All practice questions

8270 questions

Question 1001Question →

A 6262-year-old woman is evaluated in the emergency department for right-sided flank pain, nausea, and high fever that began 2424 hours ago. Her past medical history is significant for recurrent urinary tract infections. Temperature is 39.4∘C39.4^\circ\text{C} (102.9∘F102.9^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 80/40 mm Hg80/40\text{ mm Hg}, pulse is 128/min128/\text{min}, and respirations are 26/min26/\text{min}. Right costovertebral angle tenderness is present. Laboratory tests show a leukocyte count of 24,000/mm324,000/\text{mm}^3 with 15%15\% bands and a serum creatinine of 2.3 mg/dL2.3\text{ mg/dL}. Urinalysis reveals 4+4+ leukocyte esterase, positive nitrites, and numerous bacteria. A noncontrast CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis shows a 12-mm12\text{-mm} calculus obstructing the right proximal ureter with associated severe hydronephrosis. Aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation and broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics are initiated, and a norepinephrine infusion is started to maintain mean arterial pressure. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement

Answer

Percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement
The patient presents with septic shock secondary to an obstructing ureteral stone, a true urologic emergency known as obstructive pyelonephritis. In this scenario, purulent urine is trapped under pressure in the renal pelvis, leading to rapid systemic bacterial dissemination. When a patient is hemodynamically unstable (requiring vasopressors), the immediate goal is purely 'damage control' through source drainage. Percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement by interventional radiology effectively drains the infected system under local anesthesia, stabilizing the patient. Once the infection is cleared and the patient is stable, definitive stone management can be planned.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the patient's critical presentation.
The patient has the classic triad of flank pain, fever, and hemodynamic instability, complicated by an obstructing calculus confirmed on noncontrast CT.
Recognizing the severity of urosepsis dictates the urgency and type of surgical intervention required.
2
Determine the primary source of the instability.
The instability is driven by an undrained, closed-space infection (obstructive pyelonephritis).
Without rapid source drainage, isolated medical therapy (fluids, pressors, antibiotics) will ultimately fail to resolve the shock state.
3
Select the appropriate surgical intervention.
Percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement is chosen to emergently decompress the purulent urine.
Definitive stone removal is contraindicated in an unstable patient due to the risk of exacerbating the systemic infection, making immediate decompression the only viable step.

Key Concept

Patients with an obstructing urinary calculus and concurrent urosepsis require emergent decompression of the collecting system (e.g., via percutaneous nephrostomy), rather than definitive stone removal.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 1002Question →

A 34-year-old man with moderate-to-severe Crohn disease visits his gastroenterologist to discuss starting a newly approved interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitor. The physician reviews the pivotal 52-week clinical trial data with the patient. In this study, 1,0001,000 adult patients with Crohn disease were equally divided into an experimental arm receiving the IL-23 inhibitor and a control arm receiving a visually matched placebo. By the end of the observation period, 325325 patients receiving the active drug and 200200 patients receiving the placebo had successfully maintained clinical remission. Additionally, the safety analysis revealed that 4040 patients on the active drug experienced a severe upper respiratory tract infection requiring hospitalization, compared to 1515 patients in the placebo group. Based on the data presented, which of the following statements most accurately quantifies the treatment effect and risk of the IL-23 inhibitor over a 52-week period?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Treating 44 patients will maintain remission in one additional patient, and treating 2020 patients will cause one additional severe infection.

Answer

Treating 4 patients will maintain remission in one additional patient, and treating 20 patients will cause one additional severe infection.
The correct answer accurately determines both metrics. First, calculate the experimental event rate (EER) and control event rate (CER) for the favorable outcome. EER = 325/500=0.65325/500 = 0.65 (65%65\%). CER = 200/500=0.40200/500 = 0.40 (40%40\%). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) is 0.65−0.40=0.250.65 - 0.40 = 0.25. The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) is 1ARR=10.25=4\frac{1}{\text{ARR}} = \frac{1}{0.25} = 4. Next, calculate the rates for the adverse outcome. EER for infection = 40/500=0.0840/500 = 0.08 (8%8\%). CER for infection = 15/500=0.0315/500 = 0.03 (3%3\%). The absolute risk increase (ARI) is 0.08−0.03=0.050.08 - 0.03 = 0.05. The Number Needed to Harm (NNH) is 1ARI=10.05=20\frac{1}{\text{ARI}} = \frac{1}{0.05} = 20.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the incidence of the favorable outcome (remission) in both groups.
Experimental event rate (EER) = 325/500=0.65325 / 500 = 0.65 (65%65\%). Control event rate (CER) = 200/500=0.40200 / 500 = 0.40 (40%40\%).
These rates are required to calculate the absolute risk reduction.
2
Calculate the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Number Needed to Treat (NNT).
ARR=0.65−0.40=0.25\text{ARR} = 0.65 - 0.40 = 0.25. NNT=10.25=4\text{NNT} = \frac{1}{0.25} = 4.
NNT quantifies the number of patients required to achieve one additional favorable outcome.
3
Determine the incidence of the adverse outcome (severe infection) in both groups.
Experimental event rate for infection = 40/500=0.0840 / 500 = 0.08 (8%8\%). Control event rate for infection = 15/500=0.0315 / 500 = 0.03 (3%3\%).
These rates are required to calculate the absolute risk increase.
4
Calculate the Absolute Risk Increase (ARI) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH).
ARI=0.08−0.03=0.05\text{ARI} = 0.08 - 0.03 = 0.05. NNH=10.05=20\text{NNH} = \frac{1}{0.05} = 20.
NNH quantifies the number of patients required to cause one additional adverse event.

Key Concept

Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and Number Needed to Harm (NNH)
Question 1003Question →

A retrospective cohort study uses an international oncology registry to compare the incidence of severe pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy. The researchers identify a history of heavy tobacco smoking as a significant confounder. Additionally, previous early-phase trials indicate that a patient's baseline pre-existing autoimmune disease status acts as a strong effect modifier for the relationship between the immune checkpoint inhibitor and the development of pneumonitis. The investigators are outlining their final statistical analysis protocol.

Which of the following analytical approaches are most appropriate for managing the variables of smoking history and pre-existing autoimmune disease in this study? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Stratifying the analysis by pre-existing autoimmune disease status and reporting separate relative risks for patients with and without the condition; Incorporating tobacco smoking history into a multivariable regression model to calculate an adjusted overall relative risk for pneumonitis

Answer

The most appropriate analytical approaches are stratifying the analysis by pre-existing autoimmune disease status to report separate relative risks, and incorporating tobacco smoking history into a multivariable regression model.
The correct analytical approaches successfully differentiate between the handling of an effect modifier and a confounder. Because pre-existing autoimmune disease is an effect modifier, its interaction with the immune checkpoint inhibitor must be described. This is best accomplished by stratifying the analysis and reporting separate relative risks for patients with and without the condition. Conversely, because smoking history is a confounder, it introduces bias that must be controlled. During the analysis phase, incorporating the confounder into a multivariable regression model effectively adjusts for its influence, providing a more accurate, unconfounded overall relative risk.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the variables described in the study design.
Smoking history is identified as a confounder, and pre-existing autoimmune disease is identified as an effect modifier.
Different statistical approaches are required for confounders (which bias results and must be controlled) versus effect modifiers (which represent true biological interactions and must be reported).
2
Determine the appropriate analytical management for a confounder in the analysis phase.
Smoking history should be adjusted for using techniques such as multivariable regression or stratified analysis to yield an unconfounded overall risk estimate.
Controlling for confounding mathematically removes the distorting effect of the third variable on the primary exposure-outcome relationship.
3
Determine the appropriate analytical management for an effect modifier.
Pre-existing autoimmune disease should be analyzed using stratification, where relative risks are calculated and reported separately for patients with and without the condition.
Effect modification is a clinically significant finding. Adjusting or matching it away obscures important biological differences in the drug's safety profile across different patient populations.

