Examkin

Indian Polity and Governance

316 questions

All types316Multiple choice161Multiple select68Matching74Ordering13
Question 81Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional powers of the Governor and the President in relation to state legislation in India:

1. Under Article 200, the Governor is constitutionally required to reserve any bill for the consideration of the President if it derogates from the powers of the State High Court so as to endanger its constitutional position.
2. When a bill is returned by the President to the State Legislature for reconsideration under Article 201, the House or Houses of the State Legislature must reconsider it within a period of six months.
3. If a bill reserved for the consideration of the President is re-passed by the State Legislature with or without amendments, the President is constitutionally bound to give assent to the bill.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 2 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 2 only are correct.
The combination declaring statements 1 and 2 only as correct is right. Statement 1 correctly reflects the mandatory reservation under the second proviso of Article 200 to protect High Court autonomy. Statement 2 accurately quotes the 6-month statutory limit for state legislature reconsideration under Article 201. Statement 3 is false because the President retains absolute discretion to withhold assent even if the State Legislature re-passes the bill.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding mandatory bill reservation by the Governor.
Article 200 (second proviso) states that the Governor shall not assent to, but shall reserve for the consideration of the President, any bill which in the opinion of the Governor would, if it became law, so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger the position which that Court is by this Constitution designed to fill.
This is a mandatory constitutional duty of the Governor, making Statement 1 correct.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding the timeframe for state legislature reconsideration under Article 201.
Article 201 provides that where a bill is returned by the President for reconsideration, the House or Houses shall reconsider it accordingly within a period of six months from the date of receipt of such message.
This procedural timeline is explicitly prescribed in the Constitution, making Statement 2 correct.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding presidential assent on re-passed state bills.
Under Article 201, if the bill is passed again by the State Legislature with or without amendment, it is presented again to the President for consideration. However, the Constitution does not mandate that the President must give assent (unlike Article 200 for the Governor). The President may withhold assent or withhold decision indefinitely.
Conflating presidential assent under Article 201 with gubernatorial obligation under Article 200 is a common mistake. Statement 3 is false.

Key Concept

Discretionary and constitutional duties of the Governor under Article 200 and President's veto power over state legislation under Article 201.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 82Question →

According to the Constitution of India, to which of the following bodies is the Union Council of Ministers collectively responsible?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Lok Sabha (House of the People)

Answer

The Lok Sabha (House of the People)
According to Article 75(3) of the Constitution of India, the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (House of the People). This principle forms the bedrock of parliamentary democracy in India, ensuring that the ministry remains in power only as long as it enjoys the confidence of the directly elected representatives.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provision governing executive accountability to the legislature.
Article 75(3) of the Constitution of India addresses the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers.
Constitutional provisions clearly define the relationship between the executive and legislative branches.
2
Determine the specific legislative body named in Article 75(3).
Article 75(3) specifies that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the House of the People (Lok Sabha).
This establishes the democratic principle of executive accountability to the directly elected house of representatives.

Key Concept

Collective Responsibility of the Union Council of Ministers
Question 83Question →

The Preamble to the Constitution of India has been amended only once since its adoption. Which Constitutional Amendment Act added the terms 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976

Answer

The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 added the terms 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to the Preamble.
The Preamble to the Constitution of India was amended by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act in 1976. This single amendment introduced three key terms into the Preamble: 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the historical amendment that modified the Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
The Preamble has been amended exactly once in constitutional history.
Recognizing that the Preamble was amended only once helps narrow down the relevant landmark legislation.
2
Associate the specified terms with the corresponding Constitutional Amendment Act.
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 added 'Socialist' and 'Secular' between 'Sovereign' and 'Democratic', and changed 'unity of the Nation' to 'unity and integrity of the Nation'.
This amendment implemented significant textual additions to the Preamble.

Key Concept

Amendment of the Preamble under the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976
Question 84Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) and Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A) of the Constitution of India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 43A was inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976, to secure the participation of workers in the management of undertakings and industrial establishments.; Article 48A directs the State to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wildlife of the country.

