Examkin

Indian Polity and Governance

316 questions

All types316Multiple choice161Multiple select68Matching74Ordering13
Question 101Question →

Which of the following statements accurately distinguishes between the compulsory (mandatory) and voluntary provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Providing reservation for Backward Classes in Panchayats at any level is a voluntary provision, whereas reserving seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in proportion to their population is a compulsory provision.

Answer

Providing reservation for Backward Classes in Panchayats at any level is a voluntary provision, whereas reserving seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in proportion to their population is a compulsory provision.
The correct answer accurately distinguishes between compulsory and voluntary provisions: reserving seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in proportion to population under Article 243D is a mandatory constitutional requirement, whereas authorizing reservation of seats or chairperson offices for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) is an explicit voluntary provision left to state legislatures.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional classification under the 73rd Amendment Act, 1992
Identify mandatory constitutional mandates (compulsory) versus discretionary powers delegated to state legislatures (voluntary).
The 73rd Amendment establishes a framework where basic structural, electoral, and representational rules are mandatory, but financial devolution and specific political reservations (OBCs) depend on state legislation.
2
Evaluate mandatory provisions regarding reservations and institutions
Creation of Gram Sabha (Article 243A), 5-year tenure (Article 243E), minimum 21 years age for contesting (Article 243F), SC/ST reservations by population proportion (Article 243D), one-third reservation for women (Article 243D), State Election Commission (Article 243K), and State Finance Commission (Article 243I) are compulsory.
These provisions ensure uniform institutional structure across states.
3
Evaluate voluntary provisions subject to state law
Reserving seats/offices for Backward Classes, representation of MPs/MLAs/MLCs in local bodies, giving financial powers to levy taxes, and devolving powers listed under the 11th Schedule are voluntary.
State legislatures hold constitutional autonomy under Part IX to determine the extent of these powers and reservations.

Key Concept

Compulsory vs Voluntary Provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act
Question 102Question →

Under the provisions of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, governing Urban Local Bodies in India, which of the following statements regarding Wards Committees and Metropolitan Planning Committees are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: As per Article 243S of the Constitution of India, the constitution of Wards Committees is mandatory for every Municipality having a population of three lakhs or more.; Under Article 243ZE, not less than two-thirds of the members of a Metropolitan Planning Committee must be elected by, and from amongst, the elected members of the Municipalities and Chairpersons of the Panchayats in the Metropolitan area.

Answer

The correct statements are that Wards Committees are mandatory for municipalities with a population of three lakhs or more under Article 243S, and at least two-thirds of Metropolitan Planning Committee members are elected from municipal members and panchayat chairpersons under Article 243ZE.
The statement specifying that Wards Committees are mandatory for municipalities with a population of 3 lakhs or more (Article 243S) and the statement asserting that at least two-thirds of Metropolitan Planning Committee members are elected from municipal members and panchayat chairpersons (Article 243ZE) are constitutionally accurate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the statement regarding Wards Committees under Article 243S.
Confirmed correct: Article 243S mandates Wards Committees for every municipality having a population of 300,000 (3 lakhs) or more.
Constitutional mandate under Article 243S.
2
Evaluate the statement regarding Metropolitan Planning Committee composition under Article 243ZE.
Confirmed correct: Article 243ZE specifies that not less than two-thirds of MPC members must be elected by and from amongst elected municipal members and chairpersons of panchayats in the area.
Constitutional ratio prescribed under Article 243ZE.
3
Verify article assignment and schedule designations in the remaining statements.
Identified errors: Article 243ZD deals with District Planning Committees (DPC), whereas Article 243Y specifies the State Finance Commission for Municipalities. Furthermore, Municipalities are covered under the Twelfth Schedule, not the Eleventh Schedule.
Correct mapping of Articles and Schedules under Part IXA.