Key Concept

In clinical research, confounders are nuisance variables that bias the exposure-outcome association and must be controlled for (e.g., via multivariable regression, matching, or restriction) to find the true effect. Effect modifiers represent a true biological interaction where the exposure's effect differs by the variable's level, and they should be highlighted by reporting stratum-specific results.
Question 1004Question →

A 5555-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department due to severe right flank pain, fever, and chills for the past 2424 hours. Her temperature is 39.2∘C39.2^\circ\text{C} (102.6∘F102.6^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 88/55 mm Hg88/55\text{ mm Hg}, and pulse is 122/min122/\text{min}. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 18,000/mm318,000/\text{mm}^3. A noncontrast computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis reveals a 9-mm9\text{-mm} obstructing calculus in the right proximal ureter with moderate hydronephrosis and perinephric stranding. Arrange the following management steps in the most appropriate chronological order.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence is to first resuscitate the patient with intravenous fluids and antibiotics, then urgently decompress the collecting system via nephrostomy or stenting, followed by continued monitoring until the sepsis resolves, and finally proceeding with delayed definitive stone removal.
An infected obstructing ureteral stone is a severe urologic emergency. The sequence of management strictly follows the principles of sepsis care and source control: first, medical resuscitation (intravenous fluids and broad-spectrum antibiotics) is initiated to stabilize the patient. Next, urgent minimal-intervention decompression (via percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stent) is performed to drain the infected urine. The patient is then stabilized on continued antibiotics. Only after the systemic infection has completely resolved is it safe to proceed with delayed, definitive surgical removal of the stone, as high-pressure irrigation during acute infection can exacerbate sepsis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Administer intravenous fluids and empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics.
The patient's intravascular volume is restored, and antimicrobial therapy is initiated against the presumed uropathogens.
Sepsis from an infected urolithiasis is a life-threatening emergency requiring immediate medical stabilization before any surgical intervention.
2
Perform urgent decompression of the collecting system (e.g., percutaneous nephrostomy).
The purulent urine is drained from the obstructed renal pelvis, controlling the source of infection.
Antibiotics alone cannot penetrate an obstructed, infected system effectively; physical decompression is mandatory for source control.
3
Continue monitoring and antimicrobial therapy.
The systemic inflammatory response syndrome resolves, and the patient becomes hemodynamically stable.
Time is needed for the infection to clear and for the patient to optimize their physiological state prior to definitive surgery.
4
Perform definitive stone removal.
The obstructing 9-mm9\text{-mm} calculus is fragmented and extracted.
Definitive lithotripsy or ureteroscopy is highly risky in an infected system due to the risk of exacerbating sepsis. It is performed safely as a delayed procedure.

Key Concept

Sequential management of an infected obstructing ureteral stone (urologic emergency)
Question 1005Question →

An occupational medicine physician is investigating the long-term respiratory effects of a synthetic resin used in a large manufacturing plant. The physician accesses company employment records and identifies 300 workers who were exclusively assigned to the resin-mixing department between 2010 and 2015. Additionally, 300 workers who were exclusively assigned to the packaging department, where the resin is never handled, are identified from the same time period. The physician then reviews the annual employee health clinic records and spirometry logs from 2015 through 2025 for all 600 workers to determine the incidence of newly diagnosed asthma. Which of the following best describes this study design and the most appropriate primary measure of association to calculate?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Retrospective cohort study; relative risk

Answer

Retrospective cohort study; relative risk
The correct answer identifies this as a retrospective cohort study using relative risk. A retrospective cohort study identifies subjects based on their past exposure status (in this case, resin-mixing vs. packaging) and then looks forward in time (using historical records from 2015-2025) to determine the incidence of the outcome (asthma). Because this design tracks populations over time to measure the true incidence of disease, the relative risk (or risk ratio) is the most appropriate primary measure of association.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze how the study groups were initially formed.
Workers were selected based on their department assignment between 2010 and 2015, meaning they were grouped by their exposure status (resin-mixing vs. packaging).
Identifying the initial grouping method is the critical first step in distinguishing between cohort and case-control designs.
2
Determine the direction of the study timeline.
The investigator looked forward from the time of exposure to assess the future development (incidence) of asthma between 2015 and 2025.
Tracking populations from exposure to outcome defines a cohort study. Because all events (exposure and outcome) had already occurred at the time the study was initiated, it is a retrospective cohort study.
3
Select the appropriate measure of association for the identified design.
Because this is a cohort study measuring incidence, relative risk (risk ratio) is the correct primary measure.
Relative risk compares the incidence of disease in the exposed group to the incidence in the unexposed group, which can be directly calculated in a cohort study.

Key Concept

Retrospective cohort studies group participants by past exposure status and track them over time to determine outcome incidence, utilizing relative risk as the primary measure of association.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 1006Question →

A 2828-year-old man comes to the clinic for a routine wellness examination. He has no significant past medical history and takes no medications. He has no symptoms of fatigue, bone pain, abdominal pain, or polyuria. Family history is notable for mild hypercalcemia in his father, who has never required medical or surgical intervention. Vital signs are within normal limits. Physical examination is unremarkable. Laboratory testing reveals the following:

Serum calcium: 11.3 mg/dL11.3\ \text{mg/dL} (normal: 8.4–10.2 mg/dL8.4\text{--}10.2\ \text{mg/dL})
Serum phosphorus: 2.8 mg/dL2.8\ \text{mg/dL} (normal: 2.7–4.5 mg/dL2.7\text{--}4.5\ \text{mg/dL})
Serum creatinine: 0.9 mg/dL0.9\ \text{mg/dL}
Serum intact parathyroid hormone: 58 pg/mL58\ \text{pg/mL} (normal: 10–65 pg/mL10\text{--}65\ \text{pg/mL})
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: 34 ng/mL34\ \text{ng/mL} (normal: 20–50 ng/mL20\text{--}50\ \text{ng/mL})

Based on the information provided, which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the evaluation of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Measurement of 24-hour urinary calcium excretion