Answer

The correct statements are that Article 43A (worker participation in industrial management) and Article 48A (protection of environment, forests, and wildlife) were added to the Directive Principles of State Policy by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.
The statements confirming Article 43A (workers' participation in industrial management) and Article 48A (protection of environment and wildlife) are correct because both provisions were added to Part IV of the Constitution under the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze provisions added to Part IV by constitutional amendments
Identify that Article 43A (participation of workers in management) and Article 48A (environmental protection) were both enacted through the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976.
Verifies the historic amendment context for socialist and environmental Directive Principles.
2
Evaluate the timeline of Fundamental Duties under Article 51A
Recognize that the 42nd Amendment (1976) introduced 10 duties recommended by the Swaran Singh Committee, while the 11th duty regarding children's education was introduced by the 86th Amendment in 2002.
Distinguishes between the original set of duties added in 1976 and subsequent additions.
3
Assess the judicial enforceability of Part IV-A duties under Article 32 writ jurisdiction
Conclude that Fundamental Duties lack direct enforceability under Article 32 because Part III writ jurisdiction only applies to Fundamental Rights.
Prevents confusion between fundamental constitutional rights and non-justiciable civic obligations.

Key Concept

Constitutional Amendments to Part IV (DPSPs) and Nature of Part IV-A (Fundamental Duties)
Question 85Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the provisions of Local Self-Government under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Part IX to the Constitution of India to grant constitutional status to Panchayati Raj Institutions.; Article 243K mandates that the superintendence, direction, and control of elections to Panchayats shall be vested in a State Election Commission.

Answer

The correct statements are that the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Part IX to the Constitution and that Article 243K vests election authority for Panchayats in a State Election Commission.
The statements confirming that Part IX was introduced by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act and that Article 243K mandates the State Election Commission to conduct Panchayat elections are correct. Part IX establishes constitutional recognition for rural local self-governance, and Article 243K establishes an independent State Election Commission to oversee its electoral process.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the statement regarding Part IX and the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act.
The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, added Part IX titled 'The Panchayats' (Articles 243 to 243O). This statement is correct.
Constitutional provisions explicitly mandate Part IX for Rural Local Government.
2
Evaluate the statement regarding the election authority under Article 243K.
Article 243K creates a State Election Commission headed by a State Election Commissioner for local body elections. This statement is correct.
Elections to local self-governments are conducted by State Election Commissions, distinct from the Election Commission of India.
3
Evaluate the statement regarding the Schedule added by the 73rd Amendment.
The 73rd Amendment added the 11th Schedule (29 functional items), not the 12th Schedule (which covers 18 items under Urban Local Bodies via the 74th Amendment). This statement is incorrect.
Confusing the 11th and 12th schedules is a common mistake.
4
Evaluate the statement regarding the minimum eligibility age to contest local elections.
The constitutional minimum age for contesting Panchayat/Municipal elections is 21 years (Articles 243F/243V), not 25 years. This statement is incorrect.
The qualification age for local bodies is lowered to 21 years compared to 25 years for Legislative Assemblies.

Key Concept

Key Provisions of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts
Question 86Question →

According to Article 243ZD introduced by the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, what is the minimum proportion of total members of a District Planning Committee (DPC) that must be elected by, and from amongst, the elected members of the Zilla Parishad and Municipalities in the district?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: At least four-fifths

Answer

At least four-fifths of the members of a District Planning Committee must be elected by, and from amongst, the elected members of the rural and urban local bodies in the district.
Article 243ZD(2)(b) of the Constitution of India specifies that at least four-fifths of the total members of a District Planning Committee must be elected by, and from amongst, the elected members of the district's Zilla Parishad and Municipalities in proportion to the rural and urban population ratio.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant Constitutional Article and Amendment
Article 243ZD was inserted into Part IX-A of the Constitution of India via the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, to deal with District Planning Committees.
Establishing the constitutional basis for District Planning Committees is essential to locate the exact membership rules.
2
Analyze the structural representation provisions under Article 243ZD(2)(b)
The clause specifies that not less than four-fifths (80%) of the total members of the committee shall be elected from amongst the elected members of the Zilla Parishad and Municipalities.
This proportion ensures proportional representation between the rural and urban populations in the district.
3
Differentiate between District Planning Committees (Article 243ZD) and Metropolitan Planning Committees (Article 243ZE)
District Planning Committees require at least 4/5th elected representation, whereas Metropolitan Planning Committees require at least 2/3rd elected representation.
Comparing these two provisions eliminates common distractor options.