Key Concept

Urban Local Bodies Constitutional Provisions (74th Amendment Act)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 103Question →

Who among the following presided over the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly of India as its interim President on December 9, 1946?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha

Answer

Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha presided over the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly as its interim President on December 9, 1946.
On December 9, 1946, the Constituent Assembly convened for the first time. Following the French tradition of appointing the senior-most member as temporary head, Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha was chosen as the interim President.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the event and date specified in the question.
The event is the inaugural meeting of the Constituent Assembly held on December 9, 1946.
The Constituent Assembly held its first meeting on December 9, 1946, in the Constitution Hall (now Central Hall of Parliament).
2
Recall the convention followed for electing the temporary President.
Following the French practice, the oldest member was elected as the temporary President.
Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha was the oldest member present in the assembly.
3
Distinguish between the temporary and permanent leadership.
Dr. Sachchidananda Sinha was the interim President, while Dr. Rajendra Prasad was elected permanent President on December 11, 1946.
This clear distinction isolates the correct answer from subsequent leadership roles.

Key Concept

Inaugural Leadership of the Constituent Assembly
Estimated Time:45s
Question 104Question →

Under the Constitution of India, which Article empowers the High Courts to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights as well as for any other legal purpose?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 226

Answer

Article 226 empowers the High Courts to issue writs for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights as well as for any other legal purpose.
Article 226 of the Indian Constitution grants High Courts broad writ jurisdiction to issue writs such as Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Quo-Warranto, and Certiorari for the enforcement of Fundamental Rights and for any other purpose.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provision governing High Court writ powers.
Article 226 explicitly grants High Courts the power to issue directions, orders, or writs.
Unlike Article 32 which is restricted to Fundamental Rights for the Supreme Court, Article 226 includes 'any other purpose'.

Key Concept

Writ Jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226
Estimated Time:45s
Question 105Question →

Under Article 75 of the Constitution of India, on whose advice does the President appoint the other members of the Union Council of Ministers?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Prime Minister

Answer

The President appoints the members of the Union Council of Ministers on the advice of the Prime Minister.
Article 75(1) of the Indian Constitution mandates that the Prime Minister is appointed by the President, and all other Union Ministers are appointed by the President strictly on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision regarding the appointment of Union Ministers.
Article 75(1) of the Constitution of India specifies the procedure for appointing members of the Union Council of Ministers.
Article 75(1) explicitly states: 'The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.'

Key Concept

Appointment of Union Ministers under Article 75
Question 106Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the legal status, judicial precedents, and constitutional provisions governing Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and Fundamental Duties are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: While Fundamental Duties under Article 51A are not directly self-executing through constitutional writs, Parliament possesses legislative competence to enforce them by enacting appropriate statutory laws.; The Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 15, 16, 19, 29, and 30 are conferred exclusively upon Indian citizens, whereas other rights such as Articles 14, 20, and 21 extend to non-citizens as well.

Answer

The correct statements are that Parliament can enact statutory laws to enforce Fundamental Duties, and that Articles 15, 16, 19, 29, and 30 are available exclusively to Indian citizens.
Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A) serve as constitutional norms that Parliament may sanction through ordinary statutory law. Additionally, constitutional jurisprudence establishes that rights under Articles 15, 16, 19, 29, and 30 are exclusively reserved for Indian citizens, whereas rights under Articles 14, 20, and 21 extend to all individuals regardless of citizenship.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the enforceability of Fundamental Duties under Part IV-A.
Fundamental Duties are non-self-executing, but Parliament can enact legislation (e.g., Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act) to enforce them.
Judicial precedents affirm that while courts cannot issue writs directly under Article 51A, statutory enactments by Parliament enforcing these duties are constitutionally valid.
2
Evaluate the current legal status of Article 31C and DPSP primacy over Fundamental Rights.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 sought to give precedence to all DPSPs over Articles 14 and 19, but this expansion was invalidated in the Minerva Mills case (1980).
Only Directive Principles in clauses (b) and (c) of Article 39 enjoy immunity under Article 31C against challenges under Articles 14 and 19.
3
Examine the applicability of Fundamental Rights to citizens versus foreign nationals.
Articles 15, 16, 19, 29, and 30 are available only to citizens of India, while other rights (such as Articles 14, 20, 21, 21A, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28) apply to all persons.
The text of Part III explicitly distinguishes between 'any person' and 'citizens' for specific fundamental freedom provisions.
4
Assess judicial writ powers regarding legislative directives for DPSPs.
The judiciary cannot issue a writ of Mandamus to compel Parliament or state legislatures to pass laws executing Directive Principles.
DPSPs are non-justiciable under Article 37, and courts cannot encroach upon the core legislative mandate of legislative assemblies.

