BOnly assumption II is implicit
- CEither assumption I or II is implicit
- DNeither assumption I nor II is implicit
- EBoth assumptions I and II are implicit
Answer
Only assumption I is implicit.
The correct answer states that only assumption I is implicit. When an administrative body mandates digital inventory updates specifically to combat artificial scarcity, it takes for granted that such monitoring will effectively expose and curb speculative hoarding. Conversely, expecting market prices to crash below the minimum support price is an unwarranted exaggeration that is neither implied nor intended by a price-stabilization policy.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Identifying Implicit Premises in Administrative Directives
Estimated Time:1m 30s