Key Concept

Composition and election ratio of District Planning Committees under Article 243ZD of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act.
Question 87Question →

Match each Constitutional Article governing the State Executive and Legislature listed in List-I with its corresponding constitutional provision in List-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 163
Article 167
Article 174
Article 202

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 163 corresponds to the Council of Ministers aiding and advising the Governor; Article 167 corresponds to the duties of the Chief Minister to furnish information to the Governor; Article 174 corresponds to the Governor's power to summon, prorogue, and dissolve the State Legislature; and Article 202 corresponds to the Annual Financial Statement (State Budget).
Article 163 provides for a Council of Ministers to aid and advise the Governor; Article 167 lays down the duties of the Chief Minister to communicate administrative decisions to the Governor; Article 174 confers powers on the Governor regarding the summoning, prorogation, and dissolution of the State Legislature; and Article 202 mandates laying the Annual Financial Statement before the State Legislature.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary executive relationship defined under Article 163.
Article 163 provides for a Council of Ministers with the Chief Minister at the head to aid and advise the Governor.
This establishes the parliamentary executive structure at the state level.
2
Determine the constitutional duties of the Chief Minister towards the Governor under Article 167.
Article 167 details the obligation of the Chief Minister to communicate all Council of Ministers decisions and legislative proposals to the Governor.
This maintains the channel of communication between the executive head (Governor) and the real executive (CM).
3
Relate Article 174 to legislative sessions and procedures.
Article 174 grants the Governor authority to summon the House/Houses, prorogue sessions, and dissolve the Legislative Assembly.
The Governor acts as an integral part of the State Legislature responsible for convening and terminating legislative sessions.
4
Correlate Article 202 with financial provisions of the state.
Article 202 governs the Annual Financial Statement, requiring it to be laid before the State Legislature.
This mirrors Article 112 at the Union level for presentation of the budget.

Key Concept

Constitutional Articles governing the State Executive and State Legislature under Part VI of the Indian Constitution
Question 88Question →

Regarding the constitutional procedure for the abolition or creation of a Legislative Council in a State under Article 169 of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements is correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The State Legislative Assembly must pass a resolution by a special majority, following which Parliament may enact a law by a simple majority, which is not deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution under Article 368.

Answer

The State Legislative Assembly must pass a resolution by a special majority, following which Parliament may enact a law by a simple majority, which is not deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution under Article 368.
Under Article 169 of the Constitution of India, Parliament is empowered to abolish or create a Legislative Council in a State if the Legislative Assembly of that State passes a resolution to that effect by a special majority (a majority of the total membership of the Assembly and a majority of not less than two-thirds of members present and voting). Once the resolution is passed, Parliament may pass a law by simple majority, and Article 169(2) explicitly specifies that such a law shall not be deemed an amendment of the Constitution for the purposes of Article 368.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the Assembly resolution requirement under Article 169
The State Legislative Assembly must pass a resolution by a majority of total membership and a majority of not less than two-thirds of members present and voting.
Establish the state-level constitutional threshold for initiating Council creation or abolition.
2
Analyze parliamentary procedure for enacting the enabling law
Parliament may pass an Act to create or abolish the Council by simple majority through regular legislative process.
Determine the federal legislative majority needed to give effect to the Assembly's resolution.
3
Determine Article 368 applicability under Article 169(2)
Article 169(2) explicitly provides that such parliamentary legislation is not to be treated as a constitutional amendment under Article 368.
Differentiate ordinary parliamentary enactments under Article 169 from formal constitutional amendments.