Key Concept

Constitutional balance, judicial enforceability, and subject-matter scope of Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and Fundamental Duties
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 107Question →

Match the Constitutional Provisions listed under List-I with their corresponding Objectives or Provisions listed under List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 24
Article 39(f)
Article 43A
Article 51A(e)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 24 matches with the prohibition of employment of children below 14 years in factories/mines; Article 39(f) matches with securing opportunities for children to develop in a healthy manner; Article 43A matches with State action to secure the participation of workers in management; Article 51A(e) matches with the duty to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood.
Article 24 explicitly prohibits child labor under 14 years in hazardous industries; Article 39(f) provides for healthy child development guidelines; Article 43A mandates worker participation in management; and Article 51A(e) prescribes the duty to promote common brotherhood across religious, linguistic, and regional diversities.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Fundamental Rights regarding child rights
Article 24 is an enforceable Fundamental Right under Part III prohibiting employment of children below 14 in hazardous industries.
Differentiates negative injunctions against child labor from promotional directive principles.
2
Analyze Directive Principles focusing on children and labor welfare
Article 39(f) (modified by the 42nd Amendment) directs healthy development for children, while Article 43A directs worker participation in industrial management.
Classifies specific state directives under Part IV of the Indian Constitution.
3
Identify the Fundamental Duty regarding social harmony
Article 51A(e) explicitly sets out the duty of citizens to promote harmony and renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
Maps civic obligations to Part IV-A (Fundamental Duties).

Key Concept

Constitutional distinction and mapping between Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and Fundamental Duties
Question 108Question →

Which of the following provisions is classified as a voluntary provision, rather than a compulsory (mandatory) provision, under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Providing reservation of seats for Backward Classes in Panchayats at any level

Answer

Providing reservation of seats for Backward Classes in Panchayats at any level is a voluntary provision under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992.
Providing reservation of seats for Backward Classes in Panchayats at any level is a voluntary provision under Article 243D(6) of the Constitution of India. State legislatures have the discretion to decide whether to extend reservation benefits to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Panchayati Raj institutions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the structural distinction between compulsory and voluntary provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992.
Compulsory provisions must be incorporated into state legislation by law, whereas voluntary provisions are left to the discretion of state legislatures.
The constitutional amendment aimed to establish basic uniformity while preserving state autonomy in specific policy areas.
2
Evaluate the mandatory constitutional mandates under Part IX.
The establishment of a State Election Commission (Article 243K), a 1/3rd reservation for women (Article 243D), and a quinquennial State Finance Commission (Article 243I) are mandatory constitutional requirements.
These clauses contain mandatory wording ('shall be constituted' / 'shall be reserved') applicable across all states.
3
Examine the statutory provision governing Backward Class reservations.
Under Article 243D(6), state legislatures are enabled, but not mandated, to make provisions for reservation of seats or offices of chairpersons in favor of backward classes.
Article 243D(6) explicitly leaves the determination and implementation of OBC reservations to the discretion of individual states.

