Examkin

Constitutional Bodies: Election Commission, UPSC, SPSC, CAG, and Finance Commission

21 questions

All types21Multiple choice10Multiple select6Matching5
Question 1Question →

With reference to the Finance Commission of India constituted under Article 280 of the Constitution of India, which of the following statements is correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Constitution authorizes Parliament to determine by law the qualifications required for appointment as members of the Commission and the manner of their selection.

Answer

The Constitution authorizes Parliament to determine by law the qualifications required for appointment as members of the Commission and the manner of their selection.
The statement regarding Parliament's authority to determine qualifications is correct because Article 280(2) explicitly grants Parliament the power to prescribe qualifications and selection criteria by law.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Constitutional Provision under Article 280(2)
Article 280(2) states that Parliament may by law determine the qualifications which shall be requisite for appointment as members of the Commission and the manner in which they shall be selected.
The Constitution leaves the specific operational qualifications and selection procedure of Finance Commission members to parliamentary legislation (enacted via the Finance Commission Act, 1951).
2
Evaluate Reporting and Safeguard Provisions
Under Article 281, recommendations are submitted to the President (not the Speaker). Removal procedures and post-retirement eligibility differ from bodies like UPSC or CAG.
CAG and UPSC have strict constitutional post-retirement employment bars, whereas Finance Commission members are eligible for re-appointment under statutory provisions.

Key Concept

Powers of Parliament regarding Finance Commission Qualifications and Structure (Article 280)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 2Question →

Regarding the constitutional safeguards and independence guaranteed to Constitutional Bodies under the Constitution of India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or the Government of any State after demitting office.; The Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed from office on the ground of misbehaviour only after an inquiry held by the Supreme Court of India.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is ineligible for further government office after demitting office, and that the Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission can be removed for misbehaviour only after a Supreme Court inquiry.
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is explicitly barred by Article 148(4) from holding further government office post-retirement. Additionally, Article 317(1) mandates that the Chairman or members of the UPSC can only be removed for misbehaviour following a formal inquiry and finding by the Supreme Court.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional post-retirement eligibility of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).
Under Article 148(4), the CAG is barred from any further employment under the Union or State governments to ensure independence.
Prevents executive influence through promises of future post-retirement appointments.
2
Examine the removal procedure for the Chairman and members of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
Article 317(1) specifies that removal on grounds of misbehaviour requires a mandatory reference to and inquiry by the Supreme Court, whose advice is binding on the President.
Provides strict procedural security of tenure to UPSC members.
3
Evaluate the nature of Finance Commission recommendations.
Article 280 provisions establish the Finance Commission as a quasi-judicial advisory body whose recommendations are not constitutionally binding.
Fiscal autonomy allows Parliament and the Union Executive discretion over implementation.
4
Verify the removal mechanism and tenure security of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Article 324(5) safeguards the CEC from executive pleasure, requiring a parliamentary resolution passed by a special majority similar to a Supreme Court judge.
Guarantees free and fair elections without fear of arbitrary executive dismissal.

Key Concept

Constitutional Independence, Tenure Security, and Removal Safeguards of Indian Constitutional Bodies
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 3Question →

With reference to the constitutional provisions governing Constitutional Bodies in India, consider the following statements:

1. The salary and other conditions of service of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India cannot be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
2. A member of a State Public Service Commission (SPSC) can be removed from office by the Governor of the concerned state on the ground of misbehaviour after an inquiry by the High Court.
3. The recommendations made by the Finance Commission under Article 280 of the Constitution are advisory in nature and not legally binding on the Union Government.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

1 and 3 only
The statement regarding the CAG's protection against disadvantageous variation of service conditions is accurate under Article 148(3). Similarly, the statement noting that Finance Commission recommendations under Article 280 are advisory is correct. However, the statement regarding SPSC removal is false because SPSC members can only be removed by the President (not the Governor) after an inquiry by the Supreme Court (not the High Court). Thus, the combination containing 1 and 3 only is the correct answer.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding the CAG's independence safeguards.
Statement 1 is correct. Article 148(3) explicitly safeguards the CAG's independence by stipulating that the salary and other service conditions of the CAG shall not be varied to his disadvantage after his appointment.
Constitutional independence requires protection against executive pressure through post-appointment variations in service conditions.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the removal procedure for State Public Service Commission (SPSC) members.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Under Article 317, although members of an SPSC are appointed by the Governor, they can be removed from office ONLY by the President of India (not the Governor) on the ground of misbehaviour, and only after the Supreme Court (not the High Court) conducts an inquiry.
State PSC members enjoy constitutional immunity from state-level executive removal to ensure impartiality.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding the nature of Finance Commission recommendations.
Statement 3 is correct. Under Article 280, the recommendations of the Finance Commission are advisory in nature and there is no legal obligation on the Union Government to implement them, though they carry strong moral authority.
The Constitution designates the Finance Commission as a quasi-judicial advisory body.