Key Concept

Constitutional procedure for abolition or creation of State Legislative Councils under Article 169
Question 89Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions under Part IX of the Constitution of India (73rd Constitutional Amendment Act):

1. The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor of the State, but can only be removed from office in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Judge of a High Court.
2. A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution continues for a full fresh term of five years from the date appointed for its first meeting.
3. The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act makes the reservation of seats for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in Panchayats at any level a compulsory provision across all States.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 only

Answer

The statement stating that the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor but removed in the same manner as a High Court Judge is the only correct statement.
Statement 1 is correct because Article 243K(2) protects the independence of the State Election Commissioner by mandating that removal can only occur in like manner and on like grounds as a Judge of a High Court. Statement 2 is incorrect because Article 243E(4) limits the duration of a Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution to the remaining term only. Statement 3 is incorrect because reservation for Backward Classes is a voluntary provision under Article 243D(6). Therefore, only Statement 1 is correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding the removal procedure of the State Election Commissioner.
According to Article 243K(2), while the Governor appoints the State Election Commissioner, the Commissioner can be removed only in like manner and on like grounds as a Judge of a High Court (i.e. by order of the President following an address by Parliament). Hence, Statement 1 is correct.
Ensuring independence of the State Election Commission.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the tenure of a reconstituted Panchayat.
Article 243E(4) specifies that a Panchayat constituted upon the premature dissolution of a Panchayat shall continue only for the remainder of the period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have continued. Hence, Statement 2 is incorrect.
Preventing perpetual alteration of election cycles.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding compulsory vs voluntary reservation provisions.
Under Article 243D(6), providing reservation of seats or offices of chairpersons for backward classes of citizens is a voluntary (discretionary) provision left to State Legislatures, unlike compulsory reservations mandated for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Women. Hence, Statement 3 is incorrect.
Distinguishing compulsory constitutional mandates from state-level discretionary powers.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions under 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 (Articles 243D, 243E, and 243K)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 90Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional duties and functions of the Chief Minister in an Indian State are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Chief Minister acts as the principal channel of communication between the Governor and the State Council of Ministers.; The Chief Minister allocates and reshuffles portfolios among the state ministers.

Answer

The Chief Minister acts as the principal channel of communication between the Governor and the Council of Ministers, and also allocates and reshuffles portfolios among state ministers.
The valid statements accurately highlight that the Chief Minister serves as the primary conduit of official communication to the Governor regarding cabinet decisions (Article 167) and possesses the authority to assign and reallocate portfolios among state ministers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the appointment authority of the Chief Minister.
Under Article 164, the Chief Minister is appointed by the Governor of the state, making the claim of Presidential appointment incorrect.
To distinguish between state-level executive authority and central executive authority.
2
Evaluate executive communication responsibilities.
Article 167 explicitly defines the Chief Minister's duty to communicate cabinet decisions to the Governor.
To confirm the Chief Minister's position as the primary link between the cabinet and the head of state.
3
Verify cabinet leadership powers and tenure rules.
The Chief Minister reshuffles portfolio assignments among ministers and holds office contingent on majority support in the Assembly rather than a fixed six-year term.
To analyze how democratic accountability functions within the state legislature.

Key Concept

Constitutional duties and powers of the Chief Minister in the State Executive
Question 91Question →

With reference to the constitutional safeguards against arrest and preventive detention under Article 22 of Part III of the Constitution of India, consider the following statements:

1. The constitutional safeguard requiring an arrested person to be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours applies equally to punitive detention and preventive detention.
2. Parliament holds exclusive legislative competence to enact laws pertaining to preventive detention for reasons connected with the security of a State and maintenance of public order.
3. The constitutional maximum period for detaining a person under a preventive detention law without obtaining an opinion from an Advisory Board remains three months, as the provision of the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act reducing it to two months was never brought into force.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 3 only