Key Concept

Compulsory vs. Voluntary Provisions of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act
Question 109Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and High Courts in India:

1. The writ jurisdiction of a High Court under Article 226 is broader in scope than that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 because High Courts can issue writs for both the enforcement of Fundamental Rights and for any other ordinary legal purpose.
2. The advisory opinion tendered by the Supreme Court to the President under Article 143 is binding on the President and carries the weight of a judicial decree.
3. The right to move the Supreme Court under Article 32 is itself a guaranteed Fundamental Right in Part III, whereas approaching a High Court under Article 226 is a constitutional right but not a Fundamental Right.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

The correct combination is '1 and 3 only'. Statement 1 is correct because Article 226 allows High Courts to issue writs for Fundamental Rights and 'any other purpose' (ordinary legal rights), whereas Article 32 restricts the Supreme Court's writ power strictly to Fundamental Rights. Statement 3 is correct because Article 32 is located in Part III of the Constitution, making remedy through the Apex Court a Fundamental Right itself, unlike Article 226. Statement 2 is incorrect because advisory opinions under Article 143 are purely consultative and non-binding.
Statements 1 and 3 are constitutionally accurate. Under Article 226, High Courts can issue writs for fundamental rights as well as ordinary legal rights, giving them broader subject-matter writ jurisdiction than the Supreme Court under Article 32. Furthermore, Article 32 is guaranteed as a Fundamental Right within Part III, whereas Article 226 is a constitutional provision outside Part III. Statement 2 is false because Article 143 advisory opinions are consultative and non-binding.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding Article 226 vs Article 32 writ scope.
Statement 1 is verified as CORRECT.
Article 32 can be invoked exclusively for enforcing Fundamental Rights, whereas Article 226 covers Fundamental Rights as well as ordinary legal/statutory rights ('for any other purpose').
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding advisory jurisdiction under Article 143.
Statement 2 is verified as INCORRECT.
An advisory opinion given by the Supreme Court under Article 143 is purely advisory and consultative in nature; it does not constitute a judicial order or binding decision on the President.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding constitutional status of Article 32 vs Article 226.
Statement 3 is verified as CORRECT.
Article 32 is part of Part III (Fundamental Rights), so seeking remedy via Article 32 is guaranteed as a Fundamental Right. Article 226 resides in Part VI and is a constitutional right, but not a Fundamental Right.

Key Concept

Writ Jurisdiction (Art 32 vs 226) and Advisory Jurisdiction (Art 143) of the Indian Judiciary
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 110Question →

Match the Constitutional Articles of the Union Executive in List-I with their corresponding provisions in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 52
Article 63
Article 72
Article 74

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 52 matches the establishment of the office of the President of India; Article 63 matches the provision establishing the office of the Vice-President of India; Article 72 matches the power of the President to grant pardons; and Article 74 matches the Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President.
Each article under Part V of the Constitution of India corresponds to its explicit provision: Article 52 establishes the President of India, Article 63 provides for the Vice-President of India, Article 72 grants pardoning powers to the President, and Article 74 specifies that the Council of Ministers aids and advises the President.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the scope of Article 52
Article 52 establishes the executive office of the President of India.
It is the foundational constitutional provision for the Union Executive.
2
Identify the scope of Article 63
Article 63 mandates the office of the Vice-President of India.
It specifies the creation of the second-highest constitutional dignitary.
3
Identify the scope of Article 72
Article 72 defines the judicial and executive pardoning powers of the President.
It empowers the President to grant pardons, reprieves, and remissions.
4
Identify the scope of Article 74
Article 74 establishes the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister to aid and advise the President.
It forms the core basis of cabinet government at the Union level.

Key Concept

Key Articles governing the Union Executive under Part V of the Constitution of India
Question 111Question →

With reference to the constitutional provisions governing the State Executive in India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Advocate General for a State has the right to speak and take part in the proceedings of any committee of the State Legislature of which they may be named a member, but without the right to vote.; No criminal proceedings whatsoever can be instituted or continued against the Governor of a State in any court during their term of office.

