A 73-year-old woman with advanced Alzheimer dementia is admitted to the surgical ward with a necrotizing infection of her right foot. She is persistently disoriented to time and place, cannot comprehend her diagnosis, and lacks the clinical capacity to make medical decisions. The surgical team strongly recommends a below-the-knee amputation to prevent the localized infection from progressing to life-threatening systemic sepsis. She is widowed, her only child is deceased, and her parents are deceased. The patient is accompanied by her former business partner and her younger sister. No written advance directive or Healthcare Proxy was ever established. The business partner presents a notarized Durable Power of Attorney for Financial Affairs and insists on consenting to the surgery, stating, "I hold her power of attorney, and she must have this operation to live." The sister opposes the surgery, stating that the patient had previously witnessed a friend undergo an amputation and explicitly told her, "I would rather die whole than live without a limb." Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in obtaining medical consent for this patient?
- AAccept the business partner's consent because a durable power of attorney supersedes statutory family surrogates.
- BProceed with the amputation immediately under the emergency consent doctrine.
- Withhold the surgery and follow the sister's directive based on substituted judgment.Answer
- DRequest a judge to determine the patient's legal competence before honoring the refusal.
- ETransfer the patient to a hospice facility immediately due to the disagreement over life-saving interventions.