Answer

Only statement 3 is correct.
Statement 3 is the only correct statement. Under Article 22(4) of the Constitution, a person cannot be held under preventive detention for more than three months without an Advisory Board's recommendation. Although the 44th Amendment Act of 1978 sought to reduce this duration to two months, that specific amendment provision was never brought into force by executive notification. Meanwhile, Statement 1 fails because Article 22(3) deprives preventive detainees of the 24-hour magistrate production right, and Statement 2 fails because state security and public order preventive detention fall under Entry 3 of the Concurrent List, allowing both Parliament and State Assemblies to legislate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 regarding procedural safeguards for preventive detention.
Statement 1 is incorrect.
Article 22(3) of the Constitution explicitly states that the protection under clauses (1) and (2)—including the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest, the right to consult a legal practitioner, and the mandate to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours—does NOT apply to any person arrested or detained under preventive detention laws.
2
Analyze Statement 2 regarding legislative competence for preventive detention.
Statement 2 is incorrect.
Under the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, legislative power over preventive detention is divided: Parliament has exclusive power under Entry 9 of the Union List (List I) for reasons connected with Defense, Foreign Affairs, or the Security of India. However, under Entry 3 of the Concurrent List (List III), both Parliament and State Legislatures possess legislative power for preventive detention connected with the security of a State, public order, or maintenance of essential supplies.
3
Analyze Statement 3 regarding the enforcement status of the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act.
Statement 3 is correct.
The 44th Amendment Act, 1978 amended Article 22(4) to reduce the maximum period of preventive detention without Advisory Board approval from 3 months to 2 months. However, this section of the Amendment Act was never formally notified by the Central Government, leaving the 3-month period intact in operative constitutional law.

Key Concept

Constitutional safeguards and legislative division regarding Preventive Detention under Article 22
Question 92Question →

Match the committees on Panchayati Raj Institutions in List I with their landmark recommendations and constitutional contributions in List II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985)
L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986)
P.K. Thungon Committee (1988)
V.N. Gadgil Committee (1988)

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

G.V.K. Rao Committee matches with bureaucratization critique ('grass without roots') and District Development Commissioner; L.M. Singhvi Committee matches with initial constitutional recognition recommendation and Nyaya Panchayats; P.K. Thungon Committee matches with Parliamentary Sub-Committee recommending 3-tier system and 5-year fixed tenure; V.N. Gadgil Committee matches with formulating the comprehensive blueprint covering reservations and independent Commissions.
Each committee is accurately paired with its distinct contribution: G.V.K. Rao Committee identified the issue of bureaucratization ('grass without roots'); L.M. Singhvi Committee pioneered the demand for constitutional status and Nyaya Panchayats; P.K. Thungon Committee recommended constitutional backing as a Parliamentary sub-committee; and V.N. Gadgil Committee produced the broad structural blueprint adopted in the 73rd Amendment Act.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary contribution of the G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985).
Recognized its analysis of development bureaucratization ('grass without roots') and proposal for a District Development Commissioner acting as CEO of Zilla Parishad.
The G.V.K. Rao committee focused heavily on administrative arrangements for rural development and poverty alleviation.
2
Analyze the recommendations of the L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986).
Identified its landmark proposal to constitutionally declare and protect Panchayati Raj Institutions alongside establishing Nyaya Panchayats.
The Rajiv Gandhi government appointed the L.M. Singhvi committee specifically to revitalize local self-government institutions for democracy and development.
3
Examine the role of the P.K. Thungon Committee (1988).
Identified its status as a Parliamentary Consultative Sub-Committee advocating a 3-tier structure, constitutional backing, and fixed 5-year tenure.
The Thungon committee examined political and administrative structures of local governance for planning at the district level.
4
Evaluate the V.N. Gadgil Committee (1988) blueprint.
Identified its detailed design provisions including mandatory reservations, State Finance Commission, and State Election Commission.
The recommendations of the Gadgil Committee served as the direct foundation for drafting the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Bill.

Key Concept

Committees and Constitutional Evolution of Panchayati Raj Institutions in India
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 93Question →

Regarding the Vice-President of India under the Constitution, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Vice-President serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.; The Vice-President is elected by an electoral college consisting of members of both Houses of Parliament.