Answer

The statements confirming that the Advocate General has the right to participate in legislative proceedings without voting rights, and that the Governor enjoys complete immunity from criminal proceedings during their term of office, are correct.
The correct options are the statement regarding the Advocate General's right to take part in legislative proceedings without a vote (Article 177) and the statement regarding the Governor's total immunity from criminal proceedings during their term (Article 361(2)). Both statements accurately state the constitutional provisions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the statement regarding the participation rights of the Advocate General.
Statement is accurate under Article 177.
Article 177 grants the Advocate General for the State the right to speak and participate in proceedings of either House and legislative committees, explicitly withholding voting rights.
2
Evaluate the statement regarding the Governor's criminal immunity.
Statement is accurate under Article 361(2).
Article 361 grants absolute protection to the Governor against any criminal proceedings in any court during their tenure.
3
Evaluate the statement regarding the limit on the size of the State Council of Ministers.
Statement is incorrect.
Article 164(1A) caps the strength of the Council of Ministers at 15 percent of the total members of the Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha), not the Legislative Council (Vidhan Parishad).
4
Evaluate the statement regarding the Governor's pardoning power over military courts.
Statement is incorrect.
The power to pardon sentences imposed by a Court-Martial belongs exclusively to the President of India under Article 72 and is not extended to the Governor under Article 161.

Key Concept

Constitutional Immunities, Rights of Officers, and Power Limitations of the State Executive
Question 112Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions and executive powers of the President and the Prime Minister of India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the President shall not be inquired into in any court of law under Article 74(2).; Under Article 78, it is the constitutional duty of the Prime Minister to communicate to the President all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to Union administration and proposals for legislation.

Answer

The correct statements are the non-justiciability of ministerial advice tendered to the President under Article 74(2), and the constitutional obligation of the Prime Minister to communicate administrative decisions and legislative proposals to the President under Article 78.
The statement regarding Article 74(2) is correct because the Constitution explicitly prohibits courts from inquiring into advice tendered by Ministers to the President. Additionally, the statement on Article 78 is correct as it accurately captures the constitutional duty of the Prime Minister to inform the President of all cabinet decisions and legislative proposals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the constitutional protection regarding ministerial advice to the President under Article 74(2).
Article 74(2) provides complete judicial immunity regarding advice tendered by Ministers to the President.
This safeguards executive confidentiality and maintains the parliamentary framework.
2
Analyze the conditions required for issuing an Ordinance under Article 123.
An Ordinance can be promulgated if either House of Parliament is prorogued or not in session, as lawmaking requires both Houses.
Claiming that both Houses must be out of session misinterprets parliamentary lawmaking prerequisites.
3
Evaluate the duties of the Prime Minister under Article 78.
Article 78(a) establishes a mandatory channel of communication where the Prime Minister must submit all decisions of the Council of Ministers to the President.
This ensures the Constitutional Head remains updated on governance and administrative affairs.
4
Compare pardoning powers regarding Court Martial sentences under Article 72 and Article 161.
Pardoning power over Court Martial sentences belongs exclusively to the President under Article 72; Governors under Article 161 do not possess this jurisdiction.
Military tribunals fall strictly under Union jurisdiction.

Key Concept

Constitutional Executive Powers and Nuances under Articles 72, 74, 78, 123, and 161
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 113Question →

Match the Constitutional Provisions listed under List-I with their corresponding Articles under the Constitution of India listed under List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Duty to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals, the National Flag, and the National Anthem
Separation of the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State
Protection of life and personal liberty except according to procedure established by law
Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to improve public health