Key Concept

Constitutional Bodies: Removal Powers, Independence Safeguards, and Advisory Status
Question 4Question →

Which of the following constitutional bodies in India are established directly under Article 315 of the Constitution of India? Select all correct options.

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Union Public Service Commission (UPSC); State Public Service Commission (SPSC)

Answer

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and the State Public Service Commission (SPSC) are both established directly under Article 315 of the Constitution of India.
Both the Union Public Service Commission and the State Public Service Commission are constituted under Article 315 of the Constitution of India, which provides for Public Service Commissions for the Union and for the States.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the article specifying the establishment of Public Service Commissions.
Article 315 of Part XIV of the Constitution mandates Public Service Commissions for the Union and for each State.
To determine which bodies derive their existence directly from Article 315.
2
Verify the constitutional provisions for the other listed entities.
The Election Commission of India is established under Article 324, and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is established under Article 148.
To eliminate constitutional bodies created under different articles.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions for Public Service Commissions (Article 315)
Estimated Time:45s
Question 5Question →

Under which Article of the Constitution of India is the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India established?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Article 148

Answer

Article 148 establishes the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
The option specifying Article 148 is correct because Chapter V of Part V of the Constitution of India provides for the office, appointment, tenure, and duties of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provisions relating to independent constitutional bodies.
Article 148 specifically prescribes an independent Comptroller and Auditor General of India appointed by the President.
The CAG acts as the guardian of the public purse and audits all expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions for the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (Article 148)
Question 6Question →

Match each Constitutional Body in List-I with its corresponding Article of the Constitution of India in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Election Commission of India
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Union Public Service Commission
Finance Commission of India

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches are: Election Commission of India matches with Article 324; Comptroller and Auditor General of India matches with Article 148; Union Public Service Commission matches with Article 315; and Finance Commission of India matches with Article 280.
Each constitutional body in India is established by a specific article of the Constitution. The Election Commission is anchored in Article 324, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India in Article 148, the Union Public Service Commission in Article 315, and the Finance Commission in Article 280.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional article for the Election Commission of India
Part XV, Article 324 governs the Election Commission of India.
Article 324 establishes the body responsible for conducting free and fair elections.
2
Identify the constitutional article for the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)
Part V, Article 148 governs the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Article 148 creates the CAG as the guardian of the public purse.
3
Identify the constitutional article for the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
Part XIV, Article 315 governs the Union and State Public Service Commissions.
Article 315 mandates the establishment of Public Service Commissions for recruitment to civil services.
4
Identify the constitutional article for the Finance Commission of India
Part XII, Article 280 governs the Finance Commission.
Article 280 provides for a quasi-judicial body to recommend tax distribution between the Union and States.

Key Concept

Constitutional Articles Governing Key Bodies in India
Question 7Question →

With reference to the constitutional safeguards and operational framework of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC) and Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Although the Chairman and members of a State Public Service Commission are appointed by the Governor of the state, they can be removed from office only by the President of India.; The conditions of service of a member of UPSC or SPSC cannot be varied to their disadvantage after their appointment.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Chairman and members of an SPSC are appointed by the Governor but removed only by the President, and that their conditions of service cannot be varied to their disadvantage after appointment.
The Constitution assigns appointment of SPSC members to the Governor, but reserves removal strictly to the President of India under Article 317 to shield members from local political influence. Additionally, service conditions are protected from adverse changes during the tenure to ensure impartiality.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the appointment and removal provisions of SPSC members (Article 317).
The Governor makes the appointment, but removal authority rests solely with the President following a Supreme Court reference.
This dual-authority design provides constitutional protection against state political interference.
2
Examine service condition protection under constitutional provisions.
Service conditions determined at the time of appointment cannot be altered to the officer's disadvantage during tenure.
This guarantees independence in official functioning.
3
Assess post-retirement eligibility rules under Article 319.
The SPSC Chairman can transition to UPSC (as Chairman or member) or another SPSC as Chairman.
Claims restricting transition to UPSC misinterpret the constitutional post-retirement bar.
4
Check the financial charging status of SPSC expenses under Article 322.
Expenses are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of the State.
Charged expenses are not subject to annual voting in the state assembly to prevent executive financial control.

