Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardStatement and Assumptions

Analyze the regulatory directive provided below and evaluate the implicit assumptions.

Directive: In an effort to combat the increasing rate of targeted financial scams, the Central Banking Authority now requires all commercial banks to enforce a 24-hour processing delay on first-time electronic transfers over $5,000 made by customers aged 65 and above.

Assumption I: A 24-hour delay provides an adequate window of time for either the banking institution or the customer to identify and halt a fraudulent transaction.
Assumption II: The implementation of this processing delay will cause a substantial reduction in the overall number of high-value electronic transfers initiated by senior citizens.

Which of the assumptions is logically implicit in the given directive?

  1. Only Assumption I is implicitAnswer
  2. B
    Only Assumption II is implicit
  3. C
    Both Assumptions I and II are implicit
  4. D
    Neither Assumption I nor II is implicit

Answer

Only Assumption I is implicit.
An assumption is a foundational belief necessary for a statement to make logical sense. Because the Central Banking Authority instituted a precise 24-hour delay specifically to 'combat' financial scams, they must inherently believe that 24 hours is a sufficient window to intercept these scams. Therefore, the first assumption is implicit. The second assumption, however, is a predictive inference about future economic behavior, which is a possible consequence rather than an underlying premise.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Define the criteria for an implicit assumption in logical reasoning.
An assumption must be a hidden, unstated premise that the author or authority absolutely believes to be true in order to make the statement or issue the directive.
Establishing the definition prevents confusing assumptions with inferences, conclusions, or external facts.
2
Evaluate Assumption I using the negation test.
If a 24-hour delay did NOT provide enough time to identify and halt fraud, the Authority's directive would be useless. Therefore, they must assume it DOES provide adequate time.
The negation test proves that Assumption I is a foundational prerequisite for the policy.
3
Evaluate Assumption II by checking if it is a premise or a consequence.
Assumption II predicts that the 'overall number' of legitimate and illegitimate transfers will decrease. This is a speculative future outcome (an inference), not a required starting premise.
Policies are built on premises (assumptions) to achieve goals; they do not necessarily assume speculative side-effects as their foundational logic.

Key Concept

Statement and Assumptions: Distinguishing between foundational premises and logical inferences/consequences.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Assumptions

More questions from this topic