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matching aligns the Duty to abide by the Constitution with Article 51A(a), Separation of judiciary from executive with Article 50, Protection of life and personal liberty with Article 21, and Duty to raise nutrition and public health with Article 47.
Respecting the National Flag and National Anthem is explicitly listed under Article 51A(a) as a Fundamental Duty. Separation of the judiciary from the executive is provided under Article 50 as a Directive Principle. Protection of life and personal liberty is guaranteed under Article 21 as a Fundamental Right. Raising the level of nutrition and public health is specified under Article 47 as a Directive Principle.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Categorize each item in List-I into its constitutional category (Fundamental Right, DPSP, or Fundamental Duty).
The duty to abide by the Constitution is a Fundamental Duty (Part IV-A). Separation of judiciary from executive and improving public health are Directive Principles (Part IV). Protection of life and personal liberty is a Fundamental Right (Part III).
Distinguishing between Parts III, IV, and IV-A narrows down the specific article ranges.
2
Map each provision directly to its corresponding Article in List-II.
Item 1 maps to Article 51A(a), Item 2 maps to Article 50, Item 3 maps to Article 21, and Item 4 maps to Article 47.
Article numbers specifically correspond to provisions: 21 (FR), 47 and 50 (DPSPs), and 51A(a) (Fundamental Duty).

Key Concept

Mapping and Distinction of Fundamental Rights (Part III), Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV), and Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A)
Question 114Question →

In the context of the constitutional framework governing the State Executive in India, evaluate the following statements regarding the powers of the Governor and the State Council of Ministers:

1. Under Article 163(2), if any question arises whether a matter falls within the Governor's constitutional discretion, the decision of the Governor in their discretion is final and cannot be called into question.
2. While the Governor can suspend, remit, or commute a sentence of death under state executive scope, the constitutional power to grant a full pardon for a sentence of death rests exclusively with the President of India under Article 72.
3. Under Article 163(3), the advice tendered by State Ministers to the Governor is subject to judicial scrutiny by the High Court under its writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

Which of the statements given above are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 2 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while Statement 3 is incorrect.
The correct answer identifies '1 and 2 only' as true. Statement 1 accurately describes Article 163(2), which gives finality to the Governor's discretion. Statement 2 correctly reflects the distinction in mercy powers under Articles 72 and 161: while the Governor can suspend, remit, or commute a sentence of death, only the President holds the constitutional prerogative to grant a full pardon for a death sentence under Article 72(1)(c). Statement 3 is false because Article 163(3) explicitly prevents courts from inquiring into the advice tendered by Ministers to the Governor.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding the Governor's discretionary jurisdiction under Article 163(2).
Article 163(2) mandates that if any question arises whether a matter is or is not a matter in respect of which the Governor is required to act in discretion, the Governor's decision in discretion shall be final and valid.
To verify the finality of the Governor's discretionary decisions.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding pardoning and mercy powers under Articles 161 and 72.
Under Article 72(1)(c), the power to grant a complete pardon in cases of death sentences is reserved exclusively for the President of India. Under Article 161, the Governor may suspend, remit, or commute a sentence of death, but cannot grant a full pardon.
To delineate the boundary between Presidential and Gubernatorial mercy powers.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding judicial review of Cabinet advice under Article 163(3).
Article 163(3) contains an explicit constitutional exclusion: 'The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the Governor shall not be inquired into in any court.' High Courts under Article 226 cannot inquire into ministerial advice.
To assess judicial immunity surrounding Council of Ministers advice.
4
Synthesize results to select the correct combination.
Statements 1 and 2 are correct, whereas Statement 3 is false, yielding the correct choice '1 and 2 only'.
To finalize the solution.

Key Concept

Constitutional Powers of the Governor vs President and Judicial Immunity of Ministerial Advice
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 115Question →