Answer

The statements confirming that the Vice-President acts as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and is elected by members of both Houses of Parliament are correct.
The Vice-President serves as the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Article 64) and is elected by an electoral college composed of members of both Houses of Parliament (Article 66(1)).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the ex-officio role of the Vice-President
Article 64 explicitly states that the Vice-President of India is the ex-officio Chairman of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha).
This is a fundamental constitutional provision governing the leadership of the Upper House.
2
Examine the removal procedure
Removal requires a resolution originating in the Rajya Sabha passed by an effective majority and agreed to by the Lok Sabha.
The Lok Sabha cannot unilaterally pass a resolution to remove the Vice-President.
3
Verify the composition of the electoral college
Article 66(1) specifies that the electoral college consists of all members (both elected and nominated) of both Houses of Parliament.
Unlike the Presidential election, state legislative assemblies do not participate in the election of the Vice-President.
4
Check the tenure length
The standard tenure is five years under Article 67.
Confusing the tenure of the Vice-President with the six-year term of individual Rajya Sabha members is a common mistake.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions, election, tenure, and functions of the Vice-President of India
Question 94Question →

With reference to the constitutional framework of the Union Executive, what is the precise legal consequence on the Council of Ministers when an incumbent Prime Minister dies in office or submits their resignation to the President?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Union Council of Ministers automatically stands dissolved, as the Prime Minister is the central pillar of the Cabinet.

Answer

The Union Council of Ministers automatically stands dissolved, as the Prime Minister is the central pillar of the Cabinet.
The Prime Minister occupies a pivotal position in the Indian parliamentary democracy as the head of the Union Council of Ministers. Because the Council of Ministers comes into existence only after the Prime Minister takes the oath and advises the President on ministerial appointments, the resignation or death of an incumbent Prime Minister automatically brings about the dissolution of the entire Council of Ministers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional position of the Prime Minister in relation to the Union Council of Ministers under Article 74 and Article 75.
The Prime Minister is the head of the Council of Ministers and the cornerstone of the Cabinet arch.
The existence of the Council of Ministers is fundamentally tied to the leadership of the Prime Minister.
2
Evaluate the effect of a Prime Minister's death or resignation on the Council of Ministers.
The resignation or demise of the Prime Minister automatically dissolves the Council of Ministers, creating a vacuum.
Since ministers are appointed on the advice of the Prime Minister, the exit of the Prime Minister collapses the entire executive body.
3
Distinguish between the dissolution of the Council of Ministers and the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Only the ministry collapses; the Lok Sabha remains intact unless specifically dissolved by the President.
A new Prime Minister can be appointed if a political party or coalition demonstrates majority support in the Lok Sabha.

Key Concept

Constitutional Position and Primacy of the Prime Minister in the Union Executive
Question 95Question →

Under Article 22 of the Constitution of India, what is the maximum period for which a person can ordinarily be detained under a preventive detention law without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 3 months

Answer

3 months
Under Article 22(4) of the Constitution of India, no law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a period longer than three months unless an Advisory Board—consisting of persons who are, or have been, or are qualified to be appointed as Judges of a High Court—has reported before the expiration of the said three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention. Although the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978 passed a provision to reduce this maximum period to two months, that specific amendment was never officially brought into force, so three months remains the active constitutional standard.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional safeguards against preventive detention under Part III.
Identified Article 22(4) as the governing provision for detention limits without Advisory Board review.
Article 22 balances state security needs with protection against arbitrary detention.
2
Verify the operative constitutional timeframe specified in Article 22(4)(a).
The text explicitly sets three months as the threshold limit.
An Advisory Board must report sufficient cause before the expiration of three months to extend detention.
3
Check for statutory amendments or enforcement status regarding this provision.
The 44th Constitutional Amendment Act (1978) proposed reducing the limit to two months, but this amendment was never notified or brought into force.
The original three-month period remains the binding constitutional law.