Key Concept

Constitutional Independence Safeguards of Public Service Commissions (Articles 315 to 323)
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 8Question →

Under Article 151 of the Constitution of India, to whom does the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) submit audit reports relating to the accounts of a State?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Governor of the State

Answer

The Governor of the State
According to Article 151(2) of the Constitution of India, the reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India relating to the accounts of a State shall be submitted to the Governor of the State, who shall cause them to be laid before the Legislature of the State.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant constitutional provision for CAG report submissions
Article 151 of the Indian Constitution governs audit reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Article 151 clearly demarcates the submission procedure for both Union and State accounts.
2
Distinguish between Union accounts and State accounts reporting channels
Article 151(1) mandates reporting Union accounts to the President, while Article 151(2) mandates reporting State accounts to the Governor.
The Governor acts as the constitutional head of the State to lay the report before the State Legislature.

Key Concept

Submission of audit reports by the CAG under Article 151
Question 9Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions and operational frameworks of the Election Commission of India and the Finance Commission:

1. The Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners hold office for a term of six years or until they attain the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier.
2. The recommendations made by the Finance Commission regarding the distribution of net proceeds of taxes between the Union and the States are legally binding on the Union Government.
3. The Constitution of India has not specified the educational or legal qualifications of the members of the Election Commission of India, nor has it debarred retiring election commissioners from further government appointments.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

The correct response consists of statements 1 and 3 only.
The combination of statements 1 and 3 is correct. Under Article 324 and statutory provisions, Election Commissioners serve a 6-year term or until age 65. Furthermore, the Constitution omits specific member qualifications and does not restrict retiring commissioners from accepting further executive appointments. Meanwhile, Finance Commission recommendations under Article 280 are non-binding and advisory.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding the tenure of Election Commissioners.
Statement 1 is correct. The Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners hold office for a term of 6 years or up to 65 years of age, whichever occurs earlier.
This tenure rule is established under parliamentary legislation governing the service conditions of Election Commissioners pursuant to Article 324.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the legal nature of Finance Commission recommendations.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The recommendations of the Finance Commission (constituted under Article 280) are advisory in nature and not legally binding on the Executive or Parliament.
The Constitution does not explicitly make the recommendations binding, though established convention leads the Union Government to accept tax-sharing formulas.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding qualifications and post-retirement restrictions for Election Commissioners.
Statement 3 is correct. The Constitution does not prescribe legal, administrative, or educational qualifications for members of the Election Commission, nor does it explicitly bar retiring members from further appointments by the government.
Unlike the UPSC members or CAG (who face strict disqualification from subsequent government service), the Constitution leaves ECI qualification and post-retirement rules open.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions, tenure safeguards, and advisory scope of the Election Commission of India and Finance Commission
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 10Question →

Match the Constitutional Authorities/Officers in List-I with their corresponding Constitutional Safeguards/Conditions of Service in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Chief Election Commissioner
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Chairman of a State Public Service Commission
Member of the Union Public Service Commission

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The Chief Election Commissioner pairs with removal in like manner as a Supreme Court Judge; the Comptroller and Auditor General of India pairs with total ineligibility for further government employment; the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission pairs with appointment by the Governor but removal exclusively by the President; and a Member of the Union Public Service Commission pairs with eligibility to become Chairman of UPSC or SPSC while being barred from other government jobs.
The correct pairings accurately reflect constitutional provisions: Article 324(5) protects the Chief Election Commissioner with Supreme Court Judge removal parity; Article 148(4) completely debars the CAG from subsequent public employment; Article 316/317 creates a federal safeguard where the Governor appoints but only the President can remove an SPSC Chairman; and Article 319(c) restricts UPSC members to chairmanships of UPSC/SPSC only.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the removal security of the Chief Election Commissioner.
Article 324(5) explicitly equates the removal process and grounds of the CEC to those of a Supreme Court Judge.
Ensures independence of conduct of elections from political executive control.
2
Determine post-retirement restrictions for the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Article 148(4) imposes a complete ban on future government employment under Union or State governments.
Prevents executive inducement or conflict of interest during audit oversight.
3
Analyze appointment vs removal authority for the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission.
The Governor appoints the SPSC Chairman, but removal authority rests solely with the President under Article 317(1).
Guarantees functional independence from state executive interference.
4
Evaluate career progression rules for a UPSC member under Article 319.
A member can only be elevated to Chairman of UPSC or Chairman of an SPSC; all other public employment is prohibited.
Maintains strict neutrality while preserving internal promotion avenues within public service commissions.