Answer

Measurement of 24-hour urinary calcium excretion
This patient presents with mild, asymptomatic hypercalcemia and an inappropriately normal intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) level. In the presence of hypercalcemia, a normal PTH level is not truly normal; it indicates a failure of the parathyroid glands to adequately suppress hormone secretion. This presentation (PTH-dependent hypercalcemia) is characteristic of primary hyperparathyroidism and familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH). The patient's family history of untreated hypercalcemia strongly suggests FHH, an autosomal dominant disorder caused by an inactivating mutation in the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) in the parathyroid glands and kidneys. To distinguish between primary hyperparathyroidism and FHH, the most appropriate next step is measurement of 24-hour urinary calcium excretion. Patients with FHH typically have hypocalciuria (urine calcium-to-creatinine clearance ratio <0.01< 0.01), whereas those with primary hyperparathyroidism usually have normal or elevated urinary calcium.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's laboratory findings.
The patient has hypercalcemia with an inappropriately normal intact PTH level.
This establishes the diagnosis of PTH-dependent hypercalcemia, which is primarily caused by either primary hyperparathyroidism or familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH).
2
Incorporate the clinical and family history into the diagnostic reasoning.
The patient is completely asymptomatic, and his father has a history of untreated mild hypercalcemia.
This highly suggestive family history points toward FHH, an autosomal dominant benign disorder of the calcium-sensing receptor.
3
Identify the definitive test to differentiate the remaining diagnostic possibilities.
A 24-hour urine calcium collection must be ordered.
FHH causes increased renal calcium reabsorption, resulting in a low urine calcium level (urine calcium-to-creatinine clearance ratio < 0.01). Primary hyperparathyroidism generally presents with normal or elevated urinary calcium.

Key Concept

Patients with PTH-dependent hypercalcemia (elevated or inappropriately normal PTH) must undergo 24-hour urinary calcium measurement to differentiate primary hyperparathyroidism from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) before any imaging or surgical interventions are considered.
Question 1007Question →

A 42-year-old man is brought to the emergency department via helicopter following a structural fire. The injury occurred exactly 2 hours prior to arrival. He weighs 90 kg90 \text{ kg}. Physical examination reveals deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns involving his entire anterior trunk, his entire right arm, and the entire anterior surface of his right leg. The remainder of his skin is intact. During transport, paramedics administered 480 mL480 \text{ mL} of intravenous lactated Ringer solution. The trauma team initiates fluid resuscitation using the traditional Parkland formula (4 mL×weight in kg×%TBSA4 \text{ mL} \times \text{weight in kg} \times \% \text{TBSA}). At what rate (in mL/hr\text{mL/hr}) should the lactated Ringer infusion be set for the remainder of the first 8-hour period following the injury?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 1000

Answer

1000
The patient requires 12,960 mL total in 24 hours (4×90×364 \times 90 \times 36). Half of this (6,480 mL) belongs in the first 8 hours. Deducting the 480 mL given en route leaves 6,000 mL. Because 2 hours have passed since the injury, this 6,000 mL must be given over the remaining 6 hours, yielding a rate of 1000 mL/hr.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) affected by the burns.
Entire anterior trunk (18%) + entire right arm (9%) + anterior right leg (9%) = 36% TBSA.
The Rule of Nines is required to accurately estimate burn surface area for fluid calculation.
2
Calculate the total 24-hour fluid requirement using the traditional Parkland formula.
4 mL×90 kg×36=12,960 mL4 \text{ mL} \times 90 \text{ kg} \times 36 = 12,960 \text{ mL}.
The Parkland formula dictates the total volume of lactated Ringer solution needed in the first 24 hours post-injury.
3
Determine the fluid requirement for the first 8 hours.
12,960 mL÷2=6,480 mL12,960 \text{ mL} \div 2 = 6,480 \text{ mL}.
Standard burn resuscitation guidelines state that half of the total 24-hour volume must be given in the first 8 hours from the time of injury.
4
Calculate the remaining volume to be administered.
6,480 mL−480 mL=6,000 mL6,480 \text{ mL} - 480 \text{ mL} = 6,000 \text{ mL}.
Fluids given by EMS en route must be deducted from the total 8-hour requirement.
5
Calculate the required infusion rate for the remaining time.
6,000 mL÷6 hours=1000 mL/hr6,000 \text{ mL} \div 6 \text{ hours} = 1000 \text{ mL/hr}.
The 8-hour window begins at the time of injury. Since 2 hours have elapsed, there are 6 hours left to infuse the remaining 6,000 mL.

Key Concept

Burn fluid resuscitation requires accurate TBSA estimation using the Rule of Nines, application of the appropriate formula, and adjustment of the infusion rate based on the time elapsed since the injury and any pre-hospital fluids already administered.
Question 1008Question →

A 32-year-old woman presents to the ambulatory care clinic reporting four days of frequent, large-volume, watery stools after returning from an international trip. During the interview, she is noticeably distressed and pacing the room. She states she is terrified of acquiring a severe parasitic infection and has been breathing rapidly for the past hour. Physical examination reveals dry mucous membranes and hyperactive bowel sounds. Vital signs include a heart rate of 112/min112/\text{min}, blood pressure of 105/65 mm Hg105/65\ \text{mm Hg}, and respiratory rate of 30/min30/\text{min}. Laboratory results are as follows:

Serum sodium: 138 mEq/L138\ \text{mEq/L}
Serum potassium: 3.4 mEq/L3.4\ \text{mEq/L}
Serum chloride: 116 mEq/L116\ \text{mEq/L}
Serum bicarbonate: 12 mEq/L12\ \text{mEq/L}

Arterial blood gas (room air):
pH: 7.387.38
pCO2pCO_2: 21 mm Hg21\ \text{mm Hg}

Which of the following best characterizes this patient's current acid-base status?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Mixed normal anion gap metabolic acidosis and primary respiratory alkalosis

Answer

Mixed normal anion gap metabolic acidosis and primary respiratory alkalosis
The correct answer accurately synthesizes all steps of the acid-base algorithm. The pH is 7.38 (primary acidosis). The low bicarbonate (12 mEq/L) identifies the acidosis as metabolic. The anion gap is 10 mEq/L, defining it as a normal anion gap (hyperchloremic) metabolic acidosis, consistent with bicarbonate loss from diarrhea. Finally, applying Winter's formula yields an expected pCO2 of 24 to 28 mm Hg. The patient's actual pCO2 of 21 mm Hg is significantly lower than this range, indicating she is hyperventilating beyond what is required for compensation. This confirms a superimposed primary respiratory alkalosis, clinically correlating with her acute distress and tachypnea.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the primary acid-base disorder by evaluating the pH.
The pH is 7.387.38, which is less than 7.407.40 (acidemia).
The direction of the pH deviation from normal (7.40) always indicates the primary disorder. Therefore, the primary process is an acidosis.
2
Examine the serum bicarbonate and pCO2pCO_2 to identify the source of the acidosis.
Serum bicarbonate is low (12 mEq/L12\ \text{mEq/L}) and pCO2pCO_2 is low (21 mm Hg21\ \text{mm Hg}).
A primary metabolic acidosis is characterized by a low bicarbonate level. The decreased pCO2pCO_2 indicates a respiratory response.
3
Calculate the serum anion gap.
Anion Gap=Na−(Cl+HCO3)=138−(116+12)=10 mEq/L\text{Anion Gap} = \text{Na} - (\text{Cl} + \text{HCO}_3) = 138 - (116 + 12) = 10\ \text{mEq/L}.
Determining whether the metabolic acidosis is an anion gap or non-anion gap process narrows the differential. An AG of 1010 is normal (reference range 8−12 mEq/L8-12\ \text{mEq/L}). Severe diarrhea typically causes a normal anion gap metabolic acidosis due to direct bicarbonate loss.
4
Determine if the respiratory compensation is appropriate using Winter's formula.
Expected pCO2=(1.5×12)+8±2=18+8±2=26±2\text{Expected } pCO_2 = (1.5 \times 12) + 8 \pm 2 = 18 + 8 \pm 2 = 26 \pm 2 (range 24−28 mm Hg24-28\ \text{mm Hg}).
Winter's formula calculates the expected respiratory compensation for a given degree of metabolic acidosis to identify superimposed respiratory disorders.
5
Compare the actual pCO2pCO_2 to the expected pCO2pCO_2.
The actual pCO2pCO_2 (21 mm Hg21\ \text{mm Hg}) is lower than the expected range (24−28 mm Hg24-28\ \text{mm Hg}).
Because the patient is blowing off more CO2CO_2 than expected for simple compensation, there is a coexisting primary respiratory alkalosis, likely driven by her acute anxiety and hyperventilation.