Match the fundamental judicial mechanisms and constitutional jurisdictions in Column I with their correct legal descriptions in Column II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Public Interest Litigation
Judicial Review
Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Public Interest Litigation matches the relaxation of traditional locus standi; Judicial Review matches the judicial power to invalidate unconstitutional acts; Original Jurisdiction matches exclusive inter-governmental dispute settlement; Advisory Jurisdiction matches presidential consultative references.
The pairing accurately links each judicial concept to its functional scope under the Indian Constitution: Public Interest Litigation concerns relaxed locus standi, Judicial Review pertains to checking legislative/executive constitutional validity, Original Jurisdiction governs exclusive federal dispute resolution, and Advisory Jurisdiction covers consultative presidential guidance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL)
PIL allows any public-spirited individual to approach the court for the redressal of public wrongs, broadening standing rights.
It expands access to justice beyond aggrieved individuals.
2
Define Judicial Review
Judicial Review is the court's prerogative to scrutinize legislative statutes and executive actions against constitutional standards.
It upholds the principle of constitutional supremacy.
3
Analyze Original Jurisdiction
Original Jurisdiction gives the Supreme Court sole authority to resolve inter-state or federal disputes in the first instance.
It serves as the constitutional federal court of original instance.
4
Analyze Advisory Jurisdiction
Advisory Jurisdiction provides formal legal guidance to the President of India on matters of law or fact.
It fulfills a consultative role under Article 143.

Key Concept

Jurisdictions and Judicial Powers under the Indian Constitution
Question 116Question →

Regarding the constitutional safeguards and functional framework of the State Election Commission under Article 243K of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements is correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor, but can be removed from office only in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court.

Answer

The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor, but can be removed from office only in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court.
Under Article 243K(2) of the Constitution of India, the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor of the State. To ensure institutional autonomy, the Constitution provides that the Commissioner shall not be removed from office except in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court, and their conditions of service shall not be varied to their disadvantage after appointment.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant constitutional article governing the State Election Commission
Article 243K of Part IX of the Constitution of India vests the superintendence, direction, and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of all elections to the Panchayats in a State Election Commission.
Establishing the constitutional basis for local body elections.
2
Analyze appointment and removal provisions under Article 243K(2)
The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor. However, to guarantee independence, the Commissioner cannot be removed except in the manner and on the grounds prescribed for a High Court Judge.
Verifying the security of tenure and removal procedures.
3
Evaluate the role of the Governor versus the Central/State executive
The Governor determines service conditions subject to state legislation, but cannot vary them to the Commissioner's disadvantage after appointment. Removal requires presidential action based on a parliamentary address, not state cabinet pleasure.
Eliminating options confusing executive pleasure and administrative jurisdiction.

Key Concept

Constitutional safeguards and independence of the State Election Commission under Article 243K
Question 117Question →

Which Schedule was added to the Constitution of India by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 to specify the functional matters of Panchayati Raj Institutions?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Eleventh Schedule

Answer

The Eleventh Schedule was added to the Constitution of India by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992.
The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 added Part IX and the Eleventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. This schedule contains 29 functional matters (such as agriculture, land improvement, minor irrigation, and rural housing) devolved to the Panchayats.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Constitutional Amendment Act
The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992 granted constitutional status to rural local self-government (Panchayati Raj Institutions).
Understanding which amendment created Part IX and its corresponding schedule.
2
Map the amendment to its corresponding Schedule
The 73rd Amendment introduced Part IX and the Eleventh Schedule (containing 29 subjects), while the 74th Amendment introduced Part IXA and the Twelfth Schedule (containing 18 subjects).
Direct mapping of constitutional schedules to their provisions.

Key Concept

Constitutional Schedules added by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act
Question 118Question →

Regarding the constitutional safeguards and independence guaranteed to Constitutional Bodies under the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or the Government of any State after demitting office.; The Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed from office on the ground of misbehaviour only after an inquiry held by the Supreme Court of India.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is ineligible for further government office after demitting office, and that the Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehaviour only after a Supreme Court inquiry.
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is explicitly barred by Article 148(4) from holding further government office post-retirement. Additionally, Article 317(1) mandates that the Chairman or members of the UPSC can only be removed for misbehaviour following a formal inquiry and finding by the Supreme Court.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional post-retirement eligibility of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).
Under Article 148(4), the CAG is barred from any further employment under the Union or State governments to ensure independence.
Prevents executive influence through promises of future post-retirement appointments.
2
Examine the removal procedure for the Chairman and members of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
Article 317(1) specifies that removal on grounds of misbehaviour requires a mandatory reference to and inquiry by the Supreme Court, whose advice is binding on the President.
Provides strict procedural security of tenure to UPSC members.
3
Evaluate the nature of Finance Commission recommendations.
Article 280 provisions establish the Finance Commission as a quasi-judicial advisory body whose recommendations are not constitutionally binding.
Fiscal autonomy allows Parliament and the Union Executive discretion over implementation.
4
Verify the removal mechanism and tenure security of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Article 324(5) safeguards the CEC from executive pleasure, requiring a parliamentary resolution passed by a special majority similar to a Supreme Court judge.
Guarantees free and fair elections without fear of arbitrary executive dismissal.

