Question

Difficulty: HardCourse of Action

Statement: During peak agricultural sowing season, high concentrations of toxic industrial effluents were detected in a primary canal network, threatening regional crops and rural water security. Preliminary reports indicate that multiple industrial units along the river basin may be discharging untreated waste.

Proposed Course of Action: The district administration should immediately order the permanent shutdown of all manufacturing plants along the river basin, freeze their corporate bank accounts without waiting for a technical audit, and divert the untreated river water into municipal drinking reservoirs to flush out the canal network.

Evaluative Assertion: The proposed course of action is an administratively sound, feasible, and logically valid remedy to handle this crisis.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False. The proposed course of action is logically unsound and administratively improper.
The proposed course of action fails on two critical logical standards: proportionality and safety. First, taking permanent punitive action against all regional factories prior to an investigative audit violates administrative norms and due process. Second, transferring untreated river water into municipal drinking reservoirs creates an extreme public health hazards, making the remedy far worse than the original problem.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the problem stem for core issues and constraints.
The core problem involves industrial effluent contamination in an irrigation canal during peak sowing season, requiring targeted remediation and environmental control.
Understanding the precise scope prevents adopting disproportionate or dangerous administrative measures.
2
Evaluate the feasibility and proportionality of the proposed administrative remedies.
Closing all industrial units permanently and freezing accounts without a technical audit is an extreme, unverified, and legally flawed response.
Administrative decisions must follow due process, base punitive measures on empirical findings, and avoid arbitrary economic disruption.
3
Evaluate the safety and consequence of the operational remedy.
Diverting untreated river water into municipal drinking reservoirs exacerbates the crisis by threatening public health.
A valid course of action must mitigate the problem without creating a secondary, more severe emergency.

Key Concept

Evaluation of Administrative Feasibility and Proportionality in Course of Action
Rate this question