Key Concept

Diagnosis of mixed acid-base disorders requires sequential analysis: determining the primary disorder via pH, calculating the anion gap, and verifying respiratory compensation using Winter's formula.
Question 1009Question →

A 64-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department by emergency medical services due to severe, worsening shortness of breath that began 24 hours ago. The patient has a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 30%30\%, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD stage III). Her temperature is 37.2∘C37.2^\circ\text{C} (99.0∘F99.0^\circ\text{F}), blood pressure is 170/95 mm Hg170/95\text{ mm Hg}, pulse is 118/min118/\text{min}, and respirations are 28/min28/\text{min}. Pulse oximetry shows 86%86\% on room air. She appears in moderate respiratory distress and is using accessory muscles of respiration. Lung auscultation reveals prolonged expiration, diffuse expiratory wheezing, and bilateral crackles at the lung bases. Cardiovascular examination shows distant heart sounds, a normal S1 and S2, and a prominent S3 gallop. The jugular venous pressure is estimated at 13 cm H2O13\text{ cm H}_2\text{O}. There is 2+2+ bilateral lower extremity pitting edema.

Laboratory studies show:

Lab TestResultReference Range
pH7.277.277.35−7.457.35 - 7.45
pCO2_256 mm Hg56\text{ mm Hg}35−45 mm Hg35 - 45\text{ mm Hg}
pO2_255 mm Hg55\text{ mm Hg}75−105 mm Hg75 - 105\text{ mm Hg}
HCO3−_3^-25 mEq/L25\text{ mEq/L}22−28 mEq/L22 - 28\text{ mEq/L}
TSH1.2 \muU/mL1.2\text{ \mu U/mL}0.4−4.0 \muU/mL0.4 - 4.0\text{ \mu U/mL}
Free T40.6 ng/dL0.6\text{ ng/dL}0.9−1.7 ng/dL0.9 - 1.7\text{ ng/dL}

Chest radiograph reveals cardiomegaly, bilateral pleural effusions, and cephalization of the pulmonary vasculature. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Intravenous furosemide and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Answer

The most appropriate next step in management is to administer intravenous furosemide and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
The correct answer properly targets both the underlying volume overload and the acute respiratory distress. The patient's presentation of wheezing, an S3 gallop, elevated jugular venous pressure, and radiographic evidence of pulmonary edema is diagnostic of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Intravenous loop diuretics are first-line for volume removal. Concurrently, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is indicated for patients with ADHF who have severe dyspnea, hypoxia, or respiratory acidosis, as it decreases the work of breathing and favorably alters cardiopulmonary hemodynamics by reducing both preload and afterload.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clinical presentation to differentiate between a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and acute decompensated heart failure.
The presence of a prominent S3 gallop, elevated jugular venous pressure, and cardiomegaly strongly points to acute decompensated heart failure rather than a primary pulmonary etiology.
Patients with a history of both heart failure and lung disease frequently present with overlapping symptoms like dyspnea and wheezing (cardiac asthma).
2
Evaluate the patient's hemodynamic and respiratory status using vital signs, physical exam, and laboratory data.
The patient is hypertensive, hypoxic, and has an acute respiratory acidosis (pH 7.27pH\ 7.27, pCO2 56 mm HgpCO_2\ 56\text{ mm Hg}), indicating severe respiratory distress secondary to pulmonary edema.
Identifying the severity of the respiratory failure determines the urgency and modality of respiratory support needed.
3
Select the optimal initial therapeutic interventions for acute decompensated heart failure presenting with respiratory distress.
Intravenous loop diuretics (furosemide) and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation are selected.
Furosemide rapidly reduces volume overload, while noninvasive positive pressure ventilation decreases both right ventricular preload and left ventricular afterload, rapidly improving oxygenation without the need for immediate intubation.

Key Concept

Differentiating 'cardiac asthma' (acute decompensated heart failure) from a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation is critical; management of acute heart failure with respiratory distress requires prompt administration of intravenous diuretics and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 1010Question →

An adolescent girl is brought to the pediatric gynecology clinic by her mother due to the absence of menarche. She is 1515 years and 66 months old. The patient's mother expresses concern that all of her daughter's peers have already started menstruating. The patient denies cyclical abdominal cramping, pelvic pain, or any prior sexual activity. Her medical history is unremarkable, and she takes no medications. Her height is at the 55 th percentile for her age, and her weight is at the 2525 th percentile. Vital signs are within normal limits. Physical examination reveals a broad chest with widely spaced nipples and a low posterior hairline. Tanner stage 11 is noted for breast development, and Tanner stage 22 for pubic hair. A normal-appearing vaginal introitus is present.

Arrange the following diagnostic and management steps in the most appropriate chronological sequence for this patient's evaluation, from initial mandatory testing to post-diagnostic screening.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct chronological sequence for evaluating primary amenorrhea in this patient is: 1) Obtain a urine beta-hCG test, 2) Perform a pelvic ultrasound, 3) Measure serum FSH levels, 4) Order a peripheral blood karyotype analysis, and 5) Perform a transthoracic echocardiogram.
The evaluation of primary amenorrhea follows a strict, step-wise algorithm. First, a pregnancy test must always be obtained, as pregnancy is the most common cause of amenorrhea. Second, a pelvic ultrasound is performed to confirm the presence of a uterus. Because this patient lacks breast development (indicating an absence of estrogen), the next step after confirming a uterus is to measure serum FSH. Elevated FSH in this setting points to hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (primary ovarian insufficiency). Given her short stature and phenotypic features (broad chest, low hairline), Turner syndrome (45,X) is the most likely diagnosis, which is definitively confirmed via a karyotype. Once diagnosed, standard of care dictates screening for common Turner syndrome comorbidities, primarily cardiovascular defects, using a transthoracic echocardiogram.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Exclude pregnancy
Urine beta-hCG is negative
Pregnancy is the most common cause of amenorrhea and must be excluded prior to any further evaluation or imaging, regardless of reported sexual history.
2
Evaluate pelvic anatomy
Pelvic ultrasound confirms the presence of a uterus
Determining the presence or absence of Müllerian structures is the crucial first branch point in the diagnostic algorithm for primary amenorrhea.
3
Assess ovarian axis function
Serum FSH level is elevated
With a uterus present and absent breast development (lack of estrogen), measuring FSH differentiates peripheral hypergonadotropic hypogonadism from central causes.
4
Determine genetic etiology
Peripheral blood karyotype reveals 45,X0
A karyotype is the definitive diagnostic test for Turner syndrome, which is highly suspected given the patient's short stature, broad chest, and primary ovarian insufficiency.
5
Screen for associated comorbidities
Transthoracic echocardiogram is performed
Patients with Turner syndrome have a high incidence of cardiovascular anomalies, specifically bicuspid aortic valve and coarctation of the aorta, necessitating baseline echocardiographic screening post-diagnosis.

