Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumCourse of Action

Statement: Several district agricultural offices have urgently reported that a coordinated network of illegal suppliers has flooded regional markets with counterfeit fertilizers. This has already caused severe crop damage in early-sown fields, triggering significant unrest among farming communities during this critical planting season.

Courses of Action:
I. The state administration should immediately ban the sale of all agricultural fertilizers across the entire state until a comprehensive, month-long quality control audit is completed.
II. The authorities should rapidly dispatch mobile testing laboratories to the affected districts to identify and seize the counterfeit batches while launching an emergency supply of verified fertilizers.

Which of the following courses of action logically follows from the given statement?

  1. A
    Only course of action I follows
  2. Only course of action II followsAnswer
  3. C
    Both courses of action I and II follow
  4. D
    Neither course of action I nor II follows
  5. E
    Either course of action I or II follows

Answer

Only course of action II logically follows, as it provides a practical, targeted solution, whereas Action I is an extreme measure that would cause disproportionate harm.
The correct answer identifies that only the second course of action is sound. Action II provides a balanced, immediate, and practical remedy by addressing both the identification of the counterfeit products and the urgent need for genuine supplies. Action I is an extreme and disproportionate measure; halting all fertilizer sales for a month during a critical planting season would cause massive state-wide agricultural collapse.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core problem presented in the statement.
The immediate problem is a sudden influx of counterfeit fertilizers causing crop damage and unrest during a time-sensitive planting season.
Identifying the severity and time-constraints of the crisis is necessary to judge whether proposed actions are practical and proportionate.
2
Evaluate the viability and impact of Course of Action I.
Banning all fertilizers state-wide for a month is an extreme, impractical measure that would halt all legitimate farming operations and cause massive economic damage. It does not logically follow.
Administrative actions must be proportional and must not introduce disproportionate harm or new major problems.
3
Evaluate the viability and impact of Course of Action II.
Dispatching mobile labs to seize fakes and supplying genuine fertilizers directly addresses both the cause (counterfeiters) and the symptom (lack of fertilizer) of the crisis without halting agriculture. It logically follows.
Targeted responses that mitigate harm while following established procedures are the hallmark of valid administrative decision-making.

Key Concept

Evaluating the feasibility, proportionality, and practical consequences of administrative remedies in crisis management.
Rate this question

Topics

Course of Action

More questions from this topic