Key Concept

Constitutional safeguards, appointing authorities, removal procedures, and post-retirement eligibility rules for constitutional officers.
Question 11Question →

Regarding the constitutional safeguards ensuring the independence of key constitutional authorities in India, which of the following provisions correctly applies to BOTH the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: They become completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or the Government of any State after ceasing to hold their respective offices.

Answer

Both the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Chairman of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) are completely ineligible for any further employment under the Government of India or any State Government after demitting office.
To maintain absolute independence from executive influence, both Article 148(4) (for the CAG) and Article 319(a) (for the Chairman of the UPSC) stipulate that upon relinquishing their respective positions, these officials are entirely disqualified from holding any subsequent office or employment under the Union or State governments.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze post-retirement restrictions for CAG and UPSC Chairman.
Under Article 148(4), the CAG is barred from further office under the GoI or State Governments. Under Article 319(a), the Chairman of the UPSC is similarly barred from further employment under the GoI or State Governments.
This guarantees independence from executive influence or future political inducements.
2
Evaluate removal procedures for both authorities.
The CAG is removed via Parliamentary address identical to a Supreme Court Judge (Article 148(1)). The UPSC Chairman is removed by the President following a Supreme Court inquiry under Article 317(1).
The removal grounds and parliamentary mechanics differ between the two positions.
3
Verify financial autonomy and voting mechanisms.
Salaries and administrative expenses for both offices are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India (Articles 148(6) and 322), which means they are non-votable.
Charged expenditures do not require annual parliamentary votes.

Key Concept

Independence guarantees and post-tenure restrictions of Indian Constitutional Bodies
Question 12Question →

Two or more states in India may agree to serve their recruitment needs through a Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC). What is the legal status of a JSPSC and which authority appoints its Chairman and members?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It is a statutory body created by an Act of Parliament, and its Chairman and members are appointed by the President of India.

Answer

A Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC) is a statutory body created by an Act of Parliament, and its Chairman and members are appointed by the President of India.
A Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC) is formed when two or more states pass resolutions in their legislative assemblies requesting a joint commission, leading Parliament to enact a specific law. Consequently, a JSPSC is a statutory body, not a constitutional body. Furthermore, under Article 316 of the Constitution of India, the Chairman and members of a JSPSC are appointed by the President of India.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the legal creation mechanism of a Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC).
Under Article 315(2), when state legislatures pass resolutions requesting a joint commission, Parliament may by law create a JSPSC. Because it comes into existence through parliamentary legislation rather than direct constitutional mandate, it is a statutory body.
Constitutional bodies exist directly by force of the Constitution text, whereas statutory bodies are created by an Act of Parliament.
2
Identify the constitutional authority responsible for appointing JSPSC members.
Under Article 316(1) of the Constitution of India, the Chairman and other members of a JSPSC are appointed by the President of India.
Unlike an SPSC where the Governor makes appointments, a JSPSC serves multiple states, placing appointment authority with the Union executive (the President).

Key Concept

Statutory Nature and Appointment Authority of Joint State Public Service Commission (JSPSC)
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 13Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional safeguards and administrative provisions of the Public Service Commissions in India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Chairman and members of a State Public Service Commission are appointed by the Governor of the state, but can be removed from office only by the President of India.; The administrative expenses of the Union Public Service Commission, including all salaries, allowances, and pensions of its members and staff, are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.