Key Concept

The algorithmic step-wise evaluation of primary amenorrhea and subsequent management of Turner syndrome.
Question 1011Question →

During an evening shift in the emergency department, a 7171-year-old woman is evaluated for a three-day history of progressively worsening dyspnea and increased production of thick, yellowish-green sputum. She has a history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Her current maintenance medications include a long-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist, and as-needed albuterol.

Vital signs reveal a temperature of 37.6∘C37.6^\circ C (99.7∘F99.7^\circ F), heart rate of 118/min118/min, respiratory rate of 28/min28/min, and blood pressure of 142/85 mm Hg142/85 \text{ mm Hg}. Oxygen saturation is 86%86\% on room air.

On physical examination, she is in acute respiratory distress and is utilizing accessory muscles of respiration. Jugular venous pressure is visibly elevated at 10 cm H2O10 \text{ cm H}_2\text{O}. Lung auscultation demonstrates prolonged expiration, diffuse expiratory wheezing, and faint bibasilar crackles. She has 2+2+ pitting edema in both lower extremities.

Laboratory studies are notable for:
Leukocyte count: 12,500/μL12,500/\mu L
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP): 210 pg/mL210 \text{ pg/mL} (normal <100 pg/mL<100 \text{ pg/mL})
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH): 1.4μU/mL1.4 \mu\text{U/mL} (normal 0.5−5.0μU/mL0.5-5.0 \mu\text{U/mL})
Free T4: 0.5 ng/dL0.5 \text{ ng/dL} (normal 0.9−1.7 ng/dL0.9-1.7 \text{ ng/dL})

Arterial blood gas on room air:
pH: 7.277.27
PaO2: 56 mm Hg56 \text{ mm Hg}
PaCO2: 66 mm Hg66 \text{ mm Hg}
HCO3: 29 mEq/L29 \text{ mEq/L}

A chest radiograph shows hyperinflation with flattened diaphragms and enlarged central pulmonary arteries, without focal consolidation.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation

Answer

Trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
The correct answer provides ventilatory support. This patient is experiencing a severe acute exacerbation of COPD complicated by acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, as evidenced by her significant acidemia (pH 7.27) and elevated PaCO2 (66 mm Hg). In patients with a COPD exacerbation, a pH <= 7.35 and/or PaCO2 >= 45 mm Hg is a strong indication for a trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). NPPV improves alveolar ventilation, reduces the work of the fatigued respiratory muscles, and significantly decreases both mortality and the need for endotracheal intubation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clinical presentation.
The patient has cardinal symptoms of a COPD exacerbation (dyspnea, increased sputum volume, sputum purulence).
Identifying the primary clinical syndrome guides the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.
2
Interpret the acid-base status.
The arterial blood gas reveals an acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis with a pH of 7.27 and PaCO2 of 66 mm Hg.
The degree of acidemia dictates whether supportive care alone is sufficient or if ventilatory assistance is required.
3
Evaluate the cardiac and endocrine findings.
Elevated JVP, lower extremity edema, and mildly elevated BNP in a COPD patient indicate cor pulmonale. The low Free T4 with normal TSH indicates euthyroid sick syndrome.
These secondary findings serve as distractors and must be correctly identified as consequences of chronic lung disease and acute severe illness rather than primary pathologies requiring immediate targeted intervention.
4
Determine the priority management step.
A trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is selected.
In an awake, cooperative patient with a COPD exacerbation and respiratory acidosis (pH <= 7.35), NPPV is the most appropriate immediate intervention to reduce the work of breathing, reverse respiratory acidosis, and decrease the need for endotracheal intubation.

Key Concept

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is the first-line intervention for patients with acute exacerbations of COPD who develop acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis (pH <= 7.35) or clinical signs of respiratory muscle fatigue.
Question 1012Question →

A 48-year-old male construction worker is brought to the emergency department after being crushed between a concrete barrier and a moving vehicle at the level of his hips. On arrival, he is pale, diaphoretic, and confused. Vital signs are blood pressure 75/40 mm Hg, heart rate 138/min, and respiratory rate 24/min. The airway is patent, and breath sounds are clear and equal bilaterally. A portable chest radiograph shows no abnormalities. The abdomen is soft, non-distended, and mildly tender to deep palpation. Anteroposterior compression of the pelvis reveals severe mechanical instability, and a pelvic binder is immediately applied in the trauma bay. A focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) exam demonstrates no anechoic free fluid in the pericardium, hepatorenal recess, splenorenal recess, or retrovesical space. The patient receives 2 units of uncrossmatched type O-negative packed red blood cells and 1 L of isotonic crystalloid. Reassessment reveals a blood pressure of 78/42 mm Hg and a heart rate of 135/min. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Pelvic angiography

Answer

The correct step is to proceed with pelvic angiography (or preperitoneal pelvic packing) to control the retroperitoneal arterial hemorrhage.
The correct management for this patient is pelvic angiography (or preperitoneal pelvic packing). This patient is in profound hemorrhagic shock following a crush injury. The physical examination confirms an unstable pelvic ring, which is a major source of blood loss via the presacral venous plexus and internal iliac arterial branches. The initial management of an unstable pelvic fracture includes mechanical stabilization with a pelvic binder to reduce pelvic volume and promote tamponade, alongside aggressive blood product resuscitation. Because the patient remains hemodynamically unstable despite these measures, definitive hemorrhage control is required. Crucially, the FAST exam is negative, which effectively rules out massive intraperitoneal hemorrhage. In this algorithmic scenario (Hemodynamically Unstable + Unstable Pelvis + Negative FAST), the bleeding is assumed to be retroperitoneal. The standard of care is immediate pelvic angiography with embolization to control arterial bleeding. Preperitoneal pelvic packing is an accepted alternative, particularly in centers without immediate interventional radiology capabilities.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's hemodynamic status and injury mechanism.
The patient is in hemorrhagic shock (hypotension, marked tachycardia) following a severe crush injury to the pelvis.
Identifying shock dictates the urgency of the trauma algorithm and precludes time-consuming diagnostic tests like CT scans.
2
Integrate the physical exam and initial diagnostic findings.
The patient has a mechanically unstable pelvis (indicating pelvic fracture) and a definitively negative FAST exam.
A negative FAST in the setting of severe shock points away from intraperitoneal hemorrhage and toward extraperitoneal (retroperitoneal) bleeding associated with the pelvic ring disruption.
3
Determine the algorithmic next step for a hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture.
After the initial mechanical stabilization with a pelvic binder, the patient remains unstable, requiring definitive control of the retroperitoneal bleeding.
According to ATLS protocols, an unstable pelvic fracture with a negative FAST requires pelvic angiography with embolization or preperitoneal pelvic packing to halt ongoing arterial blood loss.