Key Concept

Preventive Detention Safeguards under Article 22
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 96Question →

Regarding the framing of the Indian Constitution and the adoption of its Preamble, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Objectives Resolution, which laid down the underlying principles of the Constitution and inspired the Preamble, was introduced in the Constituent Assembly by Jawaharlal Nehru in December 1946.; The Constituent Assembly voted to enact and join the Preamble to the Constitution after the rest of the Constitution had already been passed.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Objectives Resolution was introduced by Jawaharlal Nehru in December 1946, and that the Preamble was adopted by the Constituent Assembly after the rest of the Constitution was passed.
The Objectives Resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru in December 1946 laid down the foundational vision for India's Constitution and directly influenced the Preamble. Furthermore, the Constituent Assembly deliberately enacted the Preamble at the very end of the drafting process to ensure full alignment with all constitutional provisions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the statement concerning the introduction of the Objectives Resolution.
Jawaharlal Nehru moved the Objectives Resolution on December 13, 1946, which set out the principles guiding the assembly and formed the foundation of the Preamble.
This confirms the historical origination of the philosophical framework of the Constitution.
2
Evaluate the procedure for adopting the Preamble in the Constituent Assembly.
The Preamble was formally adopted last to ensure consistency with the finalized text of the Constitution.
Procedurally, the assembly wanted the Preamble to reflect the completed Constitution.
3
Analyze the claim regarding the inclusion of 'Socialist' and 'Secular' in 1949.
These terms were added by the 42nd Amendment in 1976.
Confusing original constitutional text with subsequent amendments is a common error.
4
Examine the attribution of Fundamental Rights and Preamble to the Indian Councils Act of 1892.
The 1892 Act dealt with legislative council expansion, not the Preamble or Fundamental Rights.
Colonial legislations must be accurately differentiated by their specific administrative provisions.

Key Concept

Framing of the Indian Constitution and History of the Preamble
Question 97Question →

Match the Constitutional Articles governing the State Executive and Legislature in List-I with their corresponding specific constitutional provisions in List-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 161
Article 167
Article 200
Article 213

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 161 matches with the pardoning power extending to state executive scope excluding court-martial; Article 167 matches with the Chief Minister's duty to furnish administrative information to the Governor; Article 200 matches with the Governor's options regarding assent or reservation of bills for Presidential consideration; Article 213 matches with the Governor's ordinance-making power during legislative recess.
Each constitutional Article correctly corresponds to its constitutional mandate under Part VI of the Constitution of India: Article 161 specifies the Governor's judicial pardoning power; Article 167 outlines the Chief Minister's duties to inform the Governor; Article 200 outlines gubernatorial assent and reservation of bills; Article 213 lays down the ordinance-making power during legislative recess.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the scope of Article 161
Article 161 relates to the pardoning, remitting, and commuting powers of the Governor under the state executive boundary.
Constitutional framework explicitly differentiates gubernatorial pardoning under Article 161 from presidential pardoning under Article 72.
2
Identify the duties under Article 167
Article 167 specifies the Chief Minister's constitutional obligation as a link between the State Cabinet and the Governor.
The CM must report cabinet decisions and supply information requested by the Governor regarding administration and legislation.
3
Analyze Article 200 regarding state legislative bills
Article 200 covers gubernatorial assent, returning bills, and reservation of state bills for Presidential consideration.
It forms the core mechanism balancing state legislative enactments with constitutional compliance.
4
Analyze Article 213 for emergency state lawmaking
Article 213 authorizes gubernatorial ordinances when the legislature is in recess.
An ordinance under Article 213 must be approved by the state legislature within six weeks of its reassembly.

Key Concept

Constitutional Articles governing the executive authority of the Governor, duties of the Chief Minister, legislative assent procedures, and ordinance powers under Part VI of the Indian Constitution.
Question 98Question →

Under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, what is the standard term of office for Panchayati Raj Institutions from the date appointed for their first meeting?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 5 years

Answer

The standard term of office for Panchayati Raj Institutions under the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act is 5 years.
Article 243E of Part IX of the Constitution of India provides that every Panchayat, unless sooner dissolved under any law for the time being in force, shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision under Part IX dealing with the duration of Panchayats.
Article 243E specifically governs the duration and term of office of Panchayats.
The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act introduced Part IX (Articles 243 to 243O) to provide constitutional status to Panchayati Raj Institutions.
2
Determine the constitutional duration specified in Article 243E(1).
Article 243E(1) states that every Panchayat, unless sooner dissolved, shall continue for five years from the date appointed for its first meeting and no longer.
This establishes a uniform 5-year tenure for rural local self-government bodies across all states in India.