Answer

The correct statements are the statement regarding SPSC appointment by the Governor and removal by the President, and the statement asserting that UPSC administrative expenses are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
The statement specifying that SPSC members are appointed by the Governor but removable only by the President, and the statement highlighting that UPSC expenses are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, are accurate statements under Articles 316, 317, and 322 of the Constitution of India.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the appointment and removal authorities for State Public Service Commission members.
According to Article 316, the Governor appoints SPSC members. However, Article 317 stipulates that only the President of India has the power to remove them.
This constitutional provision ensures that state-level commissions maintain operational independence from local political executive pressure.
2
Analyze the procedural requirement for removing an SPSC member on grounds of misbehaviour.
Article 317(1) requires the President to refer the matter to the Supreme Court for an inquiry, not the State High Court.
The Supreme Court conducts the investigation and reports its findings to the President.
3
Evaluate the financial provisions governing the UPSC.
Article 322 explicitly states that the administrative expenses of the UPSC are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
Charged expenses are not subject to annual voting in Parliament, guaranteeing financial autonomy.
4
Verify the constitutional article mapping for the UPSC.
Public Service Commissions are governed by Articles 315–323. Article 324 governs the Election Commission of India.
Mapping Article 324 to UPSC is a common constitutional misquote.

Key Concept

Constitutional safeguards, removal mechanisms, and governing articles of Public Service Commissions (Articles 315-323)
Question 14Question →

Match each Constitutional Authority/Body in List-I with its corresponding Constitutional Provision or Operational Framework in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Union Public Service Commission
State Public Service Commission
Finance Commission of India

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The Comptroller and Auditor General of India audits local bodies upon request by the President or Governor; the Union Public Service Commission has its administrative expenses charged on the Consolidated Fund of India; State Public Service Commission members are appointed by the Governor but removable only by the President; and the Finance Commission provides advisory recommendations on fiscal distribution.
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India can audit local bodies or other public authorities on request by the Governor or President under Section 20 of the CAG Act. The Union Public Service Commission's administrative expenses are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India as per Article 322. State Public Service Commission members are appointed by the Governor but can be removed solely by the President under Article 317. The Finance Commission functions as a quasi-judicial body whose recommendations on tax sharing under Article 280 are advisory in nature.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the constitutional provisions governing the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Identified that under Article 149 and the CAG (DPC) Act, the CAG can undertake audit of local bodies or authorities upon request of the President or Governor.
The CAG's mandate extends beyond central and state government accounts to local bodies when specifically requested by the executive.
2
Examine the expenditure safeguards of the Union Public Service Commission.
Matched with Article 322, which specifies that expenses of the UPSC are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
Charging expenses on the Consolidated Fund ensures financial independence from annual parliamentary votes.
3
Determine the appointment and removal mechanism for the State Public Service Commission.
Matched with Article 317, noting appointment is by Governor but removal authority rests strictly with the President.
This dual mechanism provides constitutional security of tenure to state public service commission members.
4
Evaluate the nature of recommendations made by the Finance Commission.
Matched with Article 280, recognizing its role as a quasi-judicial body making advisory recommendations on tax distribution.
The Constitution establishes the Finance Commission as a balancing wheel of fiscal federalism whose recommendations are advisory.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions, operational safeguards, and statutory functions governing major Constitutional Bodies in India (CAG, UPSC, SPSC, and Finance Commission).
Question 15Question →

Regarding the constitutional provisions and operational safeguards of key constitutional bodies in India, which of the following statements are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) is ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or the Government of any State after ceasing to hold office.; The recommendations made by the Finance Commission regarding the distribution of net tax proceeds between the Union and the States are advisory in nature.

Answer

The correct statements are that the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is ineligible for further government office post-retirement, and that the recommendations of the Finance Commission are advisory in nature.
The post-retirement bar on the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (Article 148) and the advisory character of Finance Commission recommendations (Article 280) accurately state Indian constitutional provisions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the post-retirement eligibility of the CAG under Article 148.
Article 148(4) guarantees independence by prohibiting the CAG from taking up any further government office after demitting office.
Ensures no executive inducement influences the CAG during tenure.
2
Evaluate the constitutional weight of Finance Commission recommendations under Article 280.
The recommendations are constitutionally advisory to the President/Government of India.
There is no constitutional obligation mandating statutory enforcement of tax distribution advice.
3
Verify the removal authority for SPSC members under Article 317.
Although appointed by the Governor, SPSC members can only be removed by the President.
This dual mechanism provides independence from local political executive influence.
4
Examine the reporting chain of CAG state audit reports under Article 151(2).
The CAG submits reports to the Governor, not directly to the Speaker.
The constitutional channel requires executive submission to the head of state prior to legislative tabling.