Key Concept

Management algorithm for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1013Question →

A 33-year-old gravida 2, para 1 at 39 weeks of gestation is admitted to the labor suite for a trial of labor. Her obstetric history is significant for a previous low transverse cesarean delivery performed due to breech presentation. She is currently in the active phase of labor, with the cervix dilated to 6 cm and the fetal presenting part at 0 station. Her contractions are strong and occur every 3 minutes. The baseline fetal heart rate is 140/min with moderate variability and no decelerations. Thirty minutes later, the patient suddenly reports an excruciating, tearing pain in her lower abdomen that does not resolve between contractions. Her blood pressure decreases to 88/54 mmHg, and her heart rate increases to 122/min. The electronic fetal monitor reveals a sudden, prolonged deceleration to 70/min that has lasted for over 4 minutes. A repeat pelvic examination demonstrates a cervical dilation of 6 cm, but the fetal presenting part is now palpable at -3 station. Moderate dark red vaginal bleeding is noted. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate laparotomy and cesarean delivery

Answer

Immediate laparotomy and cesarean delivery
The clinical picture of sudden tearing abdominal pain, maternal hypotension and tachycardia, a prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration, and specifically the loss of fetal station in a patient with a prior cesarean delivery is highly pathognomonic for uterine rupture. In this catastrophic event, the fetus can extrude into the maternal abdomen, leading to profound fetal asphyxia and maternal exsanguination. The only appropriate intervention is immediate surgical exploration via laparotomy to deliver the fetus and achieve hemostasis (via uterine repair or hysterectomy).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clinical presentation and maternal history.
The patient has a history of a prior cesarean delivery and presents with sudden tearing abdominal pain and maternal hemodynamic instability (hypotension, tachycardia).
Prior uterine scars significantly increase the risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.
2
Identify the pathognomonic physical examination findings.
The fetal presenting part has regressed from 0 station to -3 station, and the fetal heart rate shows a severe, prolonged deceleration.
Loss of fetal station indicates that the fetus has extruded through a myometrial defect into the maternal abdominal cavity.
3
Determine the definitive next step in management.
Emergency surgical exploration is selected.
Uterine rupture is a life-threatening emergency; immediate laparotomy is required to deliver the fetus and control maternal hemorrhage.

Key Concept

Diagnosis and management of uterine rupture
Question 1014Question →

Review the clinical situations below. Which ethical principle or legal decision-making standard most appropriately justifies the action taken in each situation?

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

A surrogate declines a feeding tube for an incapacitated patient, stating that the patient previously expressed they would never want artificial nutrition, even though it is not in writing.
A legal guardian authorizes a life-saving appendectomy for an adult patient who has had severe intellectual disability since birth and has never possessed decision-making capacity.
A palliative care physician administers high-dose continuous intravenous morphine to a terminally ill patient to alleviate severe dyspnea, recognizing it may inadvertently depress respiratory drive.
A physician withholds intubation for a patient with acute respiratory failure because the patient's legally valid Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form specifies 'Do Not Intubate'.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The surrogate's reliance on prior verbal statements matches the Substituted judgment standard; the guardian's decision for the never-competent patient matches the Best interest standard; the administration of morphine for dyspnea matches the Principle of double effect; and the adherence to the MOLST form matches the Explicit advance directive.
Surrogate decision-making relies on a strict legal hierarchy: 1) Explicit advance directives (living wills, MOLST) provide direct patient instruction; 2) Substituted judgment requires the surrogate to decide based on what the patient would want based on known values; and 3) Best interest requires maximizing benefit when a patient's wishes are unknown or they never had capacity. Additionally, the principle of double effect is a distinct ethical framework protecting clinicians who provide necessary palliative interventions that may foreseeably hasten death, provided the intent is purely to relieve suffering.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the decision-making framework for the patient with prior verbal statements.
The surrogate is using the patient's known values to decide, which aligns with the substituted judgment standard.
When written directives are absent but patient preferences are known, surrogates are legally and ethically obligated to use substituted judgment.
2
Analyze the decision-making framework for the patient with lifelong intellectual disability.
The surrogate must weigh objective benefits and harms, which aligns with the best interest standard.
Patients who have never possessed capacity cannot have their substituted judgment determined, necessitating the best interest standard.
3
Evaluate the physician's administration of morphine causing potential respiratory depression.
This scenario describes an action with both a good intended effect and a foreseeable bad effect, aligning with the principle of double effect.
The clinician's intent is symptom relief, not hastening death, which is ethically permissible under this specific principle.
4
Evaluate the scenario involving the MOLST form.
The physician follows a written medical order, which aligns with an explicit advance directive.
A valid MOLST represents the patient's explicit autonomous choice and supersedes surrogate interpretation.

Key Concept

Surrogate Decision-Making and End-of-Life Ethical Frameworks
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1015Question →

A 32-year-old woman with a history of systemic lupus erythematosus presents to the clinic with new-onset bilateral lower extremity edema, worsening fatigue, and newly elevated blood pressure of 150/95 mmHg. Recent laboratory studies show worsening normocytic anemia, hypocomplementemia (decreased C3 and C4), and an increasing serum creatinine level from 0.8 mg/dL to 1.6 mg/dL. Arrange the following clinical steps in the most appropriate sequential order for the standard diagnosis and management of this patient's suspected complication.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence begins with non-invasive confirmation using urinalysis and protein quantification, followed by a renal biopsy for histologic classification, then intensive induction immunosuppression, and finally transitioning to long-term maintenance therapy.
Lupus nephritis is a major organ-threatening complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. The standard of care demands a stepwise approach: initially confirming the presence of renal injury with non-invasive tests (urinalysis, spot protein-to-creatinine ratio), followed by an invasive renal biopsy to precisely classify the histologic severity (Classes I-VI). Because treatments for severe proliferative classes (III and IV) involve highly toxic agents, biopsy confirmation is mandatory before exposing the patient to these risks. Once confirmed, induction therapy (high-dose steroids plus an agent like mycophenolate or cyclophosphamide) is started to rapidly induce remission. After 3 to 6 months of successful induction, therapy is de-escalated to a maintenance regimen (e.g., lower-dose mycophenolate or azathioprine) to sustain remission while reducing long-term adverse effects.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Confirm and quantify renal involvement non-invasively.
Urinalysis and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio demonstrate active urine sediment and significant proteinuria.
Before performing invasive procedures, clinical suspicion of lupus nephritis must be corroborated by non-invasive functional markers of renal injury.
2
Obtain tissue for histologic classification via renal biopsy.
Biopsy results classify the disease severity (e.g., Class IV diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis).
Because treatment regimens range from observation to highly toxic immunosuppressants, tissue diagnosis is required to guide appropriate therapy without exposing patients to unnecessary risks.
3
Administer induction immunosuppressive therapy.
Active renal inflammation is halted, and renal function begins to stabilize or improve.
Severe classes of lupus nephritis require immediate, aggressive treatment (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide with high-dose steroids) to prevent permanent end-stage renal disease.
4
De-escalate to maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.
The patient maintains disease remission on a less toxic medication regimen.
Prolonged use of induction agents carries high risks of toxicity (e.g., infection, malignancy, infertility); thus, transitioning to a safer maintenance regimen is necessary once initial remission is achieved.