Key Concept

Constitutional Independence, Tenure Security, and Removal Safeguards of Indian Constitutional Bodies
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 119Question →

Which of the following judicial writs can be issued by the Supreme Court or High Courts against both judicial or quasi-judicial bodies and administrative authorities to quash an order that has already been passed in excess of jurisdiction?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Certiorari

Answer

Certiorari is the writ used to quash orders passed in excess of jurisdiction by judicial, quasi-judicial, and administrative authorities.
The writ of Certiorari is issued by a higher judicial body to lower judicial, quasi-judicial, or administrative authorities. Its primary objective is to quash an order that has been issued without jurisdiction, in excess of jurisdiction, or in violation of natural justice. In 1991, the Supreme Court extended the availability of Certiorari to administrative authorities affecting the rights of citizens.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the purpose of the writ mentioned in the stem.
The target writ must be corrective in nature (quashing an existing order) and apply to both judicial/quasi-judicial bodies and administrative authorities.
The stem specifies quashing an order already passed in excess of jurisdiction.
2
Evaluate the scope of the writ of Certiorari.
Certiorari acts to quash illegal orders. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in 1991, Certiorari can be issued against administrative authorities affecting rights of individuals, as well as judicial and quasi-judicial bodies.
It fulfills both conditions: corrective nature (quashing) and applicability to administrative as well as judicial bodies.
3
Distinguish Certiorari from Prohibition, Mandamus, and Quo-Warranto.
Prohibition is purely preventive before an order is made; Mandamus directs action for failure of duty; Quo-Warranto tests title to public office.
This confirms Certiorari as the unique matching answer.

Key Concept

Scope and Jurisdiction of Writs under Articles 32 and 226
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 120Question →

Under the Constitution of India, which of the following executive powers is exclusively available to the President of India under Article 72 and CANNOT be exercised by the Governor of a State under Article 161?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Pardoning a sentence of death

Answer

Pardoning a sentence of death
Under Article 72 of the Constitution of India, the President has the power to grant a pardon to any person convicted of an offense where the sentence is a sentence of death. Under Article 161, the Governor does not possess the power to grant a complete pardon in death penalty cases (which remains an exclusive Presidential power), although the Governor retains authority to suspend, remit, or commute a sentence of death.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Constitutional provisions
Article 72 governs the pardoning powers of the President, while Article 161 governs the pardoning powers of the Governor.
Constitutional comparison requires examining the specific jurisdiction and exceptions laid down in both articles.
2
Analyze the overlap and differences regarding death sentences
Article 72 explicitly grants the President power to pardon death sentences. Under Article 161, the Governor cannot grant a full pardon for a death sentence, even though the Governor can suspend, remit, or commute it.
The power of complete pardon for a capital punishment sentence is uniquely reserved for the Union Head (President).
3
Conclude the exclusive power
Pardoning a sentence of death is exclusively vested in the President of India.
This establishes the distinction between Article 72 and Article 161.

Key Concept

Constitutional distinction between Presidential (Article 72) and Gubernatorial (Article 161) pardoning powers
PreviousPage 6 / 16Next
Indian Polity and Governance Practice Questions — State PSC Exam — Page 6 | Examkin