Key Concept

Independence guarantees and administrative procedures of Constitutional Bodies (CAG, Finance Commission, SPSC)
Question 16Question →

Under the Constitution of India, both the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India and members of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) are granted independence through specific constitutional safeguards. Which of the following correctly describes the difference in their post-retirement employment eligibility?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The CAG is completely ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or any State, whereas a UPSC member (other than the Chairman) remains eligible to be appointed as the Chairman of the UPSC or a State Public Service Commission.

Answer

The CAG is completely ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or any State, whereas a UPSC member (other than the Chairman) remains eligible to be appointed as the Chairman of the UPSC or a State Public Service Commission.
Under Article 148(4) of the Constitution of India, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) becomes completely ineligible for any further office under the Government of India or the Government of any State after ceasing to hold office. Conversely, under Article 319(b), a member of the UPSC (other than the Chairman) is ineligible for general government employment but remains eligible for appointment as the Chairman of the UPSC or as the Chairman of a State Public Service Commission.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine Article 148(4) regarding the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
The CAG shall not be eligible for further office either under the Government of India or under the Government of any State after demitting office.
This total restriction ensures complete audit independence during tenure without expectation of post-retirement executive favors.
2
Examine Article 319 regarding UPSC members upon ceasing to hold office.
A UPSC member (other than the Chairman) is ineligible for employment under the Government of India or a State, EXCEPT for appointment as Chairman of the UPSC or Chairman of a State Public Service Commission.
The Constitution allows vertical mobility within the service commissions while restricting standard executive employment.
3
Compare the two provisions to identify the correct statement.
The statement highlighting the absolute bar on the CAG while allowing UPSC members to ascend to Commission Chairmanships is accurate.
It accurately reflects the distinct constitutional restrictions under Article 148(4) and Article 319.

Key Concept

Post-retirement eligibility conditions for Constitutional Bodies (CAG vs UPSC under Articles 148 and 319)
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 17Question →

Match the Constitutional Bodies in List-I with their corresponding Constitutional Functions and Reporting Frameworks in List-II:

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Election Commission of India
Comptroller and Auditor General of India
Union Public Service Commission
Finance Commission of India

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Election Commission of India matches with vesting the superintendence, direction, and control of elections to Parliament and State Legislatures. Comptroller and Auditor General of India matches with auditing expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India and submitting reports to the President. Union Public Service Commission matches with submitting an annual report on performance to the President. Finance Commission of India matches with recommending principles governing grants-in-aid and tax distribution.
Each body is correctly paired with its respective constitutional role and reporting framework: Election Commission with election control (Article 324), CAG with financial auditing and reports to the President (Articles 148–151), UPSC with annual performance reports to the President (Article 323), and Finance Commission with tax distribution and grants-in-aid recommendations (Article 280).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Examine the constitutional mandate of the Election Commission of India.
Article 324 establishes that superintendence, direction, and control of elections belong to the Election Commission.
It ensures independent conduct of free and fair elections.
2
Examine the duties of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Article 151 requires the CAG to audit accounts of the Union and submit reports directly to the President.
The CAG serves as the guardian of the public purse.
3
Examine the reporting mechanism of the Union Public Service Commission.
Article 323 states that the UPSC presents an annual report on work done to the President.
This guarantees executive accountability to Parliament regarding civil service recruitment.
4
Examine the fiscal role of the Finance Commission of India.
Article 280 requires the Finance Commission to recommend principles for grants-in-aid and tax sharing between the Centre and States.
It acts as a key constitutional mechanism for fiscal federalism.

Key Concept

Constitutional provisions, mandates, and report submission frameworks of key Indian constitutional bodies.
Question 18Question →

Consider the following statements regarding the State Public Service Commission (SPSC):

1. Although appointed by the Governor of the State, the Chairman and members of an SPSC can be removed from office only by the President of India.
2. The procedure and grounds for the removal of an SPSC member are identical to those prescribed for a Judge of a High Court.
3. Upon ceasing to hold office, the Chairman of an SPSC is eligible for appointment as the Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1 and 3 only