Key Concept

Diagnosis and step-wise management of lupus nephritis
Question 1016Question →

A 42-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department complaining of sudden-onset, severe, colicky abdominal pain that has become constant over the past 6 hours. She has also experienced multiple episodes of bilious vomiting and has not passed flatus or stool since the pain began. Her medical history is unremarkable, and she has never undergone abdominal surgery. She is an avid long-distance runner. Her temperature is 38.6°C (101.5°F), pulse is 122/min, respirations are 22/min, and blood pressure is 92/58 mm Hg. Physical examination reveals an asymmetrically distended abdomen with a tympanitic mass palpable in the mid-abdomen. There is marked right-sided tenderness with involuntary guarding and rebound tenderness. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 16,500/μL16,500/\mu L and a serum lactate of 4.2 mmol/L4.2 \text{ mmol/L}. An upright plain abdominal radiograph demonstrates a large, comma-shaped dilated bowel loop projecting from the right lower quadrant toward the left upper quadrant, with a paucity of gas in the distal colon. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Immediate exploratory laparotomy

Answer

Immediate exploratory laparotomy
The correct answer is immediate exploratory laparotomy. This patient presents with a classic cecal volvulus, indicated by the asymmetrically distended abdomen and the radiograph showing a large, comma-shaped bowel loop originating from the right lower quadrant. Cecal volvulus occurs when the cecum twists on its mesentery (often due to congenital incomplete intestinal rotation, making the cecum highly mobile). Crucially, this patient exhibits 'hard signs' of bowel strangulation and ischemia: fever, tachycardia, hypotension, involuntary guarding, rebound tenderness, leukocytosis, and elevated serum lactate. When any mechanical bowel obstruction is complicated by ischemia or peritonitis, emergent surgical exploration is mandatory to resect necrotic bowel and prevent catastrophic intra-abdominal sepsis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the clinical presentation and physical examination.
The patient has acute, severe abdominal pain, vomiting, obstipation, and asymmetric abdominal distension. Crucially, she exhibits signs of systemic toxicity (fever, tachycardia, hypotension) and peritonitis (guarding, rebound tenderness).
Identifying signs of peritonitis and hemodynamic instability is critical, as it shifts the management paradigm from conservative/diagnostic to emergent surgical intervention.
2
Interpret the laboratory and imaging findings.
Leukocytosis and elevated lactate (4.2 mmol/L4.2 \text{ mmol/L}) suggest tissue hypoperfusion and bowel ischemia. The radiograph showing a comma-shaped dilated loop originating in the right lower quadrant and pointing to the left upper quadrant is classic for a cecal volvulus.
Correlating the pathognomonic X-ray finding with markers of ischemia confirms the diagnosis of a strangulated cecal volvulus.
3
Determine the most appropriate management.
The presence of a mechanical obstruction (cecal volvulus) complicated by bowel ischemia and peritonitis requires immediate surgical exploration (laparotomy).
Delaying surgery for further imaging (CT), attempting non-operative decompression (endoscopy, NG tube), or using medical therapies (neostigmine) increases the risk of frank bowel perforation, sepsis, and mortality.

Key Concept

Cecal volvulus presenting with clinical and laboratory signs of bowel ischemia or peritonitis requires emergent exploratory laparotomy.
Question 1017Question →

A 62-year-old man is assessed on the surgical ward 72 hours after undergoing an open sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis. He reports feeling fatigued but denies shortness of breath, chest pain, dysuria, or nausea. He is tolerating a clear liquid diet and passed flatus this morning. His medical history includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and essential hypertension.

His vital signs are:
Temperature: 38.6°C (101.5°F)
Blood pressure: 132/84 mm Hg
Heart rate: 96/min
Respiratory rate: 18/min
Oxygen saturation: 94% on room air

Physical examination reveals a soft abdomen with mild, localized tenderness at the surgical incision site. There is no rebound tenderness or guarding. The midline incision is well-approximated, clean, and dry without erythema or discharge. Pulmonary auscultation reveals mild, scattered expiratory wheezes bilaterally that are unchanged from his preoperative baseline examination. There are no crackles, and jugular venous distension is absent. His indwelling urethral catheter was removed 24 hours ago, and he has voided spontaneously since then. Bilateral calf examination shows no edema or tenderness.

Which of the following are the most appropriate next steps in the management of this patient? (Select 3)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Order a urinalysis and urine culture; Perform a portable chest radiograph; Advise the patient to continue incentive spirometry and ambulation

Answer

The correct steps are to order a urinalysis and urine culture, perform a portable chest radiograph, and advise the patient to continue incentive spirometry and ambulation.
Postoperative fever is a common clinical challenge, and its etiology can often be deduced from the timeline of onset, classically remembered as the '5 Ws': Wind (pulmonary, days 1-2), Water (urinary tract, days 3-5), Walking (venous thromboembolism, days 4-6), Wound (surgical site infection, days 5-7), and Wonder drugs (drug fever, days 7+). This patient is on postoperative day 3 and recently had an indwelling urethral catheter removed, making a urinary tract infection highly suspicious. Therefore, obtaining a urinalysis and urine culture is a necessary diagnostic step. Additionally, while atelectasis usually peaks on days 1-2, true pneumonia can develop concurrently or slightly later. Given his baseline chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), he is at higher risk for pulmonary complications, justifying a portable chest radiograph to evaluate for an infiltrate. Regardless of the specific diagnosis, encouraging continued incentive spirometry and ambulation remains essential standard-of-care prophylaxis to prevent further pulmonary and thromboembolic complications.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the timing of the patient's postoperative fever.
The fever is occurring at 72 hours (postoperative day 3).
The postoperative day helps narrow the differential diagnosis using the classic '5 Ws' mnemonic.
2
Assess the patient's clinical signs and risk factors.
The patient had a Foley catheter removed 24 hours ago and has a history of COPD.
Recent catheterization puts him at risk for a urinary tract infection ('Water'), while his COPD puts him at risk for pulmonary complications ('Wind').
3
Select the appropriate diagnostic and prophylactic interventions.
Diagnostic tests for UTI (urinalysis and culture) and pneumonia (chest radiograph) are indicated, along with continued pulmonary prophylaxis.
These steps directly address the most likely etiologies of fever at this stage in a patient with these specific risk factors.

Key Concept

The evaluation of postoperative fever is guided by the timeline of symptom onset. Fever on days 3-5 often points to a urinary tract infection, particularly following catheter removal, while pulmonary complications must also be ruled out in patients with underlying lung disease.
Question 1018Question →

A 27-year-old male graphic designer is brought to the emergency department by his roommate. The patient has not left his bedroom for the past 3 weeks, has been eating very little, and sleeps up to 14 hours a day. The roommate notes that for the last 5 days, the patient has been repeatedly whispering to himself and claiming that "the authorities have hidden listening devices in the ceiling." Past psychiatric history is notable for an involuntary psychiatric admission 4 years ago due to severe agitation, grandiose beliefs of having superhuman abilities, and pressured speech; that episode lasted 12 days. The patient's medical history is significant for a recent ankle sprain, for which he is currently taking tramadol. Mental status examination reveals a disheveled appearance, poor eye contact, profound psychomotor retardation, and a restricted affect. He confirms hearing a male voice calling him a "traitor." Vital signs are within normal limits. Which of the following is the most appropriate management plan for this patient?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Admit to the inpatient psychiatric unit and start quetiapine