Key Concept

Duration and Tenure of Panchayati Raj Institutions (Article 243E)
Question 99Question →

With reference to the constitutional provisions governing Panchayati Raj Institutions under Part IX (73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992) of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor and can only be removed from office in the manner and on the grounds specified for a Judge of a High Court.; The State Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor every five years under Article 243-I to review the financial position of the Panchayats and recommend principles for revenue distribution.

Answer

The correct statements are that the State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor and removed like a High Court Judge, and that the State Finance Commission is constituted every five years by the Governor under Article 243-I.
The statements describing the removal procedure of the State Election Commissioner (same as a High Court Judge under Article 243K) and the constitution of the State Finance Commission by the Governor every five years (under Article 243-I) accurately state constitutional facts under Part IX.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the provision regarding the State Election Commission (Article 243K)
Article 243K(2) specifies that the Governor appoints the State Election Commissioner, and conditions of service/tenure cannot be varied to their disadvantage after appointment. Removal requires the same procedure as a High Court Judge.
Ensures independence of the election machinery at the local governance level.
2
Examine the tenure rule for Panchayats constituted after premature dissolution (Article 243E)
Article 243E(4) explicitly states that a Panchayat elected after early dissolution serves only the remaining portion of the original 5-year tenure.
Prevents alignment shifts and maintains synchronization of electoral cycles.
3
Check the structural tiers mandate under Article 243B
Article 243B(2) provides an exemption: states with a population below 20 lakhs need not establish the intermediate level tier.
Provides administrative flexibility for smaller states.
4
Verify the provisions for the State Finance Commission under Article 243-I
Article 243-I requires the Governor to constitute a State Finance Commission every five years to advise on fiscal devolution to local bodies.
Ensures financial autonomy and structured resource transfer to Panchayats.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions under Part IX (Articles 243 to 243O) regulating tenure, election machinery, financial devolution, and structural tiers of Panchayati Raj Institutions.
Question 100Question →

Match the Constitutional Articles relating to the Indian Judiciary in List-I with their exact Jurisdictional Scope and Legal Characteristics in List-II.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Article 131
Article 136
Article 143
Article 226

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Article 131 matches Exclusive original jurisdiction in Union-State disputes; Article 136 matches Special Leave Petition against court/tribunal orders; Article 143 matches Advisory jurisdiction upon Presidential reference; Article 226 matches High Court writ jurisdiction for Fundamental Rights and other legal purposes.
The correct pairings accurately map each Constitutional Article to its precise jurisdiction: Article 131 specifies the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction over Union-State and inter-State disputes involving legal rights; Article 136 confers plenary discretionary authority to grant special leave to appeal against judgments of any court or tribunal except military tribunals; Article 143 governs the Supreme Court's advisory jurisdiction on Presidential references; and Article 226 provides High Courts with broad writ power covering both Fundamental Rights and ordinary legal rights.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine Article 131 of the Constitution of India.
Identified as exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
Article 131 applies exclusively to federal disputes involving legal questions between the Union government and State governments or between different States.
2
Examine Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Identified as the plenary discretionary jurisdiction for Special Leave Petitions.
Article 136 permits the Supreme Court to hear appeals by special leave from any judicial or quasi-judicial body in India, excluding military tribunals.
3
Examine Article 143 of the Constitution of India.
Identified as advisory jurisdiction.
Article 143 enables the President of India to refer matters of law or fact of general public importance to the Supreme Court for advisory opinions.
4
Examine Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Identified as writ jurisdiction of the High Courts.
Article 226 grants High Courts the authority to issue writs not only for enforcing Fundamental Rights (Part III) but also for 'any other purpose' (statutory or legal rights).

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions governing the jurisdiction and powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts of India.
PreviousPage 5 / 16Next
Indian Polity and Governance Practice Questions — State PSC Exam — Page 5 | Examkin