Answer

Statements 1 and 3 are correct.
Under Article 316 of the Constitution of India, the Chairman and members of a State Public Service Commission are appointed by the Governor of the state. However, under Article 317, they can be removed from office only by an order of the President of India on the ground of misbehaviour after the Supreme Court, on a reference made by the President, conducts an inquiry and recommends removal. This makes Statement 1 correct and Statement 2 incorrect (since High Court Judges are removed through a parliamentary address under Article 124(4)). Under Article 319, on ceasing to hold office, the Chairman of an SPSC is eligible for appointment as the Chairman or a member of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) or as the Chairman of any other SPSC, making Statement 3 correct.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate Statement 1 regarding appointment and removal authority of SPSC members.
Statement 1 is correct. Under Article 316, SPSC members are appointed by the Governor, but under Article 317, they can only be removed by the President of India.
Constitutional provisions grant independence to SPSC members by restricting the power of removal strictly to the President.
2
Evaluate Statement 2 regarding the removal mechanism for SPSC members vs High Court Judges.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Removal of SPSC members on grounds of misbehaviour requires the President to refer the matter to the Supreme Court for an inquiry. High Court Judges, by contrast, are removed by Parliament passing an address supported by a special majority.
The removal procedures for SPSC members (Article 317) and High Court Judges (Article 217/124) follow distinct constitutional mechanisms.
3
Evaluate Statement 3 regarding post-retirement eligibility of the SPSC Chairman.
Statement 3 is correct. Article 319 explicitly allows the Chairman of an SPSC to be appointed as the Chairman or member of the UPSC, or as the Chairman of another SPSC.
Article 319 prevents government influence while permitting lateral or upward movement to higher constitutional bodies like the UPSC.

Key Concept

Appointment, removal safeguards, and post-retirement eligibility of State Public Service Commission members under Articles 316, 317, and 319 of the Constitution of India.
Question 19Question →

Which of the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions and operational safeguards of Constitutional Bodies in India are correct?

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The administrative expenses of the Union Public Service Commission, including all salaries, allowances, and pensions of its members and staff, are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India.; The Finance Commission is a quasi-judicial constitutional body constituted by the President of India at the expiration of every fifth year or earlier.

Answer

The statements confirming that the administrative expenses of the Union Public Service Commission are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India and that the Finance Commission is constituted every fifth year by the President under Article 280 are correct.
The statement regarding the Union Public Service Commission is accurate because Article 322 charges its administrative expenses directly to the Consolidated Fund of India, rendering them non-votable. The statement regarding the Finance Commission is also accurate because Article 280 mandates its constitution by the President every five years or earlier to govern financial devolution.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the financial independence provisions of the Union Public Service Commission.
Article 322 specifies that expenses of the Union Public Service Commission are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
Charging expenses on the Consolidated Fund ensures immunity from annual parliamentary vote and secures functional autonomy.
2
Evaluate the removal mechanism for the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
Removal requires a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, identical to a Supreme Court judge.
A simple majority resolution is insufficient to remove the Comptroller and Auditor General.
3
Verify the constitutional mandate and periodic constitution of the Finance Commission.
Article 280 empowers the President to establish the Finance Commission every five years or earlier.
This requirement maintains a regular mechanism for fiscal federalism and tax devolution.
4
Examine the age limit prescribed for Election Commissioners.
The age limit for Election Commissioners is sixty-five years, not sixty-two years.
The sixty-two-year threshold applies to State Public Service Commission members.

Key Concept

Constitutional Safeguards and Mandates of Independent Bodies in India
Question 20Question →

Under Article 324 of the Constitution of India, an Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner can be removed from office ONLY on the recommendation of which of the following constitutional authorities?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The Chief Election Commissioner

Answer

The Chief Election Commissioner
Under the second proviso to Article 324(5) of the Constitution of India, an Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner cannot be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner. This specific requirement safeguards non-chief election commissioners from arbitrary removal by the executive branch.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the constitutional provisions governing the removal procedure of Election Commissioners and Regional Commissioners.
Article 324(5) of the Constitution outlines the conditions of service and tenure safeguards for members of the Election Commission of India.
Constitutional safeguards ensure institutional independence while maintaining structural hierarchy within the commission.
2
Analyze the proviso to Article 324(5) regarding non-chief commissioners.
The second proviso to Article 324(5) mandates that any other Election Commissioner or Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.
This provision prevents executive overreach and protects non-chief commissioners from arbitrary dismissal while preserving administrative cohesion.

Key Concept

Removal safeguards and procedural conditions for Election Commissioners under Article 324
Page 1 / 2Next
Constitutional Bodies: Election Commission, UPSC, SPSC, CAG, and Finance Commission Practice Questions — State PSC Exam | Examkin