Answer

Admit to the inpatient psychiatric unit and start quetiapine
The patient's history of a prior manic episode necessitating hospitalization confirms a diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder. He is currently presenting with a severe major depressive episode complicated by mood-congruent psychotic features (delusions of surveillance and derogatory auditory hallucinations) and a dangerous decline in self-care (poor oral intake, extreme hypersomnia). Inpatient psychiatric admission is indicated for patient safety and acute stabilization. The pharmacologic treatment of choice for severe bipolar depression with psychotic features is an atypical antipsychotic that has proven efficacy in the depressive phase of bipolar disorder, such as quetiapine. Quetiapine will simultaneously target the severe depressive symptoms and the acute psychosis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the past psychiatric history
The patient had a 12-day episode of severe agitation, grandiosity, and pressured speech requiring hospitalization.
This establishes a definitive history of a manic episode, confirming the diagnosis of Bipolar I disorder.
2
Evaluate the current presentation and timeline
The patient is experiencing a 3-week major depressive episode with concurrent psychotic features (delusions of persecution, auditory hallucinations) that began 5 days ago.
This determines that the current diagnosis is Bipolar I disorder, current episode depressed, severe, with mood-congruent psychotic features.
3
Determine the optimal treatment setting and pharmacotherapy
The patient requires inpatient admission due to severe functional impairment (poor oral intake, profound withdrawal), and should be started on an atypical antipsychotic like quetiapine.
Inpatient admission ensures safety. Quetiapine is a first-line monotherapy that effectively treats both bipolar depression and the concurrent psychotic symptoms without risking a manic switch.

Key Concept

Patients with Bipolar I disorder who present with a severe depressive episode and psychotic features require treatment with an atypical antipsychotic approved for bipolar depression (e.g., quetiapine, lurasidone) and often necessitate inpatient stabilization. Antidepressant monotherapy must be strictly avoided.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 1019Question →

A 26-year-old female dental hygienist comes to the outpatient psychiatry clinic reporting two months of profound sadness, lack of motivation, and sleeping 12 to 14 hours a day. She states she has lost interest in her usual hobbies and feels intense, inappropriate guilt regarding a recent decline in her work performance. She has gained 5 kg (11 lb) over this period. Her medical history is unremarkable, and she currently takes no medications. Vital signs and physical examination are within normal limits. When specifically asked about past mood fluctuations, the patient recalls a distinct five-day period during her sophomore year of college when she felt "supercharged." During that time, she required only 3 hours of sleep per night, started multiple complex art projects, and felt highly productive. That period did not result in hospitalization or significant functional impairment. Mental status examination today reveals a cooperative woman with a blunted affect, psychomotor retardation, and slow speech. She denies suicidal ideation, auditory hallucinations, and paranoia. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in pharmacotherapy?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Quetiapine

Answer

Quetiapine
The correct answer is Quetiapine. This patient's current presentation of hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and profound sadness indicates a major depressive episode. However, her history of a five-day period of elevated mood, decreased need for sleep, and increased goal-directed activity without significant functional impairment or hospitalization perfectly describes a hypomanic episode. Therefore, her diagnosis is Bipolar II disorder. The first-line pharmacological treatment for acute bipolar depression includes certain second-generation antipsychotics (such as quetiapine, lurasidone, and cariprazine) or the mood stabilizer lamotrigine. Quetiapine provides acute relief of depressive symptoms without the high risk of inducing a manic switch.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the patient's presenting symptoms and psychiatric history.
The patient is currently in a major depressive episode (sadness, hypersomnia, weight gain) but has a history of a distinct 5-day period of elevated mood, decreased need for sleep, and increased activity without severe impairment.
Identifying past mood episodes is necessary to differentiate unipolar major depressive disorder from bipolar spectrum disorders.
2
Establish the correct diagnosis based on DSM-5 criteria.
The diagnosis is Bipolar II disorder, characterized by at least one major depressive episode and at least one hypomanic episode (lasting ≥\geq 4 days).
Accurate diagnosis dictates the pharmacological approach and prevents harmful prescribing errors.
3
Select the appropriate pharmacotherapy for acute bipolar depression.
Quetiapine is selected. All traditional antidepressant monotherapies are contraindicated.
Antidepressant monotherapy can precipitate a manic switch. Quetiapine is an FDA-approved second-generation antipsychotic for treating acute bipolar depression.

Key Concept

Patients presenting with major depressive episodes must be screened for past manic or hypomanic episodes to rule out bipolar disorder; if bipolar disorder is diagnosed, antidepressant monotherapy is contraindicated due to the risk of a manic switch, and agents like quetiapine, lurasidone, or lamotrigine should be used.
Question 1020Question →

A 74-year-old man residing in a skilled nursing facility is evaluated on hospital day 33 for a complicated urinary tract infection. He was initially brought to the emergency department for altered mental status and a new fever. On admission, his temperature was 38.9∘C38.9^\circ\text{C} (102.0∘F102.0^\circ\text{F}), and his long-term indwelling urinary catheter was found to be obstructed with purulent sediment. The catheter was promptly removed, and he was started empirically on intravenous vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam. Today, the patient is afebrile, his mental status has returned to baseline, and he is tolerating an oral diet. Blood cultures obtained on admission show no growth. A urine culture obtained via straight catheterization prior to antibiotic initiation grows >100,000 CFU/mL>100,000\text{ CFU/mL} of Escherichia coli. Susceptibility testing reveals the organism is susceptible to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, but resistant to ampicillin. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Discontinue vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, and begin oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Answer

Discontinue vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, and begin oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
The correct action demonstrates the core principles of antimicrobial stewardship: narrowing the antibiotic spectrum based on culture data and transitioning from intravenous to oral therapy when clinically appropriate. The patient presented with a complicated, catheter-associated urinary tract infection accompanied by systemic symptoms, necessitating empiric broad-spectrum coverage (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam). Now, with source control achieved (catheter removal) and clinical stability established (afebrile, tolerating oral intake), the empiric regimen must be adjusted. The culture shows E. coli susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, a highly bioavailable oral agent with excellent penetration into the urinary tract and renal parenchyma. Discontinuing the broad intravenous agents and starting oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole provides optimal targeted therapy.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the patient's clinical response to initial empiric therapy.
The patient is clinically stable, afebrile, has returned to his baseline mental status, and is tolerating oral intake.
Determines if the patient has achieved source control and is physiologically eligible for transition from intravenous to oral antibiotics.
2
Analyze the microbiological data and susceptibility results.
Urine culture confirms a single pathogen, Escherichia coli, which is susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin.
Identifies the specific pathogen to allow for de-escalation from empiric broad-spectrum therapy to targeted, narrow-spectrum therapy.
3
Select the most appropriate targeted therapy for a complicated urinary tract infection.
Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is chosen.
It provides excellent systemic and renal tissue penetration (unlike nitrofurantoin), strictly targets the isolated pathogen without overly broad coverage, and utilizes the oral route.

Key Concept

Antibiotic de-escalation involves transitioning clinically stable patients from broad-spectrum intravenous empiric antibiotics to narrow-spectrum targeted oral therapy once culture and susceptibility data are available.
PreviousPage 51 / 414Next
All practice questions — USMLE Step 2 CK | Examkin