Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyAdvance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making

A 78-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after suffering a massive intracerebral hemorrhage. He is currently comatose and requires mechanical ventilation. The neurology team determines that he has suffered irreversible brain damage and lacks medical decision-making capacity. The patient's eldest son, who lives out of state, arrives at the hospital and presents a document establishing him as the patient's financial power of attorney. He insists that all life-sustaining measures be continued indefinitely. Shortly after, the patient's close friend arrives and presents a valid, legally executed durable power of attorney for healthcare naming him as the patient's healthcare proxy. The friend states that the patient had explicitly told him he would never want to be kept alive on a ventilator in a comatose state, and requests compassionate extubation. Which of the following is the most appropriate action by the physician?

  1. Honor the friend's request and prepare for compassionate extubation.Answer
  2. B
    Honor the son's request because a financial power of attorney encompasses medical decisions in emergency settings.
  3. C
    Honor the son's request because immediate family members legally supersede non-relatives in surrogate decision-making.
  4. D
    Maintain mechanical ventilation and request a psychiatric evaluation to formally determine the patient's legal competence.
  5. E
    Maintain mechanical ventilation and seek a court-appointed guardian to resolve the conflicting directives.

Answer

Honor the friend's request and prepare for compassionate extubation.
The correct action is to honor the friend's request and prepare for compassionate extubation. When a patient lacks decision-making capacity, physicians must look to advance directives or appointed surrogates. In this scenario, the patient has a legally executed durable power of attorney for healthcare, designating his friend as his healthcare proxy. A designated healthcare proxy supersedes the default next-of-kin surrogate hierarchy. Furthermore, the son's financial power of attorney grants him authority only over the patient's financial matters, not medical decisions. Because the friend is the authorized decision-maker and is applying the principle of substituted judgment (basing the decision on the patient's explicitly stated wishes to avoid being kept alive on a machine), the physician should follow the friend's directive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's decision-making capacity.
The patient is comatose and lacks medical decision-making capacity.
When a patient cannot make their own decisions, a surrogate decision-maker must be identified.
2
Evaluate the legal validity and scope of the presented documents.
The son holds a financial power of attorney, while the friend holds a durable power of attorney for healthcare.
It is necessary to determine who has the legal authority to make specifically medical decisions.
3
Apply the legal hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers.
The friend is recognized as the sole authorized surrogate decision-maker.
A designated healthcare proxy explicitly appointed by the patient supersedes any default family hierarchy and possesses the authority to direct care, including the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, based on the patient's known wishes.

Key Concept

Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making
Rate this question

Topics

Advance Directives and Surrogate Decision Making